节理的剪切强度准则和剪切分量Ⅰ：剪切强度准则

唐志成; 刘泉声

doi:10.11779/CJGE201502012

节理的剪切强度准则和剪切分量Ⅰ：剪切强度准则 English Version

武汉大学土木建筑工程学院,湖北武汉 430072

基金项目: 国家自然科学青年基金项目（41402247）; 国家重点基础研究发展计划项目（2014CB046904）; 国家自然科学重点基金项目（41130742）; 第55批中国博士后科学基金（2014M550407）

详细信息

作者简介:
唐志成(1983- ),男,博士,主要从事岩石力学方面的研究和教学工作。E-mail: tangzhichengok@126.com。

中图分类号: TU47
计量
- 文章访问数: 0280
- HTML全文浏览量: 0
- PDF下载量: 0333
出版历程
- 收稿日期: 2014-06-10
- 发布日期: 2015-03-01

Shear strength criterion and shear components of rock joints I: Shear strength criterion

School of Civil and Architecture Engineering, Wuhan University, Wuhan 430072, China

摘要

摘要: 节理的峰值剪切强度受表面三维形貌和材料力学属性的影响,已有的文献着重阐述形貌参数的重要性。总结分析了材料的抗拉强度对节理剪切力学性质的影响。采用最大可能接触面积比、最大视倾角、视倾角分布参数描述节理沿剪切方向的三维形貌特征,用双曲线函数描述不同法向应力下的剪胀角,提出新的剪切强度准则,计算值与试验值保持了较好的一致性。采用其中28组岩石节理的直剪试验数据对新准则与JRC-JCS准则进行了比较,结果表明JRC-JCS准则的计算值与试验值相比差异更大。新准则采用的形貌参通过由形貌测试确定,避免了主观因素对形貌参数取值的影响,可用用于估算岩石节理的峰值剪切强度。
- 节理 /
- 三维形貌 /
- 峰值剪切强度准则 /
- 抗拉强度
Abstract: The peak shear strength of rock joints is influenced by both the surface morphology and the mechanical parameters of joint materials. In the existing references, special attention has been paid to the importance of roughness. Here, the importance of tensile strength of joint materials is discussed. The three-dimensional surface morphology along shear direction is captured by using the maximum potential contact area ratio, the maximum apparent inclination angle and the distribution of inclination angle. A new peak shear strength criterion is proposed, in which the dilatancy angle expressed by a hyperbolic function is used. A total of 85 sets of data are used to validate the criterion. The results show that there is good agreement between the calculated and measured values. 28 sets of data from natural rock joints are used to compare the new criterion and the famous JRC-JCS criterion. The discrepancy between the measured and calculated values by JRC-JCS criterion is something larger. The proposed criterion can be used as a predictive tool to evaluate the peak shear strength of rock joints owing to the fact that the roughness parameters can be easily obtained in the laboratory and the subjectivity can be avoided.
- joint /
- three-dimensional morphology /
- peak shear strength criterion /
- tensile strength

HTML全文

参考文献(19)

[1]	BARTON N. Review of a new shear-strength criterion for rock joints[J]. Engineering Geology, 1973, 7(4): 287-332.
[2]	BARTON N,CHOUBEY V. The shear strength of rock joint in theory and practice[J]. Rock Mechanics, 1977, 10(1): 1-54.
[3]	ISRM. Suggested methods for the quantitative description of discontinuities in rock masses[J]. International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences & Geomechanics Abstracts, 1978, 15(6): 319-368.
[4]	BEER A J, STEAD D,COGGAN J S. Estimation of the joint roughness coefficient (JRC) by visual[J]. Rock Mechanics and Rock Engineering, 2002, 35(1): 65-74.
[5]	GRASSELLI G, WIRTH J, EGGER P. Quantitative 3D description of a rough surface and parameter evolution with shearing[J]. International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences, 2002, 39(6): 789-800.
[6]	GRASSELLI G, EGGER P. Constitutive law for the shear strength of rock joints based on 3-D surface parameters[J]. International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences, 2003, 40(1): 25-40.
[7]	YANG Z Y, TAGHICHIAN A,HUANG G D. On the applicability of self-affinity concept in scale of three-dimensional rock joints[J]. International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences, 2011, 48(7): 1173-1187.
[8]	GRASSELLI G. Shear strength of rock joints based on quantified surface description[J]. Rock Mechanics and Rock Engineering, 2006, 39(4): 295-314.
[9]	XIA C C, TANG Z C, XIAO W M, et al. New peak shear strength criterion of rock joints based on quantified surface description[J]. Rock Mechanics and Rock Engineering, 2014, 47(2): 387-400.
[10]	MAKSIMOVIC M. New description of the shear strength for rock joints[J]. Rock Mechanics and Rock Engineering, 1992, 25(4): 275-284.
[11]	TATONE B S A,GRASSELLI G. A method to evaluate the three-dimensional roughness of fracture surfaces in brittle geomaterials[J]. Review of Scientific Instruments, 2009, 80(12): 125110.
[12]	GHAZVINIAN A H, AZINFAR M J, GERANMAYEH- VANEGHI R. Importance of tensile strength on the shear behavior of discontinuities[J]. Rock Mechanics and Rock Engineering, 2012, 45: 349-359.
[13]	PARK J W,SONG J J. Numerical simulation of a direct shear test on a rock joint using a bonded-particle model[J]. International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences, 2009, 46(8): 1315-1328.
[14]	BAHAADDINI M, SHARROCK G, HEBBLEWHITE B K. Numerical direct shear tests to model the shear behaviour of rock joints[J]. Computers and Geotechnics, 2013, 51(1): 101-115.
[15]	SCHNEIDER H J. The friction and deformation behaviour of rock joints[J]. Rock Mechanics, 1976, 8: 169-185.
[16]	MAKSIMOVIC M. The shear strength components of a rough rock joint [J]. International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences and Geomechanics, Abstracts, 1996, 33(8): 769-783.
[17]	唐志成. 考虑扰动影响的节理与柱状节理岩体的力学性质[D]. 上海: 同济大学, 2013. (TANG Zhi-cheng. Mechanical behaviors of rock joint under different contact state and columnar jointed rock mass[D]. Shanghai: Tongji University, 2013. (in Chinese))
[18]	TATONE B S A. Quantitative characterization of natural rock discontinuity roughness in-situ and in the laboratory[D]. Toronto: University of Toronto, 2009.
[19]	ASADOLLAHI P,TONON F. Constitutive model for rock fractures: Revisiting Barton's empirical model[J]. Engineering Geology, 2010, 113(1): 11-32.

施引文献(3)

期刊类型引用(2)

1.	高志傲，孔令伟，王双娇，黄珏皓，赵浩武. 循环荷载下不同裂隙方向饱和原状膨胀土动力特性试验研究. 岩土工程学报. 2025(04): 736-748 . 本站查看
2.	简涛，孔令伟，柏巍，王俊涛，刘炳恒. 含水率对原状黄土小应变剪切模量影响的试验研究. 岩土工程学报. 2022(S1): 160-165 . 本站查看