非饱和土抗剪强度有效应力参数的分析与检验

    Analysis and examination of effective stress parameters for shear strength of unsaturated soils

    • 摘要: 为了搞清非饱和土抗剪强度有效应力参数的影响因素和定量检验其合理性,对国内外264个控制吸力的非饱和土三轴剪切试验和102个直剪试验资料进行了深入系统的分析,详细研究了在常见吸力范围内(0~1500 kPa)强度有效应力参数的量值大小和影响因素,对4种有效应力参数做了定量检验和明确评价。研究结果发现:当吸力为25~400 kPa时,占试验总数26.5%以上的三轴试验的抗剪强度有效应力参数值超过1(最大值为2.63),突破了其最大值为1的限制,并非偶然现象,其原因是有效应力方法把吸力对非饱和土抗剪强度的影响单纯地归结为摩擦方面而忽略了对黏聚力的影响所致;当吸力为25~450 kPa时,有15.5%以上的三轴试验和23.5%以上的直剪试验的强度有效应力参数值为0~0.35,远低于1,即低吸力下的有效应力参数值不一定高,亦非偶然现象,其机理与原状土的结构性及内摩擦角随吸力提高而增大有关;以与试验得到的强度有效应力参数的相对误差不超过±10%为合格标准,试样破坏时的饱和度、有效饱和度及文献中建议的2种有效应力参数经验公式(包括Khalili建议的公式)的计算值都与试验得到的有效应力参数值相差甚远,合格率均小于20%,严重高估/低估了吸力对非饱和土抗剪强度的贡献,似不宜充当非饱和土的有效应力参数;土因具有黏塑性、压硬性、剪胀性和结构性,其强度有效应力参数与土类、吸力、净围压(或竖向净应力)和应力路径有关,没有明确的规律可循,用考虑上述因素影响的控制吸力的非饱和土三轴排水剪切试验或直剪试验进行测定是目前可行的方法。

       

      Abstract: To investigate the influencing factors of effective stress parameters for shear strength of unsaturated soils and to quantitatively examine their rationality, this study systematically analyzedate of 264 suction-controlled triaxial shear tests and 102 direct shear tests on unsaturated soils from both domestic and international sources. This research focuses on magnitude and influencing factors of effective stress parameters within the commonly encountered suction range (0-1500 kPa), and conducts quantitative examination and clear assessment of four types of effective stress parameters. The key findings are as follows: (1) Within the suction range of 25-400 kPa, more than 26.5% of triaxial test results show effective stress parameter values exceed the theoretical upper limit of 1, especially a maximum measured value of 2.63, breaking through its maximum limit of 1, which is not accidental. The reason is that the effective stress method simply attributes the influence of suction on the shear strength of unsaturated soil to friction and ignores the influence on cohesion; (2) In the suction range of 25-450 kPa, over 15.5% of triaxial tests and over 23.5% of direct shear tests yield effective stress parameter values within the range of 0 to 0.35, which is far lower than 1. The mechanism is related to the increase of the structural development of and internal friction angle of the undisturbed soil with the increase of suction. It shows that low suction does not necessarily correspond to high effective stress parameter values, which is also not a random occurrence; (3) Using a relative error threshold of ±10% as the accuracy criterion, there is a significant deviation of four effective stress parameters, i.e., saturation degree at failure, effective saturation degree at failure, and two published empirical equations including the equation suggested by Khalili, from the experimental values, with qualification rates below 20%. It is found that these four effective stress parameters severely overestimate or underestimate the contribution of suction to the shear strength of unsaturated soils, which seem unsuitable as effective stress parameters; (4) The effective stress parameter on shear strength depends complexly on soil type, suction magnitude, net confining pressure (or vertical net stress), and stress path, reflecting soil viscoplasticity hardening, dilatation and structural properties. Due to the absence of clear patterns, direct measurement of effective stress parameters via suction-controlled triaxial drained shear or direct shear tests remains the feasible method currently.

       

    /

    返回文章
    返回