• 全国中文核心期刊
  • 中国科技核心期刊
  • 美国工程索引(EI)收录期刊
  • Scopus数据库收录期刊

密实度不同时格栅-砂土界面循环剪切及其后直剪特性

王军, 王攀, 刘飞禹, 胡秀青, 蔡袁强

王军, 王攀, 刘飞禹, 胡秀青, 蔡袁强. 密实度不同时格栅-砂土界面循环剪切及其后直剪特性[J]. 岩土工程学报, 2016, 38(2): 342-349. DOI: 10.11779/CJGE201602019
引用本文: 王军, 王攀, 刘飞禹, 胡秀青, 蔡袁强. 密实度不同时格栅-砂土界面循环剪切及其后直剪特性[J]. 岩土工程学报, 2016, 38(2): 342-349. DOI: 10.11779/CJGE201602019
WANG Jun, WANG Pan, LIU Fei-yu, HU Xiu-qing, CAI Yuan-qiang. Cyclic and post-cyclic direct shear behaviors of geogrid-sand interface with different soil densities[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2016, 38(2): 342-349. DOI: 10.11779/CJGE201602019
Citation: WANG Jun, WANG Pan, LIU Fei-yu, HU Xiu-qing, CAI Yuan-qiang. Cyclic and post-cyclic direct shear behaviors of geogrid-sand interface with different soil densities[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2016, 38(2): 342-349. DOI: 10.11779/CJGE201602019

密实度不同时格栅-砂土界面循环剪切及其后直剪特性  English Version

基金项目: 国家自然科学基金项目(51478255,51278383,51238009,; 51478364); 上海市自然科学基金项目(14ZR1416100); 浙江省重点
详细信息
    作者简介:

    王 军(1980- ),男,教授,主要从事地基处理与土动力学方面的研究工作。E-mail: sunnystar1980@163.com。

Cyclic and post-cyclic direct shear behaviors of geogrid-sand interface with different soil densities

  • 摘要: 为研究密实度不同时格栅-砂土界面在经历循环剪切及其后的表现,采用大型直剪仪进行了一系列大型单调直剪试验、循环直剪试验和循环后单调直剪试验。并将单调直剪试验与循环后单调直剪试验的结果进行对比分析。结果表明:单调直剪试验中,随着砂土密实度的增加筋土界面抗剪强度增加,剪切体胀现象变的明显;格栅-密砂界面发生循环剪切软化现象,土样在循环剪切过程当中整体上发生剪缩,且砂土密实度越大经历相同循环次数时的剪缩量越小;循环后单调直剪试验中,3种砂土密实度界面抗剪强度发展曲线都为软化型,在直剪过程中都发生自始至终的剪胀;遭受循环剪切后密砂-格栅界面抗剪强度发生了退化。
    Abstract: In order to investigate the cyclic and post-cyclic shear behaviors of geogrid-sand interface with different soil densities, a series of large-scale monotonic direct shear tests, cyclic direct shear tests and post-cyclic monotonic direct shear tests are performed using a large-scale direct shear device. Comparison and analysis are made between the results from monotonic direct shear tests and post-cyclic monotonic direct shear tests. The results show that the interface shear strength increases with soil density, and more evident dilatancy is observed with higher soil density in the monotonic direct shear tests. The degradation of cyclic shear stress is observed in the geogrid-dense sand interface, the soil tends to be contracted when suffering from cyclic shear, and the volume contraction increases with soil density. The interface shear strength tends to be strain softening, and the soil exhibits dilatancy throughout the tests in the post-direct shear tests with different soil densities. The degradation of the post-cyclic shear is observed in the dense sand-geogrid interface.
  • [1] 赵爱根. 加筋黏土的抗剪强度特性[J]. 岩土工程学报, 1988, 10(1): 69-75. (ZHAO Ai-gen. Shear behavior of reinforced clay[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 1988, 10(1): 69-75. (in Chinese))
    [2] 吴景海. 土工合成材料与土工合成材料加筋砂土的相关特性[J]. 岩土力学, 2005, 26(4): 538-541. (WU Jing-hai. Behavior of geosynthetics versus geosynthetic reinforced sand[J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2005, 26(4): 538-541. (in Chinese))
    [3] LOPES P C, LOPES M L, LOPES M P. Shear behaviour of geosynthetics in the inclined plane test-influence of soil particle size and geosynthetic structure[J]. Geosynthetics International, 2001, 8(4): 327-342.
    [4] WASTI Y, BAHADIR ÖZDÜZGÜN Z. Geomembrane- geotextile interface shear properties as determined by inclined board and direct shear box tests[J]. Geotextiles and Geomembranes, 2001, 19(1): 45-57.
    [5] 刘 炜, 汪益敏, 陈页开, 等. 土工格室加筋土的大尺寸直剪试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2008, 29(11): 3133-3138. (LIU Wei, WANG Yi-min, CHEN Ye-kai, et al. Research on large scale direct shear test for geocell reinforced soil[J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2008, 29(11): 3133-3138. (in Chinese))
    [6] BASUDHAR P K. Modeling of soil-woven geotextile interface behavior from direct shear test results[J]. Geotextiles and Geomembranes, 2010, 28(4): 403-408.
    [7] MORACI N, RECALCATI P. Factors affecting the pullout behaviour of extruded geogrids embedded in a compacted granular soil[J]. Geotextiles and Geomembranes, 2006, 24(4): 220-242.
    [8] 吴景海, 陈 环, 王玲娟, 等. 土工合成材料与土界面作用特性的研究[J]. 岩土工程学报, 2001, 23(1): 89-93. (WU Jing-hai, CHEN Huan, WANG Ling-juan, et al. Study on soil interaction characteristics of geosynthetics[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2001, 23(1): 89-93. (in Chinese))
    [9] LIU C N, HO Y H, HUANG J W. Large scale direct shear tests of soil/PET-yarn geogrid interfaces[J]. Geotextiles and Geomembranes, 2009, 27(1): 19-30.
    [10] ARULRAJAH A, RAHMAN M A, PIRATHEEPAN J, et al. Evaluation of interface shear strength properties of geogrid-reinforced construction and demolition materials using a modified large-scale direct shear testing apparatus[J]. Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering, 2013, 26(5): 974-982.
    [11] NERNHEIM A, MEYER N. Cyclic pull-out tests on geogrids[C]//International Conference on Geotechnical Engineering. Sharjah-United Arab Emirates, 2004.
    [12] MORACI N, CARDILE G. Influence of cyclic tensile loading on pullout resistance of geogrids embedded in a compacted granular soil[J]. Geotextiles and Geomembranes, 2009, 27(6): 475-487.
    [13] ABDEL-RAHMAN A H, IBBRAHIM M A M. Soil/geogrid behavior subjected to cyclic loading[C]// Geo-Frontiers 2011@Sadvances in Geotechnical Engineering, ASCE. Dallas, 2011: 3087-3096.
    [14] 徐 超, 陈洪帅, 石志龙, 等. 筋-土界面力学特性的水平循环剪切试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2013, 34(6): 1553-1559. (XU Chao, CHEN Hong-shuai, SHI Zhi-long, et al. Research on the mechanical behavior of soil-reinforcement interface by horizontal cyclicsheartest[J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2013, 34(6): 1553-1559. (in Chinese))
    [15] O'ROURKE T D, DRUSCHEL S J, NETRAVALI A N. Shear strength characteristics of sand-polymer interfaces[J]. Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 1990, 116(3): 451-469.
    [16] LOPES M L, LADEIRA M. Influence of the confinement, soil density and displacement rate on soil-geogrid interaction[J]. Geotextiles and Geomembranes, 1996, 14(10): 543-554.
    [17] ABU-FARSAKH M, CORONEL J, TAO M. Effect of soil moisture content and dry density on cohesive soil-geosynthetic interactions using large direct shear tests[J]. Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering, 2007, 19(7): 540-549.
    [18] 史旦达, 刘文白, 水伟厚, 等. 单, 双向塑料土工格栅与不同填料界面作用特性对比试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2009, 30(8): 2237-2244. (SHI Dan-da, LIU Wen-bai, SHUI Wei-hou, et al. Comparative experimental studies of interface characteristics between uniaxial/biaxial plastic geogrids and different soil[J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2009, 30(8): 2237-2244. (in Chinese))
    [19] 刘 动, 陈晓平, 常学宁. 基于筋-土界面摩擦特性的加筋边坡分析[J]. 岩土工程学报, 2013, 35(增刊2): 217-223. (LIU Dong, CHEN Xiao-ping, CHANG Xue-ning. Analysis of reinforced slop based on interface properties of geosynthetics and soil[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2013, 35(S2): 217-223. (in Chinese))
    [20] 刘 博, 李海波, 朱小明. 循环剪切荷载作用下岩石节理强度劣化规律试验模拟研究[J]. 岩石力学与工程学报, 2011, 30(10): 2033-2039. (LIU Bo, LI Hai-bo, ZHU Xiao-ming. Experiment simulation study of strength degradation of rock joints under cyclic shearloading[J]. Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering, 2011, 30(10): 2033-2039. (in Chinese))
  • 期刊类型引用(1)

    1. 王琳琳. 不同围压下三轴试验土体变形特性检测对比研究. 实验室检测. 2025(04): 158-160 . 百度学术

    其他类型引用(0)

计量
  • 文章访问数: 
  • HTML全文浏览量:  0
  • PDF下载量: 
  • 被引次数: 1
出版历程
  • 收稿日期:  2015-03-02
  • 发布日期:  2016-02-24

目录

    /

    返回文章
    返回