白鹤滩拱坝谷幅变形预测及不同计算方法变形机制研究

钟大宁; 刘耀儒; 杨强; 徐建荣; 何明杰; 张伟狄

doi:10.11779/CJGE201908009

白鹤滩拱坝谷幅变形预测及不同计算方法变形机制研究 English Version

1. 清华大学水沙科学与水利水电工程国家重点实验室,北京 100084;
2. 中国电建集团华东勘测设计研究院有限公司,浙江杭州 310014

基金项目: 国家自然科学基金重点项目（51739006）; 国家自然科学基金面上项目（11572174）; 水沙科学与水利水电工程国家重点实验室科研课题（2019-ky-03）

详细信息

作者简介:
钟大宁(1991— ),女,博士研究生,主要从事岩石力学方面的研究工作。E-mail: zdn14@mails.tsinghua.edu.cn。

通讯作者:
刘耀儒，E-mail：liuyaoru@tsinghua.edu.cn

中图分类号: TU43
计量
- 文章访问数: 0193
- HTML全文浏览量: 0
- PDF下载量: 0289
出版历程
- 收稿日期: 2018-11-27
- 发布日期: 2019-08-24

Prediction of deformation of valley width of Baihetan arch dam and deformation mechanisms of several methods

1. State Key Laboratory of Hydroscience and Hydraulic Engineering, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084, China;
2. PowerChina Huadong Engineering Corporation, Hangzhou 310014, China

摘要

摘要: 中国已建成的特高拱坝如溪洛渡、锦屏一级等,在初期蓄水过程中均表现出了谷幅收缩的异常现象。而拱坝是高次超静定结构,对坝基变形尤其是不均匀变形非常敏感。从有效应力改变和岩体材料泡水弱化这一谷幅变形机制和边界施加位移这一计算手段出发,利用弹塑性有限元方法,计算并预测白鹤滩拱坝在初期蓄水过程中可能产生的谷幅变形,并分析了谷幅变形对大坝位移和应力的影响。结果表明：两种方法的计算结果相差很大;从有效应力改变和岩体材料弱化角度出发,白鹤滩拱坝两岸山体可能产生的最大谷幅收缩不大于40 mm,且该谷幅变形不会很大程度上降低拱坝的整体稳定性,只是使坝体产生了新的应力集中区。而拱坝对施加边界位移具有很强的超载能力,但谷幅收缩对坝体应力的影响极小。对比发现,坝基不均匀变形是影响拱坝应力的关键因素。
- 谷幅变形 /
- 有效应力 /
- 材料弱化 /
- 边界加位移 /
- 不均匀变形
Abstract: The super high arch dams built in China, such as Xiluodu and Jinping, show abnormal phenomenon of reduction of valley width during the initial impounding stage. The arch dam is a high-order statically indeterminate structure, which is very sensitive to deformation of dam foundation, especially non-uniform deformation. Based on the deformation mechanism of valley width and the method for calculating the boundary displacement, the possible deformation of valley width of Baihetan arch dam in the process of initial impounding is calculated and predicted, and its effects on the displacement and stress of the dam are analyzed by using the elastoplastic finite element method. The results show that the two methods are greatly different. From the perspective of change of effective stress and weakening of rock mass materials, the maximum reduction of valley width is no more than 40 mm, and it will not greatly reduce the overall stability of the arch dam, but only causes new stress concentration area on the dam body. However, the arch dam has strong overload capability to the boundary displacement, and the impact of the reduction of the valley width on the stress of the dam is very small. The non-uniform deformation of the foundation is the key factor which affects the dam stress.
- valley width deformation /
- effective stress /
- weakening material /
- boundary displacement /
- non-uniform deformation

HTML全文

参考文献(23)

[1]	FRIGERIO A, MAZZA G.The rehabilitation of Beauregard dam: the contribution of the numerical modeling[C]// 12th International Benchmark Workshop on Numerical Analysis of Dams. Vienna, 2013: 343-352.
[2]	MULLER L.The rock slide in the Vajont Valley[J]. Rock Mechanics and Engineering Geology, 1964, 2(3): 148-212.
[3]	LONDE P.The Malpasset dam failure[J]. Engineering Geology, 1987, 24(1/2/3/4): 295-329.
[4]	LOMBARDI G.Kolnbrein dam: an unusual solution for an unusual problem[J]. International Water Power & Dam Construction, 1991, 43(6): 31-34.
[5]	刘有志, 张国新, 程恒, 等. 特高拱坝谷幅缩窄成因及对大坝变形和应力的影响分析[C]//中国大坝协会学术年会. 郑州, 2014. (LIU You-zhi, ZHANG Guo-xin, CHENG Heng, et al.Valley width reduction causes and its effects on displacement and stress of the dam[C]// Chinese Dam Academic Annual Meeting. Zhengzhou, 2014. (in Chinese))
[6]	梁国贺, 胡昱, 樊启祥, 等. 溪洛渡高拱坝蓄水期谷幅变形特性与影响因素分析[J]. 水力发电学报, 2016, 35(9): 101-110. (LIANG Guo-he, HU Yu, FAN Qi-xiang, et al.Analysis on valley deformation of Xiluodu high arch dam during impoundment and its influencing factors[J]. Journal of Hydroelectric Engineering, 2016, 35(9): 101-110. (in Chinese))
[7]	汤雪娟, 张冲, 王仁坤. 渗流场作用的地基变形对高拱坝结构的影响[J]. 地下空间与工程学报, 2016, 12(增刊2): 645-650. (TANG Xue-juan, ZHANG Chong, WANG Ren-kun.Analysis on foundation deformation and its effect on high arch dam surface considering seepage field[J]. Chinese Journal of Underground Space and Engineering, 2016, 12(S2): 645-650. (in Chinese))
[8]	PARONUZZI P, RIGO E, BOLLA A.Influence of filling drawdown cycles of the Vajont reservoir on Mt. Toc slope stability[J]. Geomorphology, 2013, 191(5): 75-93.
[9]	CHENG L, LIU Y R, YANG Q, et al.Mechanism and numerical simulation of reservoir slope deformation during impounding of high arch dams based on nonlinear FEM[J]. Computers and Geotechnics, 2017, 81: 143-154.
[10]	杨宝全, 张林, 徐进, 等. 高拱坝坝肩软岩及结构面强度参数水岩耦合弱化效应试验研究[J]. 四川大学学报(工程科学版), 2015, 47(2): 21-27. (YANG Bao-quan, ZHANG Lin, XU Jin, et al.Experimental study of weakening effect of water-rock coupling interaction on strength parameters of dam abutment weak rock and structural plane for high arch dam[J]. Journal of Sichuan University (Engineering Science Edition), 2015, 47(2): 21-27. (in Chinese))
[11]	TERZAGHI K.The shearing resistance of saturated soils and the angle between the planes of shear[C]// Proceedings of the 1st International Conference on Soil Mechanics and Foundation Engineering. Harvard, 1936: 54-56.
[12]	LADE P V, BOER D E.The concept of effective stress for soil, concrete and rock[J]. Géotechnique, 1997, 47(1): 61-78.
[13]	NUR A, BYERLEE J D.An exact effective stress law for elastic deformation of rock with fluids[J]. Journal of Geophysical Research, 1971, 76(26): 6414-6419.
[14]	BIOT M A, WILLIS D G.The elastic coefficients of the theory of consolidation[J]. Journal of Applied Mechanics, 1957, 24: 594-601.
[15]	SKEMPTON A W.Effective stress in soils, concrete and rocks[C]// Proceedings of the Conference on Pore Pressure and Suction in Soils. Butterworths, 1960.
[16]	COUSSY O.Poromechanics[M]. London: John Wiley & Sons, 2004.
[17]	BORJA R I, KOLIJI A.On the effective stress in unsaturated porous continua with double porosity[J]. Journal of the Mechanics and Physics of Solids, 2009, 57(8): 1182-1193.
[18]	BARENBLATT G I, ZHELTOV I P, KOCHINA I N.Basic concepts in the theory of seepage of homogeneous liquids in fissured rocks[J]. Journal of Applied Mathematics and Mechanics, 1960, 24(5): 1286-1303.
[19]	TUNCAY K, CORAPCIOGLU M Y.Effective stress principle for saturated fractured porous media[J]. Water Resources Research, 1995, 31(12): 3103-3106.
[20]	MA J J, ZHAO G F, KHALILI N.A fully coupled flow deformation model for elasto-plastic damage analysis in saturated fractured porous media[J]. International Journal of Plasticity, 2016, 76: 29-50.
[21]	杨强, 潘元炜, 程立, 等. 蓄水期边坡及地基变形对高拱坝的影响[J]. 岩石力学与工程学报, 2015, 34(增刊2): 3979-3986. (YANG Qiang, PAN Yuan-wei, CHENG Li, et al.Impounding influence of slope and foundation deformation on high arch dam[J]. Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering, 2015, 34(S2): 3979-3986. (in Chinese))
[22]	杨强, 陈新, 周维垣. 基于D-P准则的三维弹塑性有限元增量计算的有效算法[J]. 岩土工程学报, 2002, 24(1): 16-20. (YANG Qiang, CHEN Xin, ZHOU Wei-yuan.A practical 3D elasto-plastic incremental method in FEM based on D-P yield criteria[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2002, 24(1): 16-20. (in Chinese))
[23]	程立, 刘耀儒, 潘元炜, 等. 锦屏一级拱坝左岸边坡长期变形对坝体影响研究[J]. 岩石力学与工程学报, 2016, 35(增刊2): 4040-4052. (CHENG Li, LIU Yao-ru, PAN Yuan-wei, et al.Research on influence of left bank slope’s long-term deformation on dam body for JinpingⅠarch dam[J]. Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering, 2016, 35(S2): 4040-4052. (in Chinese))