• 全国中文核心期刊
  • 中国科技核心期刊
  • 美国工程索引(EI)收录期刊
  • Scopus数据库收录期刊

非饱和粉质黏土浸湿静止土压力增量计算模型

王祥, 李旭, 秦宏楠, 刘艳, 刘丽

王祥, 李旭, 秦宏楠, 刘艳, 刘丽. 非饱和粉质黏土浸湿静止土压力增量计算模型[J]. 岩土工程学报, 2023, 45(S1): 102-105, 118. DOI: 10.11779/CJGE2023S10046
引用本文: 王祥, 李旭, 秦宏楠, 刘艳, 刘丽. 非饱和粉质黏土浸湿静止土压力增量计算模型[J]. 岩土工程学报, 2023, 45(S1): 102-105, 118. DOI: 10.11779/CJGE2023S10046
WANG Xiang, LI Xu, QIN Hongnan, LIU Yan, LIU Li. Model for increment of static earth pressure of unsaturated silty clay under wetting conditions[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2023, 45(S1): 102-105, 118. DOI: 10.11779/CJGE2023S10046
Citation: WANG Xiang, LI Xu, QIN Hongnan, LIU Yan, LIU Li. Model for increment of static earth pressure of unsaturated silty clay under wetting conditions[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2023, 45(S1): 102-105, 118. DOI: 10.11779/CJGE2023S10046

非饱和粉质黏土浸湿静止土压力增量计算模型  English Version

基金项目: 

国家自然科学基金项目 52025094

国家自然科学基金项目 51979002

河南省交通运输厅科技项目 2020J-2-1

详细信息
    作者简介:

    作者简介:王祥(1998—),男,硕士研究生,工程师,主要从事岩土工程方面的研究工作。E-mail: wxiang1998666@163.com

    通讯作者:

    秦宏楠, E-mail: qinhn@chinasafety.ac.cn

  • 中图分类号: TU43

Model for increment of static earth pressure of unsaturated silty clay under wetting conditions

  • 摘要: 在基坑工程和重力式挡墙工程中,非饱和土体在浸湿条件下会产生显著的侧向土压力增量,严重时还会造成支挡结构的破坏。为定量评估浸湿作用对非饱和土侧向土压力的影响,通过室内试验实测浸湿饱和作用下,不同初始饱和度的试样,在不同上覆荷载条件下的侧向土压力增量;并建立相应的静止土压力增量计算模型。研究结果表明:①试样湿化饱和后,其静止土压力系数K0值大小一致,与初始饱和度和上覆荷载无关;②湿化前的初始饱和度越低,湿化饱和后的静止土压力增量越大;③湿化饱和后的静止土压力增量,随湿化时的上覆荷载增加而变大;④基于试验数据和机理分析,得到了湿化条件下考虑上覆荷载与初始饱和度的双线性土压力增量计算模型;将该计算模型应用于某支挡工程,发现湿化后的土压力可达初始土压力1.8倍以上,在设计时必须予以重视。
    Abstract: In excavation and retaining wall engineering, wetting of unsaturated soil can result in significant increment of lateral soil pressure and even structural damage. To assess this effect, the tests with different initial saturation degrees and varying overburden loads are conducted, and the relevant model is established. The results show that: (1) After wetting saturation, the static soil pressure coefficient K0 remains constant and is not affected by the initial saturation degree or overburden load. (2) The samples with lower initial saturation degrees exhibit greater increment in static soil pressure after wetting saturation. (3) The increment of the static soil pressure after wetting saturation increases with higher overburden loads. (4) Based on the experimental data and mechanical analysis, a bilinear model considering the overburden load and initial saturation degree under wetting conditions is established. The model shows that the wetting soil pressure can exceed the initial soil pressure by over 1.8 times and emphasizes the need to consider wetting in design.
  • 图  1   准备不同初始含水率的试样

    Figure  1.   Preparation of samples with different initial moisture contents

    图  2   试验前后对比图

    Figure  2.   Comparison of soil samples before and after tests

    图  3   静止土压力随竖向压力变化关系(Sr=0.2)

    Figure  3.   Variation of static earth pressure with vertical pressure (Sr=0.2)

    图  4   静止土压力增量与初始饱和度关系

    Figure  4.   Variation of increment of static earth pressure increment with initial saturation

    图  5   静止土压力增量与上覆荷载关系

    Figure  5.   Variation of increment of static earth pressure with load

    图  6   不同累计深度处静止土压力与其相关计算值关系

    Figure  6.   Static earth pressures and their correlation with depth

    表  1   土的基本物理性质

    Table  1   Basic physical properties of soil

    最大干
    密度/
    (g·cm-3)
    最优含水率/% 液限
    wL/%
    塑限wP/% 塑性指数IP 土粒相对密度GS
    1.80 16.5 30.7 15.2 15.5 2.73
    下载: 导出CSV

    表  2   浸水条件下非饱和粉质黏土试验方案

    Table  2   Test schemes under water immersion conditions

    上覆荷载/kPa 加载过程 初始饱和度
    100/200/
    300/400
    100(200/300/400)kPa→湿化→逐级加载至1600kPa 0.2/0.3/0.4/
    0.5/0.6
    下载: 导出CSV

    表  3   湿化静止土压力增量计算值统计

    Table  3   Statistics of calculated increment static earth pressure

    初始饱和度Sr 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6
    100 kPa下增量值 35.14 25.10 17.41 12.5 3.53
    200 kPa下增量值 68.95 48.38 33.32 22.97 6.31
    300 kPa下增量值 95.01 68.95 47.86 29.99 8.98
    400 kPa下增量值 118.02 90.00 60.99 35.97 10.11
    下载: 导出CSV
  • [1] 赵煜鑫, 刘艳, 李旭, 等. 非饱和黏性土抗剪强度模型对比分析及参数确定方法[J]. 岩土工程学报, 2022, 44(增刊1): 126-131. doi: 10.11779/CJGE2022S1023

    ZHAO Yuxin, LIU Yan, LI Xu, et al. Comparative analysis and parameter determination method of shear strength models for unsaturated clayey soils[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2022, 44(S1): 126-131 (in Chinese) doi: 10.11779/CJGE2022S1023

    [2] LU N, LIKOS W J. 非饱和土力学[M]. 韦昌富, 侯龙, 简文星, 译. 北京: 高等教育出版社, 2012.

    LU N, LIKOS W J. Unsaturated Soil Mechanics[M]. WEI Changfu, HOU Long, JIAN Wenxing, trans. Beijing: Higher Education Press, 2012. (in Chinese)

    [3]

    COLEMAN J, RUSSAMK D. Some uses of stress and strain invariants in the thermodynamic study of soils[J]. Géotechnique, 1961, 11(1): 29-36. doi: 10.1680/geot.1961.11.1.29

    [4] 李广信. 高等土力学[M]. 北京: 清华大学出版社, 2004.

    LI Guangxin. Advanced Soil Mechanics[M]. Beijing: Tsinghua University Press, 2004. (in Chinese)

    [5] 姚攀峰, 张明, 戴荣, 等. 非饱和土的广义朗肯土压力[J]. 工程地质学报, 2004, 12(3): 285-291. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-GCDZ200403011.htm

    YAO Panfeng, ZHANG Ming, DAI Rong, et al. Generic Rankine theory for unsaturated soils[J]. Journal of Engineering Geology, 2004, 12(3): 285-291. (in Chinese) https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-GCDZ200403011.htm

    [6] 陈铁林, 陈生水, 顾行文, 等. 折减吸力在膨胀土静止土压力计算中的应用[J]. 岩土工程学报, 2008, 30(2): 237-242. http://www.cgejournal.com/cn/article/id/12760

    CHEN Tielin, CHEN Shengshui, GU Xingwen, et al. Application of reduced suction in calculation of soil earth pressure at rest for expansive soils[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2008, 30(2): 237-242. (in Chinese) http://www.cgejournal.com/cn/article/id/12760

    [7] 任传健, 贾洪彪. 非饱和土特性对朗肯土压力的影响[J]. 科学技术与工程, 2015, 15(25): 78-82. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-KXJS201525014.htm

    REN Chuanjian, JIA Hongbiao. The influence of unsaturated soil's characteristics on Rankine earth pressure[J]. Science Technology and Engineering, 2015, 15(25): 78-82. (in Chinese) https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-KXJS201525014.htm

    [8] 汪丁建, 童龙云, 邱岳峰. 降雨入渗条件下非饱和土朗肯土压力分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2013, 34(11): 3192-3196. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-YTLX201311026.htm

    WANG Dingjian, TONG Longyun, QIU Yuefeng. Rankine's earth pressure analysis of unsaturated soil under condition of rainfall infiltration[J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2013, 34(11): 3192-3196. (in Chinese) https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-YTLX201311026.htm

    [9] 王晓亮, 李光范, 杜娟, 等. 降雨和蒸发对非饱和土土压力的影响[J]. 应用力学学报, 2014, 31(3): 423-427, 493. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-YYLX201403022.htm

    WANG Xiaoliang, LI Guangfan, DU Juan, et al. Influence of rainfall and evaporation on unsaturated soil pressure[J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Mechanics, 2014, 31(3): 423-427, 493. (in Chinese) https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-YYLX201403022.htm

    [10] 姚攀峰. 基于安全系数比的非饱和土边坡极限平衡法[J]. 岩石力学与工程学报, 2009, 28(增刊1): 3250-3256. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-YSLX2009S1102.htm

    YAO Panfeng. Limit equilibrium method based on ratio of factor of safety for slope stability of unsaturated soils[J]. Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering, 2009, 28(S1): 3250-3256. (in Chinese) https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-YSLX2009S1102.htm

    [11] 土工试验方法标准: GB/T 50123—2019[S]. 北京: 中国计划出版社, 2019.

    Standard for Geotechnical Test Methods: GB/T 50123—2019[S]. Beijing: China Planning Press, 2019. (in Chinese)

    [12] 王祥. 非饱和粉质黏土静止土压力和压缩特性的演化规律及机理[D]. 北京: 北京交通大学, 2022.

    WANG Xiang. Evolution Law and Mechanism of Static Earth Pressure and Compression Characteristics of Unsaturated Silty Clay[D]. Beijing: Beijing Jiaotong University, 2022. (in Chinese)

    [13] 赵成刚, 李舰, 刘艳, 等. 非饱和土力学中几个基本问题的探讨[J]. 岩土力学, 2013, 34(7): 1825-1831. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-YTLX201307002.htm

    ZHAO Chenggang, LI Jian, LIU Yan, et al. Discussion on some fundamental problems in unsaturated soil mechanics[J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2013, 34(7): 1825-1831. (in Chinese) https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-YTLX201307002.htm

    [14] 金松丽, 赵卫全, 张爱军, 等. 原状黄土增湿过程中的静止土压力系数变化规律试验研究[J]. 工程科学与技术, 2017, 49(5): 63-70.

    JIN Songli, ZHAO Weiquan, ZHANG Aijun, et al. Experimental study of variation rules of the coefficient of earth pressure at rest during wetting for original loess[J]. Journal of Sichuan University (Engineering Science Edition), 2017, 49(5): 63-70. (in Chinese)

图(6)  /  表(3)
计量
  • 文章访问数:  0
  • HTML全文浏览量:  0
  • PDF下载量:  0
  • 被引次数: 0
出版历程
  • 收稿日期:  2023-07-04
  • 网络出版日期:  2023-11-23
  • 刊出日期:  2023-10-31

目录

    /

    返回文章
    返回