紧水滩混合式抽水蓄能电站半地下厂房渗流控制数值模拟与评价

    • 摘要: 地下厂房的渗流问题目前研究已较为成熟,但对于顶部暴露于地面的半地下厂房,其渗流问题却鲜有研究。本文首次采用地下水模拟程序MODFLOW构建三维数值模型,对紧水滩混合式抽水蓄能电站研究区的地下水流场进行模拟与验证,并对12种不同半地下厂房渗流控制方案进行模拟分析。结果表明,所建模型地下水位动态拟合良好,参数均在合理范围内。排水廊道的布置形式是影响防渗效果的关键因素,“四面布置”方案防渗效果最佳,拦截率高达98.21%,“三面布置”方案次之,“一面布置”方案效果最差。排水孔间距对防渗效果具有一定影响,在“四面布置”和“三面布置”方案下,排水孔间距越小,防渗效果越好。实际工程中,需结合防渗需求与工程成本确定防渗方案。研究方法和成果可为半地下厂房的防渗设计提供有效参考。

       

      Abstract: The seepage issues of underground powerhouses have been extensively studied, but there is few researches on the seepage problems of semi-underground powerhouses with exposed tops. This study firstly uses the groundwater simulation program MODFLOW to construct a three-dimensional numerical model, simulating and validating the groundwater flow fields in the study area of the Qinshuitan Hybrid Pumped Storage Power Station. Additionally, it analyzes 12 different seepage control schemes for the semi-underground powerhouse. The results show that the constructed model provides a good fit to the dynamic groundwater level and all parameters are within a reasonable range. The layout of the drainage gallery is the key factor influencing the seepage control effects. The "four-sided layout" scheme demonstrates the best seepage control with an interception rate of 98.21%, followed by the "three-sided layout" scheme, while the "one-sided layout" scheme performs the worst. The spacing of drainage holes also affects the seepage control performance. Under both the "four-sided layout" and "three-sided layout" schemes, smaller hole spacing results to better seepage control. In actual engineering, the seepage control scheme should be determined by balancing seepage control requirements and engineering costs. The research methods and results provide valuable references for the seepage control design of semi-underground powerhouses.

       

    /

    返回文章
    返回