• 全国中文核心期刊
  • 中国科技核心期刊
  • 美国工程索引(EI)收录期刊
  • Scopus数据库收录期刊

临岸深筒形基坑支护结构整体抗倾覆稳定计算方法

王成华, 桂玉倩

王成华, 桂玉倩. 临岸深筒形基坑支护结构整体抗倾覆稳定计算方法[J]. 岩土工程学报, 2021, 43(7): 1367-1372. DOI: 10.11779/CJGE202107024
引用本文: 王成华, 桂玉倩. 临岸深筒形基坑支护结构整体抗倾覆稳定计算方法[J]. 岩土工程学报, 2021, 43(7): 1367-1372. DOI: 10.11779/CJGE202107024
WANG Cheng-hua, GUI Yu-qian. A method for analyzing anti-overturning stability of global retaining structures for deep slender foundation pits near bank slopes[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2021, 43(7): 1367-1372. DOI: 10.11779/CJGE202107024
Citation: WANG Cheng-hua, GUI Yu-qian. A method for analyzing anti-overturning stability of global retaining structures for deep slender foundation pits near bank slopes[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2021, 43(7): 1367-1372. DOI: 10.11779/CJGE202107024

临岸深筒形基坑支护结构整体抗倾覆稳定计算方法  English Version

基金项目: 

国家自然科学基金项目 51478313

国家自然科学基金项目 50978182

详细信息
    作者简介:

    王成华(1959— ),男,工学博士,教授,主要从事岩土工程方面的教学与科研工作。E-mail:chwang@tju.edu.cn

  • 中图分类号: TU470

A method for analyzing anti-overturning stability of global retaining structures for deep slender foundation pits near bank slopes

  • 摘要: 临近岸坡的深筒形基坑支护结构有发生整体倾覆破坏的可能性。通过室内模型试验与有限元数值模拟对倾覆破坏形式进行了研究,并提出了砂性土中支护结构整体抗倾覆稳定安全系数的计算方法。该计算方法考虑了支护结构空间效应、坑内及坑外临岸坡侧有限土压力的影响。通过实例计算发现,临岸深筒形基坑支护结构整体抗倾覆稳定安全系数随土的重度、内摩擦角的增大而增大;岸坡距离结构越远、坡角越小、坡深越小,结构越安全;远离岸坡侧坑外超载值越大,结构越不安全;当结构与岸坡距离、岸坡高度达到一定值时,基坑支护结构整体抗倾覆稳定安全系数趋于稳定。
    Abstract: The retaining structures for deep slender foundation pits near bank slopes are likely to overturn globally. The overturning failure mode is studied through indoor model tests and finite element numerical simulation, and a new method for analyzing the factor of safety of anti-overturning of retaining structures in sandy soils is suggested. The spatial effects of a retaining structure for a deep slender foundation pit as well as the influences of the earth pressures from the limited soil masses both inside and outside the pit are taken into account in the calculation of the factor of safety. From the calculated results of some exemples, it is found that the factor of safety of anti-overturning stability increases with the unit weight and the angle of internal friction of the soil. The further the bank slope is away from the retaining structures, the smaller the slope angle and the shallower the slope, the larger the factor of safety of the structures is. The larger the value of the surcharge loading on the side away from the bank slope is, the unsafer the structures are. However, when the distance between the structures and the bank and the slope depth reach respectively their certain values, the factor safety will be a constant value.
  • 图  1   临岸基坑室内模型设置

    Figure  1.   Schematic diagram of setup for model pit near bank

    图  2   基坑支护结构顶部变形

    Figure  2.   Deformation at the top of retaining structure

    图  3   临岸基坑有限元数值分析模型

    Figure  3.   Finite element mesh for model pit near bank

    图  4   支护结构整体侧倾形态

    Figure  4.   State of tilting of global retaining structures

    图  5   支护结构各侧土压力

    Figure  5.   Earth pressures at each side

    图  6   不同插入深度比值的旋转中心位置

    Figure  6.   Rotating centres at different penetration ratios

    图  7   支护结构倾覆破坏分析模式

    Figure  7.   Mode for analyzing overturning failure of retaining structures

    图  8   C侧坑外土压力计算示意

    Figure  8.   Schematics for computation of earth pressure outside side C

    图  9   坑外土压力平面分布

    Figure  9.   Distribution of planar earth pressure outside a pit

    图  10   坑内土压力平面分布

    Figure  10.   Distribution of planar earth pressure inside a pit

    图  11   砂土重度、内摩擦角对安全系数Kc的影响

    Figure  11.   Influences of unit weight, internal friction angle of sand soil on factor of safety

    图  12   岸坡坡角、坡深对安全系数Kc的影响

    Figure  12.   Influences of slope angle, slope depth of a bank on the factor of safety

    图  13   支护结构顶部与岸坡距离对安全系数Kc的影响

    Figure  13.   Influences of distance between top of retaining structures and crest of a slope on factor of safety

    图  14   超载对安全系数Kc的影响

    Figure  14.   Influences of surcharge loading on factor of safety

    表  1   试验材料参数

    Table  1   Parameters of materials

    试验材料弹性模量E/MPa泊松比ν 重度γ/(kN·m-3)内摩擦角φ/(°)孔隙比e
    细砂600.3014.532.610.78
    有机玻璃板30000.3712.0
    下载: 导出CSV
  • [1]

    FAHEEM H, CAI F, UGAI K. Three-dimensional base stability of rectangular excavations in soft soils using FEM[J]. Computers and Geotechnics, 2004, 31(2): 67-74. doi: 10.1016/j.compgeo.2004.02.005

    [2] 龚维明, 李辉, 陈晓东. 井筒式地下连续墙基础试验研究[C]//第十届土力学与岩土工程学术会议论文集. 重庆: 重庆大学出版社, 2007: 213-218.

    GONG Wei-ming, LI Hui, CHEN Xiao-dong. Model test research on closed diaphragm wall[C]//Proceedings of the 10th Academic Conference on Soil Mechanics and Geotechnical Engineering. Chongqing: Chongqing University Press, 2007: 213-218. (in Chinese)

    [3] 戴国亮, 龚维明, 周香琴, 等. 单室井筒式地下连续墙水平承载力试验与计算方法研究[J]. 建筑结构学报, 2012, 33(9): 67-73. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-JZJB201209009.htm

    DAI Guo-liang, GONG Wei-ming, ZHOU Xiang-qin, et al. Experiment and analysis on horizontal bearing capacity of single- chamber closed diaphragm wall[J]. Journal of Building Structures, 2012, 33(9): 67-73. (in Chinese) https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-JZJB201209009.htm

    [4] 王洪新. 基坑宽度对围护结构稳定性的影响[J]. 土木工程学报, 2011, 44(6): 120-126. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-TMGC201106019.htm

    WANG Hong-xin. Influence of excavation width on enclosure-structure stability of foundation pits[J]. China Civil Engineering Journal, 2011, 44(6): 120-126. (in Chinese) https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-TMGC201106019.htm

    [5] 高印立. 极限分析法计算有限范围土体土压力[J]. 建筑结构, 2001, 31(8): 66-68. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-JCJG200108018.htm

    GAO Yin-li. Calculation of finite earth pressure with limit analysis method[J]. Building Structure, 2001, 31(8): 66-68. (in Chinese) https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-JCJG200108018.htm

    [6] 王成华, 桂玉倩. 有限土体土压力计算方法研究进展综述[M]//土木工程新材料、新技术及其工程应用交流会论文集. 北京: 工业建筑杂志社, 2019: 1049-1058.

    WANG Cheng-hua, GUI Yu-qian. Review on research progress of calculation methods for soil pressure of finite soil[M]//Proc of New Material, Techniques and Their Applications in Civil Engineering. Beijing: Industrial Construction Press, 2019: 1049-1058. (in Chinese)

  • 期刊类型引用(4)

    1. 许旭堂,陈翔龙,杨枫,鲜振兴,徐祥. 循环荷载对充填结构面岩体剪切特性的影响. 长安大学学报(自然科学版). 2025(01): 24-37 . 百度学术
    2. 杜淼然,尹培杰,张越,晏长根,欧运起,付弘哲. 基于分形特征的3D打印岩石结构面剪切特性研究. 工程地质学报. 2025(02): 458-470 . 百度学术
    3. 班力壬,杜伟升,候宇航,戚承志,陶志刚. 考虑实际接触三维粗糙度退化的软岩节理剪胀规律预测模型. 岩土工程学报. 2024(05): 1008-1017 . 本站查看
    4. 焦峰,许江,彭守建,何美鑫,张心睿,程亮. 常法向刚度条件下人工结构面剪切力学特性及损伤演化规律试验研究. 煤炭学报. 2023(11): 4065-4077 . 百度学术

    其他类型引用(7)

图(14)  /  表(1)
计量
  • 文章访问数:  259
  • HTML全文浏览量:  18
  • PDF下载量:  190
  • 被引次数: 11
出版历程
  • 收稿日期:  2020-05-03
  • 网络出版日期:  2022-12-02
  • 刊出日期:  2021-06-30

目录

    /

    返回文章
    返回