Large-strain consolidation of soft clay with non-Darcian flow by considering time-dependent load
-
摘要: 软土中的非达西渗流和大变形特性已为人们所认识, 但能考虑土中非达西渗流的软土大变形固结理论还鲜有报道。考虑实际中的变荷载, 基于土中的非达西渗流现象在拉格朗日坐标系中建立以超静孔隙水压力为变量的软土一维大变形固结模型。利用有限差分法对所建立的模型进行数值求解, 并与特定条件下的解析解对比, 以验证数值解的可靠性。最后着重分析非达西渗流模型参数对软土大变形固结性状的影响及大、小应变不同几何假定下非达西渗流固 结性状的异同。结果表明非达西渗流模型的参数m 及i1值越大, 地基的固结速率就越慢；如果小应变固结理论中自重应力的计算也考虑沉积作用, 此时尽管软土在大变形几何假定下的固结速率要比小变形假定下快, 但大、小应变固结理论计算的地基最终沉降值相等；基于此, 鉴于大变形固结理论的复杂性, 此种情况下应用小变形代替大变形几何假定所引起的计算误差是可接受的。Abstract: The large deformation behavior and the non-Darcian flow in soft clay have been already recognized, however, the theory of large-strain nonlinear consolidation of soft clay with non-Darcian flow has been rarely reported. By considering time-dependent load, a model for one-dimensional large-strain consolidation of soft clay with non-Darcian flow law is developed in the Lagrangian coordinate, in which the excess pore water pressure serves as a variable. The finite difference method is adopted to obtain numerical solutions for this model, and a comparison between the numerical solutions and analytical solutions which are obtained on some specific conditions is presented to verify the reliability of the numerical solutions. Finally, the influence of non-Darcian flow on large-strain consolidation behavior and the difference in consolidation behavior of clay with non-Darcian flow between large-strain and small-strain conditions are investigated. The results show that the consolidation rate may decrease with an increase in the value of m or i1. If the self-weight stress for the small-strain consolidation with non-Darcian flow is also calculated by considering its sedimentation, the final settlement of clay layer under large-strain condition is the same as that in the small-strain case, although the consolidation rate under large-strain condition is faster than that under small-strain condition. As a result, due to the complexity of the large-strain condition, the error in settlement curve induced by the replacement of large-strain condition by small-strain condition can be acceptable in this case.
-
[1] HANSBO S. Consolidation of clay, with special reference to influence of vertical sand drains[C]// Swedish Geotechnical Institute Proceeding. Stockholm: Swedish Geotechnical Institute, 1960: 45–50. [2] SWARTZENDRUBER D. Modification of Darcy's law for the flow of water in soils[J]. Soil Science, 1962, 93(1): 22– 29. [3] MILLER R J, LOW P E. Threshold gradient for water flow in clay systems[J]. Soil Science Society of American Journal, 1963, 27(6): 605–609. [4] 齐 添, 谢康和, 胡安峰, 等. 萧山黏土非达西渗流性状 的试验研究[J].浙江大学学报(工学版), 2007, 41(6): 1023– 1028. (QI Tian, XIE Kang-he, HU An-feng, et al. Laboratorial study on non-Darcy seepage in Xiaoshan clay[J]. Journal of Zhejiang University (Engineering Science), 2007, 41(6): 1023–1028. (in Chinese)) [5] HANSBO S. Deviation from Darcy's law observed in one-dimensional consolidation[J]. Géotechnique, 2003, 53(6): 601–605. [6] PASCAL F, PASCAL H, MURRAY D W. Consolidation with threshold gradients[J]. International Journal for Numerical and Analytical Methods in Geomechanics, 1981, 5(3): 247– 261. [7] 刘慈群. 有起始比降固结问题的近似解[J]. 岩土工程学报, 1982, 4(3): 107–109. (LIU Ci-qun. Approximate solution for one-dimensional consolidation with threshold gradient[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 1982, 4(3): 107–109. (in Chinese)) [8] XIE K H, WANG K, WANG Y L, et al. Analytical solution for one-dimensional consolidation of clayey soils with a threshold gradient[J]. Computers and Geotechnics, 2010, 37(4): 487–493. [9] HANSBO S. Consolidation equation valid for both Darcian and non-Darcian flow[J]. Géotechnique, 2001, 51(1): 51–54. [10] HANSBO S. Deviation from Darcy’s law observed in one-dimensional consolidation[J]. Géotechnique, 2003, 53(6): 601–605. [11] TEH C I, NIE X Y. Coupled consolidation theory with non-Darcian flow[J]. Computers and Geotechnics, 2002, 29(3): 169–209. [12] 鄂 建, 陈 刚, 孙爱荣. 考虑低速非Darcy 渗流的饱和 黏性土一维固结分析[J]. 岩土工程学报, 2009, 31(7): 1115- 1119. (E Jian, CHEN Gang, SUN Ai-rong. One-dimensional consolidation of saturated cohesive soil considering non-Darcy flows[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2009, 31(7): 1115–1119. (in Chinese)) [13] LI C X, XIE K H. One-dimensional nonlinear consolidation of soft clay with the non-Darcian flow[J]. Journal of Zhejiang University, 2013, 14(6): 435–446. [14] 刘忠玉, 闫富有, 王喜军. 基于非达西渗流的饱和黏土一 维流变固结分析[J]. 岩石力学与工程学报, 2013, 32(9): 1937–1944. (LIU Zhong-yu, YAN Fu-you, WANG Xi-jun. One-dimensional rheological consolidation analysis of saturated clay considering non-Darcy flow[J]. Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering, 2013, 32(9): 1937–1944. (in Chinese)) [15] GIBSON R E, ENGLAND G L, HUSSEY M J L. The theory of one-dimensional consolidation of saturated clays: I finite non-linear consolidation of thin homogeneous layers[J]. Géotechnique, 1967, 17(2): 261–273. [16] GIBSON R E, SCHIFFMAN R L, CARGILL K W. The theory of one-dimensional consolidation of saturated clays: II Finite non-linear consolidation of thick homogeneous layers[J]. Canadian Geotechnical Journal, 1981, 18(2): 280– 293. [17] 黄杰卿, 谢新宇, 王文军, 等. 考虑起始比降的饱和土体 一维复杂非线性固结研究[J]. 岩土工程学报, 2013, 35(2): 355–363. (HUANG Jie-qing, XIE Xin-yu, WANG Wen-jun, et al. Study on one-dimensional nonlinear consolidation behavior for saturated soils with threshold gradient[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2013, 35(2): 355–363. (in Chinese)) [18] XIE K H, LEO C J. Analytical solutions of one-dimensional large strain consolidation of saturated and homogeneous clays[J]. Computers and Geotechnics, 2004, 31(4): 301– 314. [19] 谢康和, 郑 辉, LEO C J. 变荷载下饱和软黏土一维大应 变固结解析理论[J]. 水利学报, 2003, 34(10): 6–13. (XIE Kang-he, ZHENG Hui, LEO C J. Analytical solution for 1-D large strain consolidation of saturated soft clay under time-depending loading[J]. Journal of Hydraulic Engineering, 2003, 34(10): 6–13. (in Chinese)) [20] 李冰河, 谢康和, 应宏伟, 等. 软黏土非线性一维大应变 固结分析[J]. 岩土工程学报, 2000, 22(3): 368–370. (LI Bing-he, XIE Kang-he, YING Hong-wei, et al. Analysis of one dimensional nonlinear large-strain consolidation of soft clay[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2000, 22(3): 368–370. (in Chinese)) -
期刊类型引用(33)
1. 刘富成，陈彦丽. 大型深基坑工程可靠性及施工变形特征分析. 砖瓦. 2025(02): 152-154+158 . 
百度学术
2. 韩苗苗. 不同开挖与支护方式下隧道洞口深基坑仰坡水平位移变形规律研究. 四川水泥. 2024(01): 233-235 . 百度学术
3. 何润洲，罗胜亮，杨忠平，谢惠珍. 深厚淤泥土深大基坑群同步开挖对紧邻建筑的影响. 地下空间与工程学报. 2024(02): 577-586 . 百度学术
4. 王安东，张学钢，宁波. 基于数据分解重构和AM-CRU-MLR模型的基坑变形研究与应用. 粉煤灰综合利用. 2024(05): 65-70 . 百度学术
5. 诸颖，任向东，张健，姚瑶. 软土地区锁扣型钢地下连续墙适用性研究. 工程建设与设计. 2024(23): 36-38 . 百度学术
6. 李小军. 地下隧道深基坑仰坡开挖与支护数值模拟及安全性分析. 安全与环境学报. 2023(03): 812-818 . 百度学术
7. 王棣，田大浪. 含裂隙岩质深基坑桩锚支护结构变形特征研究. 岩土工程技术. 2023(02): 238-246 . 百度学术
8. 高亚鹏，赵文辉，魏锜，杨有海. 某高速铁路明挖隧道黄土深基坑变形规律分析. 兰州工业学院学报. 2023(02): 60-65 . 百度学术
9. 严长江，李旺，张子辰. 某黄土深基坑开挖变形预测分析. 低温建筑技术. 2023(03): 101-104 . 百度学术
10. 梁二雷，王冰辉，郑功博，吴静. 临河倾斜互层下深基坑变形及渗流数值分析. 工业建筑. 2023(03): 188-196 . 百度学术
11. 赵军，胡聪伟，刘飞. 桩锚支护土岩深基坑地表沉降特征分析. 低温建筑技术. 2023(08): 142-145 . 百度学术
12. 曹卫平，席茂阳，赵呈，赵敏. 局部破坏对内撑式排桩支护基坑影响的模型试验. 水资源与水工程学报. 2023(05): 190-197 . 百度学术
13. 王钰轲，付宏松，马露. 行车荷载与基坑开挖对新建及既有基坑坑底和地连墙的影响研究. 三峡大学学报(自然科学版). 2022(02): 77-82 . 百度学术
14. 王贺. 城市双线隧道车站施工工艺优化及稳定性研究. 价值工程. 2022(17): 77-79 . 百度学术
15. 王贺. 城市地铁高架车站BIM建模及可视化研究. 建筑技术开发. 2022(15): 118-120 . 百度学术
16. 程学昌. 高孔隙水压地层基坑降水开挖施工技术研究. 山西建筑. 2021(01): 68-69+74 . 百度学术
17. 罗智勇，宋林波，丁增志，成启航，王海伦. 复杂地铁车站深基坑体系的变形分析. 四川建筑. 2021(01): 99-101 . 百度学术
18. 李又云，杨立新，刘伟，王欢，贺隆贵，李昊阳. 悬挂式止水帷幕深基坑分级降水开挖变形特性. 科学技术与工程. 2021(05): 1995-2001 . 百度学术
19. 孔令华，胡军然，牛文宣，于洋，楚袁庆. 邻近老旧房屋狭长深基坑开挖施工数值模拟及周边环境影响性分析. 建筑结构. 2021(S1): 1945-1951 . 百度学术
20. 苏继超，武俊琦，李媛. 基于青岛上软下硬地层地铁地下连续墙深基坑的变形特征研究. 工程与建设. 2021(03): 506-508 . 百度学术
21. 赵得杰，毕经东，李浩. 基于ARIMA模型的基坑变形预测研究. 粉煤灰综合利用. 2021(05): 40-45 . 百度学术
22. 陈世凯，李坤杰，闫洪江，严涛，王二力，罗成勇，刘大刚. 超大埋深基坑降水开挖结构安全性分析及对地表沉降影响. 路基工程. 2020(02): 53-57 . 百度学术
23. 孙小力，孙铁成，张旭，高晓静，刘灿灿. 地铁基坑开挖数值模拟及变形特征研究. 施工技术. 2020(07): 41-44+53 . 百度学术
24. 谭伟. 基于AutoMos自动化监测系统在地铁工程中的应用与研究. 土木建筑工程信息技术. 2020(02): 28-36 . 百度学术
25. 谭伟. 临近边坡地铁基坑开挖数值模拟研究. 土工基础. 2020(02): 176-180 . 百度学术
26. 丁猛. 密集建筑老城区地铁车站基坑开挖技术. 四川建筑. 2020(02): 67-69 . 百度学术
27. 蒙国往，农忠建，吴波，黄劲松，韦汉. 地铁车站深基坑开挖变形及数值模拟分析. 中国安全生产科学技术. 2020(07): 145-151 . 百度学术
28. 王晓静，李立云，杜修力，王子英. 削桩施作诱发基坑本体力学响应数值分析. 防灾科技学院学报. 2020(03): 10-17 . 百度学术
29. 赵宏宇，高春雷，许利东，童根树，张磊. 采用预应力型钢组合支撑的某软土深基坑监测分析研究. 工程勘察. 2020(11): 7-12 . 百度学术
30. 吕彦朋，朱宏光，张新冈，刘智军. 铁路数据中心建筑基坑支护关键技术及监测分析. 铁道建筑. 2019(05): 112-116 . 百度学术
31. 方焘，舒新亮，王海龙，石钰锋. 半刚性半盖挖体系临界施工荷载研究. 兰州交通大学学报. 2019(02): 1-8 . 百度学术
32. 尹鸿达，罗正东，李检保，黄河，袁朝阳，吴鹏. 富水砂砾石地层基坑开挖超孔压变化规律研究. 市政技术. 2019(05): 246-249 . 百度学术
33. 刘志刚. 软土地区地铁深基坑监测分析及控制措施研究. 公路. 2019(10): 239-244 . 百度学术
其他类型引用(40)
计量
- 文章访问数: 388
- HTML全文浏览量: 4
- PDF下载量: 267
- 被引次数: 73
下载:
