Apparent kinetic viscosity of saturated Nanjing sand due to liquefaction-induced large deformation in torsional shear tests
-
摘要: 饱和砂土在地震作用下会发生液化变形,从而引起建立在其上的建（构）筑物发生破坏。为了对饱和砂土液化后大变形的流体特性进行研究,采用英国GDS公司的空心圆柱扭剪仪进行了饱和砂土液化后循环加载的流动性特性试验研究,在试验中循环加载直至双幅剪应变达到100%。通过对试验结果的分析,主要研究了初始静剪应力及有效围压对饱和南京砂液化后发生大变形时的流体特性的影响规律。研究结果表明：根据超孔压比确定的“零有效应力”状态末端试样其实已经进入剪胀阶段,即超孔压的反应与液化时“零有效应力”状态相比具有明显的滞后效应;初始静剪应力主要对饱和南京砂初始液化后的“零有效应力”阶段的表观黏度与剪应变率关系曲线的影响较大,反而对反向卸载段的关系曲线影响较小。同时,试验结果表明砂土液化后循环加载条件下砂土的流动性明显比单调加载条件下的流动性大的多。Abstract: The post-liquefaction dynamic flow deformation of saturated sand may cause severe damages on the ground and underground structures. To investigate the dynamic flow characteristics of the post-liquefied saturated sand, a series of undrained cyclic torsional shear tests on saturated Nanjing sand are conducted using the hollow column torsional shear apparatus by applying and measuring double amplitude shear strain up to about 100%. Based on the test results, how the effective confining pressure and the initial shear stress affect its dynamic flow characteristics in the liquefaction state is analyzed. The results show that the sample is actually in the dilation state at the end of "zero effective stress" determined by the excess pore pressure ratio. In other word, compared with the post-liquefaction "zero effective stress" state, the response of the excess pore pressure is hysteretic. The initial static shear stress has great effect on the apparent viscosity-strain rate relationship curves of saturated Nanjing sand in the "zero effective stress" state and the dilation state, while it has little effect on the apparent viscosity-strain rate relationship curves of saturated Nanjing sand in the reversal unloading state. Meanwhile, the easy flow property of saturated Nanjing sand under cyclic loading is obvious stronger than that under monotonic loading.
-
[1] SASAKI Y, TOWHATA I, TOKIDA K I, et al. Mechanism of permanent displacement of ground caused by liquefaction[J]. Soils and Foundations, 1992, 32(3): 79-96. [2] MIYAJIMA M, KITAURA M, KOIKE T, et al. Experimental study on characteristics of liquefied ground flow[C]// The First Interational Conference on Earthquake Geotechnical Engineering. Balkema, 1995: 969-974. [3] TAMATE S, TOWHATA I. Numerical simulation of ground flow caused by seismic liquefaction [J]. Soils Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 1999, 18: 473-485. [4] TOWHATA I, VARGAS-MONGE W, ORENSE R P, et al. Shaking table tests on subgrade reaction of pipe embedded in sandy liquefied subsoil[J]. Soils Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 1999, 18: 347-361. [5] 陈文化. 液化流滑变形模型及初步实验[J]. 自然灾害学报, 2004, 13(3): 75-80. (CHEN Wen-hua. Flow-slip deformations induced by seismic liquefaction and preliminary test results[J]. Journal of Natural Disasters, 2004, 13(3): 75-80. (in Chinese)) [6] 陈育民, 刘汉龙, 邵国建, 等. 液化及液化后砂土的流动特性分析[J]. 岩土工程学报, 2009, 31(9): 1408-1413. (CHEN Yu-min, LIU Han-long, SHAN Guo-jian, et al. Liquefaction and post-liquefaction flow behavior of sand[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2009, 31(9): 1408-1413. (in Chinese)) [7] 陈育民, 刘汉龙, 周云东. 液化及液化后砂土的流动特性分析[J]. 岩土工程学报, 2006, 28(9): 1139-1143. (CHEN Yu-min, LIU Han-long, ZHOU Yun-dong. Liquefaction and post-liquefaction flow behavior of sand[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2009, 28(9): 1139-1143. (in Chinese)) [8] 王志华, 周恩全, 吕 丛, 等. 基于流动性的饱和砂砾土液化机理[J]. 岩土工程学报, 2013, 35(10): 1816-1722. (WANG Zhi-hua, ZHOU En-quan, LÜ Cong, et al. Liquefaction mechanism of saturated gravelly soils based on flowing property[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2013, 35(10): 1816-1722. (in Chinese)) [9] 庄海洋, 胡中华, 王 瑞, 等. 饱和南京砂初始液化后特大流动变形特性试验研究[J]. 岩土工程学报, 2016. (ZHUANG Hai-yang, HU Zhong-hua, WANG Rui, et al. Extremely large post-liquefaction flow deformations of saturated Nanjing sand by the cyclic torsional shear loading tests[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2016. (in Chinese)) -
期刊类型引用(9)
1. 巫茂寅. 素土挤密桩对西北黄土湿陷性影响的试验研究. 中国新技术新产品. 2025(03): 121-123 . 
百度学术
2. 倪震. 基于分层综合估算法的粉煤灰回填地基承载力研究. 粘接. 2024(02): 147-150 . 百度学术
3. 王红肖. 改良黄土抗压强度试验探究. 水利科技与经济. 2024(09): 21-24 . 百度学术
4. 刘荆泉，徐昊天，陈文成，陈云泽，章定文. 施工参数对振杆密实法处理液化砂土地基效果的影响研究. 工程勘察. 2024(10): 29-35 . 百度学术
5. 化建新，王浩，张丹，梁涛. 地基处理综述及地基处理智能化——第九届全国岩土工程实录交流会特邀报告. 岩土工程技术. 2024(06): 631-643 . 百度学术
6. 徐昊天，苟志孝，王正伟，戴梁，章定文. 振杆密实法在高烈度区液化地基处理中的应用研究. 防灾减灾工程学报. 2024(06): 1439-1447 . 百度学术
7. 郑圣榆. 国有建筑企业中层管理者绩效考核体系构建研究. 现代企业文化. 2023(09): 137-140 . 百度学术
8. 唐文斐. 浅谈西北地区湿陷性黄土地基湿陷机理与处理措施. 房地产世界. 2023(14): 157-159 . 百度学术
9. 张振海. 湿陷性黄土地基的沉降规律与特征研究——以某商业楼倾斜事故为例. 重庆建筑. 2022(11): 57-61 . 百度学术
其他类型引用(4)
计量
- 文章访问数:
- HTML全文浏览量: 0
- PDF下载量:
- 被引次数: 13
下载:
