• 全国中文核心期刊
  • 中国科技核心期刊
  • 美国工程索引(EI)收录期刊
  • Scopus数据库收录期刊

EPS混合土的动模量和阻尼比特性

高洪梅, 沈艳青, 王志华, 陈国兴

高洪梅, 沈艳青, 王志华, 陈国兴. EPS混合土的动模量和阻尼比特性[J]. 岩土工程学报, 2017, 39(2): 279-286. DOI: 10.11779/CJGE201702011
引用本文: 高洪梅, 沈艳青, 王志华, 陈国兴. EPS混合土的动模量和阻尼比特性[J]. 岩土工程学报, 2017, 39(2): 279-286. DOI: 10.11779/CJGE201702011
GAO Hong-mei, SHEN Yan-qing, WANG Zhi-hua, CHEN Guo-xing. Dynamic modulus and damping ratio characteristics of EPS composite soil[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2017, 39(2): 279-286. DOI: 10.11779/CJGE201702011
Citation: GAO Hong-mei, SHEN Yan-qing, WANG Zhi-hua, CHEN Guo-xing. Dynamic modulus and damping ratio characteristics of EPS composite soil[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2017, 39(2): 279-286. DOI: 10.11779/CJGE201702011

EPS混合土的动模量和阻尼比特性  English Version

基金项目: 国家自然科学基金项目(51578286)
详细信息
    作者简介:

    高洪梅(1982- ),女,山东威海人,博士,副教授,主要从事软基处理及土动力学研究。E-mail: hongmei54@163.com。

Dynamic modulus and damping ratio characteristics of EPS composite soil

  • 摘要: 作为一种路堤填料,EPS混合土在动力荷载作用下的模量和阻尼比是进行路堤动力稳定性分析的重要参数。开展了15个循环扭剪试验研究EPS混合土的动力特性,分析了EPS混合土的骨干曲线、模量以及阻尼比特性,重点讨论了配合比和初始固结条件的影响。结果表明,EPS混合土具有典型的动力非线性特征,受水泥土强度和初始应力状态控制;EPS掺入比对混合土的初始剪切模量几乎无影响,但土体进入非线性阶段后,EPS颗粒对混合土强度的削弱作用明显;EPS颗粒与水泥土间薄弱接触面的动力行为导致“结构阻尼”效应,是混合土阻尼机制的重要组成;EPS混合土的初始剪切模量随试样初始小主应力增大而增大,其模量衰减特性与初始小主应力和EPS掺入比显著相关。基于试验结果,给出了描述EPS混合土骨干曲线、模量衰减和阻尼比增长特性的经验模型。
    Abstract: The shear modulus and damping ratio of EPS composite soil, as a kind of artificial filling material, are the key parameters to analyze the dynamic stability of embankment. 15 cyclic torsional tests are conducted on the hollow cylindrical samples of EPS composite soil to study its dynamic characteristics. The characteristics of skeleton curve, dynamic shear modulus and damping ratio for EPS composite soil are analyzed. The influences of mixing ratio and initial consolidation state are discussed. It is found that the EPS composite soil is characterized by typical dynamic non-linearity which is controlled by the strength of cemented soil and the initial stress state, but EPS bead content has no obvious influence on the initial shear modulus. After EPS composite soil enteres the non-linear deformation stage, EPS beads have a remarkable weakening effect on its strength. The “structural damping” effect induced by the dynamic behavior of the weak interface formed between EPS beads and cemented soil is an important component of the damping mechanism for EPS composite soil. The initial shear modulus increases with the increase of the initial minor principal stress. And the modulus attenuation characteristics are significantly influenced by the initial minor principal stress and EPS bead content. Based on the test results, the empirical models are given to describe the skeleton curve, modulus attenuation and damping growth characteristics for EPS composite soil.
  • [1] YOONZ G L, JEON S S, KIM B T. Mechanical characteristics of light-weighted soils using dredged materials[J]. Marine Georesources and Geotechnology, 2004, 22(4): 215-229.
    [2] MIAO L C, WANG F, HAN J, et al. Properties and applications of cement-treated sand-expanded polystyrene bead lightweight fill[J]. Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering, 2013, 25(1): 86-93.
    [3] LIU H L, DENG A, CHU J. Effect of different mixing ratios of polystyrene pre-puff beads and cement on the mechanical behaviour of lightweight fill[J]. Geotextiles and Geomembranes, 2006, 24(6): 331-338.
    [4] GAO H M, CHEN Y M, LIU H L, et al. Creep behavior of EPS composite soil[J]. Science China (Technological Sciences), 2012, 55(11): 3070-3080.
    [5] KIM Y T, AHN J, HAN W J, et al. Experimental evaluation of strength characteristics of stabilized dredged soil[J]. Journal of Material in Civil Engineering, 2010, 22(5): 539-544.
    [6] KUNIO M, KATSUHIKO M, RIKI T. Strength deformational characteristics of EPS beads-mixed lightweight geomaterial subjected to cyclic loading[C]// Proceedings of the International Workshop on Lightweight Geomaterials. Tokyo, 2002: 119-124.
    [7] 王庶懋, 高玉峰. 砂土与EPS颗粒混合的轻质土的动剪切模量衰减特性分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2007, 28(5): 1001-1005. (WANG Shu-mao, GAO Yu-feng. Study on degradation behavior of dynamic shear modulus for lightweight sand-EPS beads soil[J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2007, 28(5): 1001-1005. (in Chinese))
    [8] 李 晶, 缪林昌, 钟建驰, 等. EPS颗粒混合轻质土反复荷载下变形和阻尼特性[J]. 岩土力学, 2010, 31(6): 1769-1775. (LI Jing, MIAO Lin-chang, ZHONG Jian-chi, et al. Deformation and damping characteristics of EPS beads-mixed lightweight soil under repeated load- unloading[J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2010, 31(6): 1769-1775. (in Chinese))
    [9] 李明东, 田安国. 泡沫塑料混合轻质土在循环荷载下的力学性质[J]. 岩土工程学报, 2010, 32(11): 1806-1810. (LI Ming-dong, TIAN An-guo. Mechanical properties of EPS beads mixed lightweight soil under cyclic loading[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2010, 32(11): 1806-1810. (in Chinese))
    [10] 黎 冰, 高玉峰. 黏土与EPS颗粒混合轻质土的动力变形试验研究[J]. 岩土工程学报, 2007, 29(7): 1042-1047. (LI Bing, GAO Yu-feng. Experimental study on dynamic deformation characteristics of lightweight clay-EPS beads soil[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2007, 29(7): 1042-1047. (in Chinese))
    [11] HARDIN B O, DRNEVICH V P. Shear modulus and damping in soils: measurement and parameter effect[J]. Journal of Soil Mechanics and Foundations Division, 1972, 98(SM6): 603-624.
    [12] MAHER M H, RO K S, WELSH J P. High strain dynamic modulus and damping of chemically grouted sand[J]. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 1994, 13(2): 131-138.
    [13] FLORA A, LIRER S, SILVESTRI F. Undrained cyclic resistance of undisturbed gravelly soils[J]. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 2012, 43(4): 366-379.
    [14] ESTELLE D R, IRINI D M, RICHARD C, et al. Shear modulus and damping ratio of grouted sand[J]. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 2004, 24(6): 461-471.
    [15] DARENDELI M B. Development of a new family of normalized modulus reduction and material damping curves[D]. Austin: University of Texas, 2001.
    [16] ROLLINS K M, EVANS M D, DIEHL N B, et al. Shear modulus and damping relationships for gravels[J]. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, 1998, 124(5): 396-405.
    [17] SENETAKIS K, ANASTASIADIS A, PITILAKIS K. Dynamic properties of dry sand/rubber (SRM) and gravel/rubber (GRM) mixtures in a wide range of shearing strain amplitudes[J]. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 2012, 33(1): 38-53.
    [18] SEED H B, WONG R T, IDRISS I M, et al. Moduli and damping factors for dynamic analyses of cohesionless soils[J]. Journal of Geotechnical Engineering Division, ASCE, 1986, 112(11): 1016-1032.
    [19] LIN S Y, LIN P S, LUO H S, et al. Shear modulus and damping ratio characteristics of gravelly deposits[J]. Canadian Geotechnical Journal, 2000, 37(3): 638-651.
    [20] TRANDAFIR A C, ERICKSON B A. Stiffness degradation and yielding of EPS geofoam under cyclic loading[J]. Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering, 2012, 24(1): 119-124.
    [21] ZARNANI S, BATHURST R J. Influence of constitutive model on numerical simulation of EPS seismic buffer shaking table tests[J]. Geotextiles and Geomembranes, 2009, 27(4): 308-312.
计量
  • 文章访问数: 
  • HTML全文浏览量:  0
  • PDF下载量: 
  • 被引次数: 0
出版历程
  • 收稿日期:  2015-12-10
  • 发布日期:  2017-03-24

目录

    /

    返回文章
    返回