基于IDA的高面板堆石坝抗震性能评价

孔宪京; 庞锐; 邹德高; 徐斌; 周扬

doi:10.11779/CJGE201806002

基于IDA的高面板堆石坝抗震性能评价 English Version

孔宪京^{1, 2},
庞锐^2, ,,
邹德高^{1, 2},
徐斌^{1, 2},
周扬^{1, 2}

1. 海岸和近海工程国家重点试验室大连理工大学,辽宁大连116024;
2. 大连理工大学建设工程学部水利工程学院,辽宁大连116024

基金项目: 国家重点研发计划（2017YFC0404900）; 国家自然科学基金项目（51379028,51679029,51508071）

详细信息

作者简介:
孔宪京（1952- ）,男,江苏南京人,博士,教授,博士生导师,主要从事岩土地震工程和高土石坝抗震研究。E-mail：kongxj@dlut.edu.cn。

通讯作者:
庞锐，E-mail：pangruipangpan@163.com

计量
- 文章访问数: 366
- HTML全文浏览量: 10
- PDF下载量: 207
出版历程
- 收稿日期: 2017-02-06
- 发布日期: 2018-06-24

Seismic performance evaluation of high CFRDs based on incremental dynamic analysis

KONG Xian-jing^{1, 2},
PANG Rui^2, ,,
ZOU De-gao^{1, 2},
XU Bin^{1, 2},
ZHOU Yang^{1, 2}

1. The State Key Laboratory of Coastal and Offshore Engineering, Dalian University of Technology, Dalian 116024, China;
2. School of Hydraulic Engineering, Faculty of Infrastructure Engineering, Dalian University of Technology, Dalian 116024, China

摘要

摘要: 抗震性能分析能够有效估计结构在地震作用下的危险性,逐渐成为抗震安全性评价的重要方法,但由于结构的复杂性,该方法在面板堆石坝方面的应用还处于起步阶段。随着强震区大量高面板堆石坝的建设,这些高坝的安全性是必须要考虑的重大问题,因此对大坝进行抗震性能分析至关重要。增量动力分析（IDA）法作为一种抗震性能分析方法,能够全面、深入地分析在不同强度地震作用下结构性能的变化。将IDA法引入到高面板堆石坝安全评价领域,建立了高面板堆石坝地震破坏性能评价方法。根据场地条件选取了15条不同的强震动记录,以地震峰值加速度PGA为地震动参数,采用坝体地震震后变形、坝坡稳定性、面板防渗体安全为抗震性能评价指标,选取合适的性能参数,建议了高面板堆石坝各评价指标的破坏等级划分标准,通过大量非线性有限元计算,得到各性能参数的地震易损性曲线,分析了大坝在不同强度地震作用下发生破坏的概率,成果可为高面板堆石坝抗震性能设计和安全风险评估提供参考和依据。
- 高面板堆石坝 /
- 抗震性能 /
- 增量动力分析 /
- 地震易损性
Abstract: The seismic performance analysis can effectively estimate the risk of structures under earthquake action, so it gradually becomes the important method of seismic safety evaluation. However, this method is still in the beginning stage of application because of the complexity of CFRDs. The safety of these high dams must be seriously considered as a large number of high CFRDS are constructed, so it is very important to perform the seismic performance analysis of dams. As the seismic performance analysis method, the incremental dynamic analysis (IDA) can analyze the change of structural performance under different intensity earthquakes comprehensively and deeply. IDA is introduced into the field of safety evaluation of high CFRDs, and a seismic damage performance evaluation method is established. Fifteen different strong motion records are chosen according to the site conditions. The peak ground acceleration of earthquake is selected as the earthquake intensity factor. The dam seismic deformation, slope stability and anti-seepage of face safety are selected as the indexes of seismic performance evaluation. First, the damage grade standards of high CFRDs of each evaluation index are suggested after selecting the appropriate performance parameters. Afterwards, the seismic fragility curves of each performance parameter are acquired through a large number of nonlinear finite element calculations. Finally, the failure probability of dams under different earthquake intensities is analyzed, and the results may provide the reference and basis for the seismic performance design and safety risk assessment of high CFRDs.
- high CFRD /
- seismic performance /
- incremental dynamic analysis /
- seismic fragility

HTML全文

参考文献(21)

[1]	Euro code 8-2004. Design of structures for earthquake resistances 8-2004. Design of structures for earthquake resistances[S]. 2004.
[2]	NEHRP guidelines for the seismic rehabilitation of buildings[S]. 1996.
[3]	CECS160—2004建筑工程抗震性态设计通则(试用)[S]. 2004. (CECS160—2004 General rule for performance based seismic design of buildings[S]. 2004. (in Chinese))
[4]	Federal Emergency Management Agency.FEMA-65: federal guidelines for dam safety-earthquake analysis and design of dams[R]. Washington DC: Federal Emergency Management Agency, 2005.
[5]	张楚汉, 金峰, 王进廷, 等. 高混凝土坝抗震安全评价的关键问题与研究进展[J]. 水利学报, 2016, 47(3): 253-264. (ZHANG Chu-han, JIN Feng, WANG Jin-ting, et al.Key issues and developments on seismic safety evaluation of high concrete dams[J]. Journal of Hydraulic Engineering, 2016, 47(3): 253-264. (in Chinese))
[6]	陈厚群. 大坝的抗震设防水准及相应性能目标[C]// 第二届全国防震减灾工程学术研讨会论文集. 广州, 2005. (CHEN Hou-qun.Seismic fortification levels and performance objectives for large dams[C]// Proceedings of the 2nd national conference on Engineering Mitigation of Earthquake Disasters. Guangzhou, 2005. (in Chinese))
[7]	VAMVATSIKOS D.Incremental dynamic analysis[J]. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics, 2002, 31(3): 491-514.
[8]	王海波. 水工抗震学科国际科学技术发展动态跟踪[J]. 中国水利水电科学研究院学报, 2009, 7(2): 286-293. (WANG Hai-bo.A state-of-art report on aseismic design of hydraulic structure[J]. Journal of China Institute of Water Resources and Hydropower Research, 2009, 7(2): 286-293. (in Chinese))
[9]	沈怀至, 金峰, 张楚汉. 基于性能的重力坝-地基系统地震易损性分析[J]. 工程力学, 2008, 25(12): 86-91. (SHEN Huai-zhi, JIN Feng, ZHANG Chu-han.Performance based seismic fragility analysis of concrete gravity foundation system[J]. Engineering Mechanics, 2008, 25(12): 86-91. (in Chinese))
[10]	王笃波, 刘汉龙, 于陶, 等. 基于变形的土石坝地震易损性分析[J]. 岩土工程学报, 2013, 35(5): 814-819. (WANG Du-bo, LIU Han-long, YU Tao, et al.Seismic fragility analysis for earth-rockfill dams based on deformation[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2013, 35(5): 814-819. (in Chinese))
[11]	SWAISGOOD J R.Embankment dam deformations caused by earthquakes[C]// Pacific Conference on Earthquake Engineering[CD-ROM]. Christchurch, 2003.
[12]	陈生水, 李国英, 傅中志. 高土石坝地震安全控制标准与极限抗震能力研究[J]. 岩土工程学报, 2013, 35(1): 59-65. (CHEN Sheng-shui, LI Guo-ying, FU Zhong-zhi.Safety criteria and limit resistance capacity of high earth-rock dams subjected to earthquakes[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2013, 35(1): 59-65. (in Chinese))
[13]	赵剑明, 刘小生, 杨玉生, 等. 高面板堆石坝抗震安全评价标准与极限抗震能力研究[J]. 岩土工程学报, 2015, 37(12): 2254-2261. (ZHAO Jian-ming, LIU Xiao-sheng, YANG Yu-sheng, et al.Criteria for seismic safety evaluation and maximum aseismic capability of high concrete face rockfill dams[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2015, 37(12): 2254-2261. (in Chinese))
[14]	GHANAAT Y.Failure modes approach to safety evaluation of dams[C]// 13th World Conf on Earthquake Eng. Vancouver, 2004: 1115.
[15]	孔宪京, 邹德高. 紫坪铺面板堆石坝震害分析与数值模拟[M]. 北京: 科学出版社, 2014. (KONG Xian-jing, ZOU De-gao.The seismic damage analysis and numerical simulation of Zi Pingpu CFRD[M]. Beijing: Science Press, 2014. (in Chinese))
[16]	孔宪京. 混凝土面板堆石坝抗震性能[M]. 北京: 科学出版社, 2015. (KONG Xian-jing.Seismic performance of concrete-faced rockfill dam[M]. Beijing: Science Press, 2015. (in Chinese))
[17]	JM Raphael.The tensile strength of concrete[J]. ACI J Proc, 1984, 81(17): 158-165.
[18]	GRDarbre. Swiss Guidelines for the Earthquake Safety of Dams[C]// Proc 13th WCEE, Vancouver B C. 2004: 1794.
[19]	OZKAN M Y.A review of considerations on seismic safety of embankments and earth and rock-fill dams[J]. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 1998, 17: 439-458.
[20]	田景元, 刘汉龙, 伍小玉. 高土石坝极限抗震能力的评判角度及标准述评[J]. 防灾减灾工程学报, 2013(增刊1): 128-131. (TIAN Jing-yuan, LIU Han-long, WU Xiao-yu.Evaluation perspectives and criteria of maximum aseismic capability for high earth-rock dam[J]. Journal of Disaster Prevention and Mitigation Engineering, 2013(S1): 128-131. (in Chinese))
[21]	沈怀至, 张楚汉, 寇立夯. 基于功能的混凝土重力坝地震破坏评价模型[J]. 清华大学学报(自然科学版), 2007, 47(12): 2114-2118. (SHEN Huai-zhi, ZHANG Chu-han, KOU Li-hang.Performance-based seismic damage assessment model for concrete gravity dams[J]. J Tsinghua Univ (Sci& Tech), 2007, 47(12): 2114-2118.(in Chinese))

施引文献(7)

期刊类型引用(4)

1.	王艳，薛逸翔，朱鹏. 电动联合渗透反应屏障修复污染土壤的研究进展. 安全与环境学报. 2024(01): 330-344 . 百度学术
2.	周细霞，刘朝淑，孙荣国. Fe(II)改性蒙脱石对土壤汞的吸附固定机理探究. 贵州师范大学学报(自然科学版). 2024(04): 63-74 . 百度学术
3.	王艳，张李奕岚，朱鹏，王恒宇. 电动法去除污染土中重金属铬的试验研究. 安全与环境学报. 2024(08): 3251-3259 . 百度学术
4.	李宗春，郭苗章，谌伟艳. 某废弃矿山重金属污染土壤治理约束优化研究. 环境科学与管理. 2023(05): 71-75 . 百度学术