• 全国中文核心期刊
  • 中国科技核心期刊
  • 美国工程索引(EI)收录期刊
  • Scopus数据库收录期刊

裂隙对四分量钻孔应力-应变观测影响的数值模拟分析

姚瑞, 杨树新, 王迪

姚瑞, 杨树新, 王迪. 裂隙对四分量钻孔应力-应变观测影响的数值模拟分析[J]. 岩土工程学报, 2016, 38(2): 331-335. DOI: 10.11779/CJGE201602017
引用本文: 姚瑞, 杨树新, 王迪. 裂隙对四分量钻孔应力-应变观测影响的数值模拟分析[J]. 岩土工程学报, 2016, 38(2): 331-335. DOI: 10.11779/CJGE201602017
YAO Rui, YANG Shu-xin, WANG Di. Numerical simulation analysis of effects of cracks on 4-component borehole observation of stress-strain[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2016, 38(2): 331-335. DOI: 10.11779/CJGE201602017
Citation: YAO Rui, YANG Shu-xin, WANG Di. Numerical simulation analysis of effects of cracks on 4-component borehole observation of stress-strain[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2016, 38(2): 331-335. DOI: 10.11779/CJGE201602017

裂隙对四分量钻孔应力-应变观测影响的数值模拟分析  English Version

基金项目: 中国地震局地壳应力研究所中央级公益性科研院所基本科; 研业务专项(ZDJ2013-14); 2014年地震监测台网运行经常性项目资; 助
详细信息
    作者简介:

    姚 瑞(1985- ),女,助理研究员,主要从事地应力数据应用、构造应力场、数值模拟的研究。E-mail: yaorui_4123@163.com。

Numerical simulation analysis of effects of cracks on 4-component borehole observation of stress-strain

  • 摘要: 钻孔围岩中存在裂隙是导致钻孔应力-应变观测中测试值不满足自洽关系的原因之一,但缺乏理论依据。建立若干个二维有限元模型,通过模拟计算相邻45°的各元件位移,定性地研究裂隙与最大水平应力的角度、最大水平应力与最小水平应力比值、裂隙与孔壁距离、长度、宽度和材料属性几种典型要素对四分量钻孔应力-应变观测的影响。结果显示,几种因素对钻孔应力-应变观测都有比较明显的影响,当裂隙延展方向与最小水平应力方向一致或最大水平应力与最小水平应力比值越大、裂隙与孔壁距离越近、裂隙尺寸越大、裂隙的材料属性与围岩的差距越大时,裂隙的存在对观测的影响越明显。
    Abstract: The existence of cracks in wall rock of borehole is one of the reasons for the fact that the test values do not meet the self-consistent relationship in borehole observation of stress-strain. However, there are few theoretical researches supporting the fact. The displacements of adjacent components of 45° are calculated using a series of two-dimensional finite element models to qualitatively study the effects of different kinds of cracks on observation. The factors include angles between cracks and the maximum horizontal stresses, ratios of the maximum to the minimum horizontal stresses, distances of cracks and the borehole, length, width and material properties of the cracks. The results show that all the factors have more obvious effects on the borehole stress-strain observation when the crack extension direction is in accordance with the minimum horizontal stress direction or when the ratios of the maximum to the minimum horizontal stresses are larger, the cracks and the borehole are closer, the sizes of cracks are larger, and the differences of the material properties of the cracks and the hole wall are larger.
  • [1] 池顺良, 艾学民, 池 亮, 等. 钻孔应变观测技术发展方向探讨[J]. 地震地磁观测与研究, 1998, 19(5): 23-29. (CHI Shun-liang, AI Xue-min, CHI Liang, et al. The discussion of developing trend of borehole strain observation technology[J]. Seismological and Geomagnetic Observation and Research, 1998, 19(5): 23-29. (in Chinese))
    [2] 邱泽华, 张宝红. 我国钻孔应力-应变地震前兆监测台网的现状[J]. 国际地震动态, 2002, 283(6): 5-9. (QIU Ze-hua, ZHANG Bao-hong. The present situation of the monitoring network of borehole strain-stress for earthquake precursors in China[J]. Recent Development of World Seismology, 2002, 283(6): 5-9. (in Chinese))
    [3] 邱泽华. 中国分量钻孔地应力-应变观测发展重要事件回顾[J]. 大地测量与地球动力学, 2010, 30(5): 42-47. (QIU Ze-hua. A review of component borehole observation ofstress-strain in China[J]. Journal of Geodesy and Geodynamics, 2010, 30(5): 42-47. (in Chinese))
    [4] 苏恺之. 地应力相对测量方法[C]// 全国地应力专业会议论文选编(上). 芜湖, 1977: 42-61. (SU Kai-zhi. Methods of relative measurement of ground stress[C]// Selectedpapers of the National Conference on Stress Measurement(Part 1). Wuhu, 1977: 42-61. (in Chinese))
    [5] 王 勇, 杨选辉, 刘福生, 等. 昌平台钻孔应变观测资料的可靠性研究[J]. 中国地震, 2005, 21(2): 291-294. (WANG Yong, YANG Xuan-hui, LIU Fu-sheng, et al. Study on the data quality of borehole strain observation in the Changping Station[J]. Earthquake Research in China, 2005, 21(2): 291-294. (in Chinese))
    [6] 张国红, 王 勇, 杨选辉, 等. 钻孔应变资料的可靠性分析[J]. 大地测量与地球动力学, 2010, 30(增刊1): 62-66,73. (ZHANG Guo-hong, WANG Yong, YANG Xuan-hui, et al. Reliability analysis of borehole strainmetry observations[J]. Journal of Geodesy and Geodynamics, 2010, 30(S1): 62-66, 73. (in Chinese))
    [7] 安 鸥. 当代钻孔地应力测量的主要问题[J]. 西北地震学报, 1989, 11(2): 43-51. (AN Ou. Principal questions of geostress measurement in borehole at present time[J]. Northwestern Seismological Journal, 1989, 11(2): 43-51. (in Chinese))
    [8] 邱泽华, 张国宏, 张宝红, 等. 用高密度电法勘探预判钻孔应变观测点岩石完整性[J]. 地震地质, 2013, 35(4): 805-816. (QIU Ze-hua, ZHANG Guo-hong, ZHANG Bao-hong, et al. Prospecting underground condition for borehole strain-monitoring location by means of resistivity imaging survey[J]. Seismology and Geology, 2013, 35(4): 805-816. (in Chinese))
    [9] 王连捷, 潘立宙, 廖椿庭, 等. 地应力测量及其在工程中的应用[M]. 北京: 地质出版社, 1991. (WANG Lian-jie, PAN Li-zhou, LIAO Chun-ting, et al. Stress measurement and application in engineering[M]. Beijing: Geology Publishing House, 1991. (in Chinese))
    [10] 常士骠, 张苏民, 项 勃, 等. 工程地质手册[M]. 3版. 北京: 中国建筑工业出版社, 1992. (CHANG Shi-biao, ZHANG Su-min, XIANG Bo, et al. The engineering geology manual[M]. 3rd ed. Beijing: China Building Industry Press, 1992. (in Chinese))
    [11] 苏恺之. 地应力测量方法[M]. 北京: 地震出版社, 1985. (SU Kai-zhi. In-situ stress measurement method[M]. Beijing: Earthquake Press, 1985. (in Chinese))
计量
  • 文章访问数: 
  • HTML全文浏览量:  0
  • PDF下载量: 
  • 被引次数: 0
出版历程
  • 收稿日期:  2015-03-19
  • 发布日期:  2016-02-24

目录

    /

    返回文章
    返回