• 全国中文核心期刊
  • 中国科技核心期刊
  • 美国工程索引(EI)收录期刊
  • Scopus数据库收录期刊

K0预固结对非饱和重塑黄土强度与变形特性影响的研究

郭楠, 陈正汉, 郭剑锋, 孙树国, 扈胜霞, 王梦南

郭楠, 陈正汉, 郭剑锋, 孙树国, 扈胜霞, 王梦南. K0预固结对非饱和重塑黄土强度与变形特性影响的研究[J]. 岩土工程学报, 2018, 40(S1): 100-106. DOI: 10.11779/CJGE2018S1016
引用本文: 郭楠, 陈正汉, 郭剑锋, 孙树国, 扈胜霞, 王梦南. K0预固结对非饱和重塑黄土强度与变形特性影响的研究[J]. 岩土工程学报, 2018, 40(S1): 100-106. DOI: 10.11779/CJGE2018S1016
GUO Nan, CHEN Zheng-han, GUO Jian-feng, SUN Shu-guo, HU Sheng-xia, WANG Meng-nan. Deformation and strength properties of unsaturated remolded loess under K0 pre-consolidation condition[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2018, 40(S1): 100-106. DOI: 10.11779/CJGE2018S1016
Citation: GUO Nan, CHEN Zheng-han, GUO Jian-feng, SUN Shu-guo, HU Sheng-xia, WANG Meng-nan. Deformation and strength properties of unsaturated remolded loess under K0 pre-consolidation condition[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2018, 40(S1): 100-106. DOI: 10.11779/CJGE2018S1016

K0预固结对非饱和重塑黄土强度与变形特性影响的研究  English Version

基金项目: 国家自然科学基金项目(11672330; 51379220); 陕西省科技统筹创新工程计划项目(2014KTDZ03-01); 大学生创新训练计划项目(D2016120)
详细信息
    作者简介:

    郭 楠(1987- ),女,博士研究生,主要从事非饱和土与特殊土力学及其工程应用研究。E-mail:355094754@qq.com。

    通讯作者:

    陈正汉,E-mail:chenzhenghan47@163.com

  • 中图分类号: TU444

Deformation and strength properties of unsaturated remolded loess under K0 pre-consolidation condition

  • 摘要: 为了探讨K0预固结对土的强度及变形特性的影响,用改进的非饱和土三轴仪对重塑Q3黄土做了两组共36个试验。第一组共24个试验,每个试验包括三个阶段,即试样先在竖向压力为常数的条件下K0预固结,再经过控制吸力和净围压为常数的各向等压固结,最后进行控制吸力和净围压为常数的排水剪切试验;第二组共12个试验,每个试验仅包括第一组试验的后两个阶段。试验结果表明:第一组试验应力-应变曲线的初始切线斜率大于第二组试验的初始切线斜率,且吸力越大、净围压越大,差距越明显;第一组试验的破坏应力均明显大于第二组试验的破坏应力,但除了吸力为0 kPa的饱和试样外,两组试验相应的体应变相差不大;第一组试验剪切初始阶段有轻微的剪胀现象,但并不明显,并很快转变为剪缩,第二组试验各试样均处于剪缩状态;虽然两种试验条件下有效摩擦角及破坏比相差不大,但邓肯-张模型的初始模量表达式的指数n相差很大,且总凝聚力-吸力曲线及邓肯-张模型的初始模量表达式的系数与吸力的关系曲线(即k-s曲线)结果相差也较大。基于试验研究结果,提出了考虑K0预固结、吸力和净围压三者综合影响的表观凝聚力、切线杨氏模量的修正计算公式,完善了非饱和土的增量非线性模型。
    Abstract: In order to discuss the influence of K0 pre-consolidation on the strength and deformation properties of loess, the experiments on a total of 36 remolded Q3 loess samples in two groups are carried out using the improvement of unsaturated soil triaxial apparatus. The first group includes 24 tests, and each test includes three stages, namely, the samples are consolidated under the constant vertical pressure, and then, they are consolidated through the constant control suction and net confining pressure, and the drainage shear tests with constant control suction and net confining pressure are carried out in the end. The second group includes 12 tests, but each test only includes the last two stages of the first group. The results show that the initial tangent slope of stress-strain curves of the tests in the first group is greater than that of the second group, and the difference becomes more and more obvious with the increase of the suction and net confining pressure. The failure stress of the test samples in the first group is significantly greater than that of the second group. Except the tests on the saturated samples with no suction, the volumetric strain of two groups is similar. Unlike the shear shrinkage state of the test samples in the second group, the test samples of the first group exhibit slightly shear dilatancy at the initial stage, but it is not obvious and they become shear shrinkage insantly. Although the effective internal friction angle and destruction ratioare almost the same under the two kinds of experimental conditions, n is fairly different. Besides, the curves of total cohesion-suction and the relation curves of the index k in the initial modulus expression of Duncan-Chang model and suction (k-s) are rather different. Based on the test results, the modified formulas of apparent cohesion and tangent Young's modulus are put forward considering the comprehensive effects of
  • [1] 曾国熙, 龚晓南, 盛进源. 正常固结黏土K0固结剪切试验研究[J]. 浙江大学学报, 1987, 21(2): 1-9.
    (ZENG Guo-xi, GONG Xiao-nan, SHENG Jing-yuan.Research on normally consolidated clay by K0 consolidated shear test[J]. Journal of Zhejiang University, 1987, 21(2): 1-9. (in Chinese))
    [2] BISHOP A W, HENEL D J.The measurement of soil properties in triaxial test[M]. London: Edward Arnold, 1962.
    [3] 张崇磊, 蒋关鲁, 董志泓, 等. 原状粉质黏土K0固结状态变形响应特征[J]. 中南大学学报(自然科学版), 2014, 45(7): 2378-2386.
    (ZHANG Chong-lei, JIANG Guan-lu, DONG Zhi-hong, et al.Deformation response characteristics of undisturbed silty clay in K0 consolidation state[J]. Journal of Central South University (Science and Technology), 2014, 45(7): 2378-2386. (in Chinese))
    [4] 李校兵, 郭林, 蔡袁强, 等. K0固结饱和软黏土的三轴应力路径试验研究[J]. 中南大学学报(自然科学版), 2015, 46(5): 1820-1825.
    (LI Xiao-bing, GUO Lin, CAI Yuan-qiang, et al.Stress path triaxial tests on K0-consolidated saturated soft clay[J]. Journal of Central South University (Science and Technology), 2015, 46(5): 1820-1825. (in Chinese))
    [5] 纠永志, 黄茂松. 超固结软黏土的K0系数与不排水抗剪强度[J]. 岩土力学, 2017, 38(4).(JIU Yong-zhi, HUANG Mao-song. Coefficient of earth pressure at rest and undrained shear strength of K0 overconsolidated soft clays[J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2017, 38(4). (in Chinese))
    [6] 黄茂松, 宋晓宇, 秦会来. K0固结黏土基坑抗隆起稳定性上限分析[J]. 岩土工程学报, 2008, 30(2): 250-255.
    (HUANG Mao-song, SONG Xiao-yu, QIN Hui-lai.Basal stability of braced excavations in K0-consolidated soft clay by upper bound method[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2008, 30(2): 250-255. (in Chinese))
    [7] 王立忠, 叶盛华, 沈恺伦, 等. K0 固结软土不排水抗剪强度[J]. 岩土工程学报, 2006, 28(8): 970-977.
    (WANG Li-zhong, YE Sheng-hua, SHEN Kai-lun, et al.Undrained shear strength of K0 consolidated soft clays[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2006, 28(8): 970-977. (in Chinese))
    [8] 褚福永, 朱俊高, 王平, 等. K0 固结条件下粗粒土变形及强度特性研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2012, 33(6): 1625-1630.
    (CHU Fu-yong, ZHU Jun-gao, WANG Ping, et al.Study of deformation and strength characteristics of coarse grained soil under K0 -consolidation condition[J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2012, 33(6): 1625-1630. (in Chinese))
    [9] 朱俊高, 吉恩跃, 方智荣, 等. 粗粒土等压固结与K0固结三轴试验比较[J]. 防灾减灾工程学报, 2013, 33(4): 394-398.
    (ZHU Jun-gao, JI En-yue, FANG Zhi-rong, et al.Comparison of triaxial text with K0-consolidated and isotropically consolidated specimens of coarse grained soil[J]. Journal of Disaster Prevention and Mitigation Engineering, 2013, 33(4): 394-398. (in Chinese))
    [10] 栾茂田, 张振东, 许成顺, 等. K0 固结条件下砂土的循环剪切特性试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2008, 29(9): 2323-2328.
    (LUAN Mao-tian, ZHANG Zhen-dong, XU Cheng-shun, et al.Experimental studies of cyclic shear characteristic of sand under K0 consolidation condition[J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2008, 29(9): 2323-2328. (in Chinese))
    [11] 吕玺琳, 钱建固, 黄茂松. 不排水加载条件下K0固结饱和砂土失稳预测[J]. 岩土工程学报, 2015, 37(6): 1010-1015.
    (LÜ Xi-lin, QIAN Jian-gu, HUANG Mao-song.Prediction of instability of K0-consolidated saturated sands under undrained loading conditions[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2015, 37(6): 1010-1015. (in Chinese))
    [12] 刘清秉, 吴云刚, 项伟, 等. K0及三轴应力状态下压实膨胀土膨胀模型研究[J] .岩土力学, 2016, 37(10): 2795-2802.
    (LIU Qing-bing, WU Yun-gang, XIANG Wei, et al.Swelling model study of expansive soil at K0 and triaxial stress state[J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2016, 37(10): 2795-2802. (in Chinese))
    [13] 齐明山, 冯翠霞, 谢永利, 等. 原状黄土连续加荷K0固结试验研究[J]. 地下空间与工程学报, 2005, 1(3): 370-373.
    (QI Ming-shan, FENG Cui-xia, XIE Yong-li, et al.Research of intact loess through continuous loading K0 consolidation tests[J]. Chinese Journal of Underground Space and Engineering, 2005, 1(3): 370-373. (in Chinese))
    [14] 程海涛, 刘保健, 谢永利. 压实黄土连续加载K0固结特性[J]. 岩石力学与工程学报, 2007, 26(增刊1): 3203-3208.
    (CHENG Hai-tao, LIU Bao-jian, XIE Yong-li.K0 consolidation characteristics of compacted loess under continuous loading[J]. Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering, 2007, 26(S1): 3203-3208. (in Chinese))
    [15] 侯伟, 姚仰平, 崔文杰. K0超固结土的不排水抗剪强度[J]. 力学学报, 2008, 40(6): 795-803.
    (HOU Wei, YAO Yang-ping, CUI Wen-jie.Undrained shear strength of K0 over consolidated soil[J]. China Journal of Theoretical and Applied Meachanics, 2008, 40(6): 795-803. (in Chinese))
    [16] 冯慧强, 高凌霞, 王冲, 等. 以K0 固结线为基准的修正Lade-Duncan 模型[J]. 辽宁工程技术大学学报(自然科学版), 2016, 35(3): 289-293.
    (FENG Hui-qiang, GAO Ling-xia, WANG Chong, et al.Research on a modified Lade-Duncan model based on K0-consilidation line[J]. Journal of Liaoning Technical University (Natural Science), 2016, 35(3): 289-293. (in Chinese))
    [17] 陈正汉, 周海清, FREDLUND D G.非饱和土的非线性模型及其应用[J]. 岩土工程学报, 1999, 21(5): 603-608.
    (CHEN Zheng-han, ZHOU Hai-qing, FREDLUND D G.Nonlinear model for unsaturated soils and its application[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 1999, 21(5): 603-608. (in Chinese))
  • 期刊类型引用(8)

    1. 王怀强,李孝波,王天虎,席书衡,宣雨童. 基于岩土竖向台阵开展场地地震反应研究的若干进展. 地震工程与工程振动. 2025(02): 50-63 . 百度学术
    2. 范宏飞,王彦臻,陈炜昀,陈国兴,赵凯. 水平成层海床场地非线性地震反应的流-固弱耦合分析. 振动工程学报. 2025(04): 849-859 . 百度学术
    3. 郭云峰. 岩土勘察中地震效应问题的研究. 科技与创新. 2023(13): 117-119+122 . 百度学术
    4. 王永光,梁建文,巴振宁. 基于修正阻尼的土体非线性模型及其在Abaqus中的实现. 岩土力学. 2023(08): 2287-2296 . 百度学术
    5. 陈国兴,夏高旭,王彦臻,金丹丹. 琼州海峡海床地震反应特性的一维非线性分析. 工程力学. 2022(05): 75-85 . 百度学术
    6. 赵凯,夏高旭,王彦臻,赵丁凤,庄海洋,陈国兴. 土–地下结构相互作用的三维弱耦合有效应力分析法. 岩土工程学报. 2022(05): 861-869 . 本站查看
    7. 阮滨,吉瀚文,王苏阳,贺鸿俊,苗雨. 基于台阵观测的基岩地震动入射波分离方法及数值验证. 岩土力学. 2022(09): 2615-2623+2642 . 百度学术
    8. 陈伟庚,刘洋,王栋,岳茂,张良. 西南山区铁路沿线反倾岩质边坡地震动力响应振动台试验研究. 铁道建筑. 2021(04): 93-96 . 百度学术

    其他类型引用(8)

计量
  • 文章访问数:  159
  • HTML全文浏览量:  2
  • PDF下载量:  140
  • 被引次数: 16
出版历程
  • 收稿日期:  2017-06-10
  • 发布日期:  2018-08-24

目录

    /

    返回文章
    返回