• 全国中文核心期刊
  • 中国科技核心期刊
  • 美国工程索引(EI)收录期刊
  • Scopus数据库收录期刊
HU Zhengyang, ZHANG Xinlei, GAO Hongmei, WANG Zhihua, SUN Yue, GAO Mengting. Dynamic response analysis of shallowly buried water pipelines in liquefiable sites with impervious weak layers[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2023, 45(S2): 61-66. DOI: 10.11779/CJGE2023S20002
Citation: HU Zhengyang, ZHANG Xinlei, GAO Hongmei, WANG Zhihua, SUN Yue, GAO Mengting. Dynamic response analysis of shallowly buried water pipelines in liquefiable sites with impervious weak layers[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2023, 45(S2): 61-66. DOI: 10.11779/CJGE2023S20002

Dynamic response analysis of shallowly buried water pipelines in liquefiable sites with impervious weak layers

More Information
  • Received Date: November 29, 2023
  • Available Online: April 19, 2024
  • Due to the combined effects of special bedding structures, hydraulic barriers in impermeable layers and the formation of "water interlayers", the dynamic responses of shallowly buried water pipelines in liquefiable interlayer soil sites are complex. A series of shaking table tests on the shallowly buried water pipelines in liquefiable sites with impermeable weak layers are conducted to compare and analyze various aspects, including soil acceleration responses, development patterns of dynamic pore pressure, vertical displacements of pipelines, excess pore pressure responses at the pipe-soil interface and dynamic earth pressures on pipeline walls. The uplift mechanisms of underlying pipelines and the enhancement of anti-uplift performance in sites with impermeable layers are investigated. The results show that the differential dynamic earth pressures between the above and below pipelines are primarily responsible for pipeline uplift. Furthermore, there exists a positive correlation between the uplift rate and the differential dynamic earth pressures. The presence of impermeable layers isolates hydraulic gradients between the upper and lower sand layers within the site, reducing the differential dynamic earth pressures at both sides of the pipelines, decreasing their displacement and improving the seismic stability. Moreover, the absence or thickness of impermeable layers significantly influences the deformation patterns. The absence of an impermeable layer results in larger strains on the pipelines, accompanied by noticeable asymmetric characteristics. As the thicknesses of the impermeable layers increase, the deformations of the pipelines become more regularized.
  • [1]
    李典庆, 单晟治, 吴强, 等. 地震动持时对可液化场地管道上浮反应影响分析[J]. 地震工程与工程振动, 2022, 42(4): 43-52. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DGGC202204006.htm

    LI Dianqing, SHAN Shengzhi, WU Qiang, et al. Influence of ground motion duration on the seismic uplift response of buried pipe in liquefiable site[J]. Earthquake Engineering and Engineering Dynamics, 2022, 42(4): 43-52. (in Chinese) https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DGGC202204006.htm
    [2]
    KO Y, TSAI T, JHENG K. Full‐scale shaking table tests on soil liquefaction‐induced uplift of buried pipelines for buildings[J]. Wiley, 2023, 52(5): 1486-1510.
    [3]
    NOKANDE S, JAFARIAN Y, HADDAD A. Shaking table tests on the liquefaction-induced uplift displacement of circular tunnel structure[J]. Underground Space, 2023, 10: 182-198. doi: 10.1016/j.undsp.2022.09.004
    [4]
    NOKANDE S, HADDAD A, JAFARIAN Y. Shaking table test on mitigation of liquefaction-induced tunnel uplift by helical pile[J]. International Journal of Geomechanics, 2023, 23(1).
    [5]
    CHAKRABORTY D. Probabilistic uplift resistance of pipe buried in spatially random cohesionless soil[J]. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, India Section A: Physical Sciences, 2023, 93(2): 355-368. doi: 10.1007/s40010-022-00808-6
    [6]
    YOUSSEF H, JEFFREY H, BIRGER S, et al. Seismic design and analysis of underground structures[J]. Tunneling and Underground Space Technology, 2001, 16(4): 247-293. doi: 10.1016/S0886-7798(01)00051-7
    [7]
    OLIVETO G, CALIÒ I, GRECO A. Large displacement behavior of a structural model with foundation uplift under impulsive and earthquake excitations[J]. Wiley, 2003, 32(3): 369-393.
    [8]
    HU J, CHEN Q, LIU H. Relationship between earthquake-induced uplift of rectangular underground structures and the excess pore water pressure ratio in saturated sandy soils[J]. Tunneling and Underground Space Technology, 2018, 79: 35-51. doi: 10.1016/j.tust.2018.04.039
    [9]
    CILINGIR U, MADABHUSHI S P. Effect of depth on seismic response of circular tunnels[J]. Canadian Geotechnical Journal, 2011, 48(1): 117-127. doi: 10.1139/T10-047
    [10]
    CILINGIR U, MADABHUSHI S G. Effect of depth on the seismic response of square tunnels[J]. Soils and Foundations, 2011, 51(3): 449-457. doi: 10.3208/sandf.51.449
    [11]
    KOKUSHO T. Water film in liquefied sand and its effect on lateral spread[J]. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, 1999, 125(10): 817-826. doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0241(1999)125:10(817)
  • Related Articles

    [1]ZHOU Weining, LI Zixi, ZHANG Ga. Centrifugal model tests on micro-pile-reinforced shallow foundation in layered soils[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2024, 46(S1): 81-85. DOI: 10.11779/CJGE2024S10031
    [2]WANG Nian-xiang, ZHOU Chun-er, WU Jia-wu, JIANG Wen-bo, ZHANG De-en. Centrifugal model tests on reinforcement effects of root pile-net composite foundation in slip zone[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2022, 44(S2): 107-111. DOI: 10.11779/CJGE2022S2023
    [3]REN Yang, LI Tian-bin, YANG Ling, WEI Da-qiang, TANG Jie-ling. Stability analysis of ultra-high-steep reinforced soil-filled slopes based on centrifugal model tests and numerical calculation[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2022, 44(5): 836-844. DOI: 10.11779/CJGE202205006
    [4]LIU Hua-bei. Reinforcement loads of geosynthetic-reinforced soil retaining walls under horizontal earthquake loading[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2022, 44(2): 288-294. DOI: 10.11779/CJGE202202010
    [5]LI Zi-xi, LUO Fang-yue, ZHANG Ga. Centrifugal model tests on micro-pile-reinforced shallow foundation[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2021, 43(S2): 56-59. DOI: 10.11779/CJGE2021S2013
    [6]LIU Xu, TANG Xiao-wu, SHEN Hao, GAO Bai-song. Stress distribution of reinforcement of reinforced soil structures under drawing force[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2013, 35(4): 800-804.
    [7]LI Chi, LIU Lin. Study of indoor model test of spread foundation on the reinforced aeolian sand subgrade[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2003, 25(4): 441-444.
    [8]Yin Jianhua. A one dimensional geosynthetic reinforced foundation model with non linear spring support[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 1998, 20(1): 76-79.
    [9]Liang Bo, Sun Yuqi. A Study the Tensile Failure of Reinforced Earth Retaining Wall with Model Test[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 1995, 17(2): 83-87.
    [10]Wang Zhao. Tensile and Creep Properties of Geotextiies and Pretensioned Reinforced Embankment[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 1992, 14(2): 12-20.
  • Cited by

    Periodical cited type(2)

    1. 申志福,徐琪尔,朱玲裕,王志华,高洪梅. 人工制备互层土的静三轴剪切力学特性研究. 岩土工程学报. 2023(04): 840-846 . 本站查看
    2. 王章琼,白俊龙,张明,李雷烈,苏亮亮. 多功能重塑土制样装置的研制与应用. 实验技术与管理. 2022(03): 121-125 .

    Other cited types(4)

Catalog

    Article views PDF downloads Cited by(6)
    Related

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return