Analysis of anchorage performance on new tension-compression anchorⅡ: model test
-
摘要: 针对传统拉力型和压力型锚杆存在受力集中、锚固体与岩土体界面黏结强度发挥不充分、抗拔承载力偏低的问题,研发了一种新型拉压复合型锚杆。通过对传统锚杆及拉压复合型锚杆开展模型试验,对比研究了不同锚杆的极限抗拔承载力及其锚固性能。结果表明：拉压复合型锚杆极限抗拔承载力比传统拉力型锚杆大幅提高,拉压长度比为1∶2和2∶1时,分别提高79%和161%,且具有更好的位移延性和抗变形能力;拉压复合型锚杆峰后残余抗拔承载力显著提高,传统拉力型和压力型锚杆稳定残峰比最大值均不超过0.40,锚头相对拔出变形ξs=2.5%时,残峰比平均值分别为0.292和0.259;TC360-12锚杆和TC360-21锚杆稳定残峰比最小值分别不低于0.45和0.60,ξs=2.5%时,残峰比平均值分别为0.545和0.790;拉压长度比为2∶1的拉压复合型锚杆即将破坏时,受拉锚固段和承压锚固段协同承载能力更强,界面黏结强度得到充分发挥,锚杆极限抗拔承载力更高。Abstract: The new tension-compression composite anchor (TC-anchor) is developed to overcome the shortcomings of the traditional tensile-type anchor (T-anchor) and pressure-type anchor (C-anchor), such as stress concentration, insufficient bonding strength between anchorage body and soil mass, and low uplift bearing capacity. The ultimate uplift bearing capacity and anchorage performance are analyzed comparatively based on the model tests for T-anchor, C-anchor and TC-anchor. The results show that, in contrast with T-anchor, the ultimate uplift bearing capacities of TC-anchor significantly increase by 79% and 161% respectively for the tension-compression anchorage length ratios (TCAL-ratio) of 1:2 and 2:1. The TC-anchor has better displacement ductility and deformation resistivity, and its residual uplift bearing capacity increases significantly. The maximum ratios of the residual uplift bearing capacity to the ultimate one (RU-ratio) of T-anchor and C-anchor are both not more than 0.40, with the average values of 0.292 and 0.259 for relative out deformation of anchor head ξs=2.5%. The tension and compression anchorage segments of TC-anchor with TCAL-ratio of 2:1 have stronger coordination-bearing capacity. When the TC-anchor is closed to failure, the bonding strength between grouting body and concrete failure plays sufficiently. So the ultimate uplift bearing capacity of TC-ancor with TCAL-ratio 2:1 is higher.
-
[1] 贾强, 应惠清, 张鑫. 锚杆静压桩技术在既有建筑物增设地下空间中的应用[J]. 岩土力学, 2009, 30(7): 2053-2058.
(JIA Qiang, YING Hui-qing, ZHANG Xin.Construction of basement in existing buildings by static bolt-pile[J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2009, 30(7): 2053-2058. (in Chinese))[2] 刘宝琛. 综合利用城市地面及地下空间的几个问题[J]. 岩石力学与工程学报, 1999, 18(1): 109-111.
(LIU Bao-chen.Some aspects for utilization of ground surface and underground space in cities[J]. Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering, 1999, 18(1): 109-111. (in Chinese))[3] 郭钢, 刘钟, 邓益兵, 等. 砂土中扩体锚杆承载特性模型试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2012, 33(12): 3645-3652.
(GUO Gang, LIU Zhong, DENG Yi-bing, et al.Model test research on bearing capacity characteristics of underreamed ground anchor in sand[J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2012, 33(12): 3645-3652. (in Chinese))[4] 郭钢, 刘钟, 李永康, 等. 扩体锚杆拉拔破坏机制模型试验研究[J]. 岩石力学与工程学报, 2013, 32(8): 1677-1684.
(GUO Gang, LIU Zhong, LI Yong-kang, et al.Model test research on failure mechanism of underreamed ground anchor[J]. Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering, 2013, 32(8): 1677-1684. (in Chinese))[5] 胡建林, 张培文. 扩体型锚杆的研制及其抗拔试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2009, 30(6): 1615-1619.
(HU Jian-lin, ZHANG Pei-wen.Development of underreamed anchor and experimental study of uplift resistance[J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2009, 30(6): 1615-1619. (in Chinese))[6] 张虎元, 王晓东, 王旭东, 等. 楠竹加筋复合锚杆内部界面黏结滑移模型[J]. 岩土力学, 2011, 32(3): 789-796.
(ZHANG Hu-yuan, WANG Xiao-dong, WANG Xu-dong, et al.Bond-slip model for bamboo-steel cable composite anchor[J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2011, 32(3): 789-796. (in Chinese))[7] 王晓东, 张虎元, 吕擎峰. 楠竹加筋复合锚杆静力学性能试验研究[J]. 土木工程学报, 2011, 44(12): 108-115.
(WANG Xiao-dong, ZHANG Hu-yuan, LÜ Qing-feng.Laboratory study of the static properties of bamboo-steel cable composite anchor[J]. China Civil Engineering Journal, 2011, 44(12): 108-115. (in Chinese))[8] 曹佳文, 彭振斌, 彭文祥, 等. 充气锚杆在砂土中的模型试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2011, 32(7): 1957-1962.
(CAO Jia-wen, PENG Zhen-bin, PENG Wen-xiang, et al.Model test study of inflated anchors in sands[J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2011, 32(7): 1957-1962. (in Chinese))[9] 彭文祥, 张旭, 曹佳文. 充气锚杆极限承载力计算方法[J]. 岩土力学, 2013, 34(6): 1696-1702.
(PENG Wen-xiang, ZHANG Xu, CAO Jia-wen.Calculation method for ultimate bearing capacity of inflatable anchor[J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2013, 34(6): 1696-1702. (in Chinese))[10] 刘钟, 郭钢, 张义, 等. 囊式扩体锚杆施工技术与工程应用[J]. 岩土工程学报, 2014, 36(增刊2): 205-211.
(LIU Zhong, GUO Gang, ZHANG Yi, et al.Construction technology and engineering applications of capsule-type under-reamed ground anchor[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2014, 36(S2): 205-211. (in Chinese))[11] 涂兵雄, 贾金青, 俞缙, 等.一种拉压复合型锚杆:ZL201420450678.5, 中国[P]. 2014.
(TU Bing-xiong, JIA Jin-qin, YU Jin, et al.A tension-compression composite anchor: ZL201420450678.5, China[P]. 2014. (in Chinese))[12] 程良奎, 范景伦, 韩军, 等. 岩土锚固[M]. 北京: 中国建筑工业出版社, 2000: 35-45.
(CHENG Liang-kui, FAN Jing-lun, HAN Jun, et al.Ground anchrage[M]. Beijing: China Architecture and Building Press, 2000: 35-45. (in Chinese))[13] SERRANO A, OLALLA C.Tensile resistance of rock anchors[J]. International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences, 1999, 36(4): 449-474. [14] KILIC A, YASAR E, ATIS C D.Effect of bar shape on the pull-out load capacity of fully grouted rock bolt[J]. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 2002, 18(1): 1-6. [15] 郭锐剑, 谌文武, 段建, 等. 考虑界面软化特性的土层锚杆拉拔受力分析[J]. 中南大学学报, 2012, 43(10): 4003-4009.
(GUO Rui-jian, CHEN Wen-wu, DUAN Jian, et al.Pullout mechanical analysis of soil anchor based on softening behavior of interface[J]. Journal of Central South University, 2012, 43(10): 4003-4009. (in Chinese))[16] 尤春安, 战玉宝. 预应力锚索锚固段界面滑移的细观力学分析[J]. 岩石力学与工程学报, 2009, 28(10): 1976-1985.
(YOU Chun-an, ZHANG Yu-bao.Analysis of interfacial slip mesomechanics in anchorage section of prestressed anchor cable[J]. Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering, 2009, 28(10): 1976-1985. (in Chinese))[17] 夏元友, 陈泽松, 顾金才, 等. 压力分散型锚索受力特点的室内足尺模型实验[J]. 武汉理工大学学报, 2010, 32(3): 33-38.
(XIA Yuan-you, CHEN Zhe-song, GU Jin-cai, et al.Indoor full-size model test on stress features of pressure-dispersive prestressed anchorage cable[J]. Journal of Wuhan University of Technology, 2010, 32(3): 33-38. (in Chinese))[18] JGJ/T70—2009建筑砂浆基本性能试验方法标准[S]. 2009.
(JGJ/T70—2009 Standard for test method of basic properties of construction mortar[S]. 2009. (in Chinese))[19] JGJ/T 401—2017锚杆检测与监测技术规程[S]GJ/T 401—2017锚杆检测与监测技术规程[S].. 2017.
(JGJ/T 401—2017 Technical specification for testing and monitoring of anchors[S]GJ/T 401—2017 Technical specification for testing and monitoring of anchors[S]. Beijing: China Architecture and Building Press, 2017. (in Chinese)) -
期刊类型引用(27)
1. 李明昊，李皋，张毅，杨旭，李红涛，冯佳歆，宿腾跃. 位移约束和温度耦合下致密砂岩热诱导微裂纹发育规律研究. 岩石力学与工程学报. 2025(01): 174-184 . 
百度学术
2. 黄彦华，张坤博，杨圣奇，田文岭，朱振南，印昊，李明旭. 高温后花岗岩微观特征及其对强度影响规律研究. 岩石力学与工程学报. 2025(02): 359-372 . 百度学术
3. Wendong Yang，Xiang Zhang，Bingqi Wang，Jun Yao，Pathegama G.Ranjith. Experimental study on the physical and mechanical properties of carbonatite rocks under high confining pressure after thermal treatment. Deep Underground Science and Engineering. 2025(01): 105-118 . 必应学术
4. 解经宇，宋继伟，隋建才，赵萌，王韧，曾翀，王建龙. 我国干热花岗岩在不同冷却条件下的力学响应研究进展. 煤田地质与勘探. 2025(03): 126-142 . 百度学术
5. 李明耀，李绍金，彭磊，丁宇飞，左建平. 基于相场法的花岗岩弹塑性损伤模型及其细观力学行为研究. 岩石力学与工程学报. 2024(03): 611-622 . 百度学术
6. 黄彦华，陶然，韩媛媛，陈笑，罗一鸣，武世岩. 温度对不同孔隙砂岩Ⅰ型断裂韧度影响的试验研究. 采矿与安全工程学报. 2024(02): 430-436 . 百度学术
7. 于洪丹，卢琛，陈卫忠，黄嘉玮，李洪辉. 塔木素黏土岩蠕变特性试验与理论研究. 岩石力学与工程学报. 2024(S1): 3578-3585 . 百度学术
8. 杨文东，王柄淇，姚军，井文君，张祥. 三轴压缩下实时高温和热处理后碳酸盐岩力学特性的试验研究. 岩石力学与工程学报. 2024(06): 1347-1358 . 百度学术
9. 闫程锦，郤保平. 基于颗粒流GBM模型的花岗岩热力损伤特性研究. 水利水电技术(中英文). 2024(05): 170-180 . 百度学术
10. 赵奎，李从明，曾鹏，熊良锋，龚囱，黄震. 持续高温作用下花岗岩特征应力及声发射特征试验研究. 岩石力学与工程学报. 2024(07): 1580-1592 . 百度学术
11. 贾蓬，钱一锦，毛松泽，徐雪桐，卢佳亮. 晶粒尺寸对花岗岩动态劈裂力学特性及断面粗糙度影响的试验研究. 应用基础与工程科学学报. 2024(05): 1449-1462 . 百度学术
12. 夏开宗，刘夏临，林英书，张飞，司志伟，孙朝燚. 基于岩体波速的地下洞室围岩损伤区岩体力学参数取值方法及工程应用. 岩石力学与工程学报. 2024(10): 2414-2429 . 百度学术
13. 黄麟淇，刘茂林，王钊炜，郭懿德，司雪峰，李夕兵，李超. 温度影响和真三轴加载下深部圆形隧洞破坏研究（英文）. Journal of Central South University. 2024(09): 3119-3141 . 百度学术
14. 赵奎，李从明，曾鹏，熊良锋，龚囱，黄震. 热损伤花岗岩能量演化机制及损伤本构模型. 金属矿山. 2024(11): 45-54 . 百度学术
15. 黄彦华，陶然，陈笑，罗一鸣，韩媛媛. 高温后花岗岩断裂特性及热裂纹演化规律研究. 岩土工程学报. 2023(04): 739-747 . 本站查看
16. 张涛，蔚立元，苏海健，高亚楠，贺虎，魏江波. 基于多级力链网络分析的花岗岩压缩特性的矿物尺寸效应研究. 岩石力学与工程学报. 2023(08): 1988-2003 . 百度学术
17. 李卫，苏海健，蔚立元，刘日成，陈广印. 高温热处理砂岩Ⅰ-Ⅲ混合断裂特性试验研究. 采矿与安全工程学报. 2023(06): 1281-1289 . 百度学术
18. 顾冬，马力，罗坤，孙云儒. 水利枢纽工程场地基岩高温三轴压缩渗透力学试验研究. 水利科技与经济. 2022(02): 74-78 . 百度学术
19. 张涛，蔚立元，鞠明和，李明，苏海健，季浩奇. 基于PFC3D-GBM的晶体–单元体尺寸比对花岗岩动态拉伸特性影响分析. 岩石力学与工程学报. 2022(03): 468-478 . 百度学术
20. 李博宇，彭文祥，王李昌，隆威. 温度与化学作用下岩石物理力学性质研究进展. 地质装备. 2022(02): 33-37 . 百度学术
21. 刘磊，李睿，秦浩，刘洋. 高温后深部矽卡岩动力学特性及微观破坏机制研究. 岩土工程学报. 2022(06): 1166-1174 . 本站查看
22. 詹懿德，汪发祥，佘恬钰，沈佳轶，吕庆. 考虑围压效应的块状节理岩体变形破坏数值模拟. 水利水运工程学报. 2022(04): 70-76 . 百度学术
23. 李明耀，彭磊，左建平，王智敏，李绍金，薛喜仁. 基于DIP-FFT数值方法的花岗岩多尺度力学特性研究. 岩石力学与工程学报. 2022(11): 2254-2267 . 百度学术
24. 王春，熊宏威，舒荣华，薛文越，胡慢谷，张攀龙，雷彬彬. 高温处理后含铜矽卡岩的动态力学特性及损伤破碎特征. 中国有色金属学报. 2022(09): 2801-2818 . 百度学术
25. 梁忠豪，秦楠，孙嘉彬，葛强. 高温作用后黄砂岩三轴压缩及细观破裂机制. 科学技术与工程. 2021(24): 10430-10439 . 百度学术
26. 郝宪杰，刘继山，魏英楠，陈泽宇，靳多祥，潘光耀，张谦. 2000m超深煤系储层力学及声发射特征的围压效应. 中南大学学报(自然科学版). 2021(08): 2611-2621 . 百度学术
27. 徐文龙，徐鼎平，柳秀洋. 高温热损伤对花岗岩单轴破坏模式和强度的影响研究. 皖西学院学报. 2021(05): 94-99 . 百度学术
其他类型引用(31)
计量
- 文章访问数: 293
- HTML全文浏览量: 8
- PDF下载量: 230
- 被引次数: 58
下载:
