采用<em>K</em>-刚度法设计的模块式加筋土挡墙数值模拟

陈建峰; 张琬

doi:10.11779/CJGE201706005

采用K-刚度法设计的模块式加筋土挡墙数值模拟 English Version

陈建峰,
张琬

同济大学地下建筑与工程系,上海 200092

基金项目: 国家自然科学基金项目（41572266, 41072200）

详细信息

作者简介:
陈建峰(1972- ),男,浙江余姚人,工学博士,教授,主要从事加筋土结构与边坡支护、岩体力学与工程等方面的教学与研究工作。E-mail: jf_chen@tongji.edu.cn。

中图分类号: TU472
计量
- 文章访问数: 359
- HTML全文浏览量: 4
- PDF下载量: 203
出版历程
- 收稿日期: 2016-03-01
- 发布日期: 2017-06-24

Numerical modeling of a reinforced soil segmental retaining wall designed using the K-stiffness method

Department of Geotechnical Engineering, Tongji University, Shanghai 200092, China

摘要

摘要: 基于一采用K-刚度法设计的模块式加筋土挡墙建立有限差分数值模型,并采用界面双曲线模型真实模拟底层模块-水平基座界面及水平基座-地基界面,研究实际模块式加筋土挡墙在工作应力下的性状,并进一步分析墙趾界面剪切特性。结果表明：数值计算的挡墙筋材应变分布、填土中各层筋材最大拉力、墙面筋材连接力和墙面最大位移值与实测值比较吻合;K-刚度法计算的填土中筋材最大拉力值与数值模拟和实测值吻合较好,但墙面连接处筋材因受地基沉降和填土压实产生的下拉力影响而大于填土中筋材最大拉力,故K-刚度法不能用于墙面筋材连接力的验算;相较于刚性地基,压缩性地基上模块式加筋土挡墙的墙趾正应力系数较大,而墙趾承担荷载比例较小;尽管基座-地基界面剪切刚度较模块-基座界面小很多,由于其承受的剪应力也很小,墙趾并不会沿着基座-地基界面发生滑移破坏,模块-基座界面对挡墙墙趾起到主要的约束作用。
- 加筋土挡墙 /
- K-刚度法 /
- 模块 /
- 墙趾界面 /
- 数值模拟
Abstract: A finite difference numerical model is established for a reinforced segmental retaining wall (SRW) designed using the K-stiffness method. The hyperbolic interface model is used to actually simulate the block-leveling pad and leveling pad-foundation interface. The behaviors of the field wall under working stress are investigated, and the shear characteristics of the toe interface are further analyzed. The results show that the computed reinforcement strain distribution, the maximum reinforcement loads in the fill, the connection loads and the maximum facing displacements are in agreement with the measurements. The maximum reinforcement loads in the fill computed using the K-stiffness method agree well with those computed by numerical model and the measured. However, the K-stiffness method cannot be used for verification of the connection loads because the connection loads are larger than the maximum reinforcement loads in the fill due to the effect of the down-drag force mobilized by foundation settlement and backfill compaction. Compared to the SRWs on the rigid foundation, the walls on the compressible foundation have larger factors of normal toe loads and less fractions of the total loads carried by the toe. The leveling pad will not slide along its interface with the foundation due to very small shear stress on it, although the shear stiffness of the leveling pad-foundation interface is much less than that of the block-leveling pad interface. Thus, the block-leveling pad interface plays a major role in the toe restraint.
- reinforced soil retaining wall /
- K-stiffness method /
- segmental block /
- toe interface /
- numerical modeling

HTML全文

参考文献(17)

[1]	AASHTO. LRFD bridge design specifications[S]. 6th ed. Washington D C: American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials, 2012.
[2]	GB 50209—98 土工合成材料应用技术规范[S]. 1998. (GB50209—98 Technical standard of application of geosynthetics[S]. 1998. (in Chinese))
[3]	BATHURST R J, ALLEN T M, WALTERS D L. Reinforcement loads in geosynthetic walls and the case for a new working stress design method[J]. Geotexitiles and Geomembranes, 2005, 23(4): 287-322.
[4]	BATHURST R J, MIYATA Y, NERNHEIM A, et al. Refinement of K -stiffness method for geosynthetic reinforced soil walls[J]. Geosynthetics International, 2008, 15(4): 269-295.
[5]	ALLEN T M, BATHURST R J, HOLTZ R D, et al. A new working stress method for prediction of reinforcement loads in geosynthetic walls[J]. Canadian Geotechnical Journal, 2003, 40: 976-994.
[6]	ALLEN T M, ASCE, BATHURST R J. Design and performance of 6.3-m-high, block-faced geogrid wall designed using K -stiffness method[J]. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, 2013, 140(2): 04013016.
[7]	BATHURST R J, WALTERS D, VLACHOPOULOS N, et al. Full scale testing of geosynthetic reinforced walls[M]// ZORNBERG J, CHRISTOPHER B R, eds. Advances in Transportation and Geoenvironmental Systems using Geosynthetics. Denver, 2000: 201-217.
[8]	HUANG B Q, BATHURST R J, HATAMI K. Influence of toe restraint on reinforced soil segmental walls[J]. Canadian Geotechnical Journal, 2010, 47(8): 885-904.
[9]	LESHCHINSKY D. Discussion on ‘‘The influence of facing stiffness on the performance of two geosynthetic reinforced soil retaining walls’’[J]. Canadian Geotechnical Journal, 2007, 44(12): 1479-1482.
[10]	LESHCHINSKY D, VAHEDIFARD F. Impact of toe resistance in reinforced masonry block walls: design dilemma[J]. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, 2012, 138(2): 236-240.
[11]	陈建峰. 基于墙趾真实约束条件的模块式加筋土挡墙数值模拟[J]. 岩土工程学报, 2014, 36(9): 1640-1647. (CHEN Jian-feng. Numerical modeling of reinforced soil segmental walls under real toe restraint conditions[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2014, 36(9): 1640-1647. (in Chinese))
[12]	HATAMI K, BATHURST R J. Development and verification of a numerical model for the analysis of geosynthetic reinforced soil segmental walls under working stress conditions[J]. Canadian Geotechnical Journal, 2005, 42(4): 1066-1085.
[13]	LADE P V, LEE K L. Engineering properties of soils[R]. Los Angeles: University of California, 1976.
[14]	CHEN J F, YAN Y, BATHURST R J. Influence of leveling pad interface properties on soil reinforcement loads for walls on rigid foundations[C]// Proceedings of GeoShanghai International Conference 2014. Reston, 2014: 481-492.
[15]	NERNHEIM A, HUANG B, BATHURST R J. Using synthetic data from numerical modeling to verify the K -stiffness method for reinforced soil walls[C]// Proceedings of the 4th European Geosynthetics Conference. Edinburg, 2008: 1-8.
[16]	EHRLICH M, MIRMORADI S H. Evaluation of the effects of facing stiffness and toe resistance on the behavior of GRS walls[J]. Geotexiles and Geomembranes, 2013, 40: 28-36.
[17]	TAJIRI N, SASAKI H, NISHIMURA J, et al. Full-scale failure experiments of geotextile-reinforced soil walls with different facings[C]// Proceedings of 3rd International Symposium on Earth Reinforcement. Rotterdam, 1996: 525-530.

施引文献

资源附件(0)

计量

文章访问数: 359
HTML全文浏览量: 4
PDF下载量: 203
被引次数: 0

采用K-刚度法设计的模块式加筋土挡墙数值模拟 English Version

作者简介: 陈建峰(1972- ),男,浙江余姚人,工学博士,教授,主要从事加筋土结构与边坡支护、岩体力学与工程等方面的教学与研究工作。E-mail: jf_chen@tongji.edu.cn。

计量

出版历程

Numerical modeling of a reinforced soil segmental retaining wall designed using the K-stiffness method

计量

出版历程

目录

作者简介:
陈建峰(1972- ),男,浙江余姚人,工学博士,教授,主要从事加筋土结构与边坡支护、岩体力学与工程等方面的教学与研究工作。E-mail: jf_chen@tongji.edu.cn。