结构性砂土力学特性三维离散元分析

蒋明镜; 石安宁; 刘俊; 张伏光

doi:10.11779/CJGE2019S2001

结构性砂土力学特性三维离散元分析 English Version

蒋明镜^{1, 2, 3, 4},
石安宁^{1, 2},
刘俊^{3, 4},
张伏光⁵

1. 天津大学建筑工程学院土木工程系,天津 300072;
2.天津大学水利工程仿真与安全国家重点实验室,天津 300072;
3. 同济大学土木工程防灾重点实验室,上海 200092;
4. 同济大学地下建筑与工程系,上海 200092;
5. 石家庄铁道大学土木工程学院,河北石家庄 050043

基金项目: 国家自然科学基金重大项目（51890911）; 国家自然科学基金重点项目（51639008）

详细信息

作者简介:
蒋明镜(1965— ),男,教授,博士生导师,主要从事天然结构性黏土、砂土、非饱和土、太空土和深海能源土宏微观试验、本构模型和数值分析研究。E-mail: mingjing.jiang@tju.edu.cn。

计量
- 文章访问数: 0211
- HTML全文浏览量: 0
- PDF下载量: 0171
出版历程
- 收稿日期: 2019-04-29
- 发布日期: 2019-07-19

Three-dimensional distinct element analysis of mechanical properties of structured sands

JIANG Ming-jing^{1, 2, 3, 4},
SHI An-ning^{1, 2},
LIU Jun^{3, 4},
ZHANG Fu-guang⁵

1. Department of Civil Engineering, Tianjin University, Tianjin 300072, China;
2. State Key Laboratory of Hydraulic Engineering Simulation and Safety, Tianjin University, Tianjin 300072, China;
3. State Key Laboratory of Disaster Reduction in Civil Engineering, Tongji University, Shanghai 200092, China;
4. Department of Geotechnical Engineering, Tongji University, Shanghai 200092, China;
5. School of Civil Engineering, Shijiazhuang Tiedao University, Shijiazhuang 050043, China

摘要

摘要: 利用离散元法对结构性砂土的三轴试验进行了三维数值模拟并对其宏观特性进行了分析。首先将考虑胶结尺寸（宽度和厚度）的三维胶结接触模型导入离散元软件PFC3D中,对结构性砂土数值试样进行三轴试验数值模拟;然后对比分析离散元模拟与室内试验结果;最后从宏观力学角度对试验结果进行了分析。离散元模拟结果表明：结构性砂土与无胶结松散砂土表现不同,其在低围压时表现出应变软化和体积剪胀特征,并随胶结含量的增加或围压的减少而愈发显著,在高围压时则呈应变硬化和体积剪缩现象;低平均应力时,随胶结含量的增加,试样峰值内摩擦角、黏聚力以及内摩擦角均增加,其中黏聚力增加较为明显,随着平均应力的增加,峰值强度包线逐渐趋向于无胶结土。
- 结构性砂土 /
- 三轴试验 /
- 离散元法 /
- 应力-应变关系 /
- 强度包线
Abstract: The three-dimensional (3D) distinct element method (DEM) is employed to investigate the behaviours of cemented sands at the macro-scale in triaxial tests. A 3D bond contact model is implemented in a DEM commercial software (PFC^3D) to simulate the triaxial tests on cemented specimens, and the simulated data are compared with the experimental results. Finally, the underlying mechanism behaviour is discussed at the macroscopic scale. The DEM results show that, the structured sands and uncemented loose sands have different macroscopic behaviours. In the conventional triaxial compression tests, the strain softening and the shear dilation are more pronounced in the structured sands with the increasing cement content or decreasing confining pressure. Under high confining pressures, the specimens show strain hardening and shear contraction. Both the cohesion and the peak friction angle increase with the increasing cement content under relative low-mean stresses. As the mean stress increases, the strength envelops for cemented sands converge gradually to those for uncemented geomaterials.
- structured sand /
- triaxial test /
- DEM /
- stress-strain relationship /
- strength envelope

HTML全文

参考文献(13)

[1]	MITCHELL J K, SOGA K.Fundamentals of soil behavior[M]. 3rd ed. New York: John Wiley and Sons, 2005: 5-33.
[2]	BROMS B B, BOMAN P.Lime columns-a new foundation method[J]. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, 1979, 105(4): 539-556.
[3]	CLAYTON C R I, HIGHT D W, HOPPER R J. Progressive destructuring of Bothkennar clay implications for sampling and reconsolidation procedures[J]. Géotechnique, 1992, 42(2): 219-239.
[4]	CUNDALL P A, STRACK O D L. Discrete numerical model for granular assemblies[J]. Géotechnique, 1979, 29(1): 47-65.
[5]	JIANG M J, Yu H S, LEROUEIL S.A simple and efficient approach to capturing bonding effect in naturally microstructured sands by discrete element method[J]. International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering, 2007, 69(6): 1158-1193.
[6]	JIANG M J, SHEN Z F, WANG J F.A novel three-dimensional contact model for granulates incorporating rolling and twisting resistances[J]. Computers & Geotechnics, 2015, 65: 147-163.
[7]	JIANG M J, ZHANG F G, THORNTON C.A simple three-dimensional distinct element modeling of the mechanical behavior of bonded sands[J]. International Journal for Numerical and Analytical Methods in Geomechanics, 2015, 39(16): 1791-1820.
[8]	WANG Y H, LEUNG S C.A particulate-scale investigation of cemented sand behavior[J]. Canadian Geotechnical Journal, 2008, 45(1): 29-44.
[9]	ROTTA G V, CONSOLI N C, PRIETTO P D M, et al. Isotropic yielding in an artificially cemented soil cured under stress[J]. Géotechnique, 2003, 53(5): 493-501.
[10]	JIANG M J, KONRAD J, LEROUEIL S.An efficient technique for generating homogeneous specimens for DEM studies[J]. Computers and Geotechnics, 2003, 30(7): 579-597.
[11]	LADE P V, OVERTON D D.Cementation effects in frictional materials[J]. Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 1989, 115(10): 1373-1387.
[12]	CUCCOVILLO T, COOP M R.On the mechanics of structured sands[J]. Géotechnique, 1999, 49(6): 741-760.
[13]	LEROUEIL S, VAUGHAN P R.The general and congruent effects of structure in natural soils and weak rocks[J]. Géotechnique, 1990, 40(3): 467-48.

施引文献(7)

期刊类型引用(2)

1.	刘要来，王堡生，周红波，赵二峰，李章寅. 基于凸集比例因子和WOA-Kriging模型的重力坝非概率可靠性分析. 长江科学院院报. 2025(03): 164-170 . 百度学术
2.	魏博文，张升，袁冬阳，徐富刚. 基于概率—模糊—区间混合模型和改进分枝限界法的重力坝可靠性分析方法. 水利学报. 2022(12): 1476-1489 . 百度学术