Seismic response of small-radius planar curved tunnels
-
摘要: 基于某实际工程,建立了小半径平面曲线隧道三维分析模型,探讨其在单向水平激振下的地震响应规律。其中考虑了隧道弯曲角度、地震动幅值和类型等因素的影响。通过分析得出了小半径平面曲线隧道的地震响应规律:①响应幅值方面,横向抗震段的响应最大,曲线段其次,纵向抗震段最小;②响应差异方面,曲线部分对隧道加速度影响较小,主要影响隧道的变形;③震动能量方面,随着隧道从横向抗震逐渐过渡到纵向抗震,其震动能量逐渐降低。Abstract: A three-dimensional model for small-radius planar curved tunnels with different bending angles is established to investigate their seismic response. The influences of bending angle, amplitude and type of ground motion are considered. The seismic response laws of the small-radius planar curved tunnels are obtained: (1) For the response amplitude, the transverse seismic section is the largest, the curve section is the second, and the longitudinal seismic section is the least. (2) For the response difference, the curve part has little effect on tunnel acceleration, which mainly affects the deformation of tunnel; (3) For the vibration energy, the energy decreases gradually with the transition from transverse seismic section to longitudinal one.
-
Keywords:
- small radius /
- curved tunnel /
- bending angle /
- seismic response /
- numerical calculation
-
[1] 刘晶波, 李彬. 地铁地下结构抗震分析及设计中的几个关键问题[J]. 土木工程学报, 2006, 39(6): 106-110.
(LIU Jing-bo, LI Bin.Issues on the seismic analysis and design of subway structures[J]. China Civil Engineering Journal, 2006, 39(6): 106-110. (in Chinese))[2] 陶连金, 王文沛, 张波, 等. 竖向强震作用下密贴地铁地下交叉结构动力响应分析[J]. 岩土工程学报, 2012, 34(3): 433-437.
(TAO Lian-jin, WANG Wen-pei, ZHANG Bo.Dynamic response of closely-attached intersecting underground subway structures under vertical strong ground motion[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2012, 34(3): 433-437. (in Chinese))[3] HUO H, BOBET A, FERNANDEZ G.et al.Load transfer mechanisms between underground structure and surrounding ground: Evaluation of the failure of the Daikai station[J]. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, 2005, 131(12): 1522-1533. [4] 周彦良. 曲线隧道的地震响应特性及抗震减震方法研究[D].西安科技大学, 2013.
(ZHOU Yan-liang.Study on seismic response properties and anti-seismic and seismic-relieving measures of curved tunnel[D]. Xi'an: Xi'an University of Science and Technology, 2013. (in Chinese))[5] 周彦良, 戴俊, 曹东. 曲线隧道的震害机理及抗震分析方法探讨[J]. 公路交通技术, 2013(2): 107-110.
(ZHOU Yan-liang, DAI Jun, CAO Dong.Discussion on seismic damage mechanism and seismic analysis method of curvedd tunnel[J]. Technology of Highway and Transport, 2013(2): 107-110. (in Chinese))[6] ZHUANG Hai-yang, HU Zhong-hua, WANG Xue-jian, et al.Seismic responses of a large underground structure in liquefied soils by FEM numerical modeling[J]. Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering, 2015, 13(12): 3645-3668. [7] 安军海, 陶连金, 李积栋, 等. 地铁双层交叉隧道非线性地震响应分析[J]. 中国铁道科学, 2015, 36(3): 66-7.
(AN Jun-hai, TAO Lian-jin, LI Ji-dong, et al.Nonlinear seismic response analysis of subway double-decked tunnel[J]. China Railway Science, 2015, 36(3): 66-72. (in Chinese)) -
期刊类型引用(15)
1. 陆勇星. 工序能力指数下尺寸配合关系模糊可靠性研究. 内燃机与配件. 2025(10): 72-74 . 百度学术
2. 李志国,徐涛,刘永杰,赵立春,徐勇超,杨天鸿,郑小斌. 露天矿边坡稳定性的层次分析-模糊综合评价耦合分析. 中国地质灾害与防治学报. 2024(01): 116-123 . 百度学术
3. 孙昊,董清志,刘亚军,夏自卿. 考虑参数模糊性的头道河Ⅱ号滑坡可靠度分析. 土工基础. 2024(04): 660-663 . 百度学术
4. 熊毅,董舒,吴世鹏. 多层边坡可靠度计算随机响应面法及配点方法研究. 采矿技术. 2023(02): 92-98 . 百度学术
5. 张继旭,王林峰,黄晓明,谭国金. 双向地震动的随机性对倾倒式危岩模糊可靠度的影响. 工程科学与技术. 2023(06): 161-171 . 百度学术
6. 夏清,胡超群,宫琦. 某动车组柴田式密接车钩RAMS分析. 铁道技术标准(中英文). 2023(09): 23-32 . 百度学术
7. 仝霄金,丁刚,魏汝明,陈训龙. 双向地震荷载下崩塌堆积体盲数稳定可靠性分析. 地震工程学报. 2022(02): 258-263 . 百度学术
8. 张继旭,王林峰,夏万春. 基于模糊失效准则的危岩稳定可靠度计算. 防灾减灾工程学报. 2022(04): 695-704 . 百度学术
9. 郑捷宁,魏业文. 自然环境输电线及绝缘子覆冰状态多维度评估. 计算机仿真. 2021(01): 88-91+186 . 百度学术
10. 李文剑,潘卫东,李浩军,朱艾路. 地下停车场施工安全评价应用研究. 科技通报. 2021(05): 78-82+88 . 百度学术
11. 吴超瑜,陈文霞,潘健. 两种不同类型土坡的失效风险定量计算方法探讨. 广东水利水电. 2021(06): 1-5 . 百度学术
12. 钱龙,王刚,李梦瑶,李向鹏. 重力坝坝基多斜面抗滑稳定模糊体系可靠度研究. 水利与建筑工程学报. 2020(02): 117-122 . 百度学术
13. 王步云,倪鸣,郭晨,陈波. 短期光伏发电功率区间预测. 电子设计工程. 2019(13): 41-44+48 . 百度学术
14. 陶永霞,秦净净,于洋. 闸室抗滑稳定的模糊随机可靠度分析. 水力发电. 2019(11): 49-52 . 百度学术
15. 曾源林. 关于隶属函数的确定及应用探讨. 智富时代. 2018(10): 173 . 百度学术
其他类型引用(15)