地震基岩面的选取对深厚场地地表地震动参数的影响

朱姣; 陈国兴; 许汉刚

doi:10.11779/CJGE201511020

地震基岩面的选取对深厚场地地表地震动参数的影响 English Version

1. 南京工业大学岩土工程研究所,江苏南京 210009;
2. 江苏省土木工程防震技术研究中心,江苏南京 210009;
3. 江苏省地震局,江苏南京 210014

基金项目: 国家自然科学基金项目（51378258）

详细信息

作者简介:
朱姣(1990- ),女,博士研究生,主要研究方向为场地地震效应。E-mail: zhujiao90@163.com。

计量
- 文章访问数: 463
- HTML全文浏览量: 2
- PDF下载量: 550
出版历程
- 收稿日期: 2014-09-07
- 发布日期: 2015-11-19

Effect of seismic bedrock interface depth on surface motion parameters of deep site

1. Institute of Geotechnical Engineering, Nanjing Tech University, Nanjing 210009, China;
2. Civil Engineering & Earthquake Disaster Prevention Center of Jiangsu Province, Nanjing 210009, China;
3. Earthquake Administration of Jiangsu Province, Nanjing 210014, China

摘要

摘要: 地震基岩面的选取对场地设计地震动参数取值的合理性有重要影响。以苏州城区的钻孔剖面为研究对象,选取剪切波速介于400~800 m/s的9个土层顶面作为地震基岩面,采用等效线性方法考虑土的非线性特性,采用一维波传法分析地震基岩面的选取对地表地震动特性的影响。结果表明：①地表峰值加速度PGA随地震基岩面剪切波速的增大而增大,PGA的增大幅度随输入地震动强度的增大而减小;②地表加速度反应谱放大系数谱谱值也随地震基岩面土层剪切波速的增大而增大,且谱谱值随输入地震动强度的增大而减小;对于中强地震的近场地震动作用,基岩面深度对周期小于1.0 s的谱谱值的影响较大;而对于特大地震的远场地震动作用,基岩面深度对周期小于4.0 s的谱谱值均有较大影响;③远场地震动作用时的谱谱值明显大于近场地震动作用的谱谱值;④取剪切波速不小于700 m/s的土层顶面为地震基岩面较为适宜。
- 地震基岩面 /
- 深厚场地 /
- 等效线性化方法 /
- 一维波传法 /
- 地表峰值加速度 /
- 地表加速度反应谱放大系数
Abstract: The seismic bedrock interface depth has great influence on design ground motion parameters. Based on the borehole profiles in the downtown area of Suzhou City, nine interfaces of soil layers, whose shear wave velocities range from 400 to 800 m/s, are selected as the seismic bedrock interfaces. The equivalent linear method is used to describe the nonlinear characteristics of soil, and the effects of seismic bedrock interface depth on site surface motion are analyzed on the basis of the one-dimensional wave propagation model. The results show that: (1) The peak ground acceleration (PGA) increases as the shear wave velocity of seismic bedrock interface grows, but the PGA increasing range decreases as the input motion PGA increases; (2) The values of ground motion acceleration response amplification factorspectrum become larger with the increase of the shear wave velocity of seismic bedrock interfaces, and thevalues become smaller with the increase of input motion PGA. Under near-field ground motion of moderate strong earthquake, the depth of seismic bedrock interface has significant influence on thevalues for the period less than 1.0 s. But under far-field ground motion of great earthquake, the depth of seismic bedrock interface has significant influence on thevalues for the period less than 4.0 s; (3) Thevalues under far-field ground motion are obviously higher than those under near-field ground motion; (4) It is appropriate to choose the interface of soil with shear velocity not less than 700 m/s as the seismic bedrock interface.
- seismic bedrock interface /
- deep soft site /
- equivalent linear method /
- one-dimensional wave propagation model /
- peak ground acceleration /
- amplification factor of acceleration response spectrum

HTML全文

参考文献(13)

[1]	AKI K. Local site effects on weak and strong ground motion[J]. Tectonophysics, 1993, 218(1): 93-111.
[2]	LANZO G, SILVESTRI F, COSTANZO A, et al. Site response studies and seismic microzoning in the middle Aterno valley (L’Aquila, Central Italy)[J]. Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering, 2011, 9(5): 1417-1442.
[3]	KHAM M, SEMBLAT J F, BOUDEN-ROMDHANE N. Amplification of seismic ground motion in the Tunis basin: numerical BEM simulations vs experimental evidences[J]. Engineering Geology, 2013, 155: 80-86.
[4]	MITTAL H, KUMAR A, SINGH S K. Estimation of site effects in Delhi using standard spectral ratio[J]. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 2013, 50: 53-61.
[5]	DIMITRIU P, KALOGERAS I, THEODULIDIS N. Evidence of nonlinear site response in horizontal-to-vertical spectral ratio from near-field earthquakes[J]. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 1999, 18(6): 423-435.
[6]	DI FIORE V. Seismic site amplification induced by topographic irregularity: results of a numerical analysis on 2D synthetic models[J]. Engineering Geology, 2010, 114(3): 109-115.
[7]	CHEN G, JIN D, ZHU J, et al. Nonlinear analysis on seismic site response of Fuzhou Basin, China[J]. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of American, 2015, 105(2A): 928-949.
[8]	ASCE 4-98 Seismic analysis of safety-related nuclear structures and commentary[S]. 1998.
[9]	ASCE/SEI 43-05 Seismic design criteria for structures, systems, and components in nuclear facilities[S]. 2005.
[10]	NUREG-0800 standard review plan for the review of safety analysis reports for nuclear power plants, revision 3[S]. 2007.
[11]	Westinghouse Electric Company. AP1000 design control document, revision 17[R]. Pittsburgh: Westinghouse Electric Company, 2009.
[12]	战吉艳, 陈国兴, 杨伟林, 等. 苏州第四纪沉积土动剪切模量比和阻尼比试验研究[J]. 岩土工程学报, 2012, 34(3): 559-566. (ZHAN Ji-yan, CHEN Guo-xing, YANG Wei-lin, et al. Experimental study on dynamic shear modulus ratio and damping ratio of Suzhou quaternary sedimentary soil[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2012, 34(3): 559-566. (in Chinese))
[13]	EPRI.TR-102293 Guidelines for determining design basis ground motions[S]. 1993.

施引文献(13)

期刊类型引用(7)

1.	张泽瀚，薛冰寒，赵冠奇，方宏远，石明生. 基于中心点法的高聚物防渗墙堤坝地震变形可靠度分析. 世界地震工程. 2025(01): 189-196 . 百度学术
2.	马锐，赵丁凤，王建宁. 非均等固结条件下饱和软黏土体应变特性试验研究. 人民长江. 2024(03): 199-204+225 . 百度学术
3.	曹德昭. 考虑动力作用的土石坝边坡稳定性分析. 水利科技与经济. 2022(06): 19-23 . 百度学术
4.	王丹，张宪雷，张宏洋. 基于GPR-ARIMA-GA模型的高粘土心墙堆石坝参数反演分析. 水电能源科学. 2021(09): 94-97+85 . 百度学术
5.	李泽，彭普，张小艳，谭志华. 随机库水位作用下病险土石坝的失效概率研究. 中国农村水利水电. 2021(12): 135-143+149 . 百度学术
6.	靳聪聪，迟世春，李士杰，聂章博. 基于改进云图法的高土石坝抗震可靠度分析. 振动与冲击. 2020(02): 169-177 . 百度学术
7.	李炎隆，唐旺，温立峰，吴海波. 沥青混凝土心墙堆石坝地震变形评价方法及其可靠度分析. 水利学报. 2020(05): 580-588 . 百度学术