• 全国中文核心期刊
  • 中国科技核心期刊
  • 美国工程索引(EI)收录期刊
  • Scopus数据库收录期刊
JIA Rui, LI Yiqun, LEI Huayang, JIANG Yuxuan. Modification of structured Cam-clay model based on triaxial undrained effective stress path[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2025, 47(1): 115-124. DOI: 10.11779/CJGE20231243
Citation: JIA Rui, LI Yiqun, LEI Huayang, JIANG Yuxuan. Modification of structured Cam-clay model based on triaxial undrained effective stress path[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2025, 47(1): 115-124. DOI: 10.11779/CJGE20231243

Modification of structured Cam-clay model based on triaxial undrained effective stress path

More Information
  • Received Date: December 19, 2023
  • Available Online: April 17, 2024
  • Both laboratory and in-situ tests and engineering practices show that naturally sedimented clays have a specific structure. Therefore, establishing a structural constitutive model is of great significance in accurate predicting the mechanical responses of natural clays and solving practical geotechnical engineering problems. Firstly, based on the effective stress path of the consolidated undrained triaxial tests on structured clay, two improvements are made to the structured Cam-clay (SCC) model: (1) The formula for calculating the additional void ratio Δe is modified, which can accurately simulate the effective stress path of the structured clay beyond the critical state line. (2) Considering the plasticity in the yield surface, i.e., subyielding characteristic, the effective stress path in the yield surface can be well simulated. Then, the modified structured Cam-clay (MSCC) model is used to simulate the confined compression tests, the consolidated undrained and drained triaxial tests on the structured clay. The calculated results are compared with the experimental ones and those by the SCC model. The results show that the MSCC model can better simulate the triaxial undrained effective stress path and stress-strain curves of the confined compression and consolidated drained triaxial tests on the structured clay. Finally, the sensitivity analyses of parameters β (plastic deformation parameter in yield surface), p'yi (initial structural yield stress), Δei (initial additional void ratio), b (structure degradation rate), γ (shear-induced structure degradation parameter) and ω (reflecting the influences of soil structure on plastic flow criterion) in the MSCC model are carried out. The results show that parameter β affects the effective stress path in the yield surface of structured clay, parameter p'yi affects peak strength, parameter Δei affects the residual strength, parameters b and γ affect the strength degradation rate after the peak value, and parameter ω affects the magnitude of deviatoric strain when the strength begins to degrade.
  • [1]
    沈珠江. 土体结构性的数学模型: 21世纪土力学的核心问题[J]. 岩土工程学报, 1996, 18(1): 95-97. http://cge.nhri.cn/article/id/8998

    SHEN Zhujiang. Mathematic model of structure—The key Problem for soil mechanics in 21st century[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 1996, 18(1): 95-97. (in Chinese) http://cge.nhri.cn/article/id/8998
    [2]
    沈珠江. 结构性黏土的堆砌体模型[J]. 岩土力学, 2000, 21(1): 1-4.

    SHEN Zhujiang. A masonry model for structured clays[J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2000, 21(1): 1-4. (in Chinese)
    [3]
    刘恩龙, 罗开泰, 张树祎. 初始应力各向异性结构性土的二元介质模型[J]. 岩土力学, 2013, 34(11): 3103-3109.

    LIU Enlong, LUO Kaitai, ZHANG Shuyi. Binary medium model for structured soils with initial stress-induced anisotropy[J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2013, 34(11): 3103-3109. (in Chinese)
    [4]
    OURIA A. Disturbed state concept–based constitutive model for structured soils[J]. International Journal of Geomechanics, 2017, 17(7): 04017008. doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)GM.1943-5622.0000883
    [5]
    ASAOKA A, NAKANO M, NODA T. Superloading yield surface concept for highly structured soil behavior[J]. Soils and Foundations, 2000, 40(2): 99-110. doi: 10.3208/sandf.40.2_99
    [6]
    王立忠, 沈恺伦. K0固结结构性软黏土的本构模型[J]. 岩土工程学报, 2007, 29(4): 496-504. http://cge.nhri.cn/article/id/12452

    WANG Lizhong, SHEN Kailun. A constitutive model of K0 consolided structured soft clays[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2007, 29(4): 496-504. (in Chinese) http://cge.nhri.cn/article/id/12452
    [7]
    LU Y, JIANG Y, ZHU W X, et al. Unified description of different soils based on the superloading and subloading concepts[J]. Journal of Rock Mechanics and Geotechnical Engineering, 2023, 15(1): 239-254. doi: 10.1016/j.jrmge.2022.02.015
    [8]
    ROUAINIA M, MUIR WOOD D. A kinematic hardening constitutive model for natural clays with loss of structure[J]. Géotechnique, 2000, 50(2): 153-164. doi: 10.1680/geot.2000.50.2.153
    [9]
    KAVVADAS M, AMOROSI A. A constitutive model for structured soils[J]. Géotechnique, 2000, 50(3): 263-273. doi: 10.1680/geot.2000.50.3.263
    [10]
    PARK D S, KUTTER B L. Sensitive bounding surface constitutive model for structured clay[J]. International Journal for Numerical and Analytical Methods in Geomechanics, 2016, 40(14): 1968-1987. doi: 10.1002/nag.2507
    [11]
    YIN Z Y, HATTAB M, HICHER P Y. Multiscale modeling of a sensitive marine clay[J]. International Journal for Numerical and Analytical Methods in Geomechanics, 2011, 35(15): 1682-1702. doi: 10.1002/nag.977
    [12]
    祝恩阳, 姚仰平. 结构性土UH模型[J]. 岩土力学, 2015, 36(11): 3101-3110, 3228.

    ZHU Enyang, YAO Yangping. A UH constitutive model for structured soils[J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2015, 36(11): 3101-3110, 3228. (in Chinese)
    [13]
    TAIEBAT M, DAFALIAS Y F, PEEK R. A destructuration theory and its application to SANICLAY model[J]. International Journal for Numerical and Analytical Methods in Geomechanics, 2010, 34(10): 1009-1040. doi: 10.1002/nag.841
    [14]
    LIU M D, CARTER J P. A structured Cam Clay model[J]. Canadian Geotechnical Journal, 2002, 39: 1313-1332. doi: 10.1139/t02-069
    [15]
    CARTER J P, LIU M D. Review of the structured cam clay model[C]//Soil Constitutive Models. Austin, Texas, USA. Reston, VA: American Society of Civil Engineers, 2005: 128: 99-132.
    [16]
    SUEBSUK J, HORPIBULSUK S, LIU M D. Modified Structured Cam Clay: a generalised critical state model for destructured, naturally structured and artificially structured clays[J]. Computers and Geotechnics, 2010, 37(7/8): 956-968.
    [17]
    SUEBSUK J, HORPIBULSUK S, LIU M D. Compression and shear responses of structured clays during subyielding[J]. Geomechanics and Engineering, 2019, 18(2): 121-131. http://www.researchgate.net/publication/333852828_Compression_and_shear_responses_of_structured_clays_during_subyielding
    [18]
    BURGHIGNOLI A, MILIZAANO S, SOCCODATO F M. The effect of bond degradation in cemented clayey soils[C]// Proceedings of the Symposium on Geotechnical Engineering of Hard Soils-Soft Rocks. Balkema, 1998: 465-472.
    [19]
    NGUYEN L, FATAHI B, KHABBAZ H. Development of a constitutive model to predict the behavior of cement-treated clay during cementation degradation: C3 model[J]. International Journal of Geomechanics, 2017, 17(7): 04017010. doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)GM.1943-5622.0000863
    [20]
    ADACHI T, OKA F, HIRATA T, et al. Stress-strain behavior and yielding characteristics of eastern Osaka clay[J]. Soils and Foundations, 1995, 35(3): 1-13. doi: 10.3208/sandf.35.1
    [21]
    ANAGNOSTOPOULOS A G, KALTEZIOTIS N, TSIAMBAOS G K, et al. Geotechnical properties of the Corinth canal marls[J]. Geotechnical & Geological Engineering, 1991, 9(1): 1-26.
    [22]
    WONG R. Swelling and softening behaviour of La Biche shale[J]. Canadian Geotechnical Journal, 1998, 35(2): 206-221. doi: 10.1139/t97-087
  • Related Articles

    [1]LIU Shuang, LIU Hanlong, XIAO Yang. Soil-water characteristic curve considering temperature and void ratio under capillarity and adsorption[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2025, 47(4): 877-886. DOI: 10.11779/CJGE20231253
    [2]GAO You, SUN De-an, ZHANG Jun-ran, LUO Ting. Soil-water characteristics of unsaturated soils considering initial void ratio and hydraulic path[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2019, 41(12): 2191-2196. DOI: 10.11779/CJGE201912003
    [3]YE Yun-xue, ZOU Wei-lie, HAN Zhong, LIU Xiao-wen. General model for relationship between void ratio and matric suction in unsaturated soils[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2019, 41(5): 927-933. DOI: 10.11779/CJGE201905016
    [4]YE Yun-xue, ZOU Wei-lie, YUAN Fei, LIU Jia-guo. Predicating soil-water characteristic curves of soils with different initial void ratios based on a pedotransfer function[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2018, 40(12): 2305-2311. DOI: 10.11779/CJGE201812019
    [5]WU Qi, CHEN Guo-xing, ZHU Yu-meng, ZHOU Zheng-long, ZHOU Yan-guo. Evaluating liquefaction resistance of saturated sandy soils based on equivalent skeleton void ratio[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2018, 40(10): 1912-1922. DOI: 10.11779/CJGE201810019
    [6]LI Shan-shan, LI Da-yong, GAO Yu-feng. Determination of maximum and minimum void ratios of sands and their influence factors[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2018, 40(3): 554-561. DOI: 10.11779/CJGE201803021
    [7]ZOU Wei-lie, WANG Xie-qun, LUO Fang-de, ZHANG Jun-feng, YE Yun-xue, HU Zhong-wei. Experimental study on SWCCs under equal stress and equal void ratio states[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2017, 39(9): 1711-1717. DOI: 10.11779/CJGE201709020
    [8]MA Shao-kun, HUANG Yan-zhen, CHEN Xin, JIANG Jie, SHAO Yu. Influence of excavation on adjacent rigid-flexible piles considering change of void ratio coefficient with depth[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2014, 36(zk2): 140-145. DOI: 10.11779/CJGE2014S2024
    [9]CAI Guo-qing, SHENG Dai-chao, ZHOU An-nan. Approach for predicting the relative coefficient of permeability of unsaturated soils with different initial void ratios[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2014, 36(5): 827-835. DOI: 10.11779/CJGE201405004
    [10]MA Shao-kun<sup>1, 2, 3</sup>, SHAO Yu<sup>2, 3</sup>, HUANG Yan-zhen<sup>2, 3</sup>. Deformation of deep foundation pits due to excavation considering change of void ratio and permeability coefficient with depth[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2013, 35(zk2): 940-944.
  • Cited by

    Periodical cited type(27)

    1. 冯海华,陆勇,黄卉. 粗粒土与结构接触面的空间曲率效应试验研究. 土工基础. 2025(01): 122-126 .
    2. 胡达,肖超,梁小强,孔纲强,黎永索,蒋磊,杨仙. 考虑土拱效应的盾构隧道施工地表沉降预测. 工程地质学报. 2025(02): 783-793 .
    3. 唐昌意,李松,李智文,崔凯,樊军伟,秦晓同. 挡墙绕顶转动下的有限土体主动土压力研究. 中国公路学报. 2025(04): 43-53 .
    4. 刘光秀,党发宁,宋靖宇. 竖向分层土被动土压力的计算与分析. 应用基础与工程科学学报. 2024(03): 875-887 .
    5. 喻卫华. 考虑基坑坑内有限土体被动土压力研究. 市政技术. 2024(06): 75-80+134 .
    6. 张振波,黄安,周佳迪,刘志春,孙明磊. 基坑近接地铁车站主动土压力合力算法研究. 岩土工程学报. 2024(07): 1516-1524 . 本站查看
    7. 刘志春,马博,胡指南,张振波,杜孔泽. 邻近地下结构基坑主动土压力分布规律试验研究. 岩土力学. 2024(S1): 33-41 .
    8. 程振威,李又云,王传波. 减荷措施下高填涵洞竖向土压力计算. 地下空间与工程学报. 2024(06): 1790-1797 .
    9. 刘新喜,李彬,王玮玮,李松,贺程. 基于倾斜分层的挡墙主动土压力计算方法. 交通科学与工程. 2023(02): 41-48 .
    10. 张振波,周佳迪,孙明磊,刘志春,胡指南. 近接增建基坑有限土体土压力计算方法探究. 铁道科学与工程学报. 2023(06): 2091-2102 .
    11. 薛德敏,李天斌,张帅. 基于位移控制的双排桩桩后滑坡推力计算方法. 岩土工程学报. 2023(09): 1979-1986 . 本站查看
    12. 刘新喜,贺程,王玮玮,李彬. 放坡状态有限土体刚性挡墙滑动稳定性分析. 交通科学与工程. 2023(05): 37-44 .
    13. 刘杰锋,曹海莹,王优群,高艳斌. 考虑土拱效应的黏性土主动土压力解析解. 铁道科学与工程学报. 2023(12): 4604-4612 .
    14. 方焘,冉井念,刘春,张婷,徐翔. 考虑位移影响的有限土体基坑土压力研究. 重庆交通大学学报(自然科学版). 2022(01): 96-102+110 .
    15. 蔡忠伟,朱彦鹏,武开通,马响响,丁亚飞. 临河基坑有限成层土体主动土压力计算. 科学技术与工程. 2022(02): 666-675 .
    16. 赖丰文,刘松玉,杨大禹,程月红,范钦建. 有限宽度填土挡墙主动土压力的普适解法. 岩土工程学报. 2022(03): 483-491 . 本站查看
    17. 马明,李明东,郎钞棚,张京伍,万愉快. 刚性挡墙绕底转动时的非极限主动土压力数值解. 应用数学和力学. 2022(03): 312-321 .
    18. 刘新喜,李彬,王玮玮,贺程,李松. 基于主应力迹线分层的有限土体土压力计算. 岩土力学. 2022(05): 1175-1186 .
    19. 马明,李明东,张京伍,朱丽萍. 考虑层间剪应力的黏性土非极限主动土压力数值解. 广西大学学报(自然科学版). 2022(04): 854-861 .
    20. 吴垠龙,刘维,贾鹏蛟,史培新. 矩形顶管近距离上穿既有隧道施工扰动分析. 地下空间与工程学报. 2022(06): 1968-1978 .
    21. 关振长,黄金峰,何亚军,宁茂权. 基于极上限分析的临水深基坑围护结构主动土压力计算. 工程力学. 2022(11): 196-202+256 .
    22. 孙望成,张道兵,蒋瑾,蔚彪,尹华东. 考虑Hoek-Brown准则的挡土墙主动土压力. 吉首大学学报(自然科学版). 2021(01): 61-65 .
    23. 邵鹏,刘念武,房凯,黄栩,林强. 软土地区相邻深大基坑间有限土体土压力研究. 建筑施工. 2021(04): 691-695 .
    24. 王崇宇,刘晓平,张家强,曹周红. 刚性墙后有限宽度土体被动滑裂面特征试验研究. 岩土力学. 2021(07): 1839-1849+1860 .
    25. 王崇宇,刘晓平,曹周红,江旭,张家强. 刚性墙后有限宽度土体主动滑裂面特征试验研究. 岩土力学. 2021(11): 2943-2952 .
    26. 张常光,吴凯,隋建浩. 基于小主应力轨迹的上埋式涵管竖向土压力非线性描述. 岩土工程学报. 2021(12): 2200-2208 . 本站查看
    27. 陈建旭,钱波,郭宁,余明东,庄锦亮. 倾斜挡墙黏性填土非极限主动土压力计算. 长江科学院院报. 2021(12): 137-145 .

    Other cited types(47)

Catalog

    Article views (397) PDF downloads (117) Cited by(74)
    Related

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return