低渗储层砂岩渗流-应力-损伤渐裂过程的渗透特性演化研究

刘先珊; 王科; 许明

doi:10.11779/CJGE201809003

低渗储层砂岩渗流-应力-损伤渐裂过程的渗透特性演化研究 English Version

刘先珊^{1, 2},
王科^{1, 2},
许明^{1, 2}

1. 山地城镇建设与新技术教育部重点实验室(重庆大学),重庆 400045;
2. 重庆大学土木工程学院,重庆 400045

基金项目: 国家自然科学基金项目（51779021; 51478065）

详细信息

作者简介:
刘先珊(1978- ),女,湖北荆州人,博士,教授,主要从事岩土工程渗流、多场耦合理论及数值方法等方面的研究与教学工作。E-mail：liuxianshan@163.com。

中图分类号: TU45
计量
- 文章访问数: 0229
- HTML全文浏览量: 0
- PDF下载量: 0208
出版历程
- 收稿日期: 2017-06-01
- 发布日期: 2018-09-24

Permeability evolution of low-permeability reservoir sandstone considering hydraulic-mechanical-damage coupling effect during gradual fracturing process

LIU Xian-shan^{1, 2},
WANG Ke^{1, 2},
XU Ming^{1, 2}

1. Key Laboratory of New Technology for Construction of Cities in Mountain Area (Chongqing University), Ministry of Education, Chongqing 400045, China;
2. School of Civil Engineering, Chongqing University, Chongqing 400045, China

摘要

摘要: 低渗储层采收率的准确评价是制定合理开发方案的重要理论基础,有效揭示开采过程诱发岩体渐裂的渗透性演化机理至关重要。以低渗储层砂岩为研究对象,分析不同荷载组合下岩体裂纹的发展规律,研究渗流-应力-损伤破裂过程中渗透率与裂纹状态的关联特性。试验结果表明：加载初期由于岩石内部孔隙及微裂隙的压密,渗透率减小;随着环向裂纹应变增大,岩石内部裂纹开始稳定扩展,渗透率缓慢增大,随着荷载的增大,裂纹加速扩展导致渗透率快速增大;最后断裂面发生相对滑移,岩石碎屑堵塞原有的渗流通道,渗透率下降。基于试验结果,运用理论方法研究不同荷载下的岩体损伤特征,建立损伤变量与裂纹环向变形的关联性,推导岩体渗透率与损伤变量的关系式,描述岩体渗流-应力-损伤渐裂中的渗透特性,揭示低渗储层砂岩的渗透率演化机理。其研究成果可为低渗砂岩储层开发过程的优化及产能预测提供新的研究思路和技术手段,对确保石油工业的可持续发展具有重要的实践价值。
- 低渗储层砂岩 /
- 渗透率 /
- 渗流-应力-损伤 /
- 裂纹状态 /
- 演化机理
Abstract: The accurate assessment of the recovery ratio is significant for drawing up a rational development scheme, so it is significant to reveal the evolution mechanism of the rock permeability considering the progressive failure induced by the reservoir development. Taking the low-permeability reservoir sandstone as the case study, the variation of the rock cracks under different loading combinations is analyzed, and the correlation between the permeability rate and the cracks considering seepage-stress-damage coupling effect is also deeply investigated. According to the results, the permeability decreases at the first stage of loading due to the progressive compaction of the rock pores and small cracks. And then, the increasing hoopstrain results in a moderate increase of permeability due to the stable development of rock cracks, subsequently the increasing load induces the cracks to spread very fast so that the permeability quickly increases. Finally, the permeability gradually decreases because the relative sliding appears in the broken planes and the corresponding rock fragments block the original fluid channels. Based on the experiments, the characteristics of rock damage are analyzed using the theoretical methods, and the relation between the damage and the hoopstrain is described to derive the formula for the permeability and damage to explain the permeability variation. The evolution mechanism of the sandstone permeability is revealed clearly. The above achievements can be an important support for the development optimization and oil capacity prediction for the low-permeability reservoir, and they are also significant for the sustainable development of oil.
- low-permeability reservoir sandstone /
- permeability rate /
- hydraulic-mechanical-damage /
- crack condition /
- evolution mechanism

HTML全文

参考文献(19)

[1]	王小江, 荣冠, 周创兵. 粗砂岩变形破坏过程中渗透性试验研究[J]. 岩石力学与工程学报, 2012, 31(增刊1): 2940-2947. (WANG Xiao-jiang, RONG Guan, ZHOU Chuang-bin.Permeability experimental studyofgritstone indeformation and failureprocesses[J]. Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering, 2012, 31(S1): 2940-2947. (in Chinese))
[2]	TAN X, KONIETZKY H, FRÜHWIRT T. Laboratory observation and numerical simulation of permeability evolution during progressive failure of brittle rocks[J]. International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences, 2014, 68: 167-176.
[3]	王伟, 徐卫亚, 王如宾, 等. 低渗透岩石三轴压缩过程中的渗透性研究[J]. 岩石力学与工程学报, 2015, 34(1): 40-47. (WANG Wei, XU Wei-ya, WANG Ru-bin, et al.Permeability of dense rock under triaxial compression[J]. Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering,2015,34(1): 40-47. (in Chinese))
[4]	俞缙, 李宏, 陈旭, 等. 渗透压-应力耦合作用下砂岩渗透率与变形关联性三轴试验研究[J]. 岩石力学与工程学报, 2013, 32(6): 1203-1213. (YU Jin, LI Hong, CHEN Xu, et al.Triaxial experimental study on sandstone of the permeability-strain relationship under coupling effects of seepage and stress[J]. Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering, 2013, 32(6): 1203-1213. (in Chinese))
[5]	YANG S Q, HUANG Y H, JIAO Y Y, et al.An experimental study on seepage behavior of sandstone material with different gas pressures[J]. Acta Mech Sin, 2015, 31(6): 837-844.
[6]	胡少华, 陈益峰, 周创兵. 北山花岗岩渗透特性试验研究与细观力学分析[J]. 岩石力学与工程学报, 2014, 33(11): 2200-2209. (HU Shao-hua, CHEN Yi-feng, ZHOU Chuang-bing.Laboratory test and mesomechanical analysis of permeability variation of Beishan granite[J]. Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering, 2014, 33(11): 2200-2209. (in Chinese))
[7]	陈亮, 王春萍, 刘健锋, 等. 压缩应力条件下花岗岩损伤演化特征及其对渗透性影响研究[J]. 岩石力学与工程学报, 2014, 33(2): 287-295. (CHEN Liang, WANG Chun-ping, LIU Jian-feng, et al.Investigation on evolution characteristics of granite under compressive stress condition and its impact on permeability[J]. Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering, 2014, 33(2): 287-295. (in Chinese))
[8]	王伟, 李雪浩, 胡大伟, 等. 脆性岩石三轴压缩渐裂过程中的渗透性演化规律研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2016(10): 2761-2768. (WANG Wei, LI Xue-hao, HU Da-wei, et al.Permeability evolution of brittle rock in progressive failure process under triaxial compression[J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2016(10): 2761-2768. (in Chinese) )
[9]	俞缙, 李宏, 陈旭, 等. 砂岩卸围压变形过程中渗透特性与声发射试验研究[J]. 岩石力学与工程学报, 2014, 33(1): 69-79. (YU Jin, LI Hong, CHEN Xu, et al.Experimental study on permeability and acoustic emission characteristics of sandstone during processes of unloading confining pressure and deformation[J]. Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering, 2014, 33(1): 69-79. (in Chinese))
[10]	孔茜, 王环玲, 徐卫亚. 循环加卸载作用下砂岩孔隙度与渗透率演化规律试验研究[J]. 岩土工程学报, 2015, 37(10): 1893-1900. (KONG Qian, WANG Huang-ling, XU Wei-ya.Experimental investigation on relationship between porosity and permeability of sandstone under cyclic loading condition[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2015, 37(10): 1893-1900. (in Chinese))
[11]	王伟, 徐卫亚, 郑志, 等. 不同应力路径下花岗片麻岩渗透特性的试验研究[J]. 岩石力学与工程学报, 2016, 35(2): 260-267. (WANG Wei, XU Wei-ya, ZHENG Zhi, et al.Experimental study of permeability properties of granitic gneiss under different stress paths[J]. Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering, 2016, 35(2): 260-267. (in Chinese))
[12]	张振华, 孙钱程, 李德忠, 等. 周期性渗透压作用下红砂岩渗透特性试验研究[J]. 岩土工程学报, 2015, 37(5): 937-943. (ZHANG Zhen-hua, SUN Qian-cheng, LI De-zhong, et al.Experimental study on permeability characteristics of red sandstone under cyclic seepage pressures[J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2015, 37(5): 937-943. (in Chinese))
[13]	闵琪, 金贵孝, 荣春龙. 低渗透油气田研究与实践[M]. 北京: 石油工业出版社, 1998: 1-5. (MIN Qi, JIN Gui-xiao, RONG Chun-long.Studies and practices on low permeability oil and gas field[M]. Beijing: Petroleum Industry Press, 1998: 1-5. (in Chinese))
[14]	HEILAND J.Laboratory testing of coupled hydro-mechanical processes during rock deformation[J]. Hydrogeol Journal, 2003, 11(1): 122-141.
[15]	朱泽奇, 盛谦, 冷先伦, 等. 三峡花岗岩起裂机制研究[J]. 岩石力学与工程学报, 2007, 26(12): 2570-2575. (ZHU Ze-qi, SHENG Qian, LENG Xian-lun, et al.Study of crack initiation mechanism of three gorges granite[J]. Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering, 2007, 26(12): 2570-2575. (in Chinese))
[16]	FRENCH M E, CHESTER F M, CHESTER J S, et al.Stress-dependent transport properties of fractured arkosic sandstone[J]. Geofluids, 2016, 16(3): 533-551.
[17]	XU P, YANG S Q.Permeability evolution of sandstone under short-term and long-term triaxial compression[J]. International Journal of Rock Mechanics & Mining Sciences, 2016, 85: 152-164.
[18]	王伟, 田振元, 朱其志, 等. 考虑孔隙水压力的岩石统计损伤本构模型研究[J]. 岩石力学与工程学报, 2015, 34(增刊2): 3676-3682. (WANG Wei, TIAN Zhen-yuan, ZHU Qi-zhi, et al.Study of statistical damage constitutive model for rock considering pore water pressure[J]. Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering, 2015, 34(S2): 3676-3682. (in Chinese))
[19]	GAO C, XIE L Z, XIE H P, et al.Coupling between the statistical damage model and permeability variation in reservoir sandstone: theoretical analysis and verification[J]. Journal of Natural Gas Science and Engineering, 2017, 37: 375-385.