Experimental investigations on influences of ground loss on earth pressure and settlement of adjecent underground retaining structures
-
摘要: 城市浅层空间隧道往往从一侧或两侧地下挡土结构物之间穿过,多数情况下会引起地层损失。目前城市地下开挖引起塌陷事故呈现逐年增多的趋势,当地层损失产生后,周边已建或在建基坑挡土结构的土压力和地层沉降发展规律是决定是否需要进行加固或处理的依据。为了获取地层损失的扰动影响规律,开发了模型试验装置与钢棒相似土技术,采用活动门下沉模拟地下开挖引起的地层损失,采用挡墙平移模拟基坑开挖。分别考虑活动门深度与宽度比、活动门位置深度与距离比、活动门位置深度与侧限宽度比,开展了15组二维模型试验。利用挡土板上的18块悬臂式载荷计测得挡土结构土压力,采用粒子图像测速技术获取表面沉降曲线。结果表明：地层损失会使邻近基坑挡墙上部土压力增加,下部土压力减小；地层损失发生后,邻近的新建基坑如继续进行开挖施工,由于土体受到了充分的扰动,挡土结构底部不会出现土压力减小的箱槽效应,挡墙平移达到主动极限状态时的土压力分布与库仑主动土压力较为吻合；邻近地下开挖引起地层损失与挡墙平移的叠加效应影响下,地表沉降最大值和曲线曲率随活动门宽度增加而增加,随活动门距离和侧限宽度减小而增加。由于采用钢棒相似土,所获得的研究成果主要反映砂土地层的土压力与变形特性。Abstract: Underground excavations often pass through underground retaining structures on one side or between the structures. In most cases, ground loss will be caused. At present, there are more and more collapses caused by excavation. When the ground loss occurs, the development of earth pressure and ground settlement is the decision basis for structural reinforcement or treatment. To obtain the preliminary rules of disturbance influences of the ground loss, the model test setup and the steel rod analogical soil technology are developed. A trapdoor is used to simulate the stratum loss caused by underground excavation and collapse, and the foundation pit excavation is simplified as the translation of the retaining wall. Considering the ratios of trapdoor depth to width, trapdoor depth to distance and trapdoor depth to side limit width, 15 groups of two-dimensional model tests are carried out. The earth pressure of retaining structures is measured by 18 cantilevered loaders on the retaining plate, and the surface settlement curve is obtained by the particle image velocimetry. The results show that ground loss increases the earth pressure at the upper part of the retaining wall and decreases the earth pressure at the lower part of the retaining wall. After the occurrence of the ground loss, if the adjacent foundation pit continues being excavated, due to the disturbance of the soil, there is no "bin effect" of the decrease of the earth pressure at the bottom of the retaining structures, and the earth pressure distribution when the retaining wall translation reaches the active limit state is in good agreement with the Coulomb’s active earth pressure. Under the influences of the superposition effect of the translation of the retaining wall after the ground loss caused by the adjacent underground excavation, the maximum value of surface settlement and the curvature of curve increase with the increase of trapdoor width, and increase with the decrease of trapdoor distance and side limit width. Due to the use of steel rod analogical soil, the test results mainly reflect the earth pressure and deformation characteristics of the sandy soil.
-
Keywords:
- tunnel excavation /
- ground loss /
- retaining structure /
- surface settlement /
- model test /
- analogical soil
-
-
![]()
图 5 不同侧限宽度墙后土体剪应变云图
Figure 5. Development of shear strain with different side limit widths
![]()
图 7 不同活动门位置深度与宽度比下土压力分布
Figure 7. Distribution of earth pressure under different ratios of trapdoor depth to width
![]()
图 8 不同活动门位置深度与距离比下土压力分布
Figure 8. Distribution of earth pressure under different ratios of trapdoor depth to distance
![]()
图 9 不同活动门位置深度与侧限宽度比下土压力分布
Figure 9. Distribution of earth pressure under different ratios of trapdoor depth to side limit width
![]()
图 11 挡墙平移过程中表面沉降曲线
Figure 11. Curves of surface settlement during translation of retaining wall
![]()
图 12 不同塌陷位置深度与宽度比表面沉降曲线
Figure 12. Curves of surface settlement under different ratios of trapdoor depth to width
![]()
图 13 不同活动门位置深度与活动门距离比表面沉降曲线
Figure 13. Curves of surface settlement under different ratios of trapdoor depth to distance
![]()
图 14 不同活动门位置深度与侧限宽度比表面沉降曲线
Figure 14. Surface settlement curves under different ratios of trapdoor depth to side limit width
表 1 试验安排
Table 1 Test arrangements
编号 活动门深度H/mm 侧限宽度w/mm 活动门宽度B/mm 活动门距离s/mm H/w H/B H/s Vl W1 600 600 75 225 1 8 2.67 0.68 W2 600 600 75 150 1 8 4 0.68 W3 600 600 75 75 1 8 8 0.68 W4 600 600 150 225 1 4 2.67 0.34 W5 600 600 150 150 1 4 4 0.34 W6 600 600 150 75 1 4 8 0.34 W7 600 600 225 150 1 2.67 4 0.23 W8 600 600 225 75 1 2.67 8 0.23 W9 600 450 75 150 1.3 8 4 0.68 W10 600 450 75 75 1.3 8 8 0.68 W11 600 450 150 150 1.3 4 4 0.34 W12 600 450 150 75 1.3 4 8 0.34 W13 600 450 225 75 1.3 2.67 8 0.23 W14 600 300 75 75 2 8 8 0.68 W15 600 300 150 75 2 4 8 0.34 
下载: 导出CSV
-
[1] 那晓云, 于军, 王宝军. 地基附加应力分布对城市路面塌陷的影响[J]. 公路, 2019, 64(2): 8-12. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-GLGL201902063.htm NA Xiao-yun, YU Jun, WANG Bao-jun. Influence of additional stress distribution of foundation on urban road surface collapse[J]. Highway, 2019, 64(2): 8-12. (in Chinese) https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-GLGL201902063.htm
[2] 宋二祥, 徐明, 吴志轩, 等. 某盾构施工岩溶场地地面塌陷机理和数值分析[J]. 地下空间与工程学报, 2019, 15(6): 1874-1880. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-BASE201906035.htm SONG Er-xiang, XU Ming, WU Zhi-xuan, et al. Mechanism analysis and numerical simulation of ground collapse in a karst site under shield tunneling construction[J]. Chinese Journal of Underground Space and Engineering, 2019, 15(6): 1874-1880. (in Chinese) https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-BASE201906035.htm
[3] 张成平, 张顶立, 王梦恕, 等. 城市隧道施工诱发的地面塌陷灾变机制及其控制[J]. 岩土力学, 2010, 31(增刊1): 303-309. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-YTLX2010S1050.htm ZHANG Cheng-ping, ZHANG Ding-li, WANG Meng-shu, et al. Catastrophe mechanism and control technology of ground collapse induced by urban tunneling[J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2010, 31(S1): 303-309. (in Chinese) https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-YTLX2010S1050.htm
[4] 殷跃平, 张作辰, 张开军. 中国地面沉降现状及防治对策研究[J]. 中国地质灾害与防治学报, 2005(2): 1-8. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1003-8035.2005.02.001 YING Yue-ping, ZHANG Zuo-chen, ZHANG Kai-jun. Land subsidence and countermeasures for its prevention in China[J]. The Chinese Journal of Geological Hazard and Control, 2005(2): 1-8. (in Chinese) doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1003-8035.2005.02.001
[5] PECK R B. Deep excavations and tunneling in soft ground[C]//Proceedings of the 7th International Conference of Soil Mechanics & Foundation Engineering, State of the Art Volume. Balkema A A, 1969, Mexico: 225-290.
[6] BRYSON L S. Performance of a Stiff Excavation Support System in Soft Clay and the Response of An Adjacent Building[D]. Illinois: Northwestern University, 2002.
[7] JENCK O, DIAS D. 3D-finite difference analysis of the interaction between concrete building and shallow tunneling[J]. Géotechnique, 2004, 54(8): 519-528. doi: 10.1680/geot.2004.54.8.519
[8] 徐中华, 宗露丹, 沈健, 等. 邻近地铁隧道的软土深基坑变形实测分析[J]. 岩土工程学报, 2019, 41(增刊1): 41-44. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-YTGC2019S1012.htm XU Zhong-hua, ZONG Lu-dan, SHEN Jian, et al. Deformation of a deep excavation adjacent to metro tunnels in soft soils[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2019, 41(S1): 41-44. (in Chinese) https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-YTGC2019S1012.htm
[9] 张治国, 黄茂松, 王卫东. 隧道开挖对层状地基中邻近管道影响的DCBEM-FEM耦合方法[J]. 岩土工程学报, 2011, 33(10): 1554-1561. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-YTGC201110013.htm ZHANG Zhi-guo, HUANG Mao-song, WANG Wei-dong. DCBEM-FEM coupling method for response analysis of adjacent pipelines due to tunneling[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2011, 33(10): 1554-1561. (in Chinese) https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-YTGC201110013.htm
[10] 施成华, 彭立敏, 刘宝琛. 浅埋隧道开挖对地表建筑物的影响[J]. 岩石力学与工程学报, 2004, 23(19): 3310-3316. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-YSLX200419021.htm SHI Cheng-hua, PENG Li-min, LIU Bao-chen. Influence of shallow tunnel excavation on ground surface buildings[J]. Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering, 2004, 23(19): 3310-3316. (in Chinese) https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-YSLX200419021.htm
[11] 芮瑞, 何清, 陈成, 等. 盾构穿越临近地下挡土结构土压力及沉降影响模型试验[J]. 岩土工程学报, 2020, 42(5): 864-872. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-YTGC202005012.htm RUI Rui, HE Qing, CHEN Cheng, et al. Model tests on earth pressure and settlement of shield tunnel crossing adjacent underground retaining structures[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2020, 42(5): 864-872. (in Chinese) https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-YTGC202005012.htm
[12] 芮瑞, 叶雨秋, 陈成, 等. 考虑墙壁摩擦影响的挡土墙主动土压力非线性分布研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(5): 1797-1804. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-YTLX201905020.htm RUI Rui, YE Yu-qiu, CHEN Cheng, et al. Nonlinear distribution of active earth pressure on retaining wall considering wall-soil friction[J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2019, 40(5): 1797-1804. (in Chinese) https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-YTLX201905020.htm
[13] WHITE D J, TAKE W A, BOLTON M D. Soil deformation measurement using particle image velocimetry (PIV) and photogrammetry[J]. Géotechnique, 2003, 53(7): 619-631.
[14] RUI R, ZHAI Y X, HAN J, et al. Deformations in trapdoor tests and piled embankments[J]. Geosynthetics International, 2020, 27(2): 219-235.
[15] JAKY J. The coefficient of earth pressure at rest[J]. Journal of the Society of Hungarian Architects and Engineers, 1944, 78(22): 355-358.
[16] JENSSEN H A. Versuche uber getreidedruck in silozellen[J]. Verein Deutscher Ingenieure, 1895, 39: 1045-1049.
[17] HANDY L R. The arch in soil arching[J]. Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 1985, 111(3): 302-318.
[18] HARROP-WILLIAMS K O. Geostatic wall pressures[J]. Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 1989, 115(9): 1321-1325.
[19] PAIK K H, SALGADO R. Estimation of active earth pressure against rigid retaining walls considering arching effects[J]. Géotechnique, 2003, 53(7): 643-654.
计量
- 文章访问数:
- HTML全文浏览量: 0
- PDF下载量:
