基于高密度电阻率法的水分迁移模型试验研究

刘庭发; 聂艳侠; 胡黎明; 周启友; 温庆博

doi:10.11779/CJGE201604023

基于高密度电阻率法的水分迁移模型试验研究 English Version

1.清华大学水利水电工程系，水沙科学与水利水电工程国家重点实验室，北京100084;
2.南京大学地球科学与工程学院，江苏南京210046

基金项目: 国家重点基础研究发展计划（“973”计划）课题项目; （2012CB719804）; 国家自然科学基金项目（51323014,41372352,

详细信息

作者简介:
刘庭发(1990- ),男,硕士,从事岩土工程方面的研究。E-mail: liutingfa2011@163.com。

中图分类号: TU411
计量
- 文章访问数: 0438
- HTML全文浏览量: 0
- PDF下载量: 0404
出版历程
- 修回日期: 2015-01-18
- 发布日期: 2016-04-24

Model tests on moisture migration based on high-density electrical resistivity tomography method

1. State Key Laboratory of Hydro-Science and Engineering, Department of Hydraulic Engineering, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084, China;
2. School of Earth Sciences and Engineering, Nanjing University, Nanjing 210046, China

摘要

摘要: 在土工模型试验中,常用的应用于水分及溶质迁移过程量测的传感器量测、图像分析及取样分析等方法并不能充分满足三维、无损、实时的量测需求。高密度电阻率成像法为土工模型试验中三维、无损、实时量测需求提供了新的解决思路。基于高密度电阻率成像法发展一套适用于常规物理模型及超重力离心环境中土体电阻率测试设备和分析方法,并通过开展模型试验验证其应用于水分迁移过程量测的适用性及有效性。常规物理模型试验（1g）表明,该设备及方法能够获得模型土体中电阻率的三维时空分布,入渗过程中电阻率与含水率的分布及变化合理反映电阻率与含水率定性关系; 在低有效饱和度区间,电阻率法具有很高的灵敏度。离心模型试验结果表明,重力水平的变化可导致水分在模型土柱中的分布发生显著变化; 实时量测技术及分析方法可为土工离心环境中渗流及溶质运移过程的分析提供更为准确的依据。高密度电阻率成像法可以成功应用于常规物理模型及超重力离心环境中水分迁移过程量测,并保证一定的精度和灵敏度。
- 电阻率成像法（ERT） /
- 温纳法 /
- 土壤电阻率 /
- 水分迁移 /
- 土工离心模型试验
Abstract: In geotechnical model tests, the methods conventionally employed in measuring water content and solute transport include sensor techniques, image processing techniques and direct soil sampling methods. However, these techniques cannot fully satisfy the necessities of three-dimensional, non-destructive and real-time measurement, especially in geotechnical centrifuge environment. A set of new measuring device and analyzing technique based on the high-density electrical tomography (ERT) method, is developed to investigate water migration at multiple gravitational levels. Two model tests, one on ground and the other in a geotechnical centrifuge, are conduced to verify the capability of the developed device in capturing moisture migration and distribution. The 3D infiltration model tests on ground (1g) show that the device is capable of measuring the 3D spatial and temporal distribution of soil resistivity in the model. The water migration and distribution during the infiltration process is reasonably reflected by the variation and distribution of soil resistivity. The resistivity method presents high sensitivity, especially when the soil is at relatively low saturation degree. In the 50g centrifugal model tests, obvious non-uniformity of water content distribution is observed at the loading and unloading stages, which indicates that moisture migration is highly subjected to gravitational levels and boundary conditions. The capability of real-time measurement and analysis of the ERT method provides critical insights into moisture migration in geotechnical model tests at multiple gravitation levels, and can be fed into a wide range of investigations regarding seepage and solute transport.
- electrical resistivity tomography /
- Wenner array /
- soil resistivity /
- moisture migration /
- centrifugal model test

HTML全文

参考文献(23)

[1]	LYNCH R J, ALLERSMA H G B, BARKER H, et al. Development of sensors, probes and imaging techniques for pollutant monitoring in geo-environmental model tests[J]. International Journal of Physical Modelling in Geotechnics, 2001, 1(4): 17-27.
[2]	TAYLOR R N. Geotechnical centrifuge technology[M]. London: Chapman & Hall Press, United Kingdom, 1995.
[3]	CALAMITA G, BROCCA L, PERRONE A, et al. Electrical resistivity and TDR methods for soil moisture estimation in central Italy test-sites[J]. Journal of Hydrology, 2012(454/455): 101-112.
[4]	PASHA A Y, HU L M, MEEGODA J N, et al. Centrifuge modeling of in situ surfactant enhanced flushing of diesel contaminated soil[J]. ASTM Geotechnical Testing Journal, 2011, 34(6): 623-633.
[5]	FRIEDMAN S P. Soil properties influencing apparent electrical conductivity: a review[J]. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture, 2005, 46(1): 45-70.
[6]	SAMOUËLIAN A, COUSIN I, TABBAGH A, et al. Electrical resistivity survey in soil science: a review[J]. Soil and Tillage Research, 2005, 83(2): 173-193.
[7]	李金铭. 地电场与电法勘探[M]. 北京: 地质出版社, 2005. (LI Jin-ming. Electric field and electrical prospecting[M]. Beijing: Geological Publishing House, 2005. (in Chinese))
[8]	LOKE M H, CHAMBERS J E, RUCKER D F, et al. Recent developments in the direct-current geoelectrical imaging method[J]. Journal of Applied Geophysics, 2013, 95: 135-156.
[9]	BENSON A K, PAYNE K L, STUBBEN M A. Mapping groundwater contamination using DC resistivity and VLF geophysical methods-A case study[J]. Geophysics, 1997, 62(1): 80-86.
[10]	DEPOUNTIS N, HARRIS C, DAVIES M C R. Application of electrical imaging to leachate plume evolution studies under in-situ and model conditions[J]. Environmental Geology, 2005, 47(7): 907-914.
[11]	ZHOU Q Y, SHIMADA J, SATO A. Three-dimensional spatial and temporal monitoring of soil water content using electrical resistivity tomography[J]. Water Resources Research, 2001, 37(2): 273-285.
[12]	ZHOU Q Y, SHIMADA J, SATO A. Temporal variations of the three-dimensional rainfall infiltration process in heterogeneous soil[J]. Water Resources Research, 2002, 38(4): 1-15.
[13]	MORSE M S, LU N, GODT J W, et al. Comparison of soil thickness in a zero-order basin in the Oregon coast range using a soil probe and electrical resistivity tomography[J]. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, 2012, 138(12): 1470-1482.
[14]	CHAMBERS J E, LOKE M H, OGILVY R D, et al. Noninvasive monitoring of DNAPL migration through a saturated porous medium using electrical impedance tomography[J]. Journal of Contaminant Hydrology, 2004, 68(4): 1-22.
[15]	刘汉乐, 周启友, 吴华桥. 轻非水相液体污染过程的高密度电阻率成像法室内监测[J]. 地球物理学报, 2008, 51(4): 1246-1254. (LIU Han-le, ZHOU Qi-you, WU Hua-qiao. Laboratorial monitoring of the LNAPL contamination process using electrical resistivity tomography[J]. Chinese Journal of Geophysics, 2008, 51(4): 1246-1254. (in Chinese))
[16]	GREVE A K, ACWORTH R L, KELLY B F. Detection of subsurface soil cracks by vertical anisotropy profiles of apparent electrical resistivity[J]. Geophysics, 2010, 75(4): 85-93.
[17]	HASSAN A, TOLL D G. Electrical resistivity tomography for characterizing cracking of soils[C]// Proceedings of the Geo-Congress 2013, San Diego, Stability and Performance of Slopes and Embankments. California, 2013, III: 818-827.
[18]	MUÑOZ-CASTELBLANCO J, PEREIRA J, DELAGE P, et al. The influence of changes in water content on the electrical resistivity of a natural unsaturated loess[J]. ASTM Geotechnical Testing Journal, 2012, 35: 11-17.
[19]	TOLL D G, HASSAN, A, KING JM, et al. New devices for water content measurement[C]// Proceedings of 18th International Conference on Soil Mechanics and Geotechnical Engineering. Paris, 2013: 1200-1203.
[20]	ZHOU Q Y. A sensitivity analysis of DC resistivity prospecting on finite, homogeneous blocks and columns[J]. Geophysics, 2007, 72(6): 237-247.
[21]	DEPOUNTIS N, HARRIS C, DAVIES M C R. An assessment of miniaturised electrical imaging equipment to monitor pollution plume evolution in scaled centrifuge modelling[J]. Engineering Geology, 2001, 60: 81-94.
[22]	LAKE M H. Tutorial: 2-D and 3-D Electrical imaging surveys: course notes for USGS Workshop[C]// 2-D and 3-D Inversion and Modeling of Surface and Borehole Resistivity Date. Storrs, 2001.
[23]	ZHOU Q Y, SHIMADA J, SATO A. Three-dimensional soil resistivity inversion using patching method[J]. Journal of the Japan Society of Engineering Geology, 1999, 39(6): 524-532.

施引文献(9)

期刊类型引用(5)

1.	雷国钦，卢勇，戴泽宇，陈青林，张小普. 细粒级尾砂沉降规律及坝体稳定性研究. 有色金属(中英文). 2025(04): 660-667 . 百度学术
2.	李庚辉，肖启飞，侯英剑. 某选厂高浓度铁尾矿沉积特性试验. 现代矿业. 2025(04): 217-220 . 百度学术
3.	周罕，付俊，陈永贵，余璨，李嘉淇，李艳林. 沟谷上游式尾矿库的水力分选及沉积规律研究. 矿业研究与开发. 2023(08): 147-151 . 百度学术
4.	陈青林，戴泽宇，王晓军，李祖贵，谢锦程，廖敏敏. 不同细粒含量尾矿沉降规律与其沉积体孔隙分布特征研究. 中国安全生产科学技术. 2023(12): 79-85 . 百度学术
5.	李全明，段志杰，于玉贞，师海，李振涛. 尾矿坝沉积结构特征与性能演化规律研究进展. 中国安全生产科学技术. 2022(02): 6-19+2 . 百度学术