• 全国中文核心期刊
  • 中国科技核心期刊
  • 美国工程索引(EI)收录期刊
  • Scopus数据库收录期刊

圆形隧道弹塑性分析的强度理论效应研究

张常光, 张成林, 周菲, 晏青

张常光, 张成林, 周菲, 晏青. 圆形隧道弹塑性分析的强度理论效应研究[J]. 岩土工程学报, 2018, 40(8): 1449-1456. DOI: 10.11779/CJGE201808010
引用本文: 张常光, 张成林, 周菲, 晏青. 圆形隧道弹塑性分析的强度理论效应研究[J]. 岩土工程学报, 2018, 40(8): 1449-1456. DOI: 10.11779/CJGE201808010
ZHANG Chang-guang, ZHANG Cheng-lin, ZHOU Fei, YAN Qing. Effect of strength theory in elastic-plastic analysis of a circular tunnel[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2018, 40(8): 1449-1456. DOI: 10.11779/CJGE201808010
Citation: ZHANG Chang-guang, ZHANG Cheng-lin, ZHOU Fei, YAN Qing. Effect of strength theory in elastic-plastic analysis of a circular tunnel[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2018, 40(8): 1449-1456. DOI: 10.11779/CJGE201808010

圆形隧道弹塑性分析的强度理论效应研究  English Version

详细信息
    作者简介:

    张常光(1982- ),男,山东菏泽人,博士,副教授,从事非饱和土与地下工程等研究。E-mail: zcg1016@163.com。

Effect of strength theory in elastic-plastic analysis of a circular tunnel

  • 摘要: 合理的强度准则对隧道围岩的弹塑性分析十分重要,首先归纳建立了平面应变条件下8种岩土常用强度准则的统一线性方程,进而考虑围岩剪胀特性和塑性区不同弹性应变情况,推导了理想弹塑性围岩应力和位移的新解,并对所得新解进行可比性分析,最后探讨了围岩弹塑性分析的强度理论效应与塑性区位移的参数影响特性。研究结果表明:本文统一线性方程应用简洁灵活,便于探讨强度理论效应;围岩弹塑性新解可退化为众多已有解答,具有广泛的适用性;隧道围岩的强度理论效应明显,应优先选用广义Matsuoka-Nakai准则、统一强度理论(b=1/2)、Mogi-Coulomb准则和广义Lade-Duncan准则,谨慎采用统一强度理论(b=1)、外接圆Drucker-Prager准则,不鼓励使用内切圆Drucker-Prager准则和Mohr-Coulomb准则;围岩塑性区位移受剪胀特性、塑性区弹性应变的影响显著,且不同强度准则下二者的影响程度不同,应综合考虑3种因素的共同影响。
    Abstract: A reasonable strength criterion is very critical in elastic-plastic analysis of rock tunnel. Under the plane strain condition, a unified linear equation is first established inductively for eight commonly used strength criteria in geotechnical engineering. Then, with considerations of dilatancy and different elastic strains in the plastic zone, new solutions for stress and displacement of elastic-perfectly plastic rock are deduced. Furthermore, the feasibility analysis of the obtained solutions is carried out. Finally, both the effect of strength theory and parametric studies about the plastic displacement of tunnel are investigated. It is found that the unified linear equation is concise and flexible, which is convenient to discuss the effect of strength theory. The new solutions of elastic-perfectly plastic rock can be degraded into many existing solutions and have broad applicability. The effect of strength theory in elastic-plastic analysis of a circular rock tunnel is remarkable, therefore the generalized Matsuoka-Nakai criterion, the unified strength theory with parameter b=1/2, the Mogi-Coulomb criterion and the generalized Lade-Duncan criterion are recommended to be adopted. The application of the unified strength theory with parameter b=1 and the circumscribed Drucker-Prager criterion should be adopted cautiously. The inscribed Drucker-Prager criterion and the Mohr-Coulomb criterion are not encouraged. The dilatancy and the elastic strains in the plastic zone affect the plastic displacement of tunnel significantly, and the influencing extent of these two factors obviously varies with different strength criteria. The effects of the dilatancy, elastic strains in the plastic zone and strength theory should be comprehensively considered.
  • [1] JAEGER J C, COOK N G W, ZIMMERMAN R W. Fundamentals of rock mechanics[M]. 4th ed. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing, 2007.
    [2] 梁发云, 陈龙珠. 应变软化Tresca材料中扩孔问题解答及其应用[J]. 岩土力学, 2004, 25(2): 261-265.
    (LIANG Fa-yun, CHEN Long-zhu.Analytical solution to cavity expansion in strain-softening soils with Tresca yield criterion and its applications[J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2004, 25(2): 261-265. (in Chinese))
    [3] 李国强. 连拱隧道横断面应力分析及关键监测点研究[J]. 公路隧道, 2016(3): 12-15.
    (LI Guo-qiang.Research on stress analysis and key point monitoring of double-arch tunnel[J]. Highway Tunnel, 2016(3): 12-15. (in Chinese))
    [4] 何川, 齐春, 封坤, 等. 基于D-P准则的盾构隧道围岩与衬砌结构相互作用分析[J]. 力学学报, 2017, 49(1): 31-40.
    (HE Chuan, QI Chun, FENG Kun, et al.Theoretical analysis of interaction between surrounding rocks and linging structure of shield tunnel based on Drucker-Prager yield criteria[J]. Chinese Journal of Theoretical and Applied Mechanics, 2017, 49(1): 31-40. (in Chinese))
    [5] 张常光, 曾开华. 基于Mogi-Coulomb准则的围岩抗力系数新解[J]. 现代隧道技术, 2016, 53(5): 31-34.
    (ZHANG Chang-guang, ZENG Kai-hua.New solution of rock resistant coefficients based on the Mogi-Coulomb failure criterion[J]. Modern Tunnelling Technology, 2016, 53(5): 31-34. (in Chinese))
    [6] 吴创周, 杨林德, 李秋实. 弹脆塑性围岩应力和位移的广义SMP准则解[J]. 工程力学, 2013, 30(8): 223-228.
    (WU Chuang-zhou, YANG Lin-de, LI Qiu-shi.Perfect elastic-brittle-plastic solution of axisymmetric circular openings in rock mass on extended SMP criterion[J]. Engineering Mechanics, 2013, 30(8): 223-228. (in Chinese))
    [7] 饶平平, 张常光, 宋忠强. 基于Lade-Duncan准则的巷道围岩抗力系数[J]. 煤炭学报, 2013, 38(6): 982-986.
    (RAO Ping-ping, ZHANG Chang-guang, SONG Zhong-qiang.Rock resistant coefficient in tunnel based on Lade-Duncan failure criterion[J]. Journal of China Coal Society, 2013, 38(6): 982-986. (in Chinese))
    [8] 曾开华, 鞠海燕, 张常光. 深埋圆形隧道弹塑性位移统一解及其比较分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2011, 32(5): 1315-1319.
    (ZENG Kai-hua, JU Hai-yan, ZHANG Chang-guang.Elastoplastic unified solution for displacements around a deep circular tunnel and its comparative analysis[J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2011, 32(5): 1315-1319. (in Chinese))
    [9] 吉嶺充俊, 胡小荣, 俞茂宏, 等. 强度理论效应对岩土工程结构分析的影响[J]. 岩石力学与工程学报, 2002, 21(增刊2): 2314-2317.
    (MITSUTOSHI Y, HU Xiao-rong, YU Mao-hong, et al.Influences of the strength theory on geotechnical structure analysis[J]. Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering, 2002, 21(S2): 2314-2317. (in Chinese))
    [10] RAHIMI R, NYGAARD R.Comparison of rock failure criteria in predicting borehole shear failure[J]. International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences, 2015, 79: 29-40.
    [11] 姜福兴, 刘金海, 王平. 基于Druker-Prager准则的煤层冲击失稳模型[J]. 煤炭学报, 2011, 36(5): 727-731.
    (JIANG Fu-xing, LIU Jin-hai, WANG Ping.Model of coal burst and instability based on Druker-Prager yield criterion[J]. Journal of China Coal Society, 2011, 36(5): 727-731. (in Chinese))
    [12] 郑颖人, 沈珠江, 龚晓南. 岩土塑性力学原理[M]. 北京: 中国建筑工业出版社, 2002.
    (ZHENG Ying-ren, SHEN Zhu-jiang, GONG Xiao-nan.The principles of geotechnical plastic mechanics[M]. Beijing: China Architecture and Building Press, 2002. (in Chinese))
    [13] AL-AJMI A M, ZIMMERMAN R W. Relation between the Mogi and the Coulomb failure criteria[J]. International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Ming Sciences, 2005, 42(3): 431-439.
    [14] MATSUKA H, SUN D A.Extension of spatially mobilized plane (SMP) to frictional and cohesive materials and its application to cemented sands[J]. Soils and Foundations, 1995, 35(4): 63-72.
    [15] 朱建明, 吴则祥, 张宏涛, 等. 基于Lade-Duncan和SMP两种强度准则的岩石残余应力研究[J]. 岩石力学与工程学报, 2012, 31(8): 1715-1720.
    (ZHU Jian-ming, WU Ze-xiang, ZHANG Hong-tao, et al.Study of residual stress of rock based on Lade-Duncan and SMP strength criteria[J]. Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering, 2012, 31(8): 1715-1720. (in Chinese))
    [16] LADE P V, KIM M K.Single hardening constitutive model for frictional materials II. Yield criterion and plastic work contours[J]. Computers and Geotechnics, 1988, 6(1): 13-29.
    [17] 俞茂宏. 岩土类材料的统一强度理论及其应用[J]. 岩土工程学报, 1994, 16(2): 1-10.
    (YU Mao-hong.Unified strength theory for geomaterials and its applications[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 1994, 16(2): 1-10. (in Chinese))
    [18] 张长安. 圆形隧道围岩应力和位移的统一塑性解[J]. 铁道建筑, 2014(6): 85-87.
    (ZHANG Chang-an.Unified plastic solution of stress and displacement in surrounding rock of circular tunnel[J]. Railway Engineering, 2014(6): 85-87. (in Chinese))
  • 期刊类型引用(27)

    1. 冯海华,陆勇,黄卉. 粗粒土与结构接触面的空间曲率效应试验研究. 土工基础. 2025(01): 122-126 . 百度学术
    2. 胡达,肖超,梁小强,孔纲强,黎永索,蒋磊,杨仙. 考虑土拱效应的盾构隧道施工地表沉降预测. 工程地质学报. 2025(02): 783-793 . 百度学术
    3. 唐昌意,李松,李智文,崔凯,樊军伟,秦晓同. 挡墙绕顶转动下的有限土体主动土压力研究. 中国公路学报. 2025(04): 43-53 . 百度学术
    4. 刘光秀,党发宁,宋靖宇. 竖向分层土被动土压力的计算与分析. 应用基础与工程科学学报. 2024(03): 875-887 . 百度学术
    5. 喻卫华. 考虑基坑坑内有限土体被动土压力研究. 市政技术. 2024(06): 75-80+134 . 百度学术
    6. 张振波,黄安,周佳迪,刘志春,孙明磊. 基坑近接地铁车站主动土压力合力算法研究. 岩土工程学报. 2024(07): 1516-1524 . 本站查看
    7. 刘志春,马博,胡指南,张振波,杜孔泽. 邻近地下结构基坑主动土压力分布规律试验研究. 岩土力学. 2024(S1): 33-41 . 百度学术
    8. 程振威,李又云,王传波. 减荷措施下高填涵洞竖向土压力计算. 地下空间与工程学报. 2024(06): 1790-1797 . 百度学术
    9. 刘新喜,李彬,王玮玮,李松,贺程. 基于倾斜分层的挡墙主动土压力计算方法. 交通科学与工程. 2023(02): 41-48 . 百度学术
    10. 张振波,周佳迪,孙明磊,刘志春,胡指南. 近接增建基坑有限土体土压力计算方法探究. 铁道科学与工程学报. 2023(06): 2091-2102 . 百度学术
    11. 薛德敏,李天斌,张帅. 基于位移控制的双排桩桩后滑坡推力计算方法. 岩土工程学报. 2023(09): 1979-1986 . 本站查看
    12. 刘新喜,贺程,王玮玮,李彬. 放坡状态有限土体刚性挡墙滑动稳定性分析. 交通科学与工程. 2023(05): 37-44 . 百度学术
    13. 刘杰锋,曹海莹,王优群,高艳斌. 考虑土拱效应的黏性土主动土压力解析解. 铁道科学与工程学报. 2023(12): 4604-4612 . 百度学术
    14. 方焘,冉井念,刘春,张婷,徐翔. 考虑位移影响的有限土体基坑土压力研究. 重庆交通大学学报(自然科学版). 2022(01): 96-102+110 . 百度学术
    15. 蔡忠伟,朱彦鹏,武开通,马响响,丁亚飞. 临河基坑有限成层土体主动土压力计算. 科学技术与工程. 2022(02): 666-675 . 百度学术
    16. 赖丰文,刘松玉,杨大禹,程月红,范钦建. 有限宽度填土挡墙主动土压力的普适解法. 岩土工程学报. 2022(03): 483-491 . 本站查看
    17. 马明,李明东,郎钞棚,张京伍,万愉快. 刚性挡墙绕底转动时的非极限主动土压力数值解. 应用数学和力学. 2022(03): 312-321 . 百度学术
    18. 刘新喜,李彬,王玮玮,贺程,李松. 基于主应力迹线分层的有限土体土压力计算. 岩土力学. 2022(05): 1175-1186 . 百度学术
    19. 马明,李明东,张京伍,朱丽萍. 考虑层间剪应力的黏性土非极限主动土压力数值解. 广西大学学报(自然科学版). 2022(04): 854-861 . 百度学术
    20. 吴垠龙,刘维,贾鹏蛟,史培新. 矩形顶管近距离上穿既有隧道施工扰动分析. 地下空间与工程学报. 2022(06): 1968-1978 . 百度学术
    21. 关振长,黄金峰,何亚军,宁茂权. 基于极上限分析的临水深基坑围护结构主动土压力计算. 工程力学. 2022(11): 196-202+256 . 百度学术
    22. 孙望成,张道兵,蒋瑾,蔚彪,尹华东. 考虑Hoek-Brown准则的挡土墙主动土压力. 吉首大学学报(自然科学版). 2021(01): 61-65 . 百度学术
    23. 邵鹏,刘念武,房凯,黄栩,林强. 软土地区相邻深大基坑间有限土体土压力研究. 建筑施工. 2021(04): 691-695 . 百度学术
    24. 王崇宇,刘晓平,张家强,曹周红. 刚性墙后有限宽度土体被动滑裂面特征试验研究. 岩土力学. 2021(07): 1839-1849+1860 . 百度学术
    25. 王崇宇,刘晓平,曹周红,江旭,张家强. 刚性墙后有限宽度土体主动滑裂面特征试验研究. 岩土力学. 2021(11): 2943-2952 . 百度学术
    26. 张常光,吴凯,隋建浩. 基于小主应力轨迹的上埋式涵管竖向土压力非线性描述. 岩土工程学报. 2021(12): 2200-2208 . 本站查看
    27. 陈建旭,钱波,郭宁,余明东,庄锦亮. 倾斜挡墙黏性填土非极限主动土压力计算. 长江科学院院报. 2021(12): 137-145 . 百度学术

    其他类型引用(47)

计量
  • 文章访问数: 
  • HTML全文浏览量:  0
  • PDF下载量: 
  • 被引次数: 74
出版历程
  • 收稿日期:  2017-05-21
  • 发布日期:  2018-08-24

目录

    /

    返回文章
    返回