• 全国中文核心期刊
  • 中国科技核心期刊
  • 美国工程索引(EI)收录期刊
  • Scopus数据库收录期刊
ZHENG Gang, ZHANG Fu-zheng, ZHANG Tian-qi, ZHA Wan-li. Disturbance of shield tunnel excavation and compensation grouting to surrounding soil: laboratory tests and numerical simulations[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2016, 38(10): 1741-1753. DOI: 10.11779/CJGE201610001
Citation: ZHENG Gang, ZHANG Fu-zheng, ZHANG Tian-qi, ZHA Wan-li. Disturbance of shield tunnel excavation and compensation grouting to surrounding soil: laboratory tests and numerical simulations[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2016, 38(10): 1741-1753. DOI: 10.11779/CJGE201610001

Disturbance of shield tunnel excavation and compensation grouting to surrounding soil: laboratory tests and numerical simulations

More Information
  • Received Date: July 19, 2015
  • Published Date: October 24, 2016
  • Compensation grouting, as an effective remedial measure, is often adopted to deal with the soil loss engendered in shield tunneling. The model tests with two different scales in dry sand are performed to investigate the disturbance of tunnel excavation and compensation grouting to the surrounding soil. By “tunneling” and “grouting” sequentially in the test, the effect of compensation grouting on both surface settlements and soil stresses in the presence of soil loss is studied. The test data indicate that the surface settlements caused by tunnel excavation can be effectively predicted by the Peck formula, and the maximum settlement value is approximately proportional to the volume loss. During the stage of tunneling, the soil can be divided into three zones corresponding to the stress changes, i.e., the positive arching zone, the unloading zone and the plastic zone. During the stage of grouting, the soil can be divided into two zones according to the stress changes, i.e., the effective upheaval zone and the arching compensation zone. The two-dimensional finite element analysis considering small-strain behavior of the soil is carried out to reproduce the test data, and the simulated results correspond well to the test data, helping to further validate the disturbance mechanism by both “tunneling” and “grouting” revealed in model tests.
  • [1]
    魏 纲, 魏新江, 龚 慈, 等. 软土中盾构法隧道引起的土体移动计算研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2006, 27(6): 995-999. (WEI Gang, WEI Xin-jiang, GONG Ci, et al. Study on calculation for shield tunneling-induced ground movements in clays[J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2006, 27(6) : 995-999. (in Chinese))
    [2]
    PECK R B. Deep excavations and tunneling in soft ground[C]// Proceedings of 7th International Conference on Soil Mechanics and Foundation Engineering. Mexico City, 1969: 225-290.
    [3]
    LEE K M, ROWE R K, LO K Y. Subsidence owing to tunneling. I: Estimating the gap parameter[J]. Canadian Geotechnical Journal, 1992, 29(6): 929-940.
    [4]
    O’REILLY M P, NEW B M. Settlements above tunnels in the United Kingdom-their magnitude and prediction[C]// Proc Tunnelling 82, Institution of Mining and Metallurgy. London, 1982: 173-181.
    [5]
    王振信. 盾构施工对环境的影响[C]// 海峡两岸轨道交通建设与环境工程高级技术论坛. 北京: 人民交通出版社, 2008. (WANG Zheng-xin. The environmental impact of shield tunnel construction[C]// Strait Rail Construction and Environmental Engineering Advanced Technology Forum. Beijing: China Communications Press, 2008. (in Chinese))
    [6]
    KNOTHE S. Observations of surface movements under influence of mining and their theoretical interpretation[C]// Proceedings of European Congress on Ground Movement. Leeds. UK: University of Leeds, 1957: 210-218.
    [7]
    ATTEWELL P B, FARMER I W. Ground deformations resulting from shield tunnelling in London clay[J]. Canadian Geotechnical Journal, 1974, 11(3): 380-395.
    [8]
    廖红建, 卿伟宸, 张志刚, 等. 黄土地层盾构隧道开挖对地表沉降影响的有限元分析[J]. 西安交通大学学报, 2006, 40(11): 1343-1347. (LIAO Hong-jian, QING Wei-chen, ZHANG Zhi-gang, et al. Finite element analysis for influence of shield tunneling on settlement of ground surface in loess strata[J]. Journal of Xi'an Jiaotong University, 2006, 40(11): 1343-1347. (in Chinese))
    [9]
    魏 纲. 盾构法隧道统一土体移动模型的建立[J]. 岩土工程学报, 2007, 29(4): 554-559. (WEI Gang. Establishment of uniform ground movement model for shield tunnels[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2007, 29(4): 554-559. (in Chinese))
    [10]
    LEE K M. Ground response to the construction of shanghai metro Tunnel-line 2[J]. Soils and Foundations, 1999, 39(3): 113-134.
    [11]
    ALTAEE A, FENLLENIUS B H. Physical modeling in sand[J]. Canadian Geotechnical Journal, 1994, 31: 420-431.
    [12]
    BURLAND J B. Ninth laurits bjerrum memorial lecture: “small is beautiful”―the siffness of soils at small strains[J]. Canadian Geotechnical Journal, 1989, 26(4): 499-516
    [13]
    罗富荣, 国 斌. 北京地铁天安门西站“暗挖逆筑法”施工技术[J]. 岩土工程学报, 2001, 23(1): 32-37. (LUO Fu-rong, GUO Bin. Construction technology of “tunneling and top-down method” at west tian’anmen station in metro of Beijing[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 1998, 35(1): 159-168. (in Chinese)).
    [14]
    SHAHIN H M, NAKAI T F, ZHANG M, et al. Behavior of ground and response of existing foundation due to tunneling[J]. Soils and Foundations, 2011, 51(3): 395-405.
    [15]
    MARSHALL A M, FARRELL R, KLAR A, et al. Tunnels in sands: the effect of size, depth and volume loss on greenfield displacements[J]. Géotechnique, 2012, 62(5): 385-399.
    [16]
    LEE C J, WU B R, CHEN H T, et al. Tunnel stability and arching effects during tunneling in soft clayey soil[J]. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 2006, 21: 119-32.
  • Related Articles

    [1]SUN Rui, ZHANG Jian, YANG Junsheng, YANG Feng. Axisymmetric adaptive lower bound finite element method based on Mohr-Coulomb yield criterion and second-order cone programming[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2023, 45(11): 2387-2395. DOI: 10.11779/CJGE20220781
    [2]TAN Xu-kai, GAO Feng, XU Wei. Static instability criterion and safety factor of tunnels based on loading/unloading response ratio[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2022, 44(9): 1644-1653. DOI: 10.11779/CJGE202209009
    [3]LIU Yang, FAN Meng, YAN Zhou-yi. DEM simulation of instability mode in sand under constant shear drained conditions[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2020, 42(3): 467-475. DOI: 10.11779/CJGE202003008
    [4]YANG Xin-guang, CHI Shi-chun. Upper bound FEM analysis of slope stability using a nonlinear failure criterion[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2013, 35(9): 1759-1764.
    [5]Instability criteria for high arch dams using catastrophe theory[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2011, 33(1).
    [6]Time and space prediction of collapse of loose wall rock at tunnel exit[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2010, 32(12): 1868-1874.
    [7]LONG Xujian, HUANG Xiaoyan, ZHANG Chunyu, ZHOU Ji. Stiffness reduction and slope failure criterion in strength reduction finite element method[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2008, 30(12): 1910-1914.
    [8]LIU Enlong, SHEN Zhujiang. Strength criterion for structured soils[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2006, 28(10): 1248-1252.
    [9]Su Zhimin, Jiang chunlei. A model of the strength criterion of shale[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 1999, 21(3): 55-58.
    [10]Pan Yishan, Zhang Mengtao, Li Guozhen. Analysis on Circular Chamber Rockburst by Dynamic Stability Criterion[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 1993, 15(5): 59-66.

Catalog

    Article views PDF downloads Cited by()
    Related

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return