Processing math: 100%
  • 全国中文核心期刊
  • 中国科技核心期刊
  • 美国工程索引(EI)收录期刊
  • Scopus数据库收录期刊

高面板坝挤压墙-垫层料接触面的大型单剪试验及力学特性研究

孙大伟, 许鑫洋, 郦能惠, 章涵, 李登华, 许兵, 黄城友

孙大伟, 许鑫洋, 郦能惠, 章涵, 李登华, 许兵, 黄城友. 高面板坝挤压墙-垫层料接触面的大型单剪试验及力学特性研究[J]. 岩土工程学报, 2025, 47(2): 388-396. DOI: 10.11779/CJGE20230839
引用本文: 孙大伟, 许鑫洋, 郦能惠, 章涵, 李登华, 许兵, 黄城友. 高面板坝挤压墙-垫层料接触面的大型单剪试验及力学特性研究[J]. 岩土工程学报, 2025, 47(2): 388-396. DOI: 10.11779/CJGE20230839
SUN Dawei, XU Xinyang, LI Nenghui, ZHANG Han, LI Denghua, XU Bing, HUANG Chengyou. Simple shear tests and mechanical properties of interface between extrusion wall and cushion layer of high concrete face rockfill dams[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2025, 47(2): 388-396. DOI: 10.11779/CJGE20230839
Citation: SUN Dawei, XU Xinyang, LI Nenghui, ZHANG Han, LI Denghua, XU Bing, HUANG Chengyou. Simple shear tests and mechanical properties of interface between extrusion wall and cushion layer of high concrete face rockfill dams[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2025, 47(2): 388-396. DOI: 10.11779/CJGE20230839

高面板坝挤压墙-垫层料接触面的大型单剪试验及力学特性研究  English Version

基金项目: 

国家自然科学基金项目 42207218

详细信息
    作者简介:

    孙大伟(1971—),男,博士,副教授,主要从事堆石坝的本构模型研究及计算方面的科研工作。E-mail: daweisun@126.com

    通讯作者:

    章涵, E-mail: zhanghan@cug.edu.cn

  • 中图分类号: TU43

Simple shear tests and mechanical properties of interface between extrusion wall and cushion layer of high concrete face rockfill dams

  • 摘要: 21世纪以来高面板堆石坝多采用挤压墙施工技术,研究挤压墙-垫层料接触面力学特性以真实预测面板应力变形对于确保大坝安全相当重要。目前锯齿状挤压墙-垫层料接触面的单剪试验和离散元仿真成果均未见到。为此以某200 m级高坝为参照,开展挤压墙-垫层料接触面大型单剪试验,比较了锯齿状和平面状两种不同型式挤压墙-垫层料接触界面力学特性的差异。首次采用离散元数值单剪试验分析了接触区垫层料的位移特征及其影响因素,发现与平面状挤压墙相比,锯齿状挤压墙导致垫层料颗粒发生更剧烈的转动并导致靠近接触面的垫层料变形加大。基于锯齿状挤压墙-垫层料接触面的单剪试验成果确定了接触面本构模型及其参数,有助于提高面板堆石坝的面板应力变形计算准确性。
    Abstract: The extrusion wall technology has been widely used in high concrete face rockfill dams in the 21th century. It is very important for dam safety to study the mechanical properties of the contact surface between the extrusion wall and the cushion layer for actually predicting the stress and deformation behavior of the face slab. At present, the simple shear tests and discrete element simulation investigations related to the contact face between the zigzag extrusion wall and the cushion layer are not available. Therefore, taking a 200 m-level dam as a reference, the large-scale simple shear tests of the contact surface between the extrusion wall and the cushion layer materials are carried out, and the mechanical properties of contact surfaces with zigzag and planar extrusion walls are compared and analyzed. The shear deformation and rotation characteristics and influencing factors of the cushion layer materials are analyzed by using the discrete element numerical simple shear tests for the first time. Compared with the planar extrusion wall, the zigzag extrusion wall causes the larger rotation magnitude of the blocks in the cushion materials and the larger deformation of the cushion materials near the contact surface. Based on the simple shear test results of the zigzag extrusion wall-cushion material contact surface, the contact surface model and the parameters are determined. It is helpful to improve the accuracy of stress and deformation calculation for face slab of high concrete face rockfill dams.
  • 图  1   挤压墙实际结构

    Figure  1.   Structure of extrusion wall

    图  2   单剪仪照片

    Figure  2.   Photo of simple shear apparatus

    图  3   垫层料级配曲线

    Figure  3.   Grain-size distribution curve of cushion layer materials

    图  4   锯齿状挤压墙装料示意图

    Figure  4.   Loading of materials of zigzag extrusion wall

    图  5   接触面剪应力-相对水平位移关系曲线

    Figure  5.   Relationship between shear stress and relative horizontal displacement of contact surface

    图  6   试验结束后挤压墙照片

    Figure  6.   Photos of extrusion wall after tests

    图  7   离散元数值模型

    Figure  7.   DEM numerical models

    图  8   圆柱垫层料的单轴压缩试验与数值试验应力-应变曲线

    Figure  8.   Stress-stain curves of unconfined compression laboratory tests and numerical tests of cylinder cushion layer materials

    图  9   挤压墙立方体试件的单轴压缩试验与数值试验曲线

    Figure  9.   Curves of unconfined compression laboratory tests and numerical tests of cube extrusion wall specimens

    图  10   挤压墙-垫层料试验曲线

    Figure  10.   Curves of extrusion wall and cushion layer materials

    图  11   200 kPa法向应力下垫层料位移矢量图

    Figure  11.   Displacement vectors of cushion layer materials under vertical stress of 200 kPa

    图  12   垫层料颗粒水平位移特征

    Figure  12.   Horizontal displacement characteristics of particles of cushion layer materials

    图  13   垫层料颗粒转动特征

    Figure  13.   Rotation characteristics of particles of cushion layer materials

    图  14   足尺挤压墙离散元法数值模型

    Figure  14.   DEM numerical models of full-scale extrusion wall

    图  15   缩尺及足尺挤压墙数模单剪应力-剪切应变曲线

    Figure  15.   Shear stress-shear strain curves of extrusion wall by reduced scale and full-scale DEM models

    图  16   平面状及缩尺挤压墙接触面试验数据及拟合曲线

    Figure  16.   Test data and fitting curves of contact surface on planar and reduced scale extrusion walls

    表  1   挤压墙-垫层料接触面的细观参数

    Table  1   Micro-parameters of interface between extrusion wall and cushion layer materials

    部位 接触模型类型 弹性模量/GPa 摩擦系数 抗转动系数 法向黏结强度/
    MPa
    切向黏结强度/
    MPa
    挤压墙 平行黏结 4.0 0.9 3.2 3.2
    大粒径垫层料颗粒 平行黏结 5.0 1.0 47.0 47.0
    大粒径垫层料之间 线性抗转动 0.1 0.6 0.5
    小粒径垫层料之间 线性抗转动 5.0 1.0 0.5
    大粒径垫层料-小粒径垫层料之间 线性抗转动 5.0 0.8 0.5
    垫层料-挤压墙之间 线性抗转动 0.1 0.5 0.4
    下载: 导出CSV

    表  2   挤压墙-垫层料接触面模型参数

    Table  2   Constitutive model parameters of contact surface between extrusion wall and cushion layer

    挤压墙类型 黏聚力
    c/kPa
    内摩擦角φ/(°) k n 破坏比
    Rf
    平面状 90.1 34.4 260.1 0.29 0.81
    锯齿状(缩尺) 78.5 35.4 266.5 0.30 0.81
    下载: 导出CSV
  • [1] 贾金生, 郦能惠, 徐泽平, 等. 高混凝土面板坝安全关键技术研究[M]. 北京: 中国水利水电出版社, 2014.

    JIA Jinsheng, LI Nenghui, XU Zeping, et al. Study on Key Technology for the Safety of High CFRDs[M]. Beijing: China Water & Power Press, 2014. (in Chinese)

    [2] 周小文, 龚壁卫, 丁红顺, 等. 砾石垫层—混凝土接触面力学特性单剪试验研究[J]. 岩土工程学报, 2005, 27(8): 876-880. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1000-4548.2005.08.005

    ZHOU Xiaowen, GONG Biwei, DING Hongshun, et al. Large-scale simple shear test on mechanical properties of interface between concrete face and gravel underlayer[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2005, 27(8): 876-880. (in Chinese) doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1000-4548.2005.08.005

    [3] 王艳丽, 饶锡保, 潘家军, 等. 砂砾石垫层料与混凝土面板接触面特性的大型单剪试验研究[J]. 岩土工程学报, 2019, 41(8): 1538-1544. doi: 10.11779/CJGE201908019

    WANG Yanli, RAO Xibao, PAN Jiajun, et al. Mechanical behaviors of interface between sand-gravel cushion material and concrete face slab by large-scale simple shear tests[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2019, 41(8): 1538-1544. (in Chinese) doi: 10.11779/CJGE201908019

    [4] 张国栋, 罗雯, 杜鹏. 三峡库区典型土石混合体与混凝土接触面大型剪切试验研究[J]. 水利水电技术, 2014, 45(8): 149-152. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-0860.2014.08.037

    ZHANG Guodong, LUO Wen, DU Peng. Large shearing test on interface between typical earth-rock aggregate and concrete in Three Gorges Reservoir Area[J]. Water Resources and Hydropower Engineering, 2014, 45(8): 149-152. (in Chinese) doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-0860.2014.08.037

    [5] 李登华. 面板堆石坝接触面试验研究和本构模型的建立[D]. 南京: 南京水利科学研究院, 2009.

    LI Denghua. Experimental Study on Contact Surface of Concrete Face Rockfill Dam and Establishment of Constitutive Model[D]. Nanjing: Nanjing Hydraulic Research Institute, 2009. (in Chinese)

    [6] 张建民, 张嘎, 刘芳. 面板堆石坝挤压式边墙的概化数值模型及应用[J]. 岩土工程学报, 2005, 27(3): 249-253. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1000-4548.2005.03.001

    ZHANG Jianmin, ZHANG Ga, LIU Fang. A simplified equivalent numerical model of extrusion-sidewall for CFRD and its application[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2005, 27(3): 249-253. (in Chinese) doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1000-4548.2005.03.001

    [7] 张嘎, 张建民. 粗粒土与结构接触面统一本构模型及试验验证[J]. 岩土工程学报, 2005, 27(10): 1175-1179. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1000-4548.2005.10.013

    ZHANG Ga, ZHANG Jianmin. Unified modeling of soil-structure interface and its test confirmation[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2005, 27(10): 1175-1179. (in Chinese) doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1000-4548.2005.10.013

    [8] 张嘎, 张建民. 粗粒土与结构接触面三维本构关系及数值模型[J]. 岩土力学, 2007, 28(2): 288-292. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-7598.2007.02.015

    ZHANG Ga, ZHANG Jianmin. Three-dimensional model of interface between structure and coarse grained soil[J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2007, 28(2): 288-292. (in Chinese) doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-7598.2007.02.015

    [9]

    LIU S H, WANG Y S, SHEN C M. DEM analysis of granular crushing during simple shearing[J]. Marine Georesources & Geotechnology, 2018, 36(5): 522-531.

    [10]

    XU D S, TANG Z Y, ZHANG L. Interpretation of coarse effect in simple shear behavior of binary sand-gravel mixture by DEM with authentic particle shape[J]. Construction and Building Materials, 2019, 195: 292-304. doi: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.11.059

    [11]

    ZHANG H, BOLDINI D, WANG L H, et al. Influence of block form on the shear behaviour of soft soil–rock mixtures by 3D block modelling approaches[J]. Rock Mechanics and Rock Engineering, 2022, 55(6): 3279-3300. doi: 10.1007/s00603-022-02795-x

    [12]

    XU W J, WANG S, ZHANG H Y, et al. Discrete element modelling of a soil-rock mixture used in an embankment dam[J]. International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences, 2016, 86: 141-156. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrmms.2016.04.004

    [13] 姜仲洋, 李志华, 张聪. 基于颗粒流的新老混凝土加固构件轴压性能细观研究[J]. 应用力学学报, 2022, 39(2): 342-349.

    JIANG Zhongyang, LI Zhihua, ZHANG Cong. Meso-study on the axial compression performance of new and old concrete reinforced members based on particle flow[J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Mechanics, 2022, 39(2): 342-349. (in Chinese)

    [14] 杨忠平, 蒋源文, 李诗琪, 等. 土石混合体—基岩界面剪切力学特性试验研究[J]. 岩土工程学报, 2020, 42(10): 1947-1954. doi: 10.11779/CJGE202010021

    YANG Zhongping, JIANG Yuanwen, LI Shiqi, et al. Experimental study on shear mechanical properties of soil-rock mixture-bedrock interface[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2020, 42(10): 1947-1954. (in Chinese) doi: 10.11779/CJGE202010021

    [15]

    DESAI C S, ZAMAN M M, LIGHTNER J G, et al. Thin-layer element for interfaces and joints[J]. International Journal for Numerical and Analytical Methods in Geomechanics, 1984, 8(1): 19-43. doi: 10.1002/nag.1610080103

    [16]

    XU W J, HU L M, GAO W. Random generation of the meso-structure of a soil-rock mixture and its application in the study of the mechanical behavior in a landslide dam[J]. International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences, 2016, 86: 166-178. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrmms.2016.04.007

  • 本文视频

图(16)  /  表(2)
计量
  • 文章访问数:  219
  • HTML全文浏览量:  19
  • PDF下载量:  57
  • 被引次数: 0
出版历程
  • 收稿日期:  2023-08-29
  • 网络出版日期:  2024-07-25
  • 刊出日期:  2025-01-31

目录

    /

    返回文章
    返回