高级搜索
  • 全国中文核心期刊
  • 中国科技核心期刊
  • 美国工程索引（EI）收录期刊
  • Scopus数据库收录期刊

接触面模型对面板与垫层间接触变形及面板应力的影响

刘京茂, 孔宪京, 邹德高

刘京茂, 孔宪京, 邹德高. 接触面模型对面板与垫层间接触变形及面板应力的影响[J]. 岩土工程学报, 2015, 37(4): 700-710. DOI: 10.11779/CJGE201504016
引用本文: 刘京茂, 孔宪京, 邹德高. 接触面模型对面板与垫层间接触变形及面板应力的影响[J]. 岩土工程学报, 2015, 37(4): 700-710. DOI: 10.11779/CJGE201504016
shu
LIU Jing-mao, KONG Xian-jing, ZOU De-gao. Effects of interface models on deformation of interface between slab and cushion layer and slab stress of concrete faced rock fill dam[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2015, 37(4): 700-710. DOI: 10.11779/CJGE201504016
Citation: LIU Jing-mao, KONG Xian-jing, ZOU De-gao. Effects of interface models on deformation of interface between slab and cushion layer and slab stress of concrete faced rock fill dam[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2015, 37(4): 700-710. DOI: 10.11779/CJGE201504016
shu

接触面模型对面板与垫层间接触变形及面板应力的影响  English Version

  • 1. 大连理工大学海岸和近海工程国家重点实验室,辽宁 大连 116024; 2. 大连理工大学水利工程学院,辽宁 大连 116024

基金项目: 地震行业科研专项经费项目（201208013）; 国家自然科学基金项目（91215301,51279025,51379028）; 新世纪优秀人才支持计划项目（NCET-12-0083）
详细信息
    作者简介:

    刘京茂(1987- ),男,博士研究生,主要从事堆石料试验及本构模型研究。E-mail: goliu@mail.dlut.edu.cn。

    通讯作者:

    孔宪京

Effects of interface models on deformation of interface between slab and cushion layer and slab stress of concrete faced rock fill dam

  • 1. State Key Laboratory of Coastal & Offshore Engineering, Dalian University of Technology, Dalian 116024, China; 2. School of Hydraulic Engineering, Dalian University of Technology, Dalian 116024, China

摘要

    摘要
  • 摘要: 对某在建面板堆石坝进行了三维有限元静、动弹塑性计算,分析了接触面模型对面板与垫层间接触面变形及面板应力的影响。面板与垫层接触面分别采用：双曲线（仅静力计算）、理想弹塑性及广义塑性接触面模型。结果表明：竣工期,3种模型计算的面板应力是基本一致的。满蓄期,3种模型计算的面板顺坡向应力分布规律基本一致,但面板坝轴向应力的分布规律和量值有较明显的差别。蓄水时广义塑性接触面模型计算的接触面的应力路径和剪切位移与双曲线和理想弹塑性存在较大的差异。在地震荷载下,理想弹塑性和广义塑性接触面模型计算的地震后坝体残余变形引起的面板顺坡应力基本一致,但面板坝轴向应力差别较大。理想弹塑性模型只有当应力达到峰值时才产生塑性变形,这样会低估接触面的残余变形,不能与坝体残余变形相协调,高估了坝体残余变形对面板应力的影响。广义塑性接触面模型能更好的反映三维条件下接触面的剪胀、剪缩、硬化、软化、循环残余变形及颗粒破碎特性,更符合实际情况。
    Abstract: Three-dimensional static and dynamic elasto-plastic finite element analyses are conducted on a concrete faced rock fill dam. Three different soil-structure interface models are used to simulate the interface between slab and cushion layer, including hyperbolic model (only for static analysis), ideal elasto-plastic model and ageneralized plastic model. The slab stresses are nearly the same among three interface models after construction. The slope-direction slab stresses are also slightly different among three interface models during impoundment, while the axial-direction slab stresses have clear differences. The stress path and shear deformation between slab and cushion layer calculated by the generalized plastic model are different from those by the hyperbolic and ideal elasto-plastic models during impoundment. The slope-direction stress induced by the residual deformation is slightly different between the generalized plastic and ideal elasto-plastic interface models, but the axial-direction stress is much larger for the ideal elasto-plastic model. The ideal elasto-plastic model can only produce plastic deformation when the stress reaches the peak strength, and the shear deformation of interface during earthquakes will be underestimated. The generalized plastic interface model can reflect the dilative and contractive responses, strain hardening, softening, particle breakage and cyclic residual deformation, which is more close to reality.
    • HTML全文
    • 参考文献(26)
  • [1] GOODMAN R F, TAYLOR R L, BREKKE T L. A model for the mechanics of jointed rock[J]. Journal of Soil Mechanics and Foundation Engineering Division, ASCE, 1968, 94(3): 637-660.
    [2] DESAI C S, ZAMAN M M. Thin layer element for interfaces and joints[J]. International Journal for Numerical and Analytical Methods in Geomechanics, 1984, 8(1): 19-43.
    [3] 卢廷浩, 鲍伏波. 接触面薄层单元耦合本构模型[J]. 水利学报, 2000, 52(2): 71-75. (LU Ting-hao, BAO Fu-bo. A coupled constitutive model for interface thin-layer element[J]. Journal of Hydraulic Engineering, 2000, 52(2): 71-75. (in Chinese))
    [4] 吴军帅, 姜朴. 土与混凝土接触面的动力剪切特性[J]. 岩土工程学报, 1992, 14(2): 61-66. (WU Jun-shuai, JIANG Pu. Dynamic shearing characteristics of soil-concrete interface[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 1992, 14(2): 61-66. (in Chinese)).
    [5] 殷宗泽, 朱泓, 许国华. 土与结构材料的接触面的变形及数学模型[J]. 岩土工程学报, 1994, 16(3): 14-22. (YIN Zong-ze, ZHU Hong, XU Guo-hua. Numerical simulation of the deformation in the interface between soil and structural material[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 1994, 16(3): 14-22. (in Chinese))
    [6] 张冬雯, 卢廷浩. 一种土与结构接触面模型的建立及应用[J]. 岩土工程学报, 1998, 20(6): 62-66. (ZHANG Dong-ji, LU Ting-hao. Establishment and application of a interface model between soil and structure[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 1998, 20(6): 62-66. (in Chinese))
    [7] 胡黎明, 濮家骝. 土与结构物接触面损伤本构模型[J]. 岩土力学, 2002, 23(1): 6-11. (HU Li-ming, PU Jia-liu. Damage model of soil-structure interface[J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2002, 23(1): 6-11. (in Chinese))
    [8] 栾茂田, 武亚军. 土与结构间接触面的非线性弹性-理想塑性模型及其应用[J]. 岩土力学, 2004, 25(4): 507-513. (LUAN Mao-tian, WU Ya-jun. A nonlinear elasto-perfectly plastic model of interface element for soil-structure interaction and its applications[J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2004, 25(4): 507-513. (in Chinese))
    [9] 孙吉主, 施戈亮. 循环荷载作用下接触面的边界面模型研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2007, 28(2): 311-314. (SUN Ji-zhu, SHI Ge-liang. Bounding surface model for soil-structure interface under cyclic loading[J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2007, 28(2): 311-314. (in Chinese))
    [10] 张嘎, 张建民. 粗粒土与结构接触面统一本构模型及试验验证[J]. 岩土工程学报, 2005, 27(10): 1175-1179. (ZHANG Ga, ZHANG Jian-min. Unified modeling of soil-structure interface and its test confirmation[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2005, 27(10): 1175-1179. (in Chinese))
    [11] 张嘎, 张建民. 粗粒土与结构接触面三维本构关系及数值模型[J]. 岩土力学, 2007, 28(2): 288-292. (ZHANG Ga, ZHANG Jian-min. Three-dimensional model of interface between structure and coarse grained soil[J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2007, 28(2): 288-292. (in Chinese))
    [12] 周爱兆, 卢廷浩. 基于广义位势理论的接触面弹塑性本构模型[J]. 岩土工程学报, 2008, 30(10): 1532-1536. (ZHOU Ai-zhao, LU Ting-hao. Elasto-plastic constitutive model of interface based on generalized potential theory[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2008, 30(10): 1532-1536. (in Chinese))
    [13] CLOUGH G W, DUNCAN J M. Finite element analysis of retaining wall behavior[J]. Journal of Soil Mechanics and Foundation Engineering Division, ASCE, 1971, 97(12): 1657-1673.
    [14] ZIENKIEWICZ O C, MORZ Z. Generalized plasticity formulation and applications to geomechanics[M]. Desai C S, Gallapher R H, ed. Wiley: Mechanics of Engineer Materials, 1984: 665-679.
    [15] DAFALIAS Y F, POPOV E P. A model of nonlinearly hardening materials for complex loading[J]. Acta Mechanica, 1975(21): 173-192.
    [16] ROSCOE K H, SCHOFIELD A N, WORTH C P. On the yield of soils[J]. Géotechnique, 1958, 8(1): 22-53.
    [17] LIU J M, ZOU D G, KONG X J. A three-dimensional state-dependent model of soil-structure interface for monotonic and cyclic loadings[J]. Computers and Geotechnics, (in press).
    [18] LIU H B, LING H I. Constitutive description of interface behavior including cyclic loading and particle breakage within the framework of critical state soil mechanics[J]. International Journal for Numerical and Analytical Methods in Geomechanics, 2008, 32: 1495-1514.
    [19] PASTOR M, ZIENKIEWICZ O C, CHAN A H C. Generalized plasticity and the modeling of soil behavior[J]. International Journal for Numerical and Analytical Methods in Geomechanics, 1990, 14: 151-190.
    [20] WANG Z L, DAFALIAS Y F, SHEN C K. Bounding surface hypoplasticity model for sand[J]. Journal of Engineering Mechanics, ASCE, 1990, 116(5): 983-1001.
    [21] LADE P V, YAMAMURO J A, BOPP P A. Significance of particle crushing in granular materials[J]. Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 1996, 122(4): 309-316.
    [22] 孔宪京, 刘京茂, 邹德高, 等. 紫坪铺面板坝堆石料颗粒破碎试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2014, 25(1): 35-40. (KONG Xian-Jing, LIU Jing-mao, ZOU De-gao, et al. Experimental study of particle breakage of Zipingpu rock fill material[J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2014, 25(1): 35-40. (in Chinese))
    [23] 孔宪京, 邹德高, 徐斌, 等. 紫坪铺面板堆石坝三维有限元弹塑性分析[J]. 水力发电学报, 2013, 32(2): 213-222. (KONG Xian-Jing, ZOU De-gao, XU Bin, et al. Three-dimensional finite element elasto-plastic analysisof Zipingpu concrete faced rock-fill dam[J]. Journal of Hydroelectric Engineering, 2013, 32(2): 213-222. (in Chinese))
    [24] 邹德高, 尤华芳, 孔宪京, 等. 接缝简化模型及参数对面板堆石坝面板应力及接缝位移的影响研究[J]. 岩石力学与工程学报, 2009, 28(增刊1): 3257-3263. (ZOU De-gao, YOU Hua-Fang, KONG Xian-Jing, et al. Research on joint simplified model and effects of joint parameters on panel stress and joint displacements of faced rockfill dam[J]. Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering, 2009, 28(S1): 3257-3263.(in Chinese))
    [25] ZHANG G, ZHANG J M. Unified modeling of monotonic and cyclic behavior of interface between structure and gravelly soil[J]. Soils and Foundations, 2008, 48(2): 237-251.
    [26] 邹德高, 付猛, 刘京茂, 等. 粗粒料广义塑性模型对不同应力路径适应性研究[J]. 大连理工大学学报, 2013, 53(5): 702-709. (ZOU De-gao, FU Meng, LIU Jing-mao, et al. Study of adaptability of generalized plastic model of coarse grained soil under various stress paths[J]. Journal of Dalian University of Technology, 2013, 53(5): 702-709. (in Chinese))
    • 相关文章
    • 施引文献
    • 资源附件(0)
计量
  • 文章访问数: 
  • HTML全文浏览量:  0
  • PDF下载量: 
  • 被引次数: 0
出版历程
  • 收稿日期:  2014-06-11
  • 发布日期:  2015-05-05

目录

摘要
HTML全文
    参考文献(26)
    相关文章
    施引文献
    资源附件(0)

    /

    返回文章
    返回
    版权所有 © 2010水利部交通部国家能源局南京水利科学研究院 苏ICP备05007122号-11公安联网备案号：32010602011255
    编辑部地址：南京市虎踞关34号《岩土工程学报》编辑部邮编：210024电话：025-85829534，85829556E-mail: ge@nhri.cn