高路堤预应力锚索桩板墙承载特性分析

孙书伟; 王卫; 朱本珍

doi:10.11779/CJGE201510010

高路堤预应力锚索桩板墙承载特性分析 English Version

1. 中国矿业大学（北京）资源与安全工程学院，北京 100083;
2. 中铁西北科学研究院有限公司，甘肃兰州 730000

基金项目: 国家自然科学基金项目（51574245,41002090）

详细信息

作者简介:
孙书伟(1980- )，男，副教授，主要从事岩土边坡工程方面的教学和科研。E-mail: ssw1216@163.com。

中图分类号: A
计量
- 文章访问数: 405
- HTML全文浏览量: 0
- PDF下载量: 344
出版历程
- 收稿日期: 2015-01-10
- 发布日期: 2015-10-19

Bearing characteristics of prestressed sheet pile wall in embankment stablization

1. Faculty of Resources and Safety Engineering, China University of Mining and Technology (Beijing), Beijing 100083, China;
2. Northwest Research Institute Co., Ltd. of CREC, Lanzhou 730000, China

摘要

摘要: 以昆明—曼谷国际公路k70路堤加固工程为背景，采用原位测试方法，完成了不同工况下预应力锚索桩板墙承载特性的现场试验。通过观测结构位移、土压力、桩身内力以及锚索预应力等，系统分析了预应力锚索桩板墙的受力特性与力学行为。锚索桩板墙对高路堤的加固效果显著，填筑初期结构位移随填土高度线性增加，锚索施工后增速有所减缓;初始填筑阶段，抗滑桩变形以刚性倾斜为主，随着锚索张拉和桩后填土不断增高桩身产生了较为明显的弯曲变形。作用在抗滑桩后的土压力大致呈三角形分布，板后土压力大致呈抛物线型分布;相同埋深条件下作用在抗滑桩上的土压力明显大于挡板，原因在于相邻抗滑桩间产生了明显的土拱效应，下部相邻抗滑桩间的土拱效应更强;与解析解的对比结果表明，实测最大桩后土压力与滑坡推力接近，远小于被动土压力;实测板后土压力与主动土压力接近，工程设计中可选取Rankine主动土压力作为挡板的设计荷载，在不利位置采取增大板厚等措施避免挡板发生破坏。采用弹性弯曲梁理论对锚索桩板墙内力计算的结果与实测结果基本一致。张拉锁定初期锚索预应力损失较大，约为设计荷载的10%，后期锚索预应力逐渐趋于稳定，锚索预应力长期损失约为设计荷载值的12%~15%。
- 预应力锚索桩板墙 /
- 现场试验 /
- 土拱效应 /
- 土压力 /
- 预应力损失
Abstract: Based on the reinforcement project of k70 embankment along Kunming-Bangkok Expressway, the bearing characteristics of prestressed sheet pile wall in embankment stabilization are studied through a series of in-situ tests. The history of pile displacement, earth pressure, bending moment and prestress of cables are measured and used to illustrate the bearing characteristics and behaviors of the structure. The measured results show that the prestressed sheet pile wall significantly increases the stability of the embankment, and that the structural displacement increases linearly with the height of embankment at the beginning of backfill and then slows down with the construction of cables. The pile flexure rather than pile rotation becomes increasingly prevalent with the increasing height of filling embankment. The distribution of earth pressures exerting against the pile is triangular and that on the face of plate is parabolic. The earth pressures against the pile are systematically larger than those of plate at the same depth, which results from arching effects. The maximum value of earth pressures of the pile is close to the thrust, while the maximum value of the plate is close to the active earth pressure. Analysis of the piles using the simple elastic analysis gives that the bending moments and displacements are close to the measured ones. The test results also indicate that the percentage of loss for cables is about 10% in the short term and 12%~15% in the long term.
- prestressed sheet pile wall /
- in-situ test /
- arching effect /
- earth pressure /
- loss of prestress

HTML全文

参考文献(14)

[1]	李海光. 新型支挡结构设计与工程实例[M]. 北京: 人民交通出版社, 2004. (LI Hai-guang. Design and applications of new structures [M]. Beijing: China Communications Press, 2004. (in Chinese))
[2]	《中国公路学报》编辑部. 中国道路工程学术研究综述·2013[J]. 中国公路学报, 2013, 26(3): 1-36. (Editorial Department of China Journal of Highway and Transport. Review on China’s road engineering research: 2013[J]. China Journal of Highway and Transport, 2013, 26(3): 1-36. (in Chinese))
[3]	俞琛, 李昉. 预应力锚索桩板墙的设计原理、施工与经济分析[J]. 铁道标准设计, 2003(10): 109-110. (YU Chen, LI Fang. The design principle, constructive and economical analysis of pre-stressed anchors sheet-pile walls[J]. Railway Standard Design, 2003(10): 109-110. (in Chinese))
[4]	陈新. 多点锚拉桩板墙的变形约束计算方法[J]. 四川联合大学学报(工程科学版), 1997, 1(5): 68-74. (CHEN Xin. The calculation for multi-anchored pile-plate wall with deformer restriction method [J]. Journal of Sichuan Union University (Engineering Science Edition), 1997, 1(5): 68-74. (in Chinese))
[5]	李中国, 赵有明, 张玉芳. 某高速公路锚索桩板墙原型测试与分析[J]. 岩土工程学报, 2008, 30(5): 739-744. (LI Zhong-guo, ZHAO You-ming, ZHANG Yu-fang. Field tests and analysis of sheet-pile walls with pre-stressed anchors [J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2008, 30(5): 739-744. (in Chinese))
[6]	富海鹰, 何昌荣. 新型预应力锚拉式桩板墙的原型观测分析[J]. 岩土工程学报, 2005, 27(9): 1054-1050. (FU Hai-ying, HE Chang-rong. Prototype measurements of a new pre-stressed sheet-pile retaining wall[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2005, 27(9): 1054-1050. (in Chinese))
[7]	曲宏略, 张建经, 王富江. 预应力锚索桩板墙地震响应的振动台试验研究[J]. 岩土工程学报, 2013, 35(2): 313-320. (QU Hong-lue, ZHANG Jian-jing, WANG Fu-jiang. Seismic response of prestressed anchor sheet pile wall from shaking table tests[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2013, 35(2): 313-320. (in Chinese))
[8]	JTG D30—2004 公路路基设计规范[S]. 北京: 人民交通出版社, 2004. (JTG D30—2004 Specifications for design of highway subgrade[S]. Beijing: China Communications Press, 2004. (in Chinese))
[9]	TB10025—2001铁路路基支挡结构设计规范[S]. 北京: 中国铁道出版社, 2001. (TB10025—2001 Code for design on retaining engineering structure of railway subgrade[S]. Beijing: China Railway Publishing House, 2004. (in Chinese))
[10]	ELLIS E A, DURRANT I K, REDDISH D J. Numerical modeling of discrete pile rows for slope stability and generic guidance for design[J]. Géotechnique, 2010, 60(3): 185-195.
[11]	TERZAGHI K. Soil mechanics in engineering practice[M]. New York: Warren Press, 1996.
[12]	HOGNESTAD E. A study of combined bending and axial load in reinforced concrete members[R]. Urbana: University of Illinois Engineering Experiment Station, 1951.
[13]	孙书伟, 朱本珍, 郑静. 基于极限抗力分析的微型桩群加固土质边坡设计方法[J]. 岩土工程学报, 2010, 32(11): 1671-1677. (SUN Shu-wei, ZHU Ben-zhen, ZHENG Jing. Design method of micropile group for soil slope stabilization based on ultimate resistance of analysis[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2010, 32(11): 1671-1677. (in Chinese))
[14]	SUN S W, ZHU B Z, WANG J C. Design method for stabilization of earth slopes with micropiles[J]. Soils and Foundations, 2013, 53(4): 487-497.