Advanced Search
    Volume 35 Issue 9
    Turn off MathJax
    Article Contents
    Abstract
    References
    Related Articles
    LI Xiao-jun, CHEN Xue-qin, ZHU He-hua. Reliability analysis of shield lining sections using Spreadsheet method[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2013, 35(9): 1642-1649.
    Citation: LI Xiao-jun, CHEN Xue-qin, ZHU He-hua. Reliability analysis of shield lining sections using Spreadsheet method[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2013, 35(9): 1642-1649.
    shu

    Reliability analysis of shield lining sections using Spreadsheet method

    • 1. Key Laboratory of Geotechnical and Underground Engineering of Ministry of Education, Tongji University, Shanghai 200092, China; 2. State Key Laboratory for Disaster Reduction in Civil Engineering, Tongji University, Shanghai 200092, China; 3. Department of Geotechnical Engineering, College of Civil Engineering, Tongji University, Shanghai 200092, China

    More Information
    • Received Date: November 12, 2012
    • Published Date: September 21, 2013
      Graphical Abstract
      • Abstract
    • The reliability of shield lining sections is calculated using the Spreadsheet method which can avoid independent transformation of related variables and partial derivatives of limit state function over the basic variables. The ultimate limit state functions of eccentric compression failure of normal section and shear failure of oblique section are established. The corresponding reliability indexes are calculated using the Spreadsheet method, and the failure probability of lining sections connected by those two failure modes in series is derived. In addition, the service limit state functions of concrete crack, joint opening and tunnel convergence failures are established, and the corresponding reliability indexes are calculated using the Spreadsheet method. Meanwhile, the Monte Carlo simulation is employed to calculate the reliability indexes of the lining sections under different failure modes. The Monte Carlo simulation results are compared with those of the Spreadsheet method. The maximum difference of reliability index between the two methods is less than 4%, but the Spreadsheet method can save the computing time significantly. Therefore, based on the proposed ultimate limit state and service limit state functions and the Spreadsheet method, the reliability index of shield tunnel lining sections can be analyzed quickly, accurately and conveniently.
      • FullText(HTML)
      • References (14)
    • [1]
      胡志平, 罗丽娟. 管片衬砌结构可靠度分析的优化方法[J]. 岩石力学与工程学报, 2005, 24(22): 4145-4150. (HU Zhi-ping, LUO Li-juan. Study of reliability optimization of segments lining shield tunnel[J]. Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering, 2005, 24(22): 4145-4150. (in Chinese))
      [2]
      MOLLON G, DIAS D, SOUBRA A H. Probabilistic analysis of circular tunnels in homogeneous soil using response surface methodology[J]. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenviron- mental Engineering, 2009, 135(9): 1314-1325.
      [3]
      LÜ Q, SUN H Y, LOW B K. Reliability analysis of ground-support interaction in circular tunnels using the response surface method[J]. International Journal of Rock Mechanics & Mining Sciences, 2011, 48: 1329-1343.
      [4]
      王 慧, 黄宏伟. 软土地铁盾构隧道环间接头可靠度评价方法[J]. 岩土工程学报, 2011, 33(增刊1): 278-283. (WANG Hui, HUANG Hong-wei. Reliability evaluation method for segment joints of metro shield tunnels in soft soils[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2011, 33(S1): 278-283. (in Chinese))
      [5]
      LOW B K, TANG W H. Efficient reliability evaluation using Spreadsheet[J]. Journal of Engineering Mechanics, 1997a, 123(7): 749-752.
      [6]
      LOW B K, TANG W H. Efficient Spreadsheet algorithm for first-order reliability method[J]. Journal of Engineering Mechanics, 2007, 133(12): 1378-1387.
      [7]
      张璐璐, 张 洁, 徐 耀, 等. 岩土工程可靠度理论[M]. 上海: 同济大学出版社, 2011. (ZHANG Lu-lu, ZHANG Jie, XU Yao, et al. Geotechnical engineering reliability theory[M]. Shanghai: Tongji University Press, 2011. (in Chinese))
      [8]
      朱合华. 地下建筑结构[M]. 北京: 中国建筑工业出版社, 2005. (ZHU He-hua. Underground construction structure[M]. Beijing: China Architecture and Building Press, 2005. (in Chinese))
      [9]
      GB50010—2002 混凝土结构设计规范[S]. 北京: 中国建筑工业出版社, 2002. (GB50010—2002 Code for design of concrete structures[S]. Beijing: China Architecture and Building Press, 2002. (in Chinese))
      [10]
      袁 勇, 赵庆丽. 盾构隧道衬砌截面的承载能力功能函数[J]. 铁道工程学报, 2009(5): 59-63. (YUAN Yong, ZHAO Qing-li. Functions for the bearing capacity of lining cross-section of shield tunnel[J]. Journal of Railway Engineering Society, 2009(5): 59-63. (in Chinese))
      [11]
      周海鹰, 李立新, 陈廷国. 地铁管片抗裂度及裂缝宽度试验和计算方法[J]. 山东大学学报(工学版), 2010, 40(3): 124-127. (ZHOU Hai-ying, LI Li-xin, CHEN Ting-guo. Experiments and calculating method for cracking strength and crack width of the metro segment[J]. Journal of Shandong University (Engineering Science), 2010, 40(3): 124-127. (in Chinese))
      [12]
      徐 燕. 盾构隧道结构设计优化分析研究[D]. 上海: 同济大学, 2009. (XU Yan. Design optimization analysis on shield tunnel structure[D]. Shanghai: Tongji University, 2009. (in Chinese))
      [13]
      刘红梁, 宋罕宇, 陆钦年. 高强混凝土立方体强度变异系数的商榷[J]. 哈尔滨商业大学学报(自然科学版), 2004, 10(5): 604-607. (LIU Hong-liang, SONG Han-yu, LU Qin-nian. Discussion on variation factor of high-strength concrete cube strength[J]. Journal of Harbin University of Commerce (Natural Sciences Edition), 2004, 10(5): 604-607. (in Chinese))
      [14]
      马宏旺, 赵国藩. 钢筋混凝土矩形柱截面曲率延性系数概率分析[J]. 大连理工大学学报, 2001, 41(4): 485-490. (MA Hong-wang, ZHAO Guo-fan. Probability analysis for curvature ductility factor of square-confined reinforced concrete columns[J]. Journal of Dalian University Technology, 2001, 41(4): 485-490. (in Chinese))
      • Related Articles

    • Related Articles

      [1]SHAO Long-tan, GUO Xiao-xia, ZHENG Guo-feng. Intergranular stress, soil skeleton stress and effective stress[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2015, 37(8): 1478-1483. DOI: 10.11779/CJGE201508017
      [2]LU De-chun, DU Xiu-li, XU Cheng-shun. Analytical solutions to principle of effective stress[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2013, 35(zk1): 146-151.
      [3]CHEN Yu-jiong. Validity of effective stress principle in saturated clay[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2011, 33(6): 985.
      [4]TANG Liansheng, YAN Bo, ZHANG Pengcheng, ZHANG Qinghua. Definition and exploration for effective stress and related conception in unsaturated soil[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2006, 28(2): 216-220.
      [5]XIE Dingyi, FEN Zhiyan. Consideration of some fundamental viewpoints in studying effective stress of unsaturated soils[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2006, 28(2): 170-173.
      [6]XING Yichuan, XIE Dingyi, WANG Xiaogang, LI Zhen. 3D effective stress of unsaturated loess[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2003, 25(3): 288-293.
      [7]MIAO Tiande, MU Qingsong, LIU Zhongyu, MA Chongwu. Effective stress and shear strength of unsaturated soil with low water content[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2001, 23(4): 393-396.
      [8]XING Yichuan, XIE Dingyi, LI Zheng. Stress transmission mechanism and effective stress principle of unsaturated soil[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2001, 23(1): 53-57.
      [9]Chen Zhenghan, Wang Yongsheng, Xie Dingyi. Effective Stress in Unsaturated Soil[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 1994, 16(3): 62-69.
      [10]Wei Rulong. Effective Angle of Shearing Resistance for Soft Clay[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 1989, 11(2): 26-34.
      • Supplements (0)

    Catalog

      Get Citation
      PDF
      XML
      Article views PDF downloads Cited by()
      Related
      Website Copyright © 2010 Editorial By Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering 苏ICP备05007122号-11公安联网备案号：32010602011255
      Editorial Office address：34 Hujuguan,Nanjing 210024,ChinaPostal Code：210024Tel：025-85829534，85829556E-mail: ge@nhri.cn

      /

      DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
      Return
      Return