高级搜索
  • 全国中文核心期刊
  • 中国科技核心期刊
  • 美国工程索引（EI）收录期刊
  • Scopus数据库收录期刊

基于电阻率CPTU的饱和砂土液化势评价研究

邹海峰, 刘松玉, 蔡国军, 杜广印

邹海峰, 刘松玉, 蔡国军, 杜广印. 基于电阻率CPTU的饱和砂土液化势评价研究[J]. 岩土工程学报, 2013, 35(7): 1280-1288.
引用本文: 邹海峰, 刘松玉, 蔡国军, 杜广印. 基于电阻率CPTU的饱和砂土液化势评价研究[J]. 岩土工程学报, 2013, 35(7): 1280-1288.
shu
ZOU Hai-feng, LIU Song-yu, CAI Guo-jun, DU Guang-yin. Evaluation of liquefaction potential of saturated sands based on piezocome penetration tests on resistivity[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2013, 35(7): 1280-1288.
Citation: ZOU Hai-feng, LIU Song-yu, CAI Guo-jun, DU Guang-yin. Evaluation of liquefaction potential of saturated sands based on piezocome penetration tests on resistivity[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2013, 35(7): 1280-1288.
shu

基于电阻率CPTU的饱和砂土液化势评价研究  English Version

  • 东南大学岩土工程研究所, 江苏 南京 210096

基金项目: 国家自然科学基金项目（41202203）；国家科技支撑计划项目(2012BAJ01B02)；江苏省自然科学基金重点项目（BK2010060）；中央高校基本科研业务费专项资金项目（3221003202）
详细信息
    作者简介:

    邹海峰(1988- )，男，湖北天门人，博士研究生，从事现代原位测试技术等方面的研究。E-mail: zhf0728@gmail.com。

  • 中图分类号: TU413

Evaluation of liquefaction potential of saturated sands based on piezocome penetration tests on resistivity

  • Institute of Geotechnical Engineering, Southeast University, Nanjing 210096, China

摘要

    摘要
  • 摘要: 饱和砂土的液化是地基基础震害的主要原因之一，对饱和砂土的液化势进行有效的评估是非常重要的。由于获得无扰动试样的困难和成本限制，原位测试方法通常用于砂土液化势的评价。目前出现了许多基于静力触探的液化评估方法，然而还没有出现哪一种方法最可靠的结论，高风险项目中通常采用多种方法进行综合评估，而新的液化评估方法的研究是非常有意义的。以宿迁—新沂高速公路建设为工程背景，采用电阻率孔压静力触探（RCPTU）对饱和粉质砂土进行了土层电阻率测试。首先，分析了归一化锥尖阻力与电阻率的关系，对建立电阻率液化评估方法具有指导意义。其次，以Robertson修正方法给出的周期阻力比为参考值，研究了联合电阻率和土类指数的周期阻力比计算方法，并研究了薄黏土层和过渡层对本文所提出电阻率方法的影响。结果表明，采用电阻率和土类指数能够对饱和砂土的液化势进行有效评估，然而应用于薄黏土层和过渡层时会低估土的周期阻力比。
    Abstract: The liquefaction of saturated soils is a major concern for the earthquake damage of foundation, and its effective evaluation is rather important. Because of the difficulty and cost constraint of obtaining high-quality undisturbed samples, in-situ testing is commonly applied to evaluate the potential of soil liquefaction. At present, numerous methods based on the cone penetration test (CPT) have been developed, but none of them has been accepted to be the most reliable one. In high risk projects, a comprehensive evaluation based on various methods is usually adopted, and thus the research on new method to evaluate the liquefaction is still necessary. The resistivity of saturated silts and sands is measured using resistivity piezocone penetration tests for the construction of Suqian-Xinyi expressway. First, the relationship between normalized cone tip resistance and resistivity is analyzed and can contribute to the evaluation of soil liquefaction based on resistivity. Second, the study on combination of resistivity and soil behavior type index to directly calculate the cycle resistance ratio (CRR) is conducted with the CRR from Robertson modified liquefaction evaluation model as a reference. The influence of thin cohesive layers and transition zones is also analyzed. It is shown that the resistivity and soil behavior type index can be used for effective evaluation of liquefaction potential of saturated soils. The accuracy of the proposed method is distinct when the cone passes soil interface since the vertical resolution of resistivity is directly proportional to the distance between outer electrodes. Otherwise, the proposed method is not suitable to thin clay layers and transition zones as it may underestimate CRR.
    • HTML全文
    • 参考文献(1)
  • [1] GB50007—2002 建筑地基基础设计规范[S]GB50007—2002 建筑地基基础设计规范[S].北京:中国建筑工业出版社, 2002.(GB50007—2002 Code for design of building foundation[S](GB50007—2002 Code for design of building foundation[S].Beijing:China Architecture and Building Press, 2002. (in Chinese))
    LUNNE T,ROBERTSON P K,POWELL J J M. Cone penetration testing in geotechnical practice[M]. London: Chapman & Hall, 1997.
    CAI G J,LIU S Y,ANAND J P. Liquefaction assessments using seismic piezocone penetration (SCPTU) test investigations in Tangshan region in China[J]. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 2012, 41: 141-150.
    蔡国军,刘松玉,童立元,等. 基于CPT测试的国内外砂土液化判别方法研究[J]. (岩石力学与工程学报), 2008, 27(5): 1019-1027.(CAI Guo-jun,LIU Song-yu,TONG Li-yuan,et al. Evaluation of liquefaction of sandy soils based on cone Penetration test[J]. Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering, 2008, 27(5): 1019-1027. (in Chinese))
    SEED H B,PEACOCK W H. Test procedures for measuring soil liquefaction characteristics[J]. Journal of the Soil Mechanics and Foundations Division, ASCE, 1971, 97(SM8): 1099-1119.
    SHARP M K,DOBRY R,PHILIPS R. CPT-based evaluation of liquefaction and lateral spreading in centrifuge[J]. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, 2010, 136(10): 1334-1346.
    ARCHIE G. The electrical resistivity log as an aid in determining some reservoir characteristics[J]. Trans, American Institute of Mining Metallurgical and Petroleum Engineers, 1942, 146: 54-61.
    RINALDI V A,CUESTAS G A. Ohmic conductivity of compacted silty clay[J]. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, 2002, 128(10): 824-835.
    蔡国军,刘松玉,童立元,等. 电阻率静力触探测试技术与分析[J]. (岩石力学与工程学报), 2007, 26(增刊1): 3127-3133.(CAI Guo-jun,LIU Song-yu,Tong Li-yuan,et al. Resistivity cone penetration test technique and data interpretation[J]. Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering, 2007, 26(S1): 3127-3133. (in Chinese))
    蔡国军,刘松玉,邵光辉,等. 基于电阻率静力触探的连云港海相黏土成因特性分析[J]. (岩土工程学报), 2008, 30(4): 529-535.(CAI Guo-jun,LIU Song-yu,SHAO Guang-hui,et al. Analysis of formation characteristics of marine clay based on resistivity cone penetration test (RCPT)[J]. Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering, 2008, 30(4): 529-535. (in Chinese))
    ARULMOLI K,ARULANANDAN K,SEED H B. New method for evaluating liquefaction potential[J]. Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 1985, 111(1): 95-114.
    ARULANANDAN K,MURALEETHARAN K K. Level ground soil-liquefaction analysis using in situ properties: I[J]. Journal of geotechnical engineering, 1988, 114(7): 753-770.
    JEFFERIES M G,DAVIES M P. Use of CPTU to estimate equivalent SPT N60[J]. Geotechnical Testing Journal, 1993, 16(4): 458-468.
    ROBERTSON P K. Interpretation of cone penetration tests—a unified approach[J]. Canadian Geotechnical Journal, 2009, 46(11): 1337-1355.
    ROBERTSON P K,WRIDE C E. Evaluating cyclic liquefaction potential using the cone penetration test[J]. Canadian Geotechnical Journal, 1998, 35(3): 442-459.
    LI D K,JUANG C H,ANDRUS R D,et al. Index properties-based criteria for liquefaction susceptibility of clayey soils: a critical assessment[J]. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, 2007, 133(1): 110-115.
    SEED H B,IDRISS I M. Simplified procedure for evaluating soil liquefaction potential[J]. Journal of the Soil Mechanics and Foundations Division, ASCE, 1971, 97(9): 1249-1273.
    YOUD T L,IDRISS I M. NCEER workshop on evaluation of liquefaction resistance of soils[R]. Buffalo: National Center for Earthquake Engineering Research, State University of New York at Buffalo, 1997.
    YOUD T L,et al. Liquefaction resistance of soils: summary report from the 1996 NCEER and 1998 NCEER/NSF workshops on evaluation of liquefaction resistance of soils[J]. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, 2001, 127(10): 817-833.
    SEED R B,CETIN K O,MOSS R E S,et al. Recent advances in soil liquefaction engineering and seismic site response evaluation[C]// Proceedings of 4th International Conference and Symposium on Recent Advances in Geotechnical Earthquake Engineering and Soil Dynamics, University of Missouri, Rolla, 2001.
    IDRISS I M,BOULANGER R W. Semi-empirical procedures for evaluating liquefaction potential during earthquakes[C]// Joint Conference, 11th International Conference on Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering (SDEE), and The 3rd International Conference on Earthquake Geotechnical Engineering (ICEGE), Berkeley, 2004: 32-56.
    CETIN K O,SEED R B,DER KIUREGHIAN A,et al. Standard penetration test-based probabilistic and deterministic assessment of seismic soil liquefaction potential[J]. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, 2004, 130(12): 1314-1340.
    MOSS R E S,SEED R B,KAYEN R E,et al. CPT-based probabilistic and deterministic assessment of in situ seismic soil liquefaction potential[J]. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, 2006, 132(8): 1032-1051.
    JUANG C H,FANG S Y,KHOR E H. First-order reliability method for probabilistic liquefaction triggering analysis using CPT[J]. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, 2006, 132(3): 337-350.
    ZHANG G,ROBERTSON P K,BRACHMAN R W I. Estimating liquefaction-induced ground settlements from CPT for level ground[J]. Canadian Geotechnical Journal, 2002, 39(5): 1168-1180.
    ROBERTSON P K. Performance based earthquake design using the CPT[C]// Keynote lecture, IS-Tokyo, 2009.
    WROTH C P. The interpretation of in situ soil test. 24th Rankine Lecture[J]. Géotechnique, 1984, 34(4): 449-489.
    IDRISS I M,BOULANGER R W. Soil liquefaction during earthquakes[M]. Oakland: Earthquake Engineering Research Institute, MNO-12, 2008.
    WEEMEES I A. Development of an electrical resistivity cone for groundwater contamination studies[D]. Vancouver: The University of British Columbia, 1990.
    JUANG C H,KU C S,CHEN C C. Simplified model for evaluating soil liquefaction potential using CPTU[C]// Proceedings of the 2nd International Symposium on Cone Penetration Testing. Huntington Beach, 2010, 3: 347-354.
    JTG/T B02-01-2008 公路桥梁抗震设计细则[S]B02-01-2008 公路桥梁抗震设计细则[S].北京:人民交通出版社, 2008.(JTG/T B02-01-2008 Guidelines for seismic design of highway bridges[S]B02-01-2008 Guidelines for seismic design of highway bridges[S].Beijing:China Communications Press, 2008. (in Chinese))
    • 相关文章
    • 施引文献
    • 资源附件(0)
计量
  • 文章访问数: 
  • HTML全文浏览量:  0
  • PDF下载量: 
  • 被引次数: 0
出版历程
  • 收稿日期:  2012-09-03
  • 发布日期:  2013-07-16

目录

摘要
HTML全文
    参考文献(1)
    相关文章
    施引文献
    资源附件(0)

    /

    返回文章
    返回
    版权所有 © 2010水利部交通部国家能源局南京水利科学研究院 苏ICP备05007122号-11公安联网备案号：32010602011255
    编辑部地址：南京市虎踞关34号《岩土工程学报》编辑部邮编：210024电话：025-85829534，85829556E-mail: ge@nhri.cn