• Scopus数据库收录期刊
  • 中国科技核心期刊
  • 全国中文核心期刊
  • 美国工程索引(EI)收录期刊

南海钙质砂的动剪切模量与阻尼比试验研究

刘鑫, 李飒, 刘小龙, 陈文炜

刘鑫, 李飒, 刘小龙, 陈文炜. 南海钙质砂的动剪切模量与阻尼比试验研究[J]. 岩土工程学报, 2019, 41(9): 1773-1780. DOI: 10.11779/CJGE201909024
引用本文: 刘鑫, 李飒, 刘小龙, 陈文炜. 南海钙质砂的动剪切模量与阻尼比试验研究[J]. 岩土工程学报, 2019, 41(9): 1773-1780. DOI: 10.11779/CJGE201909024
LIU Xin, LI Sa, LIU Xiao-long, CHEN Wen-wei. Experimental study on dynamic shear modulus and damping ratio of calcareous sands in the South China Sea[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2019, 41(9): 1773-1780. DOI: 10.11779/CJGE201909024
Citation: LIU Xin, LI Sa, LIU Xiao-long, CHEN Wen-wei. Experimental study on dynamic shear modulus and damping ratio of calcareous sands in the South China Sea[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2019, 41(9): 1773-1780. DOI: 10.11779/CJGE201909024

南海钙质砂的动剪切模量与阻尼比试验研究  English Version

基金项目: 国家自然科学基金重点项目(51239008); 国家自然科学基金重大项目(51890911); 工信部高技术船舶科研计划项目(2016-[22])
详细信息
    作者简介:

    刘 鑫(1995— ),男,博士研究生,主要从事海洋土性质和土动力学方面的研究。E-mail: liuxintju@163.com。

    通讯作者:

    李飒,E-mail:lisa@tju.edu.cn

Experimental study on dynamic shear modulus and damping ratio of calcareous sands in the South China Sea

  • 摘要: 岩土体的动剪切模量和阻尼比是土工建筑物、近海场地动力稳定性分析中的主要动力学参数,为评价南海钙质砂的动力学特性,利用美国GCTS共振柱测试系统,对取自南海地区的钙质砂进行共振柱试验,研究固结压力、相对密实度对其动剪切模量和阻尼比的影响,并与石英砂进行对比分析。研究发现:相同的试验条件下,钙质砂的最大动剪切模量、阻尼比均大于石英砂;从总体而言,钙质砂的动剪切模量在剪应变小于0.1%时大于石英砂动剪切模量,在大于0.1%时两者趋于一致,其动剪切模量比G/Gmax随剪应变γ衰减的速度快于石英砂。根据试验结果建立钙质砂动剪切模量比G/Gmax、阻尼比D的数学模型,并结合现有的钙质砂动剪切模量比及阻尼比研究成果,给出钙质砂动剪切模量比和阻尼比的变化范围,为钙质砂场地工程建设中建筑物动力稳定性分析提供依据。
    Abstract: The dynamic shear modulus and damping ratio are two important parameters for the dynamic stability analysis of geotechnical structures and offshore sites. In order to evaluate the dynamic characteristics of calcareous sand in the offshore sites, the resonant column tests are performed on the calcareous sand by GCTS resonant column apparatus. Meanwhile, the effects of effective confining pressure and relative density on the dynamic shear modulus and damping ratio are investigated and compared with those of the quartz sand. It is found that the calcareous sand shows higher maximum dynamic shear modulus, higher damping ratio, and faster stiffness degradation than the quartz sand under similar states of effective confining pressure and relative density. Generally speaking, the calcareous sand shows higher Gmax than the quartz sand when the shear strain is less than 0.1%. Finally, a mathematical model for the normalized dynamic shear modulus and damping ratio of the calcareous sand is established according to the test results in this study. Based on the existing researches on the calcareous sand, the variation ranges of the normalized dynamic shear modulus and damping ratio of the calcareous sand are given, and they may provide the basis for the dynamic stability analysis of buildings in the construction of calcareous sand sites.
  • [1] 沈建华, 汪稔. 钙质砂的工程性质研究进展与展望[J]. 工程地质学报, 2010, 18(增刊1): 26-32.
    (SHEN Jian-hua, WANG Ren.Study on engineering properties of calcareous sand[J]. Journal of Engineering Geology, 2010, 18(S1): 26-32. (in Chinese))
    [2] 金宗川, 陈伟俊, 王新志, 等. 南海钙质砂的休止角与工程应用[J]. 岩土力学, 2018, 39(7): 1-9.
    (JIN Zong-chuan, CHEN Wei-jun, WANG Xin-zhi, et al.Study on engineering application of natural repose angle of calcareous sand[J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2018, 39(7): 1-9. (in Chinese))
    [3] 张炜, 李亚, 周松望, 等. 南海北部区域黏土循环动力特性试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2018, 39(7): 1-11.
    (ZHANG Wei, LI Ya, ZHOU Song-wang, et al.Experimental research on cyclic behaviors of clay in the northern region of South China Sea[J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2018, 39(7): 1-11. (in Chinese))
    [4] 虞海珍, 汪稔. 钙质砂动强度试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 1999, 20(4): 6-11.
    (YU Hai-zhen, WANG Ren.The cyclic strength test research on calcareous sand[J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 1999, 20(4): 6-11. (in Chinese))
    [5] 李建国. 波浪荷载下饱和钙质砂动力特性的试验研究[D]. 武汉: 中国科学院武汉岩土力学研究所, 2005.
    (LI Jian-guo.Experimental research on dynamic behavior of saturated calcareous sand under wave loading[D]. Wuhan: Institute of Rock and Soil Mechanics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, 2005. (in Chinese))
    [6] 刘汉龙, 胡鼎, 肖杨, 等. 钙质砂动力液化特性的试验研究[J]. 防灾减灾工程学报, 2015, 35(6): 707-711.
    (LIU Han-long, HU Ding, XIAO Yang, et al.Test study on dynamic liquefaction characteristics of calcareous sand[J]. Journal of Disaster Prevention and Mitigation Engineering, 2015, 35(6): 707-711. (in Chinese))
    [7] HYODO M, ARAMAKI N, ITOH M, et al.Cyclic strength and deformation of crushable carbonate sand[J]. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 1996, 15(5): 331-336.
    [8] MAO X, FAHEY M.Behaviour of calcareous soils in undrained cyclic simple shear[J]. Géotechnique, 2003, 53(8): 715-727.
    [9] SANDOVAL E A, PANDO M A, OLGUN C G.Liquefaction susceptibility of a calcareous sand from southwest Puerto Rico[C]// Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Earthquake Geotechnical Engineering. Santiago, 2011.
    [10] SANDOVAL E A, PANDO M A.Experimental assessment of the liquefaction resistance of calcareous biogenous sands[J]. Earth Sciences Research Journal, 2012, 16(1): 55-63.
    [11] PORCINO D, CARIDI G, GHIONNA V N.Undrained monotonic and cyclic simple shear behavior of carbonate sand[J]. Géotechnique, 2008, 58(8): 635-644.
    [12] PORCINO D, MARCIANO V.Evaluating liquefaction resistance of a calcareous sand using the cone penetration test[C]// Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Recent Advances in Geotechnical Earthquake Engineering and Soil Dynamics. San Diego, California, 2010: 1-9.
    [13] CARRARO J A H, BORTOLOTTO M S. Stiffness degradation and damping of carbonate and silica sands[C]// Frontiers in Offshore Geotechnics Ⅲ-Meyer, Taylor & Francis Group. London, 2015: 1179-1183.
    [14] WANG Yan-ning.Dynamic properties of fine liquefiable sand and calcareous sand from resonant column testing[D]. Austin: The University of Texas at Austin, 2015.
    [15] GIANG P H H, PETER O V I, WILLIAM F V I, et al. Small-strain shear modulus of calcareous sand and its dependence on particle characteristics and gradation[J]. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 2017, 100: 371-379.
    [16] ISHIHARA K.Soil behaviour in earthquake geotechnics[M]. New York: Oxford University Press, 1996.
    [17] SL 237—1999土工试验规程[S]. 1999. (SL 237—1999 Specification of soil test[S]. 1999. (in Chinese))
    [18] 贺为民, 李德庆, 杨杰, 等. 土的动剪切模量、阻尼比和泊松比研究进展[J]. 地震工程学报, 2016, 38(2): 309-317.
    (HE Wei-min, LI De-qing, YANG Jie, et al.Recent progress in research on dynamic shear modulus, damping ratio, and poisson ration of soils[J]. China Earthquake Engineering Journal, 2016, 38(2): 309-317. (in Chinese))
    [19] SEED H B, IDRISS I M.Soil moduli and damping factors for dynamic analysis [R]. Berkeley: University of California, 1970.
    [20] SEED H B, WONG R T, IDRISS I M, et al.Moduli and damping factors for dynamic analyses of cohesionless soils[J]. Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 1986, 112(11): 1016-1032.
    [21] ROLLINS K M, EVANS M D, DIEHL N B, et al.Shear modulus and damping relationships for gravels[J]. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, 1998, 124(5): 398-405.
    [22] IWASAKI T, TATSUOKA F, TAKAGI Y.Shear moduli of sands under cyclic torsional shear loading[J]. Soils and Foundations, 1978, 18(1): 39-56.
    [23] KOKUSHO T.Cyclic triaxial test of dynamic soil properties for wide strain range[J]. Soils and Foundations, 1980, 20(2): 45-60.
    [24] NI S H. Dynamic properties of sand under true triaxial stress states from resonant column/torsional shear tests[D].4 ]NI S H. Dynamic properties of sand under true triaxial stress states from resonant column/torsional shear tests[D]. Austin: The University of Texas at Austin, 1987.
    [25] ISHIBASHI I, ZHANG X.Unified dynamic shear moduli and damping ratios of sand and clay[J]. Soils and Foundations, 1993, 33(1): 182-191.
    [26] EPRI. Guidelines for determining design basis ground motions-volume 2: appendices for ground motion estimation[R]. Palo Alto: Electric Power Research Institute, 1993.
    [27] DARENDELI M B, STOKOE K H, RATHJE E M, et al.Importance of confining pressure on nonlinear soil behavior and its impact on earthquake response predictions of deep sites[C]// Proceedings of the XVth International Conference on Soil Mechanics and Geotechnical Engineering. Istanbul, 2001: 2811-2814.
    [28] 祝龙根, 徐存森. 共振柱仪及其在工程中的应用[J]. 大坝观测与土工测试, 1993, 17(2): 32-37.
    (ZHU Long-gen, XU Cun-sen.The resonant column device and its application in engineering[J]. Dam Observation and Geotechnical Tests, 1993, 17(2): 32-37. (in Chinese))
    [29] 袁晓铭, 孙锐, 孙静, 等. 常规土类动剪切模量比和阻尼比试验研究[J]. 地震工程与工程振动, 2000, 20(4): 133-139.
    (YUAN Xiao-ming, SUN Rui, SUN Jing, et al.Laboratory experimental study on dynamic shear modulus ratio and damping ration of soils[J]. Earthquake Engineering and Engineering Vibration, 2000, 20(4): 133-139. (in Chinese))
    [30] DARENDELI B M.Development of a new family of normalized modulus reduction and material damping curves[D]. Austin: The University of Texas at Austin, 2001.
    [31] JAFARIAN Y, JAVDANIAN H, HADDAD A.Dynamic properties of calcareous and siliceous sands under isotropic and anisotropic stress conditions[J]. Soils and Foundations, 2018, 58(1): 172-184.
  • 期刊类型引用(22)

    1. 王智超,彭柱,彭峰,闫实. 聚氨酯固化钙质砂物理力学特性. 长江科学院院报. 2024(01): 107-113 . 百度学术
    2. 韩庆华,王永超,刘铭劼,李浩斌. 振动台试验饱和机制砂模型土动力特性研究. 土木工程学报. 2024(03): 110-122 . 百度学术
    3. 王家全,和玉,祝梦柯,钱弘毅. 相对密实度和固结应力比对北部湾海砂动力特性影响的试验研究. 安全与环境工程. 2024(04): 20-28 . 百度学术
    4. 王钰轲,李俊豪,邵景干,余翔. 不同影响因素下路用黄河泥沙动剪切模量和阻尼比试验及理论模型研究. 工程科学学报. 2023(03): 509-519 . 百度学术
    5. 胡健,肖杨,肖鹏,王林,丁选明,仉文岗,刘汉龙. 基于机器学习预测微生物加固钙质砂统一动强度. 中国公路学报. 2023(02): 80-88 . 百度学术
    6. 刘鑫,李飒,尹福顺,姚婷. 基于动态图像技术的南海钙质土颗粒形态特征研究. 岩土工程学报. 2023(03): 590-598 . 本站查看
    7. 邱筱童,尹训强,王桂萱. 考虑不同影响因素的珊瑚岛礁场地地震响应分析. 自然灾害学报. 2023(01): 131-138 . 百度学术
    8. 尹福顺,李飒,刘鑫. 钙质粗粒料颗粒强度和压缩特性的试验研究. 岩土力学. 2023(04): 1120-1129+1152 . 百度学术
    9. 李能,吴杨,周福霖,谭平. 岛礁吹填珊瑚砂不排水单调和循环剪切特性试验. 中国公路学报. 2023(08): 152-161 . 百度学术
    10. 郭桢,蒲建,卢劲锴,黄雨. 南海西沙岛礁非饱和珊瑚砂共振柱-弯曲元试验研究. 工程地质学报. 2023(05): 1552-1562 . 百度学术
    11. 吴杨,崔杰,李晨,温丽维,单振东,廖静容. 细粒含量对岛礁吹填珊瑚砂最大动剪切模量影响的试验研究. 岩石力学与工程学报. 2022(01): 205-216 . 百度学术
    12. 赵云辉,孟凡超,郑志华. 相对密实度对结构性砂土动剪切模量和阻尼比影响的试验研究. 工程抗震与加固改造. 2022(01): 152-159 . 百度学术
    13. 吴琪,杨铮涛,刘抗,陈国兴. 细粒含量对饱和珊瑚砂动力变形特性影响试验研究. 岩土工程学报. 2022(08): 1386-1396 . 本站查看
    14. 陈龙珠,顾晓强. 共振柱试验确定土动剪切模量和阻尼比的理论辨析. 地基处理. 2022(05): 445-450 . 百度学术
    15. 王伟,李犇,罗佳乐,胡俊,姜屏,李娜. 动荷载作用历史对水泥固化钙质砂三轴力学特性影响. 自然灾害学报. 2022(05): 158-167 . 百度学术
    16. 周正龙,丁芷萱,刘杰,赵凯,梁珂,鹿庆蕊. 南海海域饱和粉土动剪切模量和阻尼比试验研究. 土木工程学报. 2022(S1): 227-233 . 百度学术
    17. 宋前进,程磊,贺为民. 孔隙比对土体动力特性参数的影响——以豫东平原粉土为例. 科学技术与工程. 2021(07): 2830-2835 . 百度学术
    18. 高盟,彭晓东,陈青生. 南海非饱和钙质砂动力特性三轴试验研究. 北京工业大学学报. 2021(06): 625-635 . 百度学术
    19. ZHANG Yan-ling,DING Xuan-ming,CHEN Zhi-xiong,WU Qi,WANG Cheng-long. Seismic responses of slopes with different angles in coral sand. Journal of Mountain Science. 2021(09): 2475-2485 . 必应学术
    20. 郭聚坤,王瑞,尹斌,卞贵建,魏道凯. 钢-钙质砂界面循环剪切特性试验研究. 建筑结构. 2021(S2): 1613-1617 . 百度学术
    21. 宋前进,程磊,贺为民. 豫东平原粉质黏土动剪切模量与阻尼比试验研究. 地震工程学报. 2020(04): 1013-1018 . 百度学术
    22. 信鹏飞,李飒,吴文娟. 冲击荷载作用下钙质砂破碎与变形特性研究. 水力发电学报. 2019(12): 102-111 . 百度学术

    其他类型引用(16)

计量
  • 文章访问数:  418
  • HTML全文浏览量:  5
  • PDF下载量:  245
  • 被引次数: 38
出版历程
  • 收稿日期:  2018-09-09
  • 发布日期:  2019-09-24

目录

    /

    返回文章
    返回