真空预压处理填埋污泥的固结解析解

田乙; 吴文兵; 梅国雄; 蒋国盛; 梁荣柱

doi:10.11779/CJGE201908012

真空预压处理填埋污泥的固结解析解 English Version

田乙¹,
吴文兵^1,2,3, ,,
梅国雄^1,2,3,
蒋国盛¹,
梁荣柱^1,2

1. 中国地质大学工程学院岩土钻掘与防护教育部工程研究中心,湖北武汉 430074;
2. 广西大学土木建筑工程学院广西防灾减灾与工程安全重点实验室,广西南宁 530004;
3. 广西大学工程防灾与结构安全教育部重点实验室,广西南宁 530004

基金项目: 国家自然科学基金项目（51578164,51678547,51878185）; 中国博士后科学基金面上项目（2016M600711）

详细信息

作者简介:
田乙(1995— ),男,硕士研究生,主要从事土体固结理论方面的研究工作。E-mail：tianyibox@163.com。

通讯作者:
吴文兵，E-mail：zjuwwb1126@163.com

中图分类号: TU433
计量
- 文章访问数: 259
- HTML全文浏览量: 6
- PDF下载量: 143
出版历程
- 收稿日期: 2018-09-26
- 发布日期: 2019-08-24

Analytical solutions for the consolidation of sludge by vacuum preloading

1. Engineering Research Center of Rock-Soil Drilling & Excavation and Protection, Ministry of Education, Faculty of Engineering, China University of Geosciences, Wuhan 430074, China;
2. Guangxi Key Laboratory of Disaster Prevention and Structural Safety, College of Civil Engineering and Architecture, Guangxi University, Nanning 530004, China;
3. Key Laboratory of Disaster Prevention and Structural Safety, Ministry of Education, Guangxi University, Nanning 530004, China

摘要

摘要: 真空预压法是一种行之有效的填埋污泥原位加固方法。在考虑真空预压的时间效应条件下,基于椭圆柱等效模型推导了真空预压联合塑料排水板的固结解析解。利用实际监测数据,拟合得出了预压时间效应参数。通过对比研究,分析了传统的圆柱形等效模型与椭圆柱等效模型的差异及预压时间效应参数对固结发展的影响。进一步,将根据解析解计算出的沉降曲线与实测沉降值比较,验证了解答的合理性与实用性。表明,在考虑塑料排水板的“形状效应”时,椭圆柱体等效模型的效果最佳,且基于各周长等效模型的计算结果与椭圆柱等效模型结果较为接近;预压时间效应参数的值越大代表真空预压施加得越快,对应的土体固结发展越快。
- 真空预压 /
- 土体固结 /
- 填埋污泥 /
- 椭圆柱等效模型 /
- 塑料排水板
Abstract: The vacuum preloading is an effective method for the in-situ consolidation of sludge in landfills. Considering its time effects, the analytical solutions for the consolidation by the vacuum preloading combined with the prefabricated vertical drain are obtained based on the equivalent elliptical cylinder model. Then, the parameter reflecting the time effects is obtained by fitting the measured data. The comparative analysis is carried out to validate the rationality and the practicability of the proposed solutions by comparing the settlement curve calculated from the proposed solutions to the measured one. The analysis results show that the elliptic cylinder equivalent model is the optimum choice to consider the shape effects of the PVD, and the calculated results based on the perimeter equivalent models are closer to those based on the elliptic cylinder equivalent model. The larger parameter α means the vacuum pressure is applied on the soil more quickly, which will lead to a quicker consolidation process.
- vacuum preloading /
- consolidation of soil /
- sludge /
- elliptical cylinder equivalent model /
- prefabricated vertical drain

HTML全文

参考文献(25)

[1]	韦小颖, 肖细元, 张珑, 等. 城市污泥中重金属和有机污染物的净化与污泥土地利用[J]. 环境工程, 2010(增刊1): 235-240. (WEI Xiao-ying, XIAO Xi-yuan, ZHANG Long, et al.Heavy metal and organic contaminants removal from sewage sludge for land application[J]. Chinese Journal of Environment Engineering, 2010(S1): 235-240. (in Chinese))
[2]	郭清嵩, 顾潇, 武博然, 等. 真空预压处理非规范填埋污泥的中试[J]. 环境工程, 2017(12): 124-128. (GUO Qing-song, GU Xiao, WU Bo-ran, et al.Pilot test on the piled sewage sludge by air-boosted vacuum preloading[J]. Chinese Journal of Environment Engineering, 2017(12): 124-128. (in Chinese))
[3]	HANSBO S.Consolidation of caly by band-shaped prefabricated drains[J]. Ground Engineering, 1979, 12(5): 16-18, 21.
[4]	FELLENIUS B H, CASTONGUAY N G.The efficiency of band shaped drains: a full scale laboratory study[R]. Ottwa: National Research Council and the Industrial Research Assistance Programme, 1985.
[5]	ATKINSON M S, ELDRED P J L. Consolidation of soil using vertical drains[J]. Géotechnique, 1981, 31(31): 33-43.
[6]	LONG R P, COVO A.Equivalent diameter of vertical drains with an oblong cross section[J]. Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 1994, 120(9): 1625-1630.
[7]	ABUEL-NAGA H, BOUAZZA A.Equivalent diameter of a prefabricated vertical drain[J]. Geotextiles & Geomembranes, 2009, 27(3): 227-231.
[8]	GB/T 51015—2014 海堤工程设计规范[S]. 2014. (GB/T 51015—2014 Code for design of sea dike project[S]. 2014. (in Chinese))
[9]	JTS 147—2—2009 真空预压加固软土地基技术规程[S]. 2009. (JTS 147—2—2009 Technical specification for vacuum preloading technique to improve soft soils[S]. 2009. (in Chinese))
[10]	卢萌盟, 张强, 靖洪文, 等. 基于环形等效的排水板地基固结[J]. 岩石力学与工程学报, 2018, 37(2): 513-520. (LU Meng-meng, ZHANG qiang, JING Hong-wen, et al. Consolidation of band-shaped drain based on equivalent annular drain[J]. Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering, 2018, 37(2): 513-520. (in Chinese))
[11]	HUANG C, DENG Y, CHEN F.Consolidation theory for prefabricated vertical drains with elliptic cylindrical assumption[J]. Computers & Geotechnics, 2016, 77(1): 156-166.
[12]	黄朝煊, 方咏来. 线性加载下塑料排水板地基固结理论探讨[J]. 工程地质学报, 2017, 25(3): 678-685. (HUANG Chao-xuan, FANG Yong-lai.Consolidation theory for prefabricated vertical drain with linear preloading[J]. Journal of Engineering Geology, 2017, 25(3): 678-685. (in Chinese))
[13]	占鑫杰. 市政污泥的化学调理和真空预压联合作用固结机理及应用[D]. 杭州: 浙江大学, 2015. (ZHAN Xin-jie.Study on the consolidation mechanism of sewage sludge under combined effect of chemical conditioning and vacuum preloading and its application[D]. Hangzhou: Zhejiang University, 2015. (in Chinese))
[14]	TANG M, SHANG J Q.Vacuum preloading consolidation of Yaoqiang Airport runway[J]. Géotechnique, 2004, 50(6): 613-623.
[15]	CHU J, YAN S W.Estimation of degree of consolidation for vacuum preloading projects[J]. International Journal of Geomechanics, 2005, 5(2): 158-165.
[16]	INDRARATNA B, BAMUNAWITA C, KHABBAZ H.Numerical modeling of vacuum preloading and field applications[J]. Canadian Geotechnical Journal, 2004, 41(6): 1098-1110.
[17]	岑仰润. 真空预压加固地基的试验及理论研究[D]. 杭州:浙江大学, 2003. (CEN Yang-run.Vacuum preloading: experiment and theory[D]. Hangzhou: Zhejiang University, 2003. (in Chinese))
[18]	蒋基安, 陈海英, 陈越, 等. 排水板真空度损耗的排水固结解析解[J]. 岩土工程学报, 2016, 38(3): 406-418. (JIANG Ji-an, CHEN Hai-ying, CHEN Yue, et al.Analytical solutions to drainage consolidation considering vacuum loss in prefabricated vertical drain[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2016, 38(3): 406-418. (in Chinese))
[19]	高广运, 聂春晓, 张海丘, 等. 塑料排水板结合真空预压法的径向固结解析解[J]. 同济大学学报(自然科学版), 2017, 45(9): 1290-1297. (GAO Guang-yun, NIE Chun-xiao, ZHANG Hai-qiu, et al.Radial consolidation solution of plastic wick drain combined vacuum preloading[J]. Journal of Tongji University (Nature Science), 2017, 45(9): 1290-1297. (in Chinese))
[20]	姜彦彬, 何宁, 许滨华, 等. 真空预压负压分布规律模型试验研究[J]. 岩土工程学报, 2017, 39(10): 127-136. (JIANG Yan-bin, HE Ning, XU Bin-hua, ZHOU Yan-zhang, et al.Model tests on negative pressure distribution in vacuum preloading[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2017, 39(10): 127-136. (in Chinese))
[21]	罗小勇. 处置库污泥工程特性测试及其对垃圾堆体稳定性影响评估[D]. 杭州: 浙江大学, 2012. (LUO Xiao-yong.Measurement of geotechnical properties for sewage sludge at a disposal site and evaluation of its influence on slope stability of MSW landfill[D]. Hangzhou: Zhejiang Universaty, 2012. (in Chinese))
[22]	龚晓南, 岑仰润. 真空预压加固软土地基机理探讨[J]. 哈尔滨建筑大学学报, 2002, 35(2): 7-10. (GONG Xiao-nan, CEN Yang-run.Mechanism of vacuum preloading[J]. Journal of Harbin University of Civil Engineering and Architecture, 2002, 35(2): 7-10. (in Chinese))
[23]	梅国雄, 徐锴, 宰金珉, 等. 真空预压加固软土地基变形机理的探讨[J]. 岩土工程学报, 2006, 28(9): 1168-1172. (MEI Guo-xiong, XU Kai, ZAI Jin-min, et al.Deformation mechanism of soft foundation under vacuum preloading[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2006, 28(9): 1168-1172. (in Chinese))
[24]	INDRARATNA B, RUJIKIATKAMJORN C, SATHANANTHAN I.Analytical and numerical solutions for a single vertical drain including the effects of vacuum preloading[J]. Canadian Geotechnical Journal, 2005, 42(4): 994-1014.
[25]	LU M M, XIE K H, GUO B.Consolidation theory for a composite foundation considering radial and vertical flows within the column and the variation of soil permeability within the disturbed soil zone[J]. Canadian Geotechnical Journal, 2010, 47(2): 207-217.

施引文献(15)

期刊类型引用(7)

1.	徐新星. 真空预压法处理深厚软土地基应用研究. 广东土木与建筑. 2022(05): 48-51 . 百度学术
2.	李明枫，杨永利，高紫阳. 建筑青砖废料对真空预压加固吹填淤泥效果影响. 中国水运(下半月). 2021(07): 145-146+149 . 百度学术
3.	林伟岸，江文豪，詹良通. 考虑真空加载过程及堆载随时间变化下砂井地基的普遍固结解析解. 岩土力学. 2021(07): 1828-1838 . 百度学术
4.	李明枫，杨永利，高紫阳. 建筑青砖废料对真空预压加固吹填淤泥效果影响. 中国水运(下半月). 2021(14): 145-146+149 . 百度学术
5.	刘丛阳. 框架真空预压法对水力冲挖淤泥脱水效果的试验研究. 四川水泥. 2020(02): 301 . 百度学术
6.	田乙，吴文兵，康成，蒋国盛，梅国雄，周克清. 基于椭圆柱等效的排水板非线性径向固结理论. 岩石力学与工程学报. 2020(S1): 3058-3066 . 百度学术
7.	蔡袁强，周岳富，王鹏，史吏，王军. 考虑淤堵效应的疏浚淤泥真空固结沉降计算. 岩土力学. 2020(11): 3705-3713 . 百度学术