• 全国中文核心期刊
  • 中国科技核心期刊
  • 美国工程索引(EI)收录期刊
  • Scopus数据库收录期刊

环保疏浚泥处理工程泥性质变化规律及问题分析

吴思麟, 朱伟, 刘既明, 李云全, 崔岩, 王飞龙, 赵笛

吴思麟, 朱伟, 刘既明, 李云全, 崔岩, 王飞龙, 赵笛. 环保疏浚泥处理工程泥性质变化规律及问题分析[J]. 岩土工程学报, 2019, 41(12): 2290-2296. DOI: 10.11779/CJGE201912014
引用本文: 吴思麟, 朱伟, 刘既明, 李云全, 崔岩, 王飞龙, 赵笛. 环保疏浚泥处理工程泥性质变化规律及问题分析[J]. 岩土工程学报, 2019, 41(12): 2290-2296. DOI: 10.11779/CJGE201912014
WU Si-lin, ZHU Wei, LIU Ji-ming, LI Yun-quan, CUI Yan, WANG Fei-long, ZHAO Di. Change laws of mud property and problems in typical environmental dredging treatment projects[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2019, 41(12): 2290-2296. DOI: 10.11779/CJGE201912014
Citation: WU Si-lin, ZHU Wei, LIU Ji-ming, LI Yun-quan, CUI Yan, WANG Fei-long, ZHAO Di. Change laws of mud property and problems in typical environmental dredging treatment projects[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2019, 41(12): 2290-2296. DOI: 10.11779/CJGE201912014

环保疏浚泥处理工程泥性质变化规律及问题分析  English Version

基金项目: 国家水体污染控制与治理科技重大专项项目(2017ZX 07603- 003-04); 江苏省科技计划项目(BE2018737)
详细信息
    作者简介:

    吴思麟(1992— ),男,博士研究生,主要从事环境岩土等方面的研究工作。E-mail: wusilinhhu@126.com。

    通讯作者:

    朱伟,E-mail:zhuweiteam.hhu@gmail.com

  • 中图分类号: TU441;X705

Change laws of mud property and problems in typical environmental dredging treatment projects

  • 摘要: 以中国通济桥水库环保疏浚及泥处理利用工程作为典型案例,研究在工程过程中泥的物理、化学性质变化规律,同时也分析了疏浚泥饼的力学性质。基于对泥的基本性质分析,梳理了该典型工程在疏浚、处理及利用中存在的关键问题:疏浚泥浆浓度低;泥浆浓缩效率低;疏浚与泥浆处理工效不匹配;处理后泥饼碱性高等。这些问题同样也是中国河湖库底泥疏浚、处理及利用中存在的共性问题,问题的梳理为该领域的科研及施工人员提供指导及借鉴。
    Abstract: With the burgeoning water environment treatment in China, a large number of environmental dredging projects are being implemented. Dredging, treatment and utilization of sediments all need to be considered. Based on the typical case of the environmental dredging, treatment and utilization project of Tongjiqiao reservoir in China, the change laws of physical and chemical properties of mud are studied, and the mechanical properties of dredged mud cake are analyzed. Through the analysis, the key problems in the typical project are pointed out: the concentration of dredged mud is low, its concentration efficiency is low, the dredging and treatment work efficiency is not matched, and the mud cake is of high alkaline property after treatment. They are also the common problems in the dredging, treatment and utilization of sediments in China. The investigation of the problems may provide guidance and inspiration for the scientific research and construction in this field.
  • [1] 武剑博, 黄引平. 环保疏浚的技术要求与环保绞刀的设计[J]. 环境污染治理技术与设备, 2006, 7(7): 138-140.
    (WU Jian-bo, HUANG Yin-ping.Technical demands of protection dredging and design of environmental protection cutters[J]. Techniques and Equipment for Environmental Pollution Control, 2006, 7(7): 138-140. (in Chinese))
    [2] 钟继承, 范成新. 底泥疏浚效果及环境效应研究进展[J]. 湖泊科学, 2007, 19(1): 1-10.
    (ZHONG Ji-cheng, FAN Cheng-xin.Advance in the study on the effectiveness and environmental impact of sediment dredging[J]. Journal of Lake Sciences, 2007, 19(1): 1-10. (in Chinese))
    [3] 徐桂中, 杨瑞敏, 丁建文, 等. 高含水率疏浚泥堆场颗粒分选规律现场试验研究[J]. 东南大学学报(自然科学版), 2013, 43(3): 634-638.
    (XU Gui-zhong, YANG Rui-min, DING Jian-wen, et al.Field experiment on grain sorting behaviors in reclaimed land of dredged slurries with high water content[J]. Journal of Southeast University 2013, 43(3): 634-638. (in Chinese))
    [4] 黄英豪, 董婵. 淤泥处理技术原理及分类综述[J]. 人民黄河, 2014, 36(7): 91-94.
    (HUANG Ying-hao, DONG Chan.Principles and classifications for treatment of dredged material[J]. Yellow River, 2014, 36(7): 91-94.(in Chinese))
    [5] 张春雷, 管非凡, 李磊, 等. 中国疏浚淤泥的处理处置及资源化利用进展[J]. 环境工程, 2014, 32(12): 95-99.
    (ZHANG Chun-lei, GUAN Fei-fan, LI Lei, et al.The progress in the reutillzation treatment and disposal of dredged sediments in China[J]. Environmental Engineering, 2014, 32(12): 95-99. (in Chinese))
    [6] 唐彤芝, 丛建, 彭吉力, 等. 疏浚土排水固结过程中水质分析与污染性评价[J]. 人民长江, 2017, 48(1):12-19.
    (TANG Tong-zhi, CONG Jian, PENG Ji-li et al. Analysis of water quality and evaluation of water pollution during drainage and consolidation of dredged sediment[J]. Yangtze River, 2017, 48(1): 12-19. (in Chinese))
    [7] 吕鑑, 霍守亮, 荆一凤, 等. 环保疏浚底泥堆场污染物扩散防治研究[J]. 北京工业大学学报, 2006, 32(3): 229-234.
    (LÜ Jian, HUO Shou-liang, JIN Yi-feng, et al.Research on pollutant diffusion control of contaminated dredged material on the mud dumping site[J]. Journal of Beijing University of Technology, 2006, 32(3): 229-234. (in Chinese))
    [8] 朱伟. 中国水利学会疏浚与泥处理利用专委会综合讨论摘登[J]. 水资源保护, 2018, 34(4): 93-94.
    (ZHU Wei.Summary of the comprehensive discussion of the special committee on dredging and mud treatment and utilization of China water conservancy society[J]. Water Resources Protection, 2018, 34(4): 93-94. (in Chinese))
    [9] 汤德意, 沈杰. 生态清淤及淤泥处置技术在水库整治中的应用[J]. 水利水电科技进展, 2018, 38(3): 70-75.
    (TANG De-yi, SHEN Jie.Application of ecological dredging and silt disposal technique in reservoir dredging engineering[J]. Advances in Science and Technology of Water Resources, 2018, 38(3): 70-75. (in Chinese))
    [10] 匡帅, 保琦蓓, 康得军, 等. 典型小型水库表层沉积物重金属分布特征及生态风险[J]. 湖泊科学, 2018, 30(2): 336-348.
    (KUANG Shuai, BAO Qi-bei, KANG De-jun, et al.Distribution patterns and ecological risk assessment of heavy metal contamination in surface sediments deposited in a typical small sized water reservoir[J]. Journal of Lake Sciences, 2018, 30(2): 336-348. (in Chinese))
    [11] ZALL J, GALIL N, REHBUN M.Skeleton builders for conditioning oily sludge[J]. Journal Water Pollution Control Federation, 1987, 59(7): 699-706.
    [12] 余志荣, 郁雨苍. 石灰在污泥调治中的应用及作用机理研究[J]. 中国给水排水, 1989, 5(6): 7-11.
    (YU Zhi-rong, YU Yu-cang.The application and mechanism of lime in sludge conditioning[J]. China Water & Wastewater, 1989, 5(6): 7-11. (in Chinese))
    [13] 冯凯, 黄鸥. 石灰调质与石灰干化工艺在污泥脱水中的应用[J]. 给水排水, 2011, 37(5): 7-10.
    (FENG Kai, HUANG Ou.Application of lime conditioning method and lime drying method in sludge dewatering[J]. Water & Wasterwater Engineering, 2011, 37(5): 7-10. (in Chinese))
    [14] 吴烈善, 曾东梅, 莫小荣, 等. 不同钝化剂对重金属污染土壤稳定化效应的研究[J]. 环境科学, 2015, 36(1): 309-313.
    (WU Lie-shan, ZENG Dong-mei, MO Xiao-rong, et al.Immobilization impact of different fixatives on heavy metals contaminated soil[J]. Environment Science, 2015, 36(1): 309-313. (in Chinese))
    [15] 杜延军, 金飞, 刘松玉, 等. 重金属工业污染场地固化/稳定处理研究进展[J]. 岩土力学, 2011, 32(1): 116-124.
    (DU Yan-jun, JIN Fei, LIU Song-yu, et al.Review of stabilization/solidification technique for remediation of heavy metals contaminated lands[J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2011, 32(1): 116-124. (in Chinese))
  • 期刊类型引用(16)

    1. 张期树,董俊利,徐方,冷伍明,吴爽爽,王文兵. 预应力水平和加固模式对铁路路基变形特性的影响. 中国铁道科学. 2025(02): 18-28 . 百度学术
    2. 段君义,吴俊江,粟雨,吕志涛,林宇亮,杨果林. 浅层膨胀土及其纤维改良土的剪切强度特性. 浙江大学学报(工学版). 2024(03): 547-556+569 . 百度学术
    3. 崔颖辉,罗强,冯桂帅,王腾飞. 一种惯性式路基激振装置的研发与现场标定. 铁道学报. 2024(03): 184-192 . 百度学术
    4. 徐方,翟斌,冷伍明,叶新宇,张期树,赵春彦. 基于大型动三轴试验和神经网络的粗粒土临界动应力研究. 铁道学报. 2023(05): 119-127 . 百度学术
    5. 冷伍明,董俊利,艾希,徐方,张期树. 新型预应力路堤侧压力板设计间距研究. 中南大学学报(自然科学版). 2023(04): 1379-1392 . 百度学术
    6. 张期树,冷伍明,徐方,阮波,董俊利. 新型预应力路基静力加固性能与机理研究. 铁道科学与工程学报. 2023(07): 2488-2499 . 百度学术
    7. 董俊利,冷伍明,张期树,徐方,聂如松. 重载列车作用下新型预应力路基动应力响应规律研究. 中南大学学报(自然科学版). 2023(08): 3286-3302 . 百度学术
    8. 徐方,董俊利,冷伍明,张期树,阮波,邓志龙. 重载列车荷载下新型预应力路基的加速度响应试验研究. 土木工程学报. 2023(10): 149-159 . 百度学术
    9. 冷伍明,董俊利,徐方,赵春彦,阮波,叶新宇,张期树. 预应力路堤侧压力板间距确定方法初探. 铁道科学与工程学报. 2022(01): 100-111 . 百度学术
    10. 冷伍明,邓志龙,徐方,张期树,董俊利,刘思慧. 基于路基土蠕变效应的路基预应力损失模型研究. 岩土力学. 2022(06): 1671-1682 . 百度学术
    11. 徐方,张期树,冷伍明,邓志龙,董俊利,刘思慧. 基于附加应力扩散效应的新型预应力路堤稳定性分析. 岩土力学. 2022(S1): 431-442 . 百度学术
    12. 贺敏,仰宗宝,徐卓君,曹文贵,张超,徐赞. 地基附加应力改进计算方法及其规律分析. 湖南工业大学学报. 2022(05): 20-28 . 百度学术
    13. 聂如松,杜市委,阮波,张向京. 考虑荷载间歇的细粒土填料累积塑性应变与临界动应力试验研究. 铁道学报. 2021(10): 98-108 . 百度学术
    14. 艾希,冷伍明,徐方,张期树,翟斌. 新型预应力路基水平附加应力计算的图表法. 岩土力学. 2020(01): 253-266+277 . 百度学术
    15. 冷伍明,张期树,徐方,冷慧康,杨奇,聂如松. 铁路预应力路堤加固技术数值研究. 铁道工程学报. 2020(01): 6-11+114 . 百度学术
    16. 储灿清. 基于多元分析的地铁车站深基坑形变规律研究. 测绘. 2020(01): 35-40 . 百度学术

    其他类型引用(6)

计量
  • 文章访问数: 
  • HTML全文浏览量:  0
  • PDF下载量: 
  • 被引次数: 22
出版历程
  • 收稿日期:  2019-04-07
  • 发布日期:  2019-12-24

目录

    /

    返回文章
    返回