• Scopus数据库收录期刊
  • 中国科技核心期刊
  • 全国中文核心期刊
  • 美国工程索引(EI)收录期刊

罗闸河二级水电站拱坝右岸边坡变形破坏机制研究及治理后评估

曾锃, 赵树祥, 葛龙进, 潘卫平, 李敏, 殷国峰

曾锃, 赵树祥, 葛龙进, 潘卫平, 李敏, 殷国峰. 罗闸河二级水电站拱坝右岸边坡变形破坏机制研究及治理后评估[J]. 岩土工程学报, 2021, 43(S1): 171-175. DOI: 10.11779/CJGE2021S1031
引用本文: 曾锃, 赵树祥, 葛龙进, 潘卫平, 李敏, 殷国峰. 罗闸河二级水电站拱坝右岸边坡变形破坏机制研究及治理后评估[J]. 岩土工程学报, 2021, 43(S1): 171-175. DOI: 10.11779/CJGE2021S1031
ZENG Zeng, ZHAO Shu-xiang, Ge Long-jin, PAN Wei-ping, LI Min, YIN Guo-feng. Failure mechanism of deformation and evaluation of treatment effect of high slope at right bank of Luozha RiverⅡHydropower Station[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2021, 43(S1): 171-175. DOI: 10.11779/CJGE2021S1031
Citation: ZENG Zeng, ZHAO Shu-xiang, Ge Long-jin, PAN Wei-ping, LI Min, YIN Guo-feng. Failure mechanism of deformation and evaluation of treatment effect of high slope at right bank of Luozha RiverⅡHydropower Station[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2021, 43(S1): 171-175. DOI: 10.11779/CJGE2021S1031

罗闸河二级水电站拱坝右岸边坡变形破坏机制研究及治理后评估  English Version

基金项目: 

国家自然科学基金项目 51979225

国家自然科学基金项目 51679199

详细信息
    作者简介:

    曾锃(1982— ),男,博士,高级工程师,主要从事水利水电工程勘测设计、建设管理及岩土力学特性方面的研究工作。E-mail:autogerry@163.com

  • 中图分类号: TU43

Failure mechanism of deformation and evaluation of treatment effect of high slope at right bank of Luozha RiverⅡHydropower Station

  • 摘要: 2013年,罗闸河二级水电站大坝拱肩开挖导致右岸高边坡出现局部滑坡事故和更大范围内的松动等诸多安全隐患,需治理。针对此类问题的共性及本边坡的特点,研究综合采用预应力锚索“锁脚”、土钉+挂网喷混凝土“护体”、内嵌软式排水管“降压”的方案对边坡进行加固。经日常巡视,以及对边坡位移、地下水位、锚索受力情况的监测,综合分析、验证了防渗处理的合理性、有效性,同时给出了管理维护的建议。该边坡于2014年治理完成,5 a来受6级以上地震影响3次,并经历2018年7.18暴雨,至今运行良好,对类似边坡的治理有一定的指导意义。
    Abstract: In 2013, the excavation of the arch abutment of dam of Luozha River II Hydropower Station caused many hidden safety hazards such as local landslide accidents and wider loosening of the high slope at the right bank, which needed to be treated.In view of the commonality of such problems and the characteristics of this slope, the scheme of "locking feet" by prestressed anchor cable, "protection" by soil nailing+hanging net sprayed concrete, and "pressure reduction" by built-in soft drainage pipe is used to reinforce the slope.After daily inspections and the monitoring of slope displacement, groundwater level and stresses on anchor cables, the comprehensive analysis and verification of the rationality and effectiveness of the antiseepage treatment are given, and the management and maintenance recommendations are also put forward.The slope treatment was completed in 2014.It had been affected by the earthquakes of magnitude 6 or above three times in the past five years, and experienced heavy rains on July 18, 2018.It has been running well so far, which has certain guiding significance for the treatment of similar slopes.
  • 图  1   滑坡原状图

    Figure  1.   Original landslide

    图  2   滑坡体及影响范围

    Figure  2.   Landslide body and affected area

    图  3   主滑断面及支护方案

    Figure  3.   Main sliding section and support plan

    图  4   多点位移计监测成果

    Figure  4.   Monitoring results of multi-point displacement meter

    图  5   锚索测力计监测成果(1038 m高程)

    Figure  5.   Monitoring results of anchor cable dynamometer

    图  6   地下水监测成果

    Figure  6.   Monitoring results of groundwater

    表  2   各工况边坡安全系数计算成果

    Table  2   Safety factor of slope under different working conditions

    工况边坡稳定性系数边坡稳定安全系数滑逸前缘
    11-10.95 <不支护,继续开挖1.2(施工期)坝顶高程以下(挖哪,滑哪)
    1-2≥1.24先完成支护,再开挖1025高程左右
    1-3≥1.29先部分支护,开挖,再支护1022高程左右(滑弧较1-2略深)
    21.41拱坝完建+设计洪水位1.3(正常运行工况)坝顶高程以上
    31.15死水位+遭遇7°地震1.1(非正常运行工况)坝顶高程以下至死水位之间
    下载: 导出CSV

    表  1   各岩土材料饱和状态下物理力学参数

    Table  1   Mechanical parameters of geotechnical materials

    地层分类重度γ/(kN·m-3)c/kPaφ/(°)
    湿饱和
    覆盖层(土石混合)1010 m高程以下17.918.216.4733.7
    1010~1050 m高程17.618.015.6532.3
    1050 m高程以上17.017.515.2230.8
    强风化层20.021.010030.0
    弱风化层21.722.922045.0
    微风化层23.624.135050.0 
    下载: 导出CSV
  • [1] 王浩, 王晓东, 泮俊. 超高路堑边坡治理工程案例研究Ⅰ:边坡失稳机制模拟分析[J]. 岩石力学与工程学报, 2017, 36(4): 899-909. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-YSLX201704014.htm

    WANG Hao WANG Xiao-dong PAN Jun. A case study of super-high cut slopeⅠ: simulation and analysis of instability mechanism of slopes[J]. Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering, 2017, 36(4): 899-909. (in Chinese) https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-YSLX201704014.htm

    [2] 王浩, 王晓东, 泮俊. 超高路堑边坡治理工程案例研究Ⅱ:治理对策及其过程控制[J]. 岩石力学与工程学报, 2017, 36(5): 1152-1161. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-YSLX201705011.htm

    WANG Hao, WANG Xiaodong, PAN Jun. A case study of super-high cut slopeⅡ: stabilization measures and their process controls[J]. Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering, 2017, 36(5): 1152-1161. (in Chinese) https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-YSLX201705011.htm

    [3] 薛海斌, 张聪敏, 党发宁, 等. 考虑参数时空演化规律的黄土边坡极限平衡分析法研究[J]. 岩土工程学报, 2018, 40(增刊2): 162-166. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-YTGC2018S2035.htm

    XUE Hai-bin, ZHANG Cong-min, DANG Fa-ning, et al. Limit equilibrium analysis method for loess slopes considering spatial-temporal evolution laws of parameters[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2018, 40(S2): 162-166. (in Chinese) https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-YTGC2018S2035.htm

    [4] 郑颖人, 赵尚毅. 有限元强度折减法在土坡与岩坡中的应用[J]. 岩石力学与工程学报, 2004, 23(19): 3381-3388. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-YSLX200419037.htm

    ZHENG Ying-ren, ZHAO Shang-yi. Application of strength reduction fem in soil and rock slope[J]. Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering, 2004, 23(19): 3381-3388. (in Chinese) https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-YSLX200419037.htm

    [5] 孙云春, 谭志伟, 董泽荣, 等. 临沧市罗闸河二级水电站安全监测系统工程工程竣工验收报告[R]. 昆明: 中国电建集团昆明勘测设计研究院有限公司, 2017.

    SUN Yun-chun, TAN Zhi-wei, DONG Ze-rong, etal. Completion Acceptance Report of Safety Monitoring System Project of Luozha River II Hydropower Station in Lincang City[R]. Kunming: PowerChinaKunmingSurvey, Designand Research Institute Co, Ltd, 2017. (in Chinese)

图(6)  /  表(2)
计量
  • 文章访问数: 
  • HTML全文浏览量:  0
  • PDF下载量: 
  • 被引次数: 0
出版历程
  • 收稿日期:  2020-12-14
  • 网络出版日期:  2022-12-05
  • 刊出日期:  2021-06-30

目录

    /

    返回文章
    返回