• 全国中文核心期刊
  • 中国科技核心期刊
  • 美国工程索引(EI)收录期刊
  • Scopus数据库收录期刊

砾性土液化评价方法的通用性和可靠性研究

曹振中, KyleM.Rollins, 袁晓铭, T.LeslieYoud, MichaelTalbot, JashodRoy, SaraAmoroso

曹振中, KyleM.Rollins, 袁晓铭, T.LeslieYoud, MichaelTalbot, JashodRoy, SaraAmoroso. 砾性土液化评价方法的通用性和可靠性研究[J]. 岩土工程学报, 2019, 41(9): 1628-1635. DOI: 10.11779/CJGE201909006
引用本文: 曹振中, KyleM.Rollins, 袁晓铭, T.LeslieYoud, MichaelTalbot, JashodRoy, SaraAmoroso. 砾性土液化评价方法的通用性和可靠性研究[J]. 岩土工程学报, 2019, 41(9): 1628-1635. DOI: 10.11779/CJGE201909006
CAO Zhen-zhong, Kyle M. Rollins, YUAN Xiao-ming, T. Leslie Youd, Michael Talbot, Jashod Roy, Sara Amoroso. Applicability and reliability of CYY formula based on Chinese dynamic penetration test for liquefaction evaluation of gravelly soils[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2019, 41(9): 1628-1635. DOI: 10.11779/CJGE201909006
Citation: CAO Zhen-zhong, Kyle M. Rollins, YUAN Xiao-ming, T. Leslie Youd, Michael Talbot, Jashod Roy, Sara Amoroso. Applicability and reliability of CYY formula based on Chinese dynamic penetration test for liquefaction evaluation of gravelly soils[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2019, 41(9): 1628-1635. DOI: 10.11779/CJGE201909006

砾性土液化评价方法的通用性和可靠性研究  English Version

基金项目: 国家重点研发计划政府间国际科技创新合作重点专项 项目(2016YFE0105500); 国家自然科学基金项目(51669005); 广西自然科学基金项目(2016GXNSFAA380117); 广西高校科研项目(2013YB100)
详细信息
    作者简介:

    曹振中(1982— ),男,博士,教授,主要从事岩土地震工程研究。E-mail: iemczz@163.com。

Applicability and reliability of CYY formula based on Chinese dynamic penetration test for liquefaction evaluation of gravelly soils

  • 摘要: 以2008年汶川地震液化震害调查资料为背景,基于操作性和经济性上具有显著优势的中国动力触探试验(DPT)而提出的砾性土液化评价方法,包括砾性土层液化触发条件以及判别公式(CYY公式),理论上已经得到国内外同行的认可,但其通用性和可靠性尚需检验。以5个国家29个历史地震砾性土场地中美联合勘测为基础,研究DPT技术、砾性土层液化触发条件和CYY公式在不同国家、不同地震和不同场地的适用性和可靠性问题,其中,成都平原14个砾性土场地的勘测与数据处理由中方完成,美国、意大利、新西兰、厄瓜多尔等15个砾性土场地的勘测与数据处理由美方Rollins教授主导完成,均为新的测试检验点。结果表明:中国动力触探标准探头在不同国家、不同砾性土场地上测试具有可行性,可以有效穿透20 m的砾性土场地,动探击数可作为砾性土液化评价的核心指标,同时亦可扩展到砾性土层的力学性能评价;不同国家、不同砾性土液化场地上,均存在不排水或排水不畅的埋藏条件,符合砾性土层液化触发条件要求;对动力触探击数进行锤击能量、有效上覆压力等修正后,CYY公式在不同国家、不同地震、不同砾性土液化场地的判别成功率约96%,具有较高可靠性。以2008年汶川地震砾性土液化为背景、以动力触探锤击数为基本指标的砾性土液化评价方法,具有国际通用的可行性。
    Abstract: The CYY formula, proposed by Cao, Youd and Yuan in 2013 and based on the field investigations of gravelly soil sites liquefied during the 2008 Wenchuan earthquake using the Chinese dynamic penetration test (DPT), has uncertainty regarding applicability and reliability in practical use. Nevertheless, the DPT has obvious advantages in maneuverability and economy. In order to verify the reliability, accuracy and practicability of the CYY formula, 29 new gravelly soil sites in total, 26 of which are liquefied during 6 different earthquakes including the 1964 Alaska earthquake in America, the 1976 Friuli earthquake in Italy, the 1983 Borah Peak earthquake in America, the 2008 Wenchuan earthquake in China, the 2016 Muisne earthquake in Ecuador, and the 2016 Kaikora earthquake in New Zealand, are selected for China-U S joint borehole drilling and DPT. The field tests at 14 sites in the Chengdu Plain are mainly completed by the Chinese side, and the rest of tests are mainly completed by the US side led by Professor Rollins. The results indicate that the Chinese DPT is feasible in different countries and can effectively penetrate about 20 meters of gravelly soils, and the blow count of DPT can be used as the primary index for predicting the liquefaction of gravelly soils. The 26 selected liquefaction sites consist of soil profiles in undrained conditions
  • [1] 徐斌, 孔宪京, 邹德高, 等. 饱和砂砾料液化后应力与变形特性试验研究[J]. 岩土工程学报, 2007, 29(1): 103-106.
    (XU Bin, KONG Xian-jing, ZOU De-gao, et al.Laboratory study on behaviour of static properties of saturated sand-gravel after liquefaction[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2007, 29(1): 103-106. (in Chinese))
    [2] FIORAVANTE V, GIRETTI D, JAMIOLKOWSKI M, et al.Triaxial tests on undisturbed gravelly soils from the Sicilian shore of the Messina Strait[J]. Bull Earthquake Eng, 2012, 10: 1717-1744.
    [3] FLORA A, LIRER S, SILVESTRI F.Undrained cyclic resistance of undisturbed gravelly soils[J]. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 2012, 43: 366-379.
    [4] 陈国兴, 孙田, 王炳辉, 等. 循环荷载作用下饱和砂砾土的破坏机理与动强度[J]. 岩土工程学报, 2015, 37(12): 2140-2148.
    (CHEN Guo-xing, SUN Tian, WANG Bing-hui, et al.Undrained cyclic failure mechanisms and resistance of saturated sand-grave mixtures[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2015, 37(12): 2140-2148. (in Chinese))
    [5] WANG Yong, WANG Yan-li.Liquefaction characteristics of gravelly soil under cyclic loading with constant strain amplitude by experimental and numerical investigations[J]. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 2017(92): 388-396.
    [6] HARDER L F.Application of the Becker Penetration test for evaluating the liquefaction potential of gravelly soils[C]// Proc NCEER Workshop on Evaluation of Liquefaction Resistance of Soils, National Center for Engineering Research. Buffalo, NY, 1997: 129-148.
    [7] GHAFGHAZI M, DEJONG T J, STURM P, et al.Instrumented becker penetration test: II iBPT-SPT correlation for characterization and liquefaction assessment of gravelly soils[J]. J Geotech Geoenviron Eng, 2017, 143(9): 04017063.
    [8] 袁晓铭, 秦志光, 刘荟达, 等. 砾性土层液化的触发条件[J].岩土工程学报, 2018, 40(5): 777-785.
    (YUAN Xiao-ming, QIN Zhi-guang, LIU Hui-da, et al.Necessary trigger conditions of liquefaction for gravelly soil layers[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2018, 40(5): 777-785. (in Chinese))
    [9] CAO Z, YOUD T, YUAN X.Chinese dynamic penetration test for liquefaction evaluation in gravelly soils[J]. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, ASCE, 2013, 139(8): 1320-1333.
    [10] NIKOLAOU S, ZEKKOS D, ASSIMAKI D et al. January 26th/February 2nd 2014 Cephalonia, Greece Events[R]. GEER-EERI Earthquake Reconnaissance Report, ASSIMAKI D et al. January 26th/February 2nd 2014 Cephalonia, Greece Events[R]. GEER-EERI Earthquake Reconnaissance Report, http://www. geerassociation.org.
    [11] LOPEZ S, VERA-GRUNAUER X, ROLLINS K, et al.Gravelly soil liquefaction after the 2016 ecuador earthquake[C]// Procs Conf on Geotech Earthquake Engrg and Soil Dynamics. ASCE, Austin, Texas USA, 2018: 273-285.
    [12] BRADLEY B, COMERIO M, CUBRINOVSKI M, et al.M7.8 Kaikoura, New Zealand Earthquake on November 14, 2016M7.8 Kaikoura, New Zealand Earthquake on November 14, 2016[R]. QuakeCoRE-GEER-EERI Earthquake Reconnaissance Report, http://www.geerassociation.org.
    [13] COULTER H W, MIGLIACCIO R R.Effect of the Earthquake of March 22, 1964 at Valdez. Alaska[R]. US: Geological Survey Professional Paper 542-C,1966.
    [14] SIROVICH L.Repetitive Liquefaction at gravelly site and liquefaction in overconsolidated sands[J]. Soils and Foundations, 1996, 36(4): 23-34.
    [15] YOUD T L, HARP E L, KEEFER D K, et al.The Borah Peak, Idaho Earthquake of October 28, 1983 Liquefaction[J]. Earthquake Spectra, 1985, 2(1): 71-89.
    [16] YOUD T L, IDRISS I M.Liquefaction resistance of soils: Summary report from the 1996 NCEER and 1998 NCEER/NSF workshops on evaluation of liquefaction resistance of soils[J]. J Geotech Geoenviron Eng, 2001, 127(10): 817-833.
    [17] ROLLINS K M, YOUD T L, TALBOT M.Evaluation of dynamic cone penetration test for liquefaction assessment of gravels from case histories in idaho[C]// Procs Conf on Geotech Earthquake Engrg and Soil Dynamics. ASCE, Austin, Texas USA, 2018: 227-236.
  • 期刊类型引用(9)

    1. 王睿,王兰民,周燕国,王刚. 土动力学与岩土地震工程. 土木工程学报. 2024(07): 71-89+105 . 百度学术
    2. 袁近远,崔家伟,李兆焱,袁晓铭,张钰洋. 中国模式下砾性土液化指数评价新方法. 土木工程学报. 2024(09): 98-108 . 百度学术
    3. 徐斌,王星亮,庞锐,陈柯好. 考虑组构演化的砂砾土弹塑性本构模型. 岩土力学. 2024(11): 3197-3211 . 百度学术
    4. 王家全,祝梦柯,林志南,梁宁. 细粒含量对饱和砾性土静动力学特性的影响. 土木工程学报. 2023(05): 112-121 . 百度学术
    5. 邢明源,胡欣宇. 基于神经网络模型的砾性土液化预测. 华北科技学院学报. 2021(03): 75-80 . 百度学术
    6. 付大庆,董德学,张修磊,孙浩东,史振铜,白书昕. 弥河朐山拦河闸砾石液化探讨. 水利技术监督. 2021(09): 162-166 . 百度学术
    7. 王海,王永志,汤兆光,袁晓铭,段雪锋. 剪切波速-相对密度联合试验与经验公式验证. 地下空间与工程学报. 2021(06): 1881-1887 . 百度学术
    8. 黄茂松,边学成,陈育民,王睿,顾晓强,周燕国. 土动力学与岩土地震工程. 土木工程学报. 2020(08): 64-86 . 百度学术
    9. 王世岐,张向阳,魏峰先,王健. 逐一土层进行液化等级判别初探. 工程勘察. 2020(12): 27-29 . 百度学术

    其他类型引用(7)

计量
  • 文章访问数:  343
  • HTML全文浏览量:  3
  • PDF下载量:  208
  • 被引次数: 16
出版历程
  • 收稿日期:  2018-10-20
  • 发布日期:  2019-09-24

目录

    /

    返回文章
    返回