• 全国中文核心期刊
  • 中国科技核心期刊
  • 美国工程索引(EI)收录期刊
  • Scopus数据库收录期刊
SUN Hui, LI Congan, LI Bo, WANG Zhipeng. Stresses and deformations of support structures of deep foundation pit based on centrifuge and numerical simulation[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2024, 46(S2): 114-118. DOI: 10.11779/CJGE2024S20012
Citation: SUN Hui, LI Congan, LI Bo, WANG Zhipeng. Stresses and deformations of support structures of deep foundation pit based on centrifuge and numerical simulation[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2024, 46(S2): 114-118. DOI: 10.11779/CJGE2024S20012

Stresses and deformations of support structures of deep foundation pit based on centrifuge and numerical simulation

More Information
  • Received Date: June 20, 2024
  • Based on the actual characteristics of excavation and support structures of foundation pit, a suitable centrifugal model test scheme is obtained, and the centrifugal model test is used to analyze the distribution characteristics of stress and deformation of the support structures of the ultra-deep foundation pit during the excavation process. Simultaneously a three-dimensional finite element model is established to simulate the deformation of the support structures during the excavation process of a circular foundation pit, and the test and numerical results are compared and analyzed. The results show that the horizontal displacement mode of the support structures is the "bulge shaped deformation" with small ends and large middle. As the depth of the foundation pit increases, the point with the maximum horizontal displacement of the underground diaphragm wall gradually moves downwards. The surface settlement is in the form of grooves, and as excavation continues, the bottom of the settlement groove develops towards the direction away from the foundation pit. The variation of soil pressure behind the diaphragm wall is non-linear. At the early stage of excavation, the variation of soil pressure along depth is small, but as excavation continues, the variation of soil pressure gradually increases. As the excavation continues, the bending moment value gradually increases, reaching the maximum positive bending moment near the depth of 17 m, about 2200 kN·m/m. The deformation characteristics of the support structures obtained from the numerical analysis and centrifugal model tests are relatively similar. The research results contribute to providing scientific basis for proposing practical and effective protection measures of the support structures for excavation of foundation pits.
  • [1]
    刘俊岩. 深基坑工程[M]. 北京: 中国建筑工业出版社, 2001.

    LIU Junyan. Deep Foundation Pit Engineering[M]. Beijing: China Architecture & Building Press, 2001. (in Chinese)
    [2]
    王莹, 夏才初, 陈孝湘, 等. 基于离心试验下软黏土地区窄基坑稳定性分析[J]. 地下空间与工程学报, 2022, 18(6): 1853-1862, 1872.

    WANG Ying, XIA Caichu, CHEN Xiaoxiang, et al. Stability analysis of narrow foundation pit in saturated soft clay area based on centrifugal test[J]. Chinese Journal of Underground Space and Engineering, 2022, 18(6): 1853-1862, 1872. (in Chinese)
    [3]
    马险峰, 曹明洋. 上海软黏土深基坑在机开挖离心模型试验研究[J]. 土木工程学报, 2023, 56(8): 131-139.

    MA Xianfeng, CAO Mingyang. Centrifuge model tests on excavation in Shanghai soft soil layers using in-flight excavation tools[J]. China Civil Engineering Journal, 2023, 56(8): 131-139. (in Chinese)
    [4]
    陈仁朋, 刘书伦, 孟凡衍, 等. 软黏土地层基坑开挖对旁侧隧道影响离心模型试验研究[J]. 岩土工程学报, 2020, 42(6): 1132-1138. doi: 10.11779/CJGE202006018

    CHEN Renpeng, LIU Shulun, MENG Fanyan, et al. Centrifuge modeling of excavation effects on a nearby tunnel in soft clay[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2020, 42(6): 1132-1138. (in Chinese) doi: 10.11779/CJGE202006018
    [5]
    郭海庆, 陶善之, 张泉. 基于离心机模型试验的超深基坑受力变形研究[J]. 地下空间与工程学报, 2020, 16(1): 177-186.

    GUO Haiqing, TAO Shanzhi, ZHANG Quan. Research on stress and deformation of super deep foundation pits based on the centrifugal model test[J]. Chinese Journal of Underground Space and Engineering, 2020, 16(1): 177-186. (in Chinese)
    [6]
    冯志, 沈正龙, 孟庆亮, 等. 泵站深基坑支护结构的离心模型试验研究[J]. 水资源与水工程学报, 2019, 30(4): 183-188.

    FENG Zhi, SHEN Zhenglong, MENG Qingliang, et al. Centrifugal model test of supporting structure of pump station deep foundation pit[J]. Journal of Water Resources and Water Engineering, 2019, 30(4): 183-188. (in Chinese)
    [7]
    王国辉, 陈文化, 聂庆科, 等. 深厚淤泥质土中基坑开挖对基桩影响的离心模型试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(2): 399-407.

    WANG Guohui, CHEN Wenhua, NIE Qingke, et al. Impacts of pit excavation on foundation piles in deep silty soil by centrifugal model tests[J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2020, 41(2): 399-407. (in Chinese)
    [8]
    鲁泰山, 何欢, 刘松玉, 等. 基于SCPTU测试的软土基坑开挖数值模拟研究[J]. 土木工程学报, 2023, 56(增刊2): 141-148.

    LU Taishan, HE Huan, LIU Songyu, et al. Study on numerical simulation of soft soil foundation pit excavation based on SCPTU test[J]. China Civil Engineering Journal, 2023, 56(S2): 141-148. (in Chinese)
    [9]
    张鹏, 邓智平, 王磊, 等. 基于Midas GTS的某近海深基坑开挖三维有限元数值模拟分析[J]. 甘肃科学学报, 2024, 36(1): 125-129.

    ZHANG Peng, DENG Zhiping, WANG Lei, et al. 3D finite element numerical simulation analysis of deep foundation pit excavation based on Midas GTS[J]. Journal of Gansu Sciences, 2024, 36(1): 125-129. (in Chinese)
    [10]
    包承纲, 饶锡保. 土工离心模型的试验原理[J]. 长江科学院院报, 1998, 15(2): 1-3, 7.

    BAO Chenggang, RAO Xibao. Test principle of geotechnical centrifugal model[J]. Journal of Changjiang River Scientific Research Institute, 1998, 15(2): 1-3, 7. (in Chinese)
  • Related Articles

    [1]CUI Chunyi, XU Minze, XU Chengshun, ZHAO Jingtong, LIU Hailong, MENG Kun. Seismic fragility analysis of subway station structures considering statistical uncertainty of seismic demands[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2025, 47(3): 453-462. DOI: 10.11779/CJGE20230980
    [2]ZHANG Chenlong, ZHANG Dongming, HUANG Zhongkai, HUANG Hongwei. Resilience assessment method for subway stations considering uncertainty of seismic intensity[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2025, 47(1): 164-172. DOI: 10.11779/CJGE20231153
    [3]LI Jinqiang, ZHONG Zilan, SHEN Jiaxu, ZHANG Bu, ZHANG Yabo, DU Xiuli. Longitudinal seismic fragility analysis of utility tunnel structures based on IDA method[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2024, 46(8): 1622-1631. DOI: 10.11779/CJGE20230397
    [4]DAI Xuan, MA Yunxiang, WEI Shaowei, WEI Peiyong, HUO Haifeng, CAI Degou, LI Zhao. Seismic performance analysis of frame beams-reinforced slope under different earthquake intensities[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2023, 45(S2): 147-152. DOI: 10.11779/CJGE2023S20019
    [5]QIU Dapeng, CHEN Jianyun, WANG Wenming, CAO Xiangyu. Fragility analysis of underground large-scale frame structures considering seismic effects of vertical earthquakes[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2023, 45(12): 2537-2546. DOI: 10.11779/CJGE20221053
    [6]ZHEN Libin, SHI Yuebo, ZHONG Zilan, DU Xiuli, LUO Wenlin. Efficient seismic fragility of underground structures using endurance time analysis method[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2023, 45(4): 777-784. DOI: 10.11779/CJGE20220188
    [7]MENG Chang, TANG Liang. Seismic fragility analysis of pile-supported wharf in nearshore liquefiable ground[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2021, 43(12): 2274-2282. DOI: 10.11779/CJGE202112014
    [8]ZHONG Zi-lan, SHEN Yi-yao, HAO Ya-ru, LI Li-yun, DU Xiu-li. Seismic fragility analysis of two-story and three-span metro station structures based on IDA method[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2020, 42(5): 916-924. DOI: 10.11779/CJGE202005014
    [9]JIN Cong-cong, CHI Shi-chun, NIE Zhang-bo. Seismic safety analysis of high earth-rockfill dams based on seismic deformational fragility[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2020, 42(2): 334-343. DOI: 10.11779/CJGE202002015
    [10]ZHU Hong-wei, YAO Ling-kan, LAI Jun. Seismic vulnerability assessment of gravity retaining walls based on performance[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2020, 42(1): 150-157. DOI: 10.11779/CJGE202001017

Catalog

    Article views PDF downloads Cited by()
    Related

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return