Influences of construction defects of concrete cutoff walls on evolution laws of their leakage dissolution
-
摘要: 渗流作用下防渗墙施工缺陷对其渗透溶蚀演化进程影响较显著，为探究防渗墙相邻槽段搭接不良和墙底分叉对其渗透溶蚀的影响机制，结合流体和化学动力学相关理论，建立含施工缺陷的混凝土防渗墙渗透溶蚀耦合分析模型。结合某土工膜防渗砂砾石坝，研究两种缺陷形式下防渗墙中钙离子浓度、孔隙率及渗流特性变化规律。防渗墙钙离子浓度随服役年份增长不断降低，且缺陷越严重，浓度越低；孔隙率随服役年份呈指数型增长，服役100 a后孔隙率增大约1.83倍；防渗性能随服役年份、接缝宽度和分叉高度的增长而减弱，相比防渗墙完好工况，当接缝宽度3.0 cm或分叉高度为3 m时，服役100 a后防渗墙等效渗透系数分别增大了8.20倍，40.38倍，大坝总渗流量分别增大了4.49倍，5.81倍。研究成果可为土石坝工程长效服役性能评估提供理论支撑。Abstract: Under the action of seepage, the construction defects of cutoff walls have a significant impact on the evolution process of their leakage dissolution. In order to investigate the influence mechanism of poor overlapping of the adjacent groove sections and the bottom bifurcation of the cutoff walls, based on the relevant theories of fluid dynamics and chemical dynamics, a coupling analysis model for leakage dissolution of concrete cutoff walls with construction defects is proposed. Based on a sand gravel dam project with geomembrane anti-seepage measure, the variation laws of calcium ion concentration, porosity and seepage characteristics of the concrete cutoff walls under two types of defects are revealed. The calcium ion concentration of the cutoff walls decreases with the increase of service year, and the more serious the defects are, the lower the concentration of calcium ion is. The porosity increases exponentially with the service year, and the maximum porosity increases by about 1.83 times after 100 service years. The anti-seepage performance of the cutoff walls decreases with the increase of the service year, joint width and bifurcation height of the construction defects. Compared with the intact condition of the cutoff walls, when the joint width is 3.0 cm or the bifurcation height is 3 m, the equivalent permeability coefficient of the cutoff walls increases by 8.20 times and 40.38 times respectively after 100 service years, and the total seepage flow of the dam body and dam foundation increases by 4.49 times and 5.81 times, respectively. The research results can provide theoretical support for evaluating the long-term service performance of earth-rock dams.
-
Keywords:
- concrete cutoff wall /
- construction defect /
- leakage dissolution /
- porosity /
- seepage characteristic
-
-
![]()
图 1 某重力坝整体计算模型示意图
Figure 1. Schematic diagram of computational model for a gravity dam
![]()
图 2 典型服役年份下重力坝基底扬压力演化曲线
Figure 2. Evolution curves of base uplift pressure of gravity dam for typical service years
![]()
图 3 典型服役年份下坝基渗流量演化曲线
Figure 3. Evolution curves of seepage flow of dam foundation for typical service years
![]()
图 5 防渗墙施工缺陷模拟示意图
Figure 5. Schematic diagram of simulating construction defects of cutoff wall
![]()
图 7 防渗墙中平均钙离子浓度变化曲线
Figure 7. Variation curves of average calcium ion concentration of cutoff wall
![]()
图 8 典型工况下防渗墙孔隙率分布
Figure 8. Distribution of porosity of cutoff wall under typical working conditions
![]()
图 9 各工况下防渗墙平均孔隙率变化曲线
Figure 9. Variation curves of average porosity of cutoff wall under various conditions
![]()
图 10 防渗墙等效平均渗透系数变化曲线
Figure 10. Variation curves of average permeability coefficient of cutoff wall
![]()
图 11 初始时刻坝体和坝基水位等值线分布
Figure 11. Distribution of water level contour of dam body and foundation at initial time
![]()
图 12 各工况下大坝渗流量变化曲线
Figure 12. Variation curves of seepage flow through dam under various conditions
表 1 各材料分区计算参数
Table 1 Parameters for different material zones
材料 θ0 k0/(m·s-1) D0/(m2·s-1) 化学反应动力学参数 A/(mol/(L·s)) n Ksp 常规混凝土 0.08 5.20×10-9 1.00×10-9 1.00×10-8 4.50 5.50×10-6 二级配混凝土 0.08 2.00×10-8 1.00×10-9 1.00×10-8 4.50 5.50×10-6 三级配混凝土 0.08 5.00×10-10 1.00×10-9 1.00×10-8 4.50 5.50×10-6 防渗帷幕 0.08 1.50×10-8 1.00×10-9 1.00×10-8 4.50 5.50×10-6 基岩 0.10 8.00×10-5 1.00×10-9 — — — 坝体排水孔 0.50 2.50×10-3 1.00×10-9 — — — 坝基排水孔 0.50 2.50×10-3 1.00×10-9 — — — 
下载: 导出CSV
表 2 计算模型渗透溶蚀参数
Table 2 Leakage dissolution parameters of model
材料 k0/(m·s-1) θ0 D0/(m2·s-1) 化学反应动力学参数 A/((mol/(L·s)) n Ksp 防渗墙 1.00×10-9 0.12 1.00×10-9 1.00×10-8 4.50 5.50×10-6 砂砾石填筑料 2.40×10-5 0.30 1.00×10-9 — — — 截流戗堤 1.00×10-6 0.25 1.00×10-9 — — — 上游闭气料 3.00×10-7 0.20 1.00×10-9 — — — 复合土工膜 3.50×10-13 — — — — — 排水棱体 2.00×10-3 0.50 1.00×10-9 — — — 砂卵砾石层 4.60×10-4 0.40 1.00×10-9 — — — 粉砂质泥岩 1.10×10-6 0.20 1.50×10-9 — — —
下载: 导出CSV
表 3 计算工况表
Table 3 Design of calculation conditions
工况 服役年份/a 接缝宽度/cm 分叉高度/m 水位/m D-1 0~100 — — 上游：1880.50下游：1862.31 D-2 0~100 1.0 — D -3 0~100 2.0 — D -4 0~100 3.0 — D -5 0~100 — 1.0 D-6 0~100 — 2.0 D -7 0~100 — 3.0
下载: 导出CSV
-
[1] 沈振中, 田振宇, 徐力群, 等. 深覆盖层上土石坝心墙与防渗墙连接型式研究[J]. 岩土工程学报, 2017, 39(5): 939-945. doi: 10.11779/CJGE201705019 SHEN Zhenzhong, TIAN Zhenyu, XU Liqun, et al. Reasonable connection type for cutoff wall and core wall of earth-rock dams on deep overburden layers[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2017, 39(5): 939-945. (in Chinese) doi: 10.11779/CJGE201705019
[2] 王刚, 张建民, 濮家骝. 坝基混凝土防渗墙应力位移影响因素分析[J]. 土木工程学报, 2006, 39(4): 73-77. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1000-131X.2006.04.015 WANG Gang, ZHANG Jianmin, PU Jialiu. An evaluation of the factors influencing the stress and deformation of concrete diaphragm wall in dams[J]. China Civil Engineering Journal, 2006, 39(4): 73-77. (in Chinese) doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1000-131X.2006.04.015
[3] 盛金昌, 赵坚, 速宝玉. 混凝土防渗墙开裂对坝基渗透稳定性的影响[J]. 水利水电科技进展, 2006, 26(1): 23-26. doi: 10.3880/j.issn.1006-7647.2006.01.007 SHENG Jinchang, ZHAO Jian, SU Baoyu. Effects of cracking of anti-seepage concrete wall on seepage stability of dam foundation[J]. Advances in Science and Technology of Water Resources, 2006, 26(1): 23-26. (in Chinese) doi: 10.3880/j.issn.1006-7647.2006.01.007
[4] 李少明. 防渗墙质量缺陷对土石坝渗流控制的影响[J]. 南水北调与水利科技, 2012, 10(5): 174-177, 169. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-NSBD201205041.htm LI Shaoming. Effects of quality defects in anti-seepage wall on seepage control of the earth-rock dam[J]. South-to-North Water Diversion and Water Science & Technology, 2012, 10(5): 174-177, 169. (in Chinese) https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-NSBD201205041.htm
[5] 彭鹏, 单治钢, 宋汉周, 等. 反映坝基帷幕体防渗时效的多场耦合数值模拟[J]. 岩土工程学报, 2011, 33(12): 1847-1853. http://www.cgejournal.com/cn/article/id/14439 PENG Peng, SHAN Zhigang, SONG Hanzhou, et al. Coupling model for assessing anti-seepage behaviors of curtain of dam foundation[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2011, 33(12): 1847-1853. (in Chinese) http://www.cgejournal.com/cn/article/id/14439
[6] 王少伟, 包腾飞. 渗透溶蚀对高混凝土坝长期变形影响的数值分析[J]. 长江科学院院报, 2020, 37(6): 62-69. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-CJKB202006014.htm WANG Shaowei, BAO Tengfei. Numerical analysis on influence of leakage dissolution on long-term deformation of high concrete dam[J]. Journal of Yangtze River Scientific Research Institute, 2020, 37(6): 62-69. (in Chinese) https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-CJKB202006014.htm
[7] 张开来, 沈振中, 甘磊. 水泥基材料溶蚀试验研究进展[J]. 水利水电科技进展, 2018, 38(6): 86-94. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SLSD201806017.htm ZHANG Kailai, SHEN Zhenzhong, GAN Lei. Advances in cement-based materials leaching test[J]. Advances in Science and Technology of Water Resources, 2018, 38(6): 86-94. (in Chinese) https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SLSD201806017.htm
[8] KAMALI S, MORANVILLE M, LECLERCQ S. Material and environmental parameter effects on the leaching of cement pastes: experiments and modelling[J]. Cement and Concrete Research, 2008, 38(4): 575-585. http://www.onacademic.com/detail/journal_1000034059586510_017d.html
[9] 盛金昌, 贾春兰, 张羽, 等. 水工混凝土渗流侵蚀渗透试验研究[J]. 水力发电学报, 2013, 32(6): 216-221. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SFXB201306036.htm SHENG Jinchang, JIA Chunlan, ZHANG Yu, et al. Experimental study of seepage inflow erosion processes in concrete[J]. Journal of Hydroelectric Engineering, 2013, 32(6): 216-221. (in Chinese) https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SFXB201306036.htm
[10] 李新宇, 方坤河. 混凝土渗透溶蚀过程中钙离子迁移过程数值模拟[J]. 长江科学院院报, 2008, 25(6): 96-100. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-CJKB200806022.htm LI Xinyu, FANG Kunhe. Numerical simulation of Ca-ion transportation during concrete leaching dissolution[J]. Journal of Yangtze River Scientific Research Institute, 2008, 25(6): 96-100. (in Chinese) https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-CJKB200806022.htm
[11] 霍吉祥, 苏社教, 马福恒, 等. 坝基帷幕防渗性能衰减的数值模拟[J]. 武汉大学学报(工学版), 2018, 51(1): 21-26. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-WSDD201801003.htm HUO Jixiang, SU Shejiao, MA Fuheng, et al. Numerical simulation of anti-seepage performance attenuation of dam curtain[J]. Engineering Journal of Wuhan University, 2018, 51(1): 21-26. (in Chinese) https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-WSDD201801003.htm
[12] 张开来, 沈振中, 徐力群, 等. 考虑渗透溶蚀作用的防渗帷幕耐久性控制指标[J]. 水利学报, 2020, 51(2): 169-179. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SLXB202002005.htm ZHANG Kailai, SHEN Zhenzhong, XU Liqun, et al. Durability control index of anti-seepage curtain considering the effect of advection-diffusion-driven leaching[J]. Journal of Hydraulic Engineering, 2020, 51(2): 169-179. (in Chinese) https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SLXB202002005.htm
[13] GÉRARD B, LE BELLEGO C, BERNARD O. Simplified modelling of calcium leaching of concrete in various environments[J]. Materials and Structures, 2002, 35(10): 632-640. doi: 10.1007%2FBF02480356.pdf
[14] YOKOZEKI K, WATANABE K, SAKATA N, et al. Modeling of leaching from cementitious materials used in underground environment[J]. Applied Clay Science, 2004, 26(1/2/3/4): 293-308. http://www.onacademic.com/detail/journal_1000035368217710_686e.html
[15] NAKARAI K, ISHIDA T, MAEKAWA K. Modeling of calcium leaching from cement hydrates coupled with micro-pore formation[J]. Journal of Advanced Concrete Technology, 2006, 4(3): 395-407. http://www.researchgate.net/profile/Koichi_Maekawa2/publication/228652993_Modeling_of_Calcium_Leaching_from_Cement_Hydrates_Coupled_with_Micro-Pore_Formation/links/547d0d850cf285ad5b0889b1.pdf
[16] 庞晓贇, 李乐, 桂强, 等. 沉管隧道壁中热-水-离子传输过程[J]. 硅酸盐学报, 2015, 43(2): 144-151. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-GXYB201502004.htm PANG Xiaoyun, LI Le, GUI Qiang, et al. Thermo-hydro-ionic transport in walls of sea immerged tube tunnel[J]. Journal of the Chinese Ceramic Society, 2015, 43(2): 144-151. (in Chinese) https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-GXYB201502004.htm
[17] 贾攀, 佘成学. 水泥基材料渗透溶蚀有限元模拟方法[J]. 长江科学院院报, 2019, 36(5): 108-115. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-CJKB201905022.htm JIA Pan, SHE Chengxue. Finite element modeling of leakage dissolution of cement-based materials[J]. Journal of Yangtze River Scientific Research Institute, 2019, 36(5): 108-115. (in Chinese) https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-CJKB201905022.htm
[18] PHUNG Q T, MAES N, JACQUES D, et al. Modelling the evolution of microstructure and transport properties of cement pastes under conditions of accelerated leaching[J]. Construction and Building Materials, 2016, 115: 179-192. http://d.wanfangdata.com.cn/periodical/51e24e4ffd3ba5f09cd2f24d4416ed6d
[19] HUO J X, MA F H, JI X L. Porosity and permeability variations of a dam curtain during dissolution[J]. Water Science and Engineering, 2019, 12(2): 155-161. http://doc.paperpass.com/foreign/rgArti2019327340760.html
[20] 王晓梅, 李克非. 水泥基材料裂隙表面溶蚀过程[J]. 硅酸盐学报, 2011, 39(3): 525-530. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-GXYB201103029.htm WANG Xiaomei, LI Kefei. Leaching behavior of fracture surfaces of cement-based materials[J]. Journal of the Chinese Ceramic Society, 2011, 39(3): 525-530. (in Chinese) https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-GXYB201103029.htm
[21] YOKOZEKI K, WATANABE K, HAYASHI D, et al. Modeling of ion diffusion coefficients in concrete considering with hydration and temperature effects[J]. Doboku Gakkai Ronbunshu, 2003, 2003(725): 131-142. http://www.jstage.jst.go.jp/A_PRedirectJournalInit?sryCd=jscej1984&noVol=2003&noIssue=725&kijiCd=2003_725_131&screenID=AF06S010
[22] COCHEPIN B, TROTIGNON L, BILDSTEIN O, et al. Approaches to modelling coupled flow and reaction in a 2D cementation experiment[J]. Advances in Water Resources, 2008, 31(12): 1540-1551. http://www.sciencedirect.com/science?_ob=ShoppingCartURL&_method=add&_eid=1-s2.0-S0309170808000870&originContentFamily=serial&_origin=article&_ts=1478478978&md5=a4e61695873f2e16559db0b497f1b5c1
-
期刊类型引用(37)
1. 张昌桔，姚言，应宏伟，李冰河. 粉土地层双线平行顶管地面沉降及注浆压力数值研究. 地基处理. 2025(01): 60-68 . 
百度学术
2. 王伟志，刘文壮，李朝煌，徐永福. 软土中浅埋顶管施工变形监测分析. 徐州工程学院学报(自然科学版). 2025(01): 1-6 . 百度学术
3. 张艳辉，纪海霞，程树辉，李张卿. 高密度建成区大型雨水管涵设计要点分析. 市政技术. 2025(04): 197-203 . 百度学术
4. 王开军，张伟，王玮鹏，窦保洋，徐荣超. 超浅覆土大断面矩形顶管近距离双线施工地表沉降规律及加固效果评价. 地质与勘探. 2024(01): 121-131 . 百度学术
5. 付增，范晓冬，魏旭鹏，李鹏，余长益. 基于结构分割法的顶管暗挖地铁站建造技术. 都市快轨交通. 2024(04): 88-95 . 百度学术
6. 万海峰，沈青松. 浅埋矩形顶管整体背土效应理论计算与分析. 市政技术. 2024(09): 129-134 . 百度学术
7. 马晓宾，苏栋，吴永照，吴炯，阳文胜，王雷，陈湘生. 浅埋矩形顶管背土效应全过程理论分析模型. 福州大学学报(自然科学版). 2024(05): 569-576 . 百度学术
8. 王虎，李栋，陈雪华，汪旭. 矩形顶管技术的应用与发展. 施工技术(中英文). 2023(01): 26-32 . 百度学术
9. 戢鸿鑫，刘跃军，张强，刘志寅，安峻彤，王耀正. 浅埋大断面矩形顶管下穿京杭大运河施工关键技术研究. 施工技术(中英文). 2023(07): 39-45 . 百度学术
10. 苏栋，吴炯，王雷，陈湘生，孙波，朱斌. 浅埋超大断面矩形顶管顶进对既有箱涵的影响. 广西大学学报(自然科学版). 2023(01): 1-9 . 百度学术
11. 黄建华，叶剑波. 大断面矩形顶管重力锚固基础力学特性分析. 人民长江. 2023(06): 140-146 . 百度学术
12. 张双茁，高桂庆，赖金星，张健伟，邱军领. MJS不同加固方式对降低顶管施工影响的效果分析. 建筑科学与工程学报. 2023(05): 183-191 . 百度学术
13. 甄亮，张显裕，李晓军. 浅埋矩形顶管整体背土效应判别方法应用与处理措施. 现代隧道技术. 2022(02): 167-171+181 . 百度学术
14. 兰彬，张鹏，张云龙，闫雪峰. 矩形顶管管周差异摩阻力对地层纵向水平位移的影响. 地质科技通报. 2022(03): 215-221 . 百度学术
15. 贾连辉，谌文涛，范磊，袁征. 特大断面矩形隧道掘进机关键系统设计与应用——结合嘉兴市长水路下穿南湖大道项目. 隧道建设(中英文). 2022(05): 917-928 . 百度学术
16. 马鹏，岛田英树，马保松，黄胜，周浩. 矩形顶管关键技术研究现状及发展趋势探讨. 隧道建设(中英文). 2022(10): 1677-1692 . 百度学术
17. 高浩，吴炯，阳文胜，苏栋，吴永照，陈湘生. 隔离墙对顶管顶进背土效应的抑制作用研究. 现代隧道技术. 2022(S1): 1120-1126 . 百度学术
18. 桂林，任睿祺，史培新，刘维. 浅埋矩形顶管施工引起的地层沉降变化规律. 城市轨道交通研究. 2022(12): 94-100 . 百度学术
19. 吴垠龙，刘维，贾鹏蛟，史培新. 矩形顶管近距离上穿既有隧道施工扰动分析. 地下空间与工程学报. 2022(06): 1968-1978 . 百度学术
20. 赵李勇. 浅埋矩形顶管施工顶推力动态监测分析. 建筑机械化. 2021(03): 13-16 . 百度学术
21. 陈志. 软弱地层浅埋矩形顶管沉降控制技术研究. 铁道建筑技术. 2021(08): 144-148 . 百度学术
22. 许有俊，黄正东，张旭，张朝，康佳旺，周薇. 大断面土压平衡矩形顶管多刀盘实测扭矩参数研究. 现代隧道技术. 2021(05): 96-103 . 百度学术
23. 李启旭，龚建伍，霍震. 浅埋矩形顶管施工地表沉降特性试验研究. 土工基础. 2021(06): 801-804 . 百度学术
24. 薛青松. 矩形顶管上穿地铁隧道施工对地表变形影响研究. 山西建筑. 2020(15): 9-11 . 百度学术
25. 李育发，李永江. 包头地下综合管廊矩形顶管施工关键技术及地表变形特征. 内蒙古科技大学学报. 2020(03): 289-293+299 . 百度学术
26. 薛广记，贾连辉，范磊，谌文涛. 大断面矩形掘进机土压平衡控制技术探究. 建筑机械化. 2020(10): 41-45 . 百度学术
27. 程鹏，高毅，于少辉，李洋. 结构分割转换工法结构体系安全性分析. 隧道建设(中英文). 2019(03): 435-443 . 百度学术
28. 苏明浩，高毅，程鹏. 关于结构分割转换工法不同分割方式的探讨. 隧道建设(中英文). 2019(03): 444-450 . 百度学术
29. 贺善宁，豆小天，赵李勇，崔现慧，王晋波，宝青峰. 浅埋矩形顶管群密贴施工的顶推力分析研究. 隧道建设(中英文). 2019(03): 383-390 . 百度学术
30. 高毅，冯超元，程鹏. 结构分割转换工法在地下空间开发中的应用及设想. 隧道建设(中英文). 2019(03): 398-406 . 百度学术
31. 豆小天，王贺昆，曹伟明，王晋波，赵李勇，冉敬鹏. 浅埋矩形顶管整体背土效应的原因分析与处理措施. 隧道建设(中英文). 2019(03): 473-479 . 百度学术
32. 李洋，高毅，于少辉，程鹏，罗雨田. 结构分割转换工法在地下车库建设中的应用研究. 隧道建设(中英文). 2019(03): 488-495 . 百度学术
33. 高毅，于少辉，李洋，程鹏，罗雨田，冯超元. 大型地下空间的结构分割转换工法研究. 隧道建设(中英文). 2019(03): 480-487 . 百度学术
34. 李鹏，李洋，高毅，于少辉，李应飞. 基于“CC工法”的顶管隧道施工地表变形规律分析与研究. 隧道建设(中英文). 2019(11): 1838-1847 . 百度学术
35. 申洋，穆保岗. 矩形顶管施工对邻近基桩的附加荷载分析. 地下空间与工程学报. 2018(S2): 781-787+820 . 百度学术
36. 苏明浩，程鹏，高毅，于少辉，李洋. 基于CC工法建造的地下结构受力分析. 隧道建设(中英文). 2018(S2): 136-143 . 百度学术
37. 李永平，白静. 输电隧道浅埋矩形顶管在砂类土下的数值模拟分析. 内蒙古电力技术. 2018(06): 86-89 . 百度学术
其他类型引用(10)
-
其他相关附件
计量
- 文章访问数: 288
- HTML全文浏览量: 37
- PDF下载量: 97
- 被引次数: 47
