软土盾构法隧道纵向应力松弛规律的实测分析

廖少明; 门燕青; 肖明清; 张迪

doi:10.11779/CJGE201705003

软土盾构法隧道纵向应力松弛规律的实测分析 English Version

廖少明^{1, 2},
门燕青^1, ,,
肖明清³,
张迪³

1. 同济大学地下建筑与工程系,上海200092;
2. 同济大学岩土与地下工程教育部重点实验室,上海 200092;
3. 中铁第四勘察设计院集团有限公司,湖北武汉 430063

基金项目: 国家重点基础研究发展计划（“973”计划）项目（2015CB057806）; 国家自然科学基金项目（51378389）; 山东省自然科学基金项目（ZR2016EEQ13,ZR2014EEQ28）

详细信息

作者简介:
廖少明（1966- ）,男,博士,教授,博士生导师,主要从事隧道、基坑等地下工程设计与施工控制关键技术方面的教学和科研。E-mail: liaosm@126.com。

通讯作者:
门燕青，E-mail：menyanqing@126.com

中图分类号: TU457；U456
计量
- 文章访问数: 418
- HTML全文浏览量: 5
- PDF下载量: 373
出版历程
- 收稿日期: 2016-02-02
- 发布日期: 2017-05-24

Field tests on longitudinal stress relaxation along shield tunnel in soft ground

1. Department of Geotechnical Engineering, Tongji Unviersity, Shanghai 200092, China;
2. Key Laboratory of Geotechnical and Underground Engineering of Ministry of Education, Tongji University, Shanghai 200092, China;
3. China Railway Siyuan Survey and Design Group Co., Ltd., Wuhan 430063, China

摘要

摘要: 为研究软土盾构法隧道的纵向应力松弛特性,对钱江隧道典型断面的管片体、衬砌环面的纵向应力松弛特性和环间纵向连接螺栓轴力的时变特性进行了长达两年的现场实测。结果表明,软土盾构法隧道管片体的纵向应力松弛将经历周期性剧烈波动、动态稳定、逐渐衰减、趋于稳定四个阶段的演变,其纵向应力平均值由3 MPa逐渐松弛为1.2 MPa,在达到稳定前至少需要1 a时间;与此同时,衬砌环缝面上的接触应力松弛也经历上述4个阶段的演变,其接触应力平均值由2 MPa逐渐松弛为1 MPa,在达到稳定前至少需要18个月;隧道环间连接螺栓轴力先减小、然后暂时稳定、最后增大,且在经历了2 a的显著波动后仍未稳定表明隧道纵向应力松弛导致接触状态仍处于复杂的演变过程之中,其最终稳定需要更长时间。软土盾构法隧道的纵向应力松弛是衬砌环间接触调整、土体-隧道结构接触调整和螺栓体松弛三大要素的时变性及其共同作用的结果,可导致隧道环面接缝刚度降低、环间抗剪承载力下降、环间接缝的防水密封性能弱化等,应引起工程界重视。
- 盾构法隧道 /
- 纵向应力松弛 /
- 松弛机理及效应 /
- 现场实测
Abstract: In order to study the longitudinal stress relaxation properties along shield tunnels in soft ground, two years of field tests in Qianjiang Tunnel are carried out using monitoring cells to obtain the relaxation characteristics of tunnel segments and the contact surface between adjacent lining rings, and to obtain the time-dependent response of longitudinal bolts connected adjacent rings. The results show that the longitudinal stress evolution process inside the segments in soft ground experiences four stages: drastic fluctuation, dynamic stabilization, gradual attenuation and final stabilization. The longitudinal stress relaxation inside the segments lasts for at least 1 year, and causes stress reduction from 3 to 1.2 MPa gradually. Similarly, the development of longitudinal stress between adjacent lining rings experiences four periods as well. After 18 months of longitudinal stress relaxation, the stress value on the interface between adjacent rings decreases from 2 to 1 MPa. The axial forces of bolts decrease first, then temporarily stabilize, and finally increase, and the axial forces of longitudinal bolts are still not stable after two years of dynamic adjustment. Therefore, the origination of longitudinal stress relaxation along the shield tunnel in soft ground is the time-dependent response of contact adjusting between adjacent rings, interaction of lining and soils, and axial forces relaxation of bolts, and coupled-interaction with each other. The stress relaxation along shield tunnel will easily lead to stiffness degradation, shear resistance reduction, and leakage water, etc. The above characteristics should be considered carefully in the future.
- shield tunneling /
- longitudinal stress relaxation /
- effect and mechanism of stress relaxation /
- field test

HTML全文

参考文献(18)

[1]	SUGIMOTO M, SRAMOON A. Theoretical model of shield behavior during excavation: I theory[J]. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, 2002, 128(2): 138-155.
[2]	BLOM C B M, VAN DER Horst E J, JOVANOVIC P S. Three-dimensional structural analyses of the shield-driven “green heart” tunnel of the high-speed line south[J]. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 1999, 14(2): 217-224.
[3]	LIAO S M, LIU J H, WANG R L, et al. Shield tunneling and environment protection in Shanghai soft ground[J]. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 2009, 24: 454-465.
[4]	廖少明, 白廷辉, 彭芳乐, 等. 盾构隧道纵向沉降模式及其结构响应[J]. 地下空间与工程学报, 2006, 2(4): 566-570. (LIAO Shao-ming, BAI Ting-hui, PENG Fang-le, et al. Longitudinal settlement forms and structural response of shield tunnel[J]. Chinese Journal of Underground Space and Engineering, 2006, 2(4): 566-570. (in Chinese))
[5]	廖少明. 圆形隧道纵向剪切传递效应研究[D]. 上海: 同济大学, 2002. (LIAO Shao-ming. Research on the effect of longitudinal shear transfer on circular tunnel lining[D]. Shanghai: Tongji University, 2002. (in Chinese))
[6]	LIAO S M, PENG F L, SHEN S L. Analysis of shearing effect on tunnel induced by load transfer along longitudinal direction[J]. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 2008, 23: 421-430.
[7]	王如路. 上海软土地铁隧道变形影响因素及变形特征分析[J]. 地下工程与隧道, 2009(1): 1-6. (WANG Ru-lu. Factors influencing deformation of Shanghai soft soil metro tunnel and deformation analysis[J]. Underground Engineering and Tunnels, 2009(1): 1-6. (in Chinese))
[8]	ARNAU O, MOLINS C, BLOM C B M, et al. Longitudinal time-dependent response of segmental tunel linings[J]. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 2012, 28: 98-108.
[9]	TALMON A M, BEZUIJEN A. Calculation of longitudinal bending moment and shear force for Shanghai Yangtze River Tunnel: Application of lessons from Dutch research[J]. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 2013, 35: 161-171.
[10]	HUANG H W, GONG W P, KHOSHNEVISAN S, et al. Simplified procedure for finite element analysis of the longitudinal performance of shield tunnels considering spatial soil variability in longitudinal direction[J]. Computers and Geotechnics, 2015, 64: 132-145.
[11]	SHEN S L, WU H N, CUI Y J, et al. Long-term settlement behaviour of metro tunnels in the soft deposits of Shanghai[J]. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 2014, 40(12): 309-323.
[12]	WU H N, SHEN S L, LIAO S M, et al. Longitudinal structural modelling of shield tunnels considering shearing dislocation between segmental rings[J]. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 2015, 50: 317-323.
[13]	叶飞, 杨鹏博, 毛家骅, 等. 基于模型试验的盾构隧道纵向刚度分析[J]. 岩土工程学报, 2015, 37(1): 83-90. (YE Fei, YANG Peng-bo, MAO Jia-hua, et al. Longitudinal rigidity of shield tunnels based on model tests[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2015, 37(1): 83-90. (in Chinese))
[14]	廖少明, 门燕青, 张迪, 等. 钱江隧道管片拼装过程中的力学行为实测分析[J]. 岩土工程学报, 2015, 37(1): 156-164. (LIAO Shao-ming, MEN Yan-qing, ZHANG Di, et al. Field tests on mechanical behaviors during assembly of segmental linings of Qianjiang tunnel[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2015, 37(1): 156-164. (in Chinese))
[15]	门燕青, 廖少明, 苑宝华. 超大直径盾构隧道纵向应力变化规律实测分析[C]// 第八届中日盾构隧道技术交流会论文集. 南京, 2015: 189-193. (MEN Yan-qing, LIAO Shao-ming, YUAN Bao-hua. Testing analysis of longitudinal stress along super large diameter shield tunnel[C]// The 8th China-Japan Conference on Shield Tunneling. Nanjing, 2015: 189-193. (in Chinese))
[16]	于怀昌, 赵阳, 刘汉东, 等. 三轴应力作用下水对岩石应力松弛特性影响作用试验研究[J]. 岩石力学与工程学报, 2015, 34(2): 313-322. (YU Huai-chang, ZHAO Yang, LIU Han-dong, et al. Experimental study of influence of water on stress relaxation of rock under triaxial stresses[J]. Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering, 2015, 34(2): 313-322. (in Chinese))
[17]	廖少明, 徐进, 焦齐柱. 盾构法隧道管片拼装过程中的衬砌内力解析[J]. 土木工程学报, 2013, 46(3): 127-135. (LIAO Shao-ming, XU Jin, JIAO Qi-zhu. Mechanical behaviors of tunnel lining during segment assembly[J]. China Civil Engineering Journal, 2013, 46(3): 127-135. (in Chinese))
[18]	徐进. 盾构隧道管片拼装力学机理分析[D]. 上海: 同济大学, 2013. (XU Jin. Mechanical behaviors of tunnel lining induced by segments assembly[D]. Shanghai: Tongji University, 2013. (in Chinese))

施引文献(7)

期刊类型引用(2)

1.	原媛，刘丝丝，崔勇涛，赖智龙，廖德祥. 生物酶用于河湖底泥脱水减量调理的对比研究. 水资源与水工程学报. 2025(01): 154-162 . 百度学术
2.	汤连生，陈洋，曾显帅，程子华，丁威涯. 聚合氯化铝预处理污泥联合脱水有效性及机理. 中山大学学报(自然科学版)(中英文). 2024(04): 37-46 . 百度学术