Zhang Huiming, Zeng Qiaoling. Steady state strength of sand:concepts and experiment[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 1999, 21(2): 95-100.
    Citation: Zhang Huiming, Zeng Qiaoling. Steady state strength of sand:concepts and experiment[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 1999, 21(2): 95-100.

    Steady state strength of sand:concepts and experiment

    More Information
    • Published Date: March 25, 1999
    • Steady state strength is an important parameter in evaluating the stability of sand deposits against flow liquefaction. Most loose sands exhibit the quasi steady state (QSS) behavior under undrained triaxial loading, in which no unique ultimate steady state is reached. Stress controlled triaxial tests were carried out on Unimin sand to study the steady state strength in the QSS behavior. The test results indicate that there are usually four distinct deformation stages in undrained tests on loose sand: initial stage, collapse stage, critical stress stage and post failure stage. The strain rate approximately remains constant in each deformation stage. The steady state, in which pore pressure, deviator stress, effective stress and strain rate remain constant, occurs in the collapse stage. The conventional definition of the steady state of deformation is not completely valid for the QSS behavior, and a modified definition is suggested.
    • Related Articles

      [1]WANG Hua-ning, GONG Hao, LI Fu-gen, JIANG Ming-jing. Analytical solutions to micro-bond model for particles considering width and thickness of bond[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2017, 39(5): 822-831. DOI: 10.11779/CJGE201705006
      [2]LI Shu-cai, YUAN Yong-cai, LI Li-ping, YE Zhi-hua, ZHANG Qian-qing, LEI Ting. Water inrush mechanism and minimum safe thickness of rock wall of karst tunnel face under blast excavation[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2015, 37(2): 313-320. DOI: 10.11779/CJGE201502015
      [3]ZHAO Minghua, JIANG Chong, CAO Wengui. Reply to the discussion on "Study on bearing capacity of rock-socked pile and safe thickness of cave roofs in karst region"[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2009, 31(2): 306-307.
      [4]PAN Yue, QI Yunsong, LI Aiwu. Discussion on "Study on bearing capacity of rock-socked pile and safe thickness of cave roofs in karst region"[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2009, 31(2): 303-306.
      [5]CAO Wengui, ZHANG Yongjie. Reply to the discussion on "Studies on numerical method for determination of safe thickness of karst roof in roadbed"[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2008, 30(8): 1263-1264.
      [6]ZHU Aijun. Discussion on "Studies on numerical manifold method for determination of safe thickness of karst roof in roadbed"[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2008, 30(8): 1261-1263.
      [7]CAO Wengui, CHENG Ye, ZHAO Minghua. Studies on numerical manifold method for determination of safe thickness of karst roof in roadbed[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2005, 27(6): 621-625.
      [8]Gong Weiming, Jiang Yongsheng, Zhai Jin. Self-balanced loading test for pile bearing capacity[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2000, 22(5): 532-536.
      [9]Wei Jie. Theoretical Method for Determining the Bearing Capacity of Pile from Static Cone Penetration[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 1994, 16(3): 103-111.

    Catalog

      Article views PDF downloads Cited by()
      Related

      /

      DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
      Return
      Return