Experimental study on scouring of traditional and new types of gabion mat cells

XU Ao; ZHOU Cheng; HUANG Liangyu; HE Ning; ZHONG Qiming; ZHANG Guirong

doi:10.11779/CJGE2024S10024

Volume 46 Issue S1

Turn off MathJax

Article Contents

Abstract

References

Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering > 2024 > 46(S1): 43-47. > DOI: 10.11779/CJGE2024S10024

XU Ao, ZHOU Cheng, HUANG Liangyu, HE Ning, ZHONG Qiming, ZHANG Guirong. Experimental study on scouring of traditional and new types of gabion mat cells[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2024, 46(S1): 43-47. DOI: 10.11779/CJGE2024S10024

Citation:

PDF (1842 KB)

Experimental study on scouring of traditional and new types of gabion mat cells

1.
College of Water Resource & Hydropower, State Key Laboratory of Hydraulics and Mountain River Engineering, Sichuan University, Chengdu 610065, China
2.
Geotechnical Engineering Department, Nanjing Hydraulic Research Institute, Nanjing 210024, China

More Information

Received Date: April 28, 2024

Graphical Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

The traditional gabion mesh mats use the mesh as the partition, which requires a lot of manpower to construct. A new type of gabion mesh mats is designed with cemented gravel latticework as the partition to save labor and shorten the construction period. The scouring tests of two types of gabion mesh mats units are carried out. The characteristics of inferior-diameter ratio (IDR) particle loss, flow rate slowing down and washed-out area with IDR between the traditional and new gabion mesh units are analyzed and compared. The scouring tests on the new type of gabion mesh units with different numbers of cemented rubble lattice partitions under the same size are further conducted. The test results show that loss of the inferior-diameter particles, the ability to slow down the scouring flow rate and the erosion area of traditional and new gabion mesh units increase with the increase of the inferior-diameter ratio. The better inferior-diameter ratio is betwwen 10% and 15% for the traditional gabion mesh, and between 10% and 20% for the new gabion mesh. For the same size of test unit, when the number of cemented gravel lattice partitions in the new gabion mats increases from 1 to 2, the loss of inferior-diameter particles and the erosion area can be reduced significantly. The increase of the number of cemented gravel lattice partitions has no significant reduction effects. The test results may provide a reference for promoting the design and construction of new gabion mesh riparian structures.
- gabion mat,
- net lattice,
- cohesive rubble lattice,
- element scouring test,
- inferior-diameter ratio

FullText(HTML)

References (6)

References

[1]	张桂荣, 张家胜, 何宁, 等. 石笼网护岸结构强度和变形特性试验研究[J]. 湖南大学学报(自然科学版), 2021, 48(5): 140-147. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-HNDX202105016.htm ZHANG Guirong, ZHANG Jiasheng, HE Ning, et al. Experimental study on strength and deformation characteristics of gabion net revetment structure[J]. Journal of Hunan University (Natural Sciences), 2021, 48(5): 140-147. (in Chinese) https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-HNDX202105016.htm
[2]	吴文霞, 魏凯, 刘加龙, 等. 游荡型河道堤防堤脚水平柔性护垫结构研究[J]. 中国农村水利水电, 2021(5): 68-73, 79. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZNSD202105013.htm WU Wenxia, WEI Kai, LIU Jialong, et al. Research on the horizontal flexible cushion structure of wandering river embankment foot[J]. China Rural Water and Hydropower, 2021(5): 68-73, 79. (in Chinese) https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZNSD202105013.htm
[3]	王远明, 张桂荣, 李登华, 等. 石笼网垫护坡结构抗冲刷性能水槽模型试验[J]. 人民黄河, 2020, 42(4): 94-98. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-RMHH202004021.htm WANG Yuanming, ZHANG Guirong, LI Denghua, et al. Experimental study on scouring of flume with stone cage net[J]. Yellow River, 2020, 42(4): 94-98. (in Chinese) https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-RMHH202004021.htm
[4]	DE VILLIERS N M, HODGSON A N, HARASTI D, et al. The impact of a Reno mattress installation on an adjacent seagrass meadow and its macrofauna in a South African Estuary[J]. Regional Studies in Marine Science, 2022, 52: 102239.
[5]	SONG N, ZHU Z X, SU C, et al. Research on stability of gabion slope on seepage-stress coupling[J]. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 2020, 585(1): 012042. doi: 10.1088/1755-1315/585/1/012042
[6]	张桂荣, 张家胜, 王远明, 等. 河流冲刷作用下石笼网生态护坡技术研究[J]. 水利水运工程学报, 2018(6): 112-119. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SLSY201806015.htm ZHANG Guirong, ZHANG Jiasheng, WANG Yuanming, et al. Preliminary study on eco-slope protection with stone cage under river scouring[J]. Hydro-Science and Engineering, 2018(6): 112-119. (in Chinese) https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SLSY201806015.htm

[1]	LIU Zhong-yu, CHEN Jie. Active earth pressure against rigid retaining wall considering shear stress under translation mode[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2016, 38(12): 2254-2261. DOI: 10.11779/CJGE201612014
[2]	HU Jun-qiang, ZHANG Yong-xing, CHEN Lin, CHEN Jian-gong. Active earth pressure on retaining wall under non-limit state[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2013, 35(2): 381-387.
[3]	DAI Zihang, LIN Zhiyong, ZHENG Yeping, LU Caijin. Finite element method for computations of active earth pressures acting on L-shaped retaining walls with reduced friction coefficients of base bottoms[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2009, 31(4): 508-514.
[4]	PENG Shuquan, LIU Aihua, FAN Ling. Active earth pressure for rigid retaining walls with different displacement modes[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2009, 31(1): 32-35.
[5]	YING Hongwei, CAI Qipeng. Distribution of active earth pressure against flexible retaining walls with drum deformation[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2008, 30(12): 1805-1810.
[6]	LIN Zhiyong, DAI Zihang, SU Meixuan. Analytical solution of active earth pressure acting on retaining walls under complicated conditions[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2008, 30(4): 555-559.
[7]	YING Hongwei, JIANG Bo, XIE Kanghe. Distribution of active earth pressure against retaining walls considering arching effects[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2007, 29(5): 717-722.
[8]	LI Juwen, WANG Chong, LIANG Yongduo, FENG Zhen. Computation of earth pressure of cohesive backfill on retaining wall[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2006, 28(5): 650-652.
[9]	WANG Yuanzhan, LI Wei, HUANG Changhong. Distribution of active earth pressure with wall movement of rotation about base[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2003, 25(2): 208-211.
[10]	Zhou Yingying, Ren Meilong. An Experimental Study on Active Earth Pressure behind Rigid Retaining Wall[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 1990, 12(2): 19-26.