城市 | 原位土渗透 系数/(cm·s-1) |
改良渣土渗透 系数/(cm·s-1) |
刀盘面中心处水头/m | 掘进速度/ (mm·min-1) |
D/m | L1/m | d/m | L2/m | θ/(°) |
哈尔滨 | 1.28×10-2 | 1.08×10-4 | 23.0 | 10~20 | 6.0 | 1.09 | 0.8 | 12.360 | 22 |
西安 | 3.13×10-2 | 9.63×10-5 | 10.2 | 20 | 6.0 | 1.00 | 0.92 | 6.000 | 22 |
兰州 | 7.50×10-2 | 5.60×10-5 | 30.0 | 50~60 | 6.4 | 0.45 | 0.92 | 5.300 | 22 |
福州 | — | 2.70×10-5 | 20.4 | 30 | 6.4 | 1.00 | 0.80 | 7.000 | 22 |
昆明 | 4.40×10-4 | 1.20×10-5 | 15.2 | 35~45 | 6.4 | 1.60 | 0.80 | 6.855 | 22 |
Basic soil parameters and construction conditions
Figures of the Article
-
Seepage model for earth pressure balance shield
-
Superposition of boundary conditions of region ①
-
Fluctuating pore pressures on cutter surface
-
Comparison of analytical results and finite element solutions
-
Influences of different frequencies and solidification factor ratios on flow rate
-
Influences of different frequencies and solidification coefficient ratios on seepage field
-
Influences of different frequencies and solidification coefficient ratios on phase hysteresis
-
Calculation of critical permeability coefficient
-
Critical permeability coefficients of typical shield sizes under different water pressures
-
Shield soil transport model test system
-
Comparison of test results
-
Discriminant diagrams of spewing in different cities
Tables of the Article
-
L1 L2 D d θ 1.6 m 6.855 m 6.4 m 0.8 m 22° -
城市 原位土渗透
系数/(cm·s-1)改良渣土渗透
系数/(cm·s-1)刀盘面中心处水头/m 掘进速度/
(mm·min-1)D/m L1/m d/m L2/m θ/(°) 哈尔滨 1.28×10-2 1.08×10-4 23.0 10~20 6.0 1.09 0.8 12.360 22 西安 3.13×10-2 9.63×10-5 10.2 20 6.0 1.00 0.92 6.000 22 兰州 7.50×10-2 5.60×10-5 30.0 50~60 6.4 0.45 0.92 5.300 22 福州 — 2.70×10-5 20.4 30 6.4 1.00 0.80 7.000 22 昆明 4.40×10-4 1.20×10-5 15.2 35~45 6.4 1.60 0.80 6.855 22