• 全国中文核心期刊
  • 中国科技核心期刊
  • 美国工程索引(EI)收录期刊
  • Scopus数据库收录期刊

动态巴西圆盘劈裂试验的极限分析解

杨仁树, 陈骏, 刘殿书

杨仁树, 陈骏, 刘殿书. 动态巴西圆盘劈裂试验的极限分析解[J]. 岩土工程学报, 2017, 39(6): 1156-1160. DOI: 10.11779/CJGE201706024
引用本文: 杨仁树, 陈骏, 刘殿书. 动态巴西圆盘劈裂试验的极限分析解[J]. 岩土工程学报, 2017, 39(6): 1156-1160. DOI: 10.11779/CJGE201706024
YANG Ren-shu, CHEN Jun, LIU Dian-shu. Limit analysis solution of dynamic Brazilian tests[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2017, 39(6): 1156-1160. DOI: 10.11779/CJGE201706024
Citation: YANG Ren-shu, CHEN Jun, LIU Dian-shu. Limit analysis solution of dynamic Brazilian tests[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2017, 39(6): 1156-1160. DOI: 10.11779/CJGE201706024

动态巴西圆盘劈裂试验的极限分析解  English Version

基金项目: 国家自然科学基金青年基金项目(51404273)
详细信息
    作者简介:

    杨仁树(1963- ),男,安徽和县人,教授,博士生导师,主要从事岩土工程,矿建工程方面的教学与研究工作。E-mail: yangg1531@163.com。

    通讯作者:

    陈骏,E-mail:cj0354@126.com

  • 中图分类号: TU458

Limit analysis solution of dynamic Brazilian tests

  • 摘要: 通过极限分析上限定理对巴西圆盘动态劈裂试验的弹性解进行了优化,考虑高速冲击作用导致的岩石试件端部剪切裂纹对动态拉伸强度的影响,获得了计算动态拉伸强度上限解的新公式。通过对实测的砂岩动态劈裂试验结果的分析,对比了原始的弹性解和得到的上限解间的差别,研究表明砂岩的动态拉伸性能随加载率的变化不明显,随着加载率的提高,动态拉伸强度曲线较平缓,说明砂岩在动态作用下承受拉应力的能力较低,抗拉强度的变化范围较小。同时验证了基于极限分析法的岩石动态抗拉强度公式可以为砂岩的工程应用提供更安全可靠的参考值。
    Abstract: By using the limit analysis upper bound theorem, the elastic solution of dynamic Brazilian tests is optimized. Considering the effects of the radially angled cracks caused by the high-speed impact at contact points of the disk on the dynamic tensile strength, a new formula for computing the upper bound solution of the limit dynamic tensile strength is obtained. The original elastic solution and new upper bound solution are discussed by analyzing the dynamic tensile results of sandstone. The research shows that the dynamic tensile properties of sandstone do not change significantly with the loading rate. With the increase of the loading rate, the curve of dynamic tensile strength is relatively flat. The upper bound solution offers a more secure and reliable reference value for the use of sandstone rock mass.
  • [1] 卢芳云. 霍普金森杆试验技术[M]. 北京: 科学出版社, 2013. (LU Fang-yun. Hopkinson bar techniques[M]. Beijing: Science Press, 2013. (in Chinese))
    [2] XIA K, YAO W. Dynamic rock tests using split Hopkinson (Kolsky) bar system-A review[J]. Journal of Rock Mechanics and Geotechnical Engineering, 2015, 7(1): 27-59.
    [3] GOMEZ J T, SHUKLA A, SHARMA A. Static and dynamic behavior of concrete and granite in tension with damage[J]. Theoretical and Applied Fracture Mechanics, 2001, 36(1): 37-49.
    [4] ZHANG Q B, ZHAO J. Determination of mechanical properties and full-field strain measurements of rock material under dynamic loads[J]. International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences, 2013, 60: 423-439.
    [5] 陈静静. 基于高速DIC方法的脆性材料动态力学性能研究[D]. 北京: 北京理工大学, 2014. (CHEN Jing-jing. Study on the dynamic mechanical properties of brittle materials by high-speed DIC[D]. Beijing: Beijing Institute of Technology, 2014. (in Chinese))
    [6] ZHU W C, BAI Y, LI X B, et al. Numerical simulation on rock failure under combined static and dynamic loading during SHPB tests[J]. International Journal of Impact Engineering, 2012, 49: 142-157.
    [7] 宫凤强. 动静组合加载下岩石力学特性和动态强度准则的试验研究[D]. 长沙: 中南大学, 2010. (GONG Feng-qiang. Experimental study of rock mechanical properties under coupled static-dynamic loads and dynamic strength criterion[D]. Changsha: Central South University, 2010. (in Chinese))
    [8] 杨小礼. 线性与非线性破坏准则下岩土极限分析方法及其应用[D]. 长沙: 中南大学, 2002. (YANG Xiao-li. Limit analysis method and its application to geotechnical engineering with linear and nonlinear failure criteria[D]. Changsha: Central South University, 2002. (in Chinese))
    [9] 杨 峰, 阳军生, 赵炼恒. 浅埋隧道工作面破坏模式与支护反力研究[J]. 岩土工程学报, 2010(2): 279-284. (YANG Feng, YANG Jun-sheng, ZHAO Lian-heng. Collapse mechanism and support pressure for shallow tunnel face[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2010(2): 279-284. (in Chinese))
    [10] 陈祖煜. 土力学经典问题的极限分析上、下限解[J]. 岩土工程学报, 2002, 24(1): 1-11. (CHEN Zu-yu. Limit analysis for the classic problems of soil mechanics[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2002, 24(1): 1-11. (in Chinese))
    [11] 阿比尔的, 冯夏庭, 郑颖人, 等. 岩土类材料应变分析与基于极限应变判据的极限分析[J]. 岩石力学与工程学报, 2015, 34(8): 1552-1560. (A Bierde, FENG Xia-ting, ZHENG Yin-ren, et al. Strain analysis and numerical analysis based on limit strain for geomaterials[J]. Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering, 2015, 34(8): 1552-1560. (in Chinese))
    [12] CHEN W F. Limit analysis and soil plasticity[M]. York: Elsevier Scientific Publishing Co, 1975.
    [13] GB/T50266—99 工程岩体试验方法标准[S]. 1999. (GB/T50266—99 Standard for tests method of engineering rock masses[S]. 1999. (in Chinese))
计量
  • 文章访问数:  310
  • HTML全文浏览量:  3
  • PDF下载量:  333
  • 被引次数: 0
出版历程
  • 收稿日期:  2016-06-02
  • 发布日期:  2017-06-24

目录

    /

    返回文章
    返回