Advanced Search
  • 全国中文核心期刊
  • 中国科技核心期刊
  • 美国工程索引（EI）收录期刊
  • Scopus数据库收录期刊
Volume 46 Issue 8
Turn off MathJax
Article Contents
Abstract
References
Supplements
LI Jinqiang, ZHONG Zilan, SHEN Jiaxu, ZHANG Bu, ZHANG Yabo, DU Xiuli. Longitudinal seismic fragility analysis of utility tunnel structures based on IDA method[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2024, 46(8): 1622-1631. DOI: 10.11779/CJGE20230397
Citation: LI Jinqiang, ZHONG Zilan, SHEN Jiaxu, ZHANG Bu, ZHANG Yabo, DU Xiuli. Longitudinal seismic fragility analysis of utility tunnel structures based on IDA method[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2024, 46(8): 1622-1631. DOI: 10.11779/CJGE20230397
shu

Longitudinal seismic fragility analysis of utility tunnel structures based on IDA method

  • Key Laboratory of Urban Security and Disaster Engineering of Ministry of Education, Beijing University of Technology, Beijing 100124, China

More Information
  • Received Date: May 07, 2023
  • Available Online: December 19, 2023
    Graphical Abstract
    • Abstract
  • This study aims to propose a fragility analysis method for evaluating the longitudinal seismic performance of long-line utility tunnels based on nonlinear incremental dynamic analysis (IDA). To this end, a simplified beam-spring model is established, to reasonably consider the mechanical properties of the joint and the soil-tunnel interaction. A series of 17 sets of ground motion records are selected and uniformly scaled to different intensity levels as the input of one-dimension free filed analyses to obtain the ground motions at the bottom slab of a utility tunnel. Finally, the seismic analysis of the utility tunnel considering wave passage effects is conducted. Based on the IDA results, the optimal intensity measure is selected. With the damage measure of the peak joint opening, the fragility curves of the utility tunnel are established using the peak velocity at the bottom slab of the tunnel and the peak velocity at the ground surface as the intensity measures, respectively. The failure probability of the utility tunnel under different earthquake intensity levels is also obtained. The proposed fragility curves and failure probability of the utility tunnel in typical site Ⅱ can provide an effective tool to estimate the seismic performance of this type of underground structures and a reliable basis for predicting damage under different earthquake intensity levels.
    • FullText(HTML)
    • References (36)
  • [1]
    钱七虎. 建设城市地下综合管廊, 转变城市发展方式[J]. 隧道建设, 2017, 37(6): 647-654. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-JSSD201706001.htm

    QIAN Qihu. To transform way of urban development by constructing underground utility tunnel[J]. Tunnel Construction, 2017, 37(6): 647-654. (in Chinese) https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-JSSD201706001.htm
    [2]
    CHEN J, JIANG L Z, LI J, et al. Numerical simulation of shaking table test on utility tunnel under non-uniform earthquake excitation[J]. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology. 2012, 30: 205-216. doi: 10.1016/j.tust.2012.02.023
    [3]
    梁建文, 李东桥, 王长祥, 等. 考虑预应力影响的壳-弹簧模型及其在预制地下管廊纵向抗震分析中的应用[J]. 地震工程与工程振动, 2021, 41(4): 13-22. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DGGC202104002.htm

    LIANG Jianwen, LI Dongjiao, WANG Changxiang, et al. Shell-spring model for longitudinal seismic analysis of precast utility tunnels considering prestress[J]. Earthquake Engineering and Engineering Dynamics. 2021, 41(4): 13-22. (in Chinese) https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DGGC202104002.htm
    [4]
    TANG G Y, FANG Y M, ZHONG Y, et al. Numerical study on the longitudinal response characteristics of utility tunnel under strong earthquake: a case study[J]. Advances in Civil Engineering, 2020: 8813303.
    [5]
    钟紫蓝, 申轶尧, 郝亚茹, 等. 基于IDA方法的两层三跨地铁地下结构地震易损性分析[J]. 岩土工程学报, 2020, 42(5): 916-924. doi: 10.11779/CJGE202005014

    ZHONG Zilan, SHEN Yiyao, HAO Yaru, et al. Seismic fragility analysis of two-story and three-span metro station structures based on IDA method[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2020, 42(5): 916-924. (in Chinese) doi: 10.11779/CJGE202005014
    [6]
    ZHONG Z L, SHEN Y Y, ZHAO M, et al. Seismic performance evaluation of two-story and three-span subway station in different engineering sites[J]. Journal of Earthquake Engineering, 2021, 26(14): 1-31.
    [7]
    ZHONG Z L, FILIATRAULT A, AREF A. Numerical simulation and seismic performance evaluation of buried pipelines rehabilitated with cured-in-place-pipe liner under seismic wave propagation[J]. Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics, 2017, 46(5): 811-829.
    [8]
    LI J Q, ZHONG Z L, WANG S R, et al. Seismic fragility analysis of water supply pipelines retrofitted with corrosion-protection liner buried in non-uniform site[J]. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering. 2024, 176: 108333. doi: 10.1016/j.soildyn.2023.108333
    [9]
    禹海涛, 李心熙, 袁勇, 等. 沉管隧道纵向地震易损性分析方法[J]. 中国公路学报. 2022, 35(10): 13-22. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZGGL202210002.htm

    YU Haitao, LI Xinxi, YUAN Yong, et al. Seismic vulnerability analysis method for longitudinal response of immersed tunnels[J]. China Journal of Highway and Transport, 2022, 35(10): 13-22. (in Chinese) https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZGGL202210002.htm
    [10]
    LONG X H, MA Y T, MIAO Y, et al. Longitudinal seismic fragility analysis of long tunnels under multiple support excitation[J]. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering. 2023, 164: 107608. doi: 10.1016/j.soildyn.2022.107608
    [11]
    城市轨道交通结构抗震设计规范: GB50909—2014[S]. 北京: 中国计划出版社, 2014.

    Code for Seismic Design of Urban Rail Transit Structures: GB50909—2014[S]. Beijing, China Planning Press, 2014. (in Chinese)
    [12]
    SILVIA M, FRANK M, MICHAEL H S, et al. OpenSees command language manual[Z]. Berkeley: Earthquake Engineering Center, University of California, 2009.
    [13]
    城市综合管廊工程技术规范: GB50838—2015[S]. 北京: 中国计划出版社, 2015.

    Technical Code for Urban Utility Tunnel Engineering: GB50838—2015[S]. Beijing, China Planning Press, 2015. (in Chinese)
    [14]
    ZHAO J, SRITHARAN S. Modeling of strain penetration effects in fiber-based analysis of reinforced concrete structures[J]. Aci Structural Journal, 2007, 104(2): 133-141.
    [15]
    FILIPPOU F C, POPOV E P, BERTERO V V. Effects of Bond Deterioration on Hysteretic Behavior of Reinforced Concrete Joints[R]. Berkeley: Earthquake Engineering Research Center, University of California, 1983.
    [16]
    冯立, 丁选明, 王成龙, 等. 考虑接缝影响的地下综合管廊振动台模型试验[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(4): 1295-1304. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-YTLX202004021.htm

    FENG Li, DING Xuanming, WANG Chenglong, et al. Shaking table model test on seismic responses of utility tunnel with joint[J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2020, 41(4): 1295-1304. (in Chinese) https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-YTLX202004021.htm
    [17]
    胡正一. 非一致地震激励下预制装配式综合管廊结构纵向地震响应及易损性研究[D]. 北京: 北京工业大学, 2022: 11-31.

    HU Zhengyi. Study on Longitudinal Seismic Response and Vulnerability of Composite Utility Tunnel Structure under Non-Uniform Seismic Excitation[D]. Beijing: Beijing University of Technology, 2022: 11-31. (in Chinese)
    [18]
    城市轨道交通岩土工程勘察规范: GB50307—2012[S]. 北京: 中国计划出版社, 2014.

    Code for Geotechnical Investigation of Urban Rail Transit: GB50307—2012[S]. Beijing, China Planning Press, 2012. (in Chinese)
    [19]
    油气输送管道线路工程抗震技术规范: GB/T50470—2017[S]. 北京: 中国计划出版社, 2017.

    Seismic Technical Code for Oil and Gas Transmission Pipeline Engineering: GB/T50470—2017[S]. Beijing, China Planning Press, 2017. (in Chinese).
    [20]
    TSINIDIS G. Response characteristics of rectangular tunnels in soft soil subjected to transversal ground shaking[J]. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology incorporating Trenchless Technology Research. 2017, 62: 1-22.
    [21]
    FEMA. Seismic Performance Assessment of Buildings: Volume 1 Methodology[R]. Washington D C: Federal Emergency Management Agency, 2012.
    [22]
    FEMA. Seismic Performance Assessment of Buildings Volume 2- Implementation Guide[R]. Washington D C: Federal Emergency Management Agency, 2012.
    [23]
    BULLOCK Z, LIEL A B, PORTER K A, et al. Site-specific liquefaction fragility analysis: cloud, stripe, and incremental approaches[J]. Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics. 2021, 50(9): 2529-2550.
    [24]
    CHEN Z Y, WEI J S. Correlation between ground motion parameters and lining damage indices for mountain tunnels[J]. Natural Hazards. 2013, 65(3): 1683-1702. doi: 10.1007/s11069-012-0437-5
    [25]
    钟紫蓝, 史跃波, 李锦强, 等. 考虑土体动力特征参数相关性的工程场地随机地震反应分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2022, 43(7): 2015-2024. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-YTLX202207027.htm

    ZHONG Zilan, SHI Yuebo, LI Jinqiang, et al. Stochastic seismic response analysis of engineering site considering correlations of critical soil dynamic parameters[J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2022, 43(7): 2015-2024. (in Chinese) https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-YTLX202207027.htm
    [26]
    杜修力, 许紫刚, 许成顺, 等. 基于等效线性化的土–地下结构整体动力时程分析方法研究[J]. 岩土工程学报, 2018, 40(12): 2155-2163. doi: 10.11779/CJGE201812001

    DU Xiuli, XU Zigang, XU Chengshun, et al. Time-history analysis method for soil-underground structure system based on equivalent linear method[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2018, 40 (12): 2155-2162. (in Chinese) doi: 10.11779/CJGE201812001
    [27]
    DU X L, ZHAO M. A local time-domain transmitting boundary for simulating cylindrical elastic wave propagation in infinite media[J]. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 2010, 30(10): 937-946. doi: 10.1016/j.soildyn.2010.04.004
    [28]
    VAMVATSIKOS D, CORNELL C A. Incremental dynamic analysis[J]. Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics, 2002, 31(3): 491-514.
    [29]
    城市轨道交通设计规范: DGJ08109—2004[S]. 上海: 同济大学出版社, 2017.

    Urban Rail Transit Design Standard: DGJ08109—2004[S]. Shanghai: Tongji University Press, 2017. (in Chinese)
    [30]
    黄忠凯, 张冬梅. 地下结构地震易损性研究进展[J]. 同济大学学报, 2021, 49(1): 49-59. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-TJDZ202101007.htm

    HUANG Zhongkai, ZHANG Dongmei. Recent advance in seismic fragility research of underground structures[J]. Journal of Tongji University, 2021, 49(01): 49-59. (in Chinese) https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-TJDZ202101007.htm
    [31]
    ARGYROUDIS S A, PITILAKIS K D. Seismic fragility curves of shallow tunnels in alluvial deposits[J]. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 2012, 35: 1-12. doi: 10.1016/j.soildyn.2011.11.004
    [32]
    钟紫蓝, 冯立倩, 史跃波, 等. 序列型地震作用下地铁车站损伤分析[J]. 岩土工程学报, 2023, 45(8): 1586-1594. doi: 10.11779/CJGE20220788

    ZHONG Zilan, FENG Liqian, SHI Yuebo, et al. Seismic damage assessment of subway station subjected to mainshock aftershock sequences[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2023, 45(8): 1586-1594. (in Chinese)' doi: 10.11779/CJGE20220788
    [33]
    HAZUS-MHMR1. Multi-hazard Loss Estimation Model: Manual Advanced Engineering Building Module Methodology Earthquake Technical and User's[R]. Washington D C: Federal Emergency Management Agency, 2003.
    [34]
    SALMON M, WANG J, JONES D, et al. Fragility formulations for the BART system[C]// Proceedings of the 6th US Conference on Lifeline Earthquake Engineering, TCLEE, Long Beach, 2003.
    [35]
    American Lifelines Alliance. Seismic Fragility Formulations for Water Systems: Part 1 Guideline[M]. Reston: ASCEFEMA, 2005: 1-103.
    [36]
    POWER M, ROSIDI D, KANESHIRO J. Strawman: "Screening, Evaluation, and Retrofit Design of Tunnels" Report Draft[R]. New York: National Centre for Earthquake Engineering Research, 1996.
    • Related Articles
  • Supplements (1)

  • Other Related Supplements

  • Cited by

    Periodical cited type(18)

    1. 梁越，罗安志，杨牛虎，许彬，代磊. 恒定围压下间断级配散粒土内部侵蚀机理研究. 防灾减灾工程学报. 2025(01): 224-232 .
    2. 张远庆，陈勇，王世梅，王力. 岸坡渗流潜蚀模型试验系统变革研究. 三峡大学学报(自然科学版). 2025(02): 48-54 .
    3. 杨彪山，查浩，国鸿圆. 多向汇水条件下弃渣土体细颗粒启动机制研究. 地质灾害与环境保护. 2025(01): 88-96 .
    4. 梁越，冉裕星，许彬，张鑫强，何慧汝. 细颗粒含量影响渗流侵蚀规律的细观机理研究. 岩土工程学报. 2025(05): 1099-1106 . 本站查看
    5. 梁越，喻金桃，张强，许彬，张宏杰，龚胜勇. 骨架颗粒组成对散粒土管涌规律影响的试验研究. 河海大学学报(自然科学版). 2024(01): 63-69 .
    6. 黄达，高溢康，黄文波. 基于CT扫描的渗流作用下碎石土孔隙结构变化规律研究. 水文地质工程地质. 2024(02): 123-131 .
    7. 王浩，许少鸿，陈叶健，徐陈灵，黄瑛瑛. 闽粤地区花岗岩风化土体粘粒迁移过程的土柱渗流试验. 山地学报. 2024(01): 132-142 .
    8. 施静怡，吴能森，刘强. 静压桩在成层地基中挤土效应的可视化研究. 河南城建学院学报. 2024(02): 20-26 .
    9. 刘垒雷，邓刚，李维朝，陈锐，周超，徐立强. 不同细粒含量与间断比下不连续级配砂砾土渗蚀的CFD-DEM数值模拟. 中南大学学报(自然科学版). 2024(07): 2677-2689 .
    10. 王櫹橦，陈盟，唐莹影，袁仁茂. 透明土试验技术在滑坡降雨入渗中的研究与应用. 煤炭学报. 2024(07): 3051-3062 .
    11. 胡焕校，谢中良，甘本清，卢雨帆，邓超. 透明砂土基本特性及其在注浆模型试验中的应用. 水资源与水工程学报. 2024(04): 179-186 .
    12. 王润北，吴能森. 平动模式下墙后有限黏性填土破坏模型试验研究. 河南城建学院学报. 2024(04): 72-79 .
    13. 梁越，何慧汝，许彬，张鑫强，冉裕星. 基于透明土的水力梯度对渗流侵蚀影响试验研究. 河海大学学报(自然科学版). 2024(05): 60-66 .
    14. 徐春瑞，郭畅，黄博. 孔隙率对砂土渗透稳定性影响的内部可视化研究. 地基处理. 2024(05): 451-462 .
    15. 徐春瑞，薛阳，郭畅，黄博. 超重力下粒子图像测速系统性能测试与评价. 地基处理. 2024(06): 547-556 .
    16. 何建新，董旭光，马渊博. 坡顶荷载作用下多级边坡失稳演化机制的透明土试验研究. 西北工程技术学报. 2024(04): 347-355 .
    17. 张亮亮，邓刚，陈锐，张茵琪，罗之源. 不连续级配无黏性土渗蚀演变特征研究. 岩土工程学报. 2023(07): 1412-1420 . 本站查看
    18. 王力，张晨宇，王世梅，潘宇晨. 波浪侵蚀诱发碎石土岸坡变形的模拟试验研究. 泥沙研究. 2023(04): 45-52 .

    Other cited types(13)

Catalog

    Get Citation
    PDF
    XML
    Article views (362) PDF downloads (72) Cited by(31)
    Related
    Copyright © 2010 Editorial By Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering 苏ICP备05007122号-11公安联网备案号：32010602011255
    Editorial Office address：34 Hujuguan,Nanjing 210024,ChinaPostal Code：210024Tel：025-85829534，85829556E-mail: ge@nhri.cn

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return