边载作用下隔离桩隔离效果的影响因素研究

竺明星; 王磊; 龚维明

doi:10.11779/CJGE201404011

边载作用下隔离桩隔离效果的影响因素研究 English Version

竺明星¹,
王磊¹,
龚维明^{1, 2}

1. 东南大学土木工程学院,江苏南京 210096; 2. 东南大学混凝土及预应力混凝土结构教育部重点实验室,江苏南京 210096

基金项目: 国家科技支撑计划项目（2011BAG07B01）

详细信息

作者简介:
竺明星(1985- ),男,江苏南京人,博士研究生,主要从事桩基础理论和岩土工程数值分析方面的研究工作。E-mail: zmx198561@163.com。

中图分类号: TU473
计量
- 文章访问数: 363
- HTML全文浏览量: 3
- PDF下载量: 314
出版历程
- 收稿日期: 2013-05-31
- 发布日期: 2014-04-21

Factors influencing isolation effects of isolation piles under side loading

1. School of Civil Engineering, Southeast University, Nanjing 210096, China; 2. Key Laboratory for RC and PRC Structure of Ministry of Education, Southeast University, Nanjing 210096, China

摘要

摘要: 以港珠澳大桥海底沉管隧道基础沉降控制研究为科研背景,为研究岛头边载作用下隔离桩隔离效果的影响因素,进行了8组室内模型试验,分别研究了隔离桩桩长、桩径、桩间距及隔离桩距减沉桩距离S₁等因素对隔离效果的影响。试验结果表明：减沉桩桩身最大轴力、弯矩随隔离桩桩长的增加而减小,并且当隔离桩桩长达到所需的嵌固深度时,对弯矩的隔离效果非常显著；隔离桩桩径的增加或桩间距的减小不仅提高隔离桩对竖向变形的隔断能力,同时也使得隔离桩之间土拱效应增强,减沉桩桩身最大轴力、弯矩随着隔离桩桩径的增加而减小,随隔离桩桩间距的减小而减小,同时,当隔离桩桩间距达到8D时,对轴力与弯矩的隔离效果可以忽略不计；减沉桩桩身最大轴力随S₁的减小而减小,而S₁的变化对弯矩的隔离效果影响不显著；研究成果可为隔离桩的应用提供较好的参考。
- 隔离桩 /
- 隔离效果 /
- 边载作用 /
- 影响因素
Abstract: Based on the settlement control of the immersed tube tunnel in Hong Kong-Zhuhai-Macao Bridge, eight groups of labortary model tests on length and diameter of piles, pile spacing and distance S₁ between isolation piles and settlement reducing piles are performed to study the isolation effects of isolation piles under large side loading in the island edge. The results show that the maximum axial force and bending moment of settlement-reducing piles decrease with the increasing length of isolation piles, meanwhile a sufficient length of isolation piles plays a significant role in diminishing the bending moment. The increasing diameter of isolation piles or the decreasing spacing of isolated piles can enhance the obstructing ability of vertical deformation and strengthen the soil arching effect. The maximum axial force and bending moment of settlement-reducing piles decrease with the increasing diameter or the decreasing pile spacing. At the same time, the isolation effects for the axial force and moment can be ignored when the pile spacing reaches 8D. The isolation effects for the axial force become better as distance S₁ decreases, however those for the moment are not significant due to the variation of distance S₁. The research achievements may provide a better reference for the application of isolation piles.
- isolation pile /
- isolation effect /
- side loading /
- influence factor

HTML全文

参考文献(9)

[1]	刘芳, 谭忠盛, 董志明. 北京地铁渡线暗挖隧道施工力学分析[J]. 铁道建筑, 2006(3): 15. (LIU Fang, TAN Zhong-sheng, DONG Zhi-ming. Mechanical analysis of construction process of NATM (New Austria Tunnelling Method) tunnel in crossover section of Beijing metro project[J]. Railway Engineering, 2006(3): 15. (in Chinese))
[2]	张冬梅, 黄宏伟, 王箭明. 复杂环境条件下浅埋近间距大直径盾构隧道施工的相互影响及控制[J]. 现代隧道技术, 2008(增刊1): 203-206. (ZHANG Dong-mei, HUANG Hong-wei, WANG Jian-ming. Interrelationship and control on construction of shallow-buried large diameter shield tunnel with small interval under complex conditions[J]. Modern Tunnelling Technology, 2008(S1): 203-206. (in Chinese))
[3]	闫静雅. 桩基础全寿命期对邻近已有隧道的影响研究[D]. 上海: 同济大学, 2007. (YAN Jing-ya. The influence of pile foundation in life-cycle on adjacent existing tunnel[D]. Shanghai: Tongji University, 2007. (in Chinese))
[4]	纪新博, 赵文, 李慎刚, 等. 隔离桩在隧道侧穿邻近浅基建筑中的应用[J]. 东北大学学报: (自然科学版), 2013, 34(1): 135-139. (JI Xin-bo, ZHAO Wen, LI Shen-gang, et al. Application of isolation piles on metro tunnel for side-crossing the buildings with shallow foundation[J]. Journal of Northeastern University (Natural Science), 2013, 34(1): 135-139. (in Chinese))
[5]	刘毓氚, 陈福全, 左广洲. 大面积堆载下软土地基的应力隔离与加固实例分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2006, 27(5): 846-849. (LIU Yu-chuan, CHEN Fu-quan, ZUO Guang-zhou. Case study of synthetic method of stress isolation and ground reinforcement to handle soft ground problem induced by adjacent surcharge load[J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2006, 27(5): 846-849. (in Chinese))
[6]	姚海波, 王梦恕, 张顶立, 等. 导洞-隔离桩体系工作机理研究与侧向变形分析[J]. 土木工程学报, 2006, 39(4): 105-109. (YAO Hai-bo, WANG Meng-shu, ZHANG Ding-li, et al. Mechanism of a drift-pile system and analysis of its horizontal displacement[J]. China Civil Engineering Journal,2006, 39(4): 105-109. (in Chinese))
[7]	于汝康. 边载作用下隔离桩的隔离效果研究[D]. 南京: 东南大学, 2012. (YU Ru-kang. Study on isolation effects of isolation piles under side loading[D]. Nanjing: Southeast University, 2012. (in Chinese))
[8]	竺明星, 龚维明, 何小元, 等. 堆载作用下考虑土拱效应的被动桩变形内力半解析解[J]. 岩土工程学报, 2013, 35(11): 10-21. (ZHU Ming-xing, GONG Wei-ming, HE Xiao-yuan, et al. Semi-analytical solution to deformation and internal force of passive piles under surcharge loads considering soil arching effect[J]. Chinese Journal of GeotechnicalEngineering, 2013, 35(11): 10-21. (in Chinese))
[9]	沈珠江. 桩的抗滑阻力和抗滑桩的极限设计[J]. 岩土工程学报, 1992, 14(1): 51-56. (SHEN Zhu-jiang. Stabilizing force and design method for anti-slide piles[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 1992, 14(1): 51-56. (in Chinese))

施引文献(16)

期刊类型引用(9)

1.	王睿，王兰民，周燕国，王刚. 土动力学与岩土地震工程. 土木工程学报. 2024(07): 71-89+105 . 百度学术
2.	袁近远，崔家伟，李兆焱，袁晓铭，张钰洋. 中国模式下砾性土液化指数评价新方法. 土木工程学报. 2024(09): 98-108 . 百度学术
3.	徐斌，王星亮，庞锐，陈柯好. 考虑组构演化的砂砾土弹塑性本构模型. 岩土力学. 2024(11): 3197-3211 . 百度学术
4.	王家全，祝梦柯，林志南，梁宁. 细粒含量对饱和砾性土静动力学特性的影响. 土木工程学报. 2023(05): 112-121 . 百度学术
5.	邢明源，胡欣宇. 基于神经网络模型的砾性土液化预测. 华北科技学院学报. 2021(03): 75-80 . 百度学术
6.	付大庆，董德学，张修磊，孙浩东，史振铜，白书昕. 弥河朐山拦河闸砾石液化探讨. 水利技术监督. 2021(09): 162-166 . 百度学术
7.	王海，王永志，汤兆光，袁晓铭，段雪锋. 剪切波速-相对密度联合试验与经验公式验证. 地下空间与工程学报. 2021(06): 1881-1887 . 百度学术
8.	黄茂松，边学成，陈育民，王睿，顾晓强，周燕国. 土动力学与岩土地震工程. 土木工程学报. 2020(08): 64-86 . 百度学术
9.	王世岐，张向阳，魏峰先，王健. 逐一土层进行液化等级判别初探. 工程勘察. 2020(12): 27-29 . 百度学术