• 全国中文核心期刊
  • 中国科技核心期刊
  • 美国工程索引(EI)收录期刊
  • Scopus数据库收录期刊
ZOU Hai-feng, LIU Song-yu, CAI Guo-jun, DU Guang-yin. Evaluation of liquefaction potential of saturated sands based on piezocome penetration tests on resistivity[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2013, 35(7): 1280-1288.
Citation: ZOU Hai-feng, LIU Song-yu, CAI Guo-jun, DU Guang-yin. Evaluation of liquefaction potential of saturated sands based on piezocome penetration tests on resistivity[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2013, 35(7): 1280-1288.

Evaluation of liquefaction potential of saturated sands based on piezocome penetration tests on resistivity

More Information
  • Received Date: September 03, 2012
  • Published Date: July 16, 2013
  • The liquefaction of saturated soils is a major concern for the earthquake damage of foundation, and its effective evaluation is rather important. Because of the difficulty and cost constraint of obtaining high-quality undisturbed samples, in-situ testing is commonly applied to evaluate the potential of soil liquefaction. At present, numerous methods based on the cone penetration test (CPT) have been developed, but none of them has been accepted to be the most reliable one. In high risk projects, a comprehensive evaluation based on various methods is usually adopted, and thus the research on new method to evaluate the liquefaction is still necessary. The resistivity of saturated silts and sands is measured using resistivity piezocone penetration tests for the construction of Suqian-Xinyi expressway. First, the relationship between normalized cone tip resistance and resistivity is analyzed and can contribute to the evaluation of soil liquefaction based on resistivity. Second, the study on combination of resistivity and soil behavior type index to directly calculate the cycle resistance ratio (CRR) is conducted with the CRR from Robertson modified liquefaction evaluation model as a reference. The influence of thin cohesive layers and transition zones is also analyzed. It is shown that the resistivity and soil behavior type index can be used for effective evaluation of liquefaction potential of saturated soils. The accuracy of the proposed method is distinct when the cone passes soil interface since the vertical resolution of resistivity is directly proportional to the distance between outer electrodes. Otherwise, the proposed method is not suitable to thin clay layers and transition zones as it may underestimate CRR.
  • [1]
    GB50007—2002 建筑地基基础设计规范[S]GB50007—2002 建筑地基基础设计规范[S].北京:中国建筑工业出版社, 2002.(GB50007—2002 Code for design of building foundation[S](GB50007—2002 Code for design of building foundation[S].Beijing:China Architecture and Building Press, 2002. (in Chinese))
    LUNNE T,ROBERTSON P K,POWELL J J M. Cone penetration testing in geotechnical practice[M]. London: Chapman & Hall, 1997.
    CAI G J,LIU S Y,ANAND J P. Liquefaction assessments using seismic piezocone penetration (SCPTU) test investigations in Tangshan region in China[J]. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 2012, 41: 141-150.
    蔡国军,刘松玉,童立元,等. 基于CPT测试的国内外砂土液化判别方法研究[J]. (岩石力学与工程学报), 2008, 27(5): 1019-1027.(CAI Guo-jun,LIU Song-yu,TONG Li-yuan,et al. Evaluation of liquefaction of sandy soils based on cone Penetration test[J]. Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering, 2008, 27(5): 1019-1027. (in Chinese))
    SEED H B,PEACOCK W H. Test procedures for measuring soil liquefaction characteristics[J]. Journal of the Soil Mechanics and Foundations Division, ASCE, 1971, 97(SM8): 1099-1119.
    SHARP M K,DOBRY R,PHILIPS R. CPT-based evaluation of liquefaction and lateral spreading in centrifuge[J]. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, 2010, 136(10): 1334-1346.
    ARCHIE G. The electrical resistivity log as an aid in determining some reservoir characteristics[J]. Trans, American Institute of Mining Metallurgical and Petroleum Engineers, 1942, 146: 54-61.
    RINALDI V A,CUESTAS G A. Ohmic conductivity of compacted silty clay[J]. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, 2002, 128(10): 824-835.
    蔡国军,刘松玉,童立元,等. 电阻率静力触探测试技术与分析[J]. (岩石力学与工程学报), 2007, 26(增刊1): 3127-3133.(CAI Guo-jun,LIU Song-yu,Tong Li-yuan,et al. Resistivity cone penetration test technique and data interpretation[J]. Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering, 2007, 26(S1): 3127-3133. (in Chinese))
    蔡国军,刘松玉,邵光辉,等. 基于电阻率静力触探的连云港海相黏土成因特性分析[J]. (岩土工程学报), 2008, 30(4): 529-535.(CAI Guo-jun,LIU Song-yu,SHAO Guang-hui,et al. Analysis of formation characteristics of marine clay based on resistivity cone penetration test (RCPT)[J]. Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering, 2008, 30(4): 529-535. (in Chinese))
    ARULMOLI K,ARULANANDAN K,SEED H B. New method for evaluating liquefaction potential[J]. Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 1985, 111(1): 95-114.
    ARULANANDAN K,MURALEETHARAN K K. Level ground soil-liquefaction analysis using in situ properties: I[J]. Journal of geotechnical engineering, 1988, 114(7): 753-770.
    JEFFERIES M G,DAVIES M P. Use of CPTU to estimate equivalent SPT N60[J]. Geotechnical Testing Journal, 1993, 16(4): 458-468.
    ROBERTSON P K. Interpretation of cone penetration tests—a unified approach[J]. Canadian Geotechnical Journal, 2009, 46(11): 1337-1355.
    ROBERTSON P K,WRIDE C E. Evaluating cyclic liquefaction potential using the cone penetration test[J]. Canadian Geotechnical Journal, 1998, 35(3): 442-459.
    LI D K,JUANG C H,ANDRUS R D,et al. Index properties-based criteria for liquefaction susceptibility of clayey soils: a critical assessment[J]. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, 2007, 133(1): 110-115.
    SEED H B,IDRISS I M. Simplified procedure for evaluating soil liquefaction potential[J]. Journal of the Soil Mechanics and Foundations Division, ASCE, 1971, 97(9): 1249-1273.
    YOUD T L,IDRISS I M. NCEER workshop on evaluation of liquefaction resistance of soils[R]. Buffalo: National Center for Earthquake Engineering Research, State University of New York at Buffalo, 1997.
    YOUD T L,et al. Liquefaction resistance of soils: summary report from the 1996 NCEER and 1998 NCEER/NSF workshops on evaluation of liquefaction resistance of soils[J]. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, 2001, 127(10): 817-833.
    SEED R B,CETIN K O,MOSS R E S,et al. Recent advances in soil liquefaction engineering and seismic site response evaluation[C]// Proceedings of 4th International Conference and Symposium on Recent Advances in Geotechnical Earthquake Engineering and Soil Dynamics, University of Missouri, Rolla, 2001.
    IDRISS I M,BOULANGER R W. Semi-empirical procedures for evaluating liquefaction potential during earthquakes[C]// Joint Conference, 11th International Conference on Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering (SDEE), and The 3rd International Conference on Earthquake Geotechnical Engineering (ICEGE), Berkeley, 2004: 32-56.
    CETIN K O,SEED R B,DER KIUREGHIAN A,et al. Standard penetration test-based probabilistic and deterministic assessment of seismic soil liquefaction potential[J]. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, 2004, 130(12): 1314-1340.
    MOSS R E S,SEED R B,KAYEN R E,et al. CPT-based probabilistic and deterministic assessment of in situ seismic soil liquefaction potential[J]. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, 2006, 132(8): 1032-1051.
    JUANG C H,FANG S Y,KHOR E H. First-order reliability method for probabilistic liquefaction triggering analysis using CPT[J]. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, 2006, 132(3): 337-350.
    ZHANG G,ROBERTSON P K,BRACHMAN R W I. Estimating liquefaction-induced ground settlements from CPT for level ground[J]. Canadian Geotechnical Journal, 2002, 39(5): 1168-1180.
    ROBERTSON P K. Performance based earthquake design using the CPT[C]// Keynote lecture, IS-Tokyo, 2009.
    WROTH C P. The interpretation of in situ soil test. 24th Rankine Lecture[J]. Géotechnique, 1984, 34(4): 449-489.
    IDRISS I M,BOULANGER R W. Soil liquefaction during earthquakes[M]. Oakland: Earthquake Engineering Research Institute, MNO-12, 2008.
    WEEMEES I A. Development of an electrical resistivity cone for groundwater contamination studies[D]. Vancouver: The University of British Columbia, 1990.
    JUANG C H,KU C S,CHEN C C. Simplified model for evaluating soil liquefaction potential using CPTU[C]// Proceedings of the 2nd International Symposium on Cone Penetration Testing. Huntington Beach, 2010, 3: 347-354.
    JTG/T B02-01-2008 公路桥梁抗震设计细则[S]B02-01-2008 公路桥梁抗震设计细则[S].北京:人民交通出版社, 2008.(JTG/T B02-01-2008 Guidelines for seismic design of highway bridges[S]B02-01-2008 Guidelines for seismic design of highway bridges[S].Beijing:China Communications Press, 2008. (in Chinese))
  • Cited by

    Periodical cited type(11)

    1. 施静怡,吴能森,刘强. 静压桩在成层地基中挤土效应的可视化研究. 河南城建学院学报. 2024(02): 20-26 .
    2. 吴泽坤,何来胜,白晓宇,麻栋栋,牛永昌,赵广,桑松魁,闫楠,张明义. 层状土中静压桩连续贯入现场试验与数值模拟. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版). 2024(04): 1291-1304 .
    3. 张智慧,朱文文,刘洋义,刘坚,马天. 成桩后黏性土中超孔压和有效应力试验研究. 力学与实践. 2023(03): 615-626 .
    4. 张智慧,朱文文,马天,刘坚,刘洋义. 静压沉桩后黏土中超孔压时空分布规律研究. 河海大学学报(自然科学版). 2023(04): 88-96 .
    5. 谷存雷,高北. PHC管桩在海相软土地基施工对土体的孔隙水压力及土体强度影响研究. 土工基础. 2023(04): 603-607 .
    6. 刘雪颖,王永洪,张明义,白晓宇. 静压桩贯入特性室内模型试验研究进展. 青岛理工大学学报. 2022(01): 49-57 .
    7. 王永洪,徐泽强,张明义,吴江斌,张腾,银吉超,魏家斌. 开闭口静压管桩贯入过程桩土界面土压力试验. 湖南科技大学学报(自然科学版). 2022(01): 36-42 .
    8. 刘雪颖,王永洪,张明义,白晓宇. 静压桩沉桩过程中贯入机理理论研究进展. 工程地质学报. 2022(02): 484-495 .
    9. 王静,肖涛,朱鸿鹄,梅国雄,刘拯源,魏广庆. 透水管桩现场试验光纤监测与承载性能研究. 岩土力学. 2021(07): 1961-1970 .
    10. 王永洪,马加骁,张明义,桑松魁,白晓宇,杨苏春. 粉土与粉质黏土互层中静压桩桩土界面径向土压力研究. 中南大学学报(自然科学版). 2021(10): 3717-3727 .
    14. 王永洪,桑松魁,张明义,白晓宇,杨苏春,苗德滋. 静压桩贯入及加载过程桩土界面受力特性研究. 振动.测试与诊断. 2021(04): 806-811+837 .

    Other cited types(9)

Catalog

    Article views PDF downloads Cited by(20)
    Related

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return