动力离心模型试验循环剪应力-剪应变反演方法对比

王永志; Daniel W Wilson; Mohammad Khosravi; 袁晓铭; C Guney Olgum

doi:10.11779/CJGE201602010

动力离心模型试验循环剪应力-剪应变反演方法对比 English Version

1. 中国地震局工程力学研究所地震工程与工程振动重点实验室,黑龙江哈尔滨 150080; 2. 加州大学戴维斯分校土工模拟中心,加州 95616; 3. 弗吉尼亚理工学院,黑堡 24061

基金项目: 中央级公益性研究所基本科研业务费专项项目（2014B09）; 国家自然科学基金项目（41272357）; 黑龙江省自然科学基金项目（LC2015021）

详细信息

作者简介:
王永志(1984- ),男,河南周口人,助理研究员,从事动力离心试验方法研究。E-mail: yong5893741@163.com。

计量
- 文章访问数: 0435
- HTML全文浏览量: 0
- PDF下载量: 0312
出版历程
- 收稿日期: 2014-09-07
- 发布日期: 2016-02-24

Evaluation of cyclic shear stress-strain using inverse analysis techniques in dynamic centrifuge tests

1. Key Laboratory of Earthquake Engineering and Engineering Vibration, Institute of Engineering Mechanics, China Earthquake Administration, Harbin 150080, China; 2. Center for Geotechnical Modeling, University of California, Davis 95616, America; 3. Virginia Polytech Institute State University, Blacksburg 24061, America

摘要

摘要: 介绍了基于加速度阵列建立的3种循环剪应力-剪应变反演方法,分析了应用条件和影响因素。基于一组软黏土场地加固动力离心模型试验,探讨了试验加速度记录反演位移的信号处理方法,与多状态下实测位移对比,验证了有效性与可靠性。运用3种反演方法分别求取了两次试验、多种波激励下,自由场地和加固场地内土体剪应力-剪应变动态响应过程。结果表明,在传感器布设间距和采样率满足应用条件下,3种反演方法可获得基本一致结果并反映基本规律,上层土体剪应力小、剪应变大,土体剪切模量与围压密切联系;自由场地剪应变远大于加固场地,并因土体软化呈现强非线性。3种方法对比,三次样条法反演结果准确性对传感器布设间距和采样率较为敏感。
- 动力离心试验 /
- 剪应力-剪应变 /
- 反演方法 /
- 加速度时程
Abstract: Evaluation of shear stress-strain characteristics in soils is paramount to the fundamental understanding of soil behavior in dynamic centrifuge tests. Three inverse analysis techniques for evaluating cyclic shear stress-strain response using data from accelerometer arrays are introduced and key factors that require consideration in the applied condition are discussed. Using a series of dynamic centrifuge tests on soft soil sites with stiff ground reinforcement, the data process for back-calculated displacements from acceleration records is presented. The back calculated displacements are compared to the recorded displacements in several cases with excellent agreements. The three inverse analysis techniques are used to estimate the dynamic shear stress-strain responses in the free field and with in the reinforced ground in two centrifuge tests with different shaking motions of varying magnitudes. The results demonstrate that as long as accelerometer spacing and sampling frequency are sufficient to the active mechanics, the calculated shear stress-strain responses from three inverse techniques are consistent and therefore likely accurately reflect the basic characteristics of interest. In these tests it is observed that shear stiffness decreased at shallower depths, consistent with the expected effects of confining pressure on shear stiffness. It was also observed that the amplitudes of shear strain in the free field are considerably larger, and stronger nonlinear features were observed in the stress-strain loops as compared to the motions with in the reinforced soil. With comparisons among the three inverse analysis techniques, the evaluation from cubic spline approach was more sensitive and the linear and weighted residual techniques produced more reasonably consistent results.
- dynamic centrifuge test /
- shear stress-strain /
- inverse analysis technique /
- acceleration record

HTML全文

参考文献(11)

[1]	孙锐, 袁晓铭, 刘晓健. 动剪切模量比与剪切波速对地震动影响及等量关系研究[J]. 岩土工程学报, 2009, 31(8): 1267-1274. (SUN Rui, YUAN Xiao-ming, LIU Xiao-jian. Effects of dynamic shear modulus ratio and velocity on surface ground motion and their equivalent relations[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2009, 31(8): 1267-1274. (in Chinese))
[2]	刘晶波, 赵冬冬, 张小波, 等. 地基自由场离心机振动台模型试验研究[J]. 岩土工程学报, 2013, 35(11): 980-987. (LIU Jing-bo, ZHAO Dong-dong, ZHANG Xiao-bo, et al. Dynamic centrifuge model tests on an unconfined soil foundation[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2013, 35(11): 980-987. (in Chinese))
[3]	徐光明, 吴宏伟. 大圆筒岸壁码头的量纲分析和离心模拟[J]. 岩土工程学报, 2007, 29(10): 1544-1552. (XU Guang-ming, NG C W W. Dimensional analysis and centrifuge modeling of quay wall of large-diameter bottomless cylinders[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2007, 29(10): 1544-1552. (in Chinese))
[4]	BRENNAN A J, THUSYANTHAN N I, MADABHUSHI S P G. Evaluation of shear modulus and damping in dynamic centrifuge tests[J]. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, 2005, 131(12): 1488-1497.
[5]	KAMAI R, BOULANGER R. Characterizing localization processes during liquefaction using inverse analysis of instrumentation arrays[M]// Meso-Scale Shear Physics in Earthquake and Landslide Mechanics. 2009: 219-238.
[6]	ZEGHAL M, ELGAMAL A W, TANG H T, et al. Lotungdownhole array. II: Evaluation of soil nonlinear properties[J]. Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 1995, 121(4): 363-378.
[7]	DAVIS R O, BERRILL J B. Rational approximation of stress and strain based on downhole acceleration measurements[J]. International Journal for Numerical and Analytical Methods in Geomechanics, 1998, 22: 603-619.
[8]	WILSON D W. Soil-pile-superstructure interaction in liquefying sand and soft clay[D]. California: University of California, 1998.
[9]	BRANDENBERG S J, WILSON D W, RASHID M M. Weighted residual numerical differentiation algorithm applied to experimental bending moment data[J]. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, 2010, 136(6): 854-863.
[10]	王永志. 大型动力离心机设计理论与关键技术研究[D]. 哈尔滨: 中国地震局工程力学研究所, 2013. (WANG Yong-zhi. Study on design theory and key technology of large dynamic centrifuge[D]. Harbin: Institute of Engineering Mechanics, China Earthquake Administration, 2013. (in Chinese))
[11]	KHOSRAVI M, TAMURA S, WILSON D W, et al. Reduction of seismic shaking intensity on soft soil sites using stiff ground reinforcement—Report 2 & 3: Big centrifuge test data MKH01-MKH02[R]. 2014.

施引文献(2)

期刊类型引用(2)

1.	张子洋，汪波，刘锦超，刘金炜，杨凯. 后注浆预应力树脂锚杆应力损失后注浆段效用分析. 铁道科学与工程学报. 2025(02): 783-794 . 百度学术
2.	谈博海，姚囝，杜键，孙明伟，刘海，关文超. 膨胀型浆体注浆锚杆拉拔力学特性及损伤失效机制研究. 岩石力学与工程学报. 2024(12): 3058-3069 . 百度学术