新污染物PFAS对膨润土渗透系数影响规律及其多尺度机理研究

    Effect of Emerging Pollutant PFAS Exposure on Hydraulic Conductivity of Bentonite and Multi-Scale Mechanistic Investigation

    • 摘要: 新污染物全氟和多氟烷基物质(PFAS)污染地下水的治理研究已引起国内外同行高度关注。然而,现阶段关于不同类型PFAS对膨润土的防渗性能影响规律及其机理研究鲜有报道。本文通过溶液pH试验、自由膨胀试验、液限试验和改进滤失试验,研究了三种阴离子型全氟和多氟烷基物质(PFAS)包括全氟丁烷磺酸(PFBS(短链))、全氟己酸(PFHxA(短链))、全氟辛酸(PFOA(长链))试验溶液对钠化膨润土自由膨胀指数、液限以及膨润土滤饼渗透系数的影响规律,并选取了去离子水开展对照试验。通过开展系列纳观-微观-介观尺度的试验,包括相对介电常数测试、Zeta电位测试、紫外吸收光谱、X射线衍射、傅里叶变换红外光谱以及扫描电子显微镜分析,揭示了PFAS与膨润土颗粒的相互作用机理。结果表明,与去离子水试验溶液(pH=6.8)相比,PFBS、PFHxA、PFOA溶液均呈酸性(pH=3.6、3.6、3.8)。在PFBS、PFHxA、PFOA溶液作用下,膨润土的自由膨胀指数分别降低了3.1%、1.6%、5.5%,液限分别降低了2.9%、2.3%、3.0%。改进滤失试验结果表明,在同一孔隙比下,相较于去离子水水化而言,在浓度为80 mg/L的PFBS、PFHxA、PFOA三种溶液水化下,膨润土滤饼的渗透系数分别增加了1.6-3.1倍、1.5-3.0倍和1.2-1.8倍。相较于去离子水,PFAS作用下膨润土滤饼的渗透系数增大的原因是下述三个因素的综合效应:①PFBS、PFHxA、PFOA溶液pH与相对介电常数降低;②膨润土颗粒表面官能团与水分子间形成氢键的总数量减少;③膨润土颗粒呈现出更弱的电负性。

       

      Abstract: Remediation and risk control of groundwater contaminated by emerging pollutants such as perfluoroalkyl and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) has received attention from global researchers. However, very limited studies have addressed whether exposure to PFAS can alter hydraulic conductivity (k) of bentonite and why this change is occurred. Accordingly, this research aims to fill the gap. A series of macroscopic tests were conducted to evaluate effects of exposure to PFAS on soil pH, free swell index, liquid limit, and k of sodium-activated calcium bentonite. The k of the bentonite filter cakes were evaluated via modified fluid loss test. Three types of PFAS were selected including perfluorobutane sulfonic acid (PFBS with short chain), perfluorohexanoic acid (PFHxA with short chain), and perfluorooctanoic acid (PFOA with long chain). Deionized water was tested as the control. In addition, a set of multi-scale, in terms of nanoscopic, microscopic, and mesoscopic scale tests were carried out to reveal the underneath mechanisms of interactions between PFAS and bentonite. These tests included dielectric constant measurement, Zeta potential measurement, ultraviolet absorption spectroscopy test, X-ray diffraction test, Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy test, and scanning electron microscopy tests. The results show that pH values of the PFBS, PFHxA and PFOA solutions, and deionized water were 3.6, 3.6, 3.8, and 6.8, respectively. Free swell index values of bentonite tested in the PFBS, PFHxA and PFOA solutions decreased by 3.1%, 1.6% and 5.5% respectively, as compared to that tested in the deionized water. Exposure to PFBS, PFHxA, and PFOA yielded a decrease in liquid limit by 2.9%, 2.3% and 3.0%, respectively, as compared to exposure to deionized water. Under the same void ratio, k of the bentonite filter cake to PFBS, PFHxA, and PFOA increased by 1.6-3.1 times, 1.5-3.0 times and 1.2-1.8 times, respectively, as compared to k to deionized water. The reasons why k of bentonite filter cake to three PFAS solutions were higher than that to deionized water were attributed to the synergistic effects of three factors as follows: (1) pH and relative dielectric constant of PFBS, PFHxA and PFOA solutions were higher than those of deionized water; (2) Total amount of hydrogen bonds formed in bentonite was lower in three PFAS testing solutions; and (3) Zeta potential of bentonite particles was less negative in three PFAS solutions as compared to that in deionized water.

       

    /

    返回文章
    返回