• 全国中文核心期刊
  • 中国科技核心期刊
  • 美国工程索引(EI)收录期刊
  • Scopus数据库收录期刊
HOU Benwei, LIU Jiawei, ZHANG Yabo, HAN Junyan, ZHONG Zilan, DU Xiuli. Seismic response of buried socket pipelines with typical cross connections[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2025, 47(2): 407-416. DOI: 10.11779/CJGE20231079
Citation: HOU Benwei, LIU Jiawei, ZHANG Yabo, HAN Junyan, ZHONG Zilan, DU Xiuli. Seismic response of buried socket pipelines with typical cross connections[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2025, 47(2): 407-416. DOI: 10.11779/CJGE20231079

Seismic response of buried socket pipelines with typical cross connections

More Information
  • Received Date: November 04, 2023
  • Available Online: July 15, 2024
  • The joint type and cross connection pattern of buried pipelines have a significant impact on the seismic responses of pipeline structures. As the seismic deformation and stress of pipeline cross are determined by the structural types of branch pipelines, a finite element model for straight branch pipelines is firstly established to investigate the joint displacement and relative pipe-soil displacement of ductile iron pipelines (DIP) with flexible socket rubber joints and cast iron pipelines (CIP) with rigid joints under seismic wave propagation. Then, the seismic responses of pipeline connections using cross-shaped, T-shaped, L-shaped and double-T-shaped cross connections are analyzed, where the pipe cross is connected to the branch pipelines using the socket or flange joints. Furthermore, the effects of joint types on the seismic responses of pipeline cross connections are evaluated. The results show that for the straight pipelines with different types of joints, the peak joint displacement of the DIP with flexible joints is larger than that of the CIP with rigid joints. When the pipe cross is connected with the socket joints, the peak joint displacement of the pipelines with double-T-shaped cross is slightly smaller than that of the pipelines with cross-shaped and T-shaped connections. When the pipe cross is connected using the flange joints, the DIP with flexible joints adjacent to the flange joints exhibits a larger joint displacement and is prone to tensile failure, while the CIP with rigid joints adjacent to the flange joint experiences greater axial compressive force and is prone to compressive failure. At the cross of double-T-shaped pipelines, the responses of the socket joints adjacent to the flange joints are significantly larger than those of the cross-shaped and T-shaped connections.
  • [1]
    O'ROURKE M J, LIU X. Seismic Design of Buried and Offshore Pipelines[M]. Buffalo: State University of New York at Buffalo, 2012.
    [2]
    李杰. 生命线工程抗震: 基础理论与应用[M]. 北京: 科学出版社, 2005.

    LI Jie. Structural Response Network Disaster Simulation Lifeline Ground Motion Reliability[M]. Beijing: Science Press, 2005. (in Chinese)
    [3]
    NEWMARK N M. Problems in wave propagation in soil and rock[C]// Proceedings of the International Symposium on Wave Propagation and Dynamic Properties of Earth Materials. Albuquerque, 1967.
    [4]
    ELHMADI K, O'ROURKE M J. Seismic damage to segmented buried pipelines[J]. Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics, 1990, 19(4): 529-539.
    [5]
    SINGHAL A C, ZUROFF M S. Analysis of underground and underwater space frames with slip joints[J]. Computers & Structures, 1990, 35(3): 227-237.
    [6]
    LIU W, SUN Q W, MIAO H Q, et al. Nonlinear stochastic seismic analysis of buried pipeline systems[J]. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 2015, 74: 69-78. doi: 10.1016/j.soildyn.2015.03.017
    [7]
    SHI P X. Seismic wave propagation effects on buried segmented pipelines[J]. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 2015, 72: 89-98. doi: 10.1016/j.soildyn.2015.02.006
    [8]
    李锦强, 钟紫蓝, 史跃波, 等. 考虑土体参数不确定性的供水管道地震响应分析[J]. 哈尔滨工业大学学报, 2023, 55(2): 45-53.

    LI Jinqiang, ZHONG Zilan, SHI Yuebo, et al. Seismic analysis of water pipeline considering uncertainty of soil properties[J]. Journal of Harbin Institute of Technology, 2023, 55(2): 45-53. (in Chinese)
    [9]
    侯本伟, 徐倩怡, 张亚波, 等. 土体参数随机场中承插式地下直线管道地震响应分析[J/OL]. 工程力学, 1-13[2025-01-13]. http://kns.cnki.net/kcms/detail/11.2595.O3.20230519.1637.010.html.

    HOU Benwei, XU Qianyi, ZHANG Yabo, et al. Seismic response analysis of buried bell-and-spigot jointed pipeline considering random field of soil properties[J/OL]. Engineering Mechanics, 1-13[2025-01-13]. http://kns.cnki.net/kcms/detail/11.2595.O3.20230519.1637.010.html. (in Chinese)
    [10]
    LIU W, SONG Z Y, WANG Y C. Seismic analysis of the connections of buried segmented pipes[J]. Computer Modeling in Engineering & Sciences, 2020, 123(1): 257-282.
    [11]
    钟紫蓝, 张亚波, 侯本伟, 等. 考虑交叉管线影响的城市供水管网地震响应分析及震害评估[J]. 岩土工程学报, 2023, 45(5): 964-975. doi: 10.11779/CJGE20220201

    ZHONG Zilan, ZHANG Yabo, HOU Benwei, et al. Seismic response analysis and damage assessment of urban water supply networks considering influences of crossing pipelines[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2023, 45(5): 964-975. (in Chinese) doi: 10.11779/CJGE20220201
    [12]
    钟紫蓝, 张亚波, 李锦强, 等. 球墨铸铁管道接口弯曲性能试验[J]. 哈尔滨工业大学学报, 2023, 55(9): 143-150.

    ZHONG Zilan, ZHANG Yabo, LI Jinqiang, et al. Bending performance test of push-on joints of ductile iron pipelines[J]. Journal of Harbin Institute of Technology, 2023, 55(9): 143-150. (in Chinese)
    [13]
    RAJANI B, ABDEL-AKHER A. Performance of cast- iron-pipe bell-spigot joints subjected to overburden pressure and ground movement[J]. Journal of Pipeline Systems Engineering and Practice, 2013, 4(2): 98-114. doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)PS.1949-1204.0000125
    [14]
    American Lifelines Alliance (ALA). Seismic Guidelines for Water Pipelines[M]. Wasthton D C: American Lifelines Alliance, 2005.
    [15]
    压力容器第3部分: 设计: GB/T 150.3—2011[S]. 北京: 中国标准出版社, 2012.

    Pressure vessels: Part 3: Design: GB/T 150.3—2011[S]. Beijing: Standards Press of China, 2012. (in Chinese)
    [16]
    Rubber Seals-Joint Rings for Water: ISO 4633—2015[S]. 2015.

Catalog

    Article views PDF downloads Cited by()
    Related

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return