Three-dimensional m method for retaining structures and its application for top-down construction of excavations
-
摘要: 逆作法技术广泛应用于软土地区敏感环境下的深大基坑工程施工。虽然基于连续介质力学的三维实体有限元方法已逐渐被用于分析评估深开挖对周围环境的影响,工程实用中支护结构的内力变形分析仍采用基于梁-土弹簧体系的弹性抗力法,而传统的支护结构弹性抗力法不能考虑逆作法基坑复杂施工因素的影响。以杭州某逆作法深大基坑工程为案例,结合现场实测数据,通过PLAXIS平面有限元分析与弹性抗力法反分析,得到逆作法深大基坑中盆边留土、坑底工程桩作用和蠕变影响的杭州软黏土等效水平基床比例系数m的拟合公式,提出了考虑逆作法复杂施工因素影响的基坑三维梁系有限元分析方法。研究表明,该方法的计算结果比现有方法更合理;对于深厚软黏土逆作法基坑工程,土体蠕变对基坑变形影响显著。Abstract: The top-down method is widely used in construction of deep and large foundation pits under sensitive environment in soft soil areas. Although the three-dimensional finite element method based on the continuum mechanics has been gradually used to analyze and evaluate the impact of deep excavation on the surrounding environment, the elastic resistance method based on the beam-soil spring system is still used to analyze the internal force and deformation of retaining structures in engineering practice, while the traditional elastic resistance method cannot consider the influence of complex construction factors of foundation pits by the top-down construction method. Based on a deep and large foundation pit project with top-down method in Hangzhou, combined with the field measured data, the fitting formula for the equivalent horizontal resistance coefficient m is obtained through PLAXIS analysis of plane finite element and back analysis of elastic resistance method. The formula can consider the effect of the earth berm, the working pile close to the retaining wall and the creep of soft clay. A 3D finite element method for beam-spring system considering these complex factors due to top-down construction is proposed. It is shown that the calculated results of this method are more reasonable than those of the existing methods. For the deep soft clay foundation pits with top-down construction method, the creep of soils has a significant effect on the deformation of the retaining walls.
-
Keywords:
- top-down method /
- earth berm /
- working pile /
- creep /
- 3D beam-spring model method
-
[1] CLOUGH G W, DUNCAN J M.Finite element analyses of retaining wall behavior[J]. Journal of the Soil Mechanics and Foundations Division, ASCE,1971, 97(12): 1657-1673. [2] CLOUGH G W, DENBY G M.Stabilizing berm design for temporary walls in clay[J]. Journal of Geotechnical Engineering Division, ASCE, 1977, 103(GT2): 75-90. [3] GOURVENEC S M, POWRIE W.Three-dimensional finite element analysis of embedded retaining walls supported by discontinuous earth berms[J]. Canadian Geotechnical Journal, 2000, 37(5): 1062-1077. [4] POWRIE W, DALY M P.Centrifuge model tests on embedded retaining walls supported by earth berms[J]. Géotechnique, 2002, 52(2): 89-106. [5] JGJ120—2012 建筑基坑支护技术规程[S]. 2012. (JGJ120—2012 Technical specification for retaining and protection of building foundation excavations[S]. 2012. (in Chinese)) [6] 陆培毅, 刘畅, 顾晓鲁. 深基坑支护结构支撑系统简化空间分析方法的研究[J]. 岩土工程学报, 2002, 24(4): 471-474.
(LU Pei-yi, LIU Chang, GU Xiao-lu.Researches on bracing system of foundation pit using simplified space analytical method[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2002, 24(4): 471-474. (in Chinese))[7] 陆新征, 宋二祥, 吉林, 等. 某特深基坑考虑支护结构与土体共同作用的三维有限元分析[J]. 岩土工程学报, 2003, 25(4): 487-491.
(LU Xin-zheng, SONG Er-xiang, JI Lin, et al.3-Dimensional FEA for the interaction between supporting structure of excavation and soil in a very deep pit[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2003, 25(4): 487-491. (in Chinese))[8] 王建华, 范巍, 王卫东, 等. 空间 m 法在深基坑支护结构分析中的应用[J]. 岩土工程学报, 2006, 28(增刊): 1332-1335.
(WANG Jian-hua, FAN Wei, WANG Wei-dong, et al.Application of 3D m method to analysis of retaining structures of deep excavation[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2006, 28(S): 1332-1335. (in Chinese))[9] 应宏伟, 郭跃. 某梁板支撑体系的深大基坑三维全过程分析[J]. 岩土工程学报, 2007, 29(11): 1670-1675.
(YING Hong-wei, GUO Yue.3D analysis on a deep beam-slab braced foundation pit considering effect of construction process[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2007, 29(11): 1670-1675. (in Chinese))[10] 应宏伟, 朱伟, 郑贝贝, 等. 柔性挡墙的主动土压力计算及分布研究[J]. 岩土工程学报, 2014, 36(增刊2): 1-6.
(YING Hong-wei, ZHU Wei, ZHENG Bei-bei, et al.Calculation and distribution of active earth pressure against flexible retaining walls[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2014, 36(S2): 1-6. (in Chinese)) -
期刊类型引用(18)
1. 姚怡宁,宗桦,周璐,李荷,冯旭环. 川西大渡河干热河谷优势灌草植物根系特征及固土能力. 生态学报. 2025(06): 2798-2810 . 百度学术
2. 王铁行,赵翊豪,金鑫. 喷射秸秆加筋黄土的强度特性研究. 地下空间与工程学报. 2024(03): 800-811 . 百度学术
3. 陈婧逸,陈晓清,宋东日,吕明,蒋豪. 灌木根系形态对土体强度影响的大型直剪试验研究. 长江科学院院报. 2024(08): 120-127+163 . 百度学术
4. 程虎,李蒙,杨劭,张乃畅,李厚峰. 水陆交错带护坡植物固土抗蚀能力比较分析. 中国水土保持科学(中英文). 2024(03): 56-63 . 百度学术
5. 谭瑞琪,谢亚军,李欣然,姜宝莹,张桂荣. 植被防护岸坡加筋机理研究. 中国水运. 2023(06): 71-74 . 百度学术
6. 陈飞,谢蕴忠,王俊峰,张仕彬. 基于数值模拟方法的根系护坡研究进展. 科学技术与工程. 2023(16): 6728-6738 . 百度学术
7. 梅红,马柯,刘瑾,王禄艺,冯玉晗,齐梦瑶,胡梦园. 生态型稳定剂协同植物根系固土特性及机理研究. 水利水电科技进展. 2023(04): 52-58 . 百度学术
8. 蒋冬卫. 不同地区沿海港口物流业发展现状评价分析. 中国水运. 2023(11): 74-76 . 百度学术
9. 杜技能,王中珏,段继琪,王忠良,段青松. 生态护坡理论及技术研究现状综述. 水利与建筑工程学报. 2023(06): 211-220 . 百度学术
10. 徐华,袁海莉,王歆宇,王栋,陈建勋,荣才权. 根系形态和层次结构对根土复合体力学特性影响研究. 岩土工程学报. 2022(05): 926-935 . 本站查看
11. 杨家庆,鲁明星,吴冠辰,袁雪涛,李富平,许永利,李小光. 矿山边坡植被修复研究现状及发展趋势分析. 矿山测量. 2022(01): 83-87 . 百度学术
12. 穆奎,潘伟良,王利彬,李婷,陈雅雯,丁奠元. 生态河道植物护坡工程技术研究现状与展望. 水利与建筑工程学报. 2022(03): 206-216 . 百度学术
13. 毕银丽,罗睿,王双明. 接菌对紫花苜蓿根系抗拉性及根菌复合土体抗剪强度影响. 煤炭学报. 2022(06): 2182-2192 . 百度学术
14. 黄琛,张友谊,叶小兵. 基于SEEP/W的强震区根系土坡面物源失稳机制分析. 科技通报. 2022(07): 57-66+72 . 百度学术
15. 李杰. 河道整治中根系植被特征对岸坡改良土影响试验研究. 水利技术监督. 2022(10): 129-132+177 . 百度学术
16. 梅红,胡国长,王禄艺,梅绪哲,刘瑾,徐佳俊,杨欣雅,杨诺. 边坡植被固土抗冲刷特性及其护坡机理研究. 河北工程大学学报(自然科学版). 2022(04): 86-91 . 百度学术
17. 姜彤,李龙飞,薛雷,黄坤,丁昊,王昊宇. 乔木护坡效果物理模型试验研究. 科学技术与工程. 2022(35): 15546-15553 . 百度学术
18. 陈飞,施康,钱乾,罗特. 根土复合体材料的抗剪强度特性研究进展. 有色金属科学与工程. 2021(06): 96-104 . 百度学术
其他类型引用(20)