Advanced Search
  • 全国中文核心期刊
  • 中国科技核心期刊
  • 美国工程索引（EI）收录期刊
  • Scopus数据库收录期刊
Volume 44 Issue S2
Turn off MathJax
Article Contents
Abstract
References
WANG Yang, ZHU Ming-xing, DAI Guo-liang, GONG Wei-ming, LIN Jing-yang. Characteristics of cumulative deformation and prediction method for pile foundation under cyclic lateral loading considering influences of pile-soil relative stiffness[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2022, 44(S2): 220-225. DOI: 10.11779/CJGE2022S2048
Citation: WANG Yang, ZHU Ming-xing, DAI Guo-liang, GONG Wei-ming, LIN Jing-yang. Characteristics of cumulative deformation and prediction method for pile foundation under cyclic lateral loading considering influences of pile-soil relative stiffness[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2022, 44(S2): 220-225. DOI: 10.11779/CJGE2022S2048
shu

Characteristics of cumulative deformation and prediction method for pile foundation under cyclic lateral loading considering influences of pile-soil relative stiffness

  • 1.

    School of Civil and Architectural Engineering, Shandong University of Technology, Zibo 255000, China

  • 2.

    School of Civil Engineering, Southeast University, Nanjing 211189, China

  • 3.

    School of Civil Engineering and Architecture, Jiangsu University of Science and Technology, Zhenjiang 212003, China

More Information
  • Received Date: November 30, 2022
  • Available Online: March 26, 2023
    Graphical Abstract
    • Abstract
  • The researches on the prediction of cyclic lateral cumulative deformation of pile foundation for offshore wind turbines mainly focus on the characteristics of external cyclic loading, ignoring the influences of pile-soil relative stiffness. A series of 1g model tests are carried out on sand by the self-developed cyclic loading system. The test results show that the normalized cumulative deformation yN/y1 increases exponentially with the increase of the cycle number N, and increases with the increase of the cycle load ratio ζc, but it is not significantly correlated with the cycle amplitude ζb. Also, the relationship between the pile-soil relative stiffness and the normalized cumulative deformation shows a "s" shape, that is, the pile-soil relative stiffness has small effects on the cumulative deformation of the flexible and rigid piles. But, the cumulative deformation of the semi-rigid pile increases with the increasing pile-soil relative stiffness. On this basis, the prediction model for the cyclic lateral cumulative deformation considering the combined effects of characteristics of cyclic loading and pile-soil relative stiffness is proposed. The rationality and reliability of this method are verified by comparing with the experimental data in the literatures.
    • FullText(HTML)
    • References (13)
  • [1]
    ABADIE C N, BYRNE B W, HOULSBY G T. Rigid pile response to cyclic lateral loading: laboratory tests[J]. Géotechnique, 2019, 69(10): 863–876. doi: 10.1680/jgeot.16.P.325
    [2]
    ROSQUOET F, THOREL L, GARNIER J. et al. Lateral cyclic loading of sand-installed piles[J]. Soils and Foundations, 2007, 47(5): 821–832. doi: 10.3208/sandf.47.821
    [3]
    KLINKVORT R T, HEDEDAL O. Lateral response of monopile supporting an offshore wind turbine[J]. Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers- Geotechnical Engineering, 2013, 166(2): 147–158. doi: 10.1680/geng.12.00033
    [4]
    LEBLANC C, HOULSBY G T, BYRNE B W. Response of stiff piles in sand to long-term cyclic lateral loading[J]. Géotechnique, 2010, 60(2): 79–90. doi: 10.1680/geot.7.00196
    [5]
    张勋, 黄茂松, 胡志平. 砂土中单桩水平循环累积变形特性模型试验[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(3): 933–941. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-YTLX201903012.htm

    ZHANG Xun, HUANG Mao-song, HU Zhi-ping. Model tests on cumulative deformation characteristics of a single pile subjected to lateral cyclic loading in sand[J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2019, 40(3): 933–941. (in Chinese) https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-YTLX201903012.htm
    [6]
    TRUONG P, LEHANE B M, ZANIA V, et al. Empirical approach based on centrifuge testing for cyclic deformations of laterally loaded piles in sand[J]. Géotechnique, 2019, 69(2): 133–145. doi: 10.1680/jgeot.17.P.203
    [7]
    FRICK D, ACHMUS M. An experimental study on the parameters affecting the cyclic lateral response of monopiles for offshore wind turbines in sand[J]. Soils and Foundations, 2020, 60(6): 1570–1587. doi: 10.1016/j.sandf.2020.10.004
    [8]
    张纪蒙, 张陈蓉, 张凯. 砂土中大直径单桩水平循环加载模型试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2021, 42(3): 783–789. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-YTLX202103021.htm

    ZHANG Ji-meng, ZHANG Chen-rong, ZHANG Kai. Model tests of large-diameter single pile under horizontal cyclic loading in sand[J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2021, 42(3): 783–789. (in Chinese) https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-YTLX202103021.htm
    [9]
    王欢. 砂土海床大直径单桩基础和桶形基础水平受荷特性研究[D]. 杭州: 浙江大学, 2020.

    WANG Huan. Lateral Behaviour of Offshore Monopile and Bucket Foundations in Sand[D]. Hangzhou: Zhejiang University, 2020. (in Chinese)
    [10]
    REESE L C, COX W R, KOOP F D. Analysis of laterally loaded piles in sand[C]// Proc 6th Annual Offshore Technology Conf. Houston, 1974.
    [11]
    American Petroleum Institute. Geotechnical Considerations and Foundation Design for Offshore Structures[M]. Washington D C: API, 2014.
    [12]
    LI W, IGOE D, GAVIN K. Field tests to investigate the cyclic response of monopiles in sand[J]. Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers-Geotechnical Engineering, 2015, 168(5): 407–421. doi: 10.1680/jgeen.14.00104
    [13]
    LI Q, ASKARINEJAD A, GAVIN K. Lateral response of rigid monopiles subjected to cyclic loading: centrifuge modelling[J]. Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers-Geotechnical Engineering, 2022, 175(4): 426–438. doi: 10.1680/jgeen.20.00088
    • Related Articles
  • Supplements (0)

  • Cited by

    Periodical cited type(24)

    1. 罗庆斐，袁松，袁飞云，周道良，王峥峥. 不同转向角度曲线隧道穿越走滑断层力学行为. 大连理工大学学报. 2025(02): 171-180 .
    2. 吴斌，袁松，康泽洲，罗庆斐，王峥峥. 地震和断层错动共同作用下大转向曲线隧道力学行为研究. 震灾防御技术. 2025(01): 153-162 .
    3. 张恒，徐龙军，彭龙强，谢礼立. 跨断层铁路隧道精细化建模与力学分析. 地震工程与工程振动. 2024(05): 1-12 .
    4. 袁松，王希宝，袁飞云，罗庆斐，肖锋，王峥峥. 不同类型断层错动下半圆形曲线隧道力学行为. 公路. 2024(12): 440-449 .
    5. 韩俊艳，赵文乐，帅义，侯本伟，郭富强，杜修力. 逆断层作用下局部腐蚀埋地管道的失效模式研究. 防灾减灾工程学报. 2024(06): 1386-1397 .
    6. 王综仕，韩现民，徐孟起，王为鑫. 断层错动-地震不同时序作用对隧道的影响研究. 石家庄铁道大学学报(自然科学版). 2024(04): 45-50+124 .
    7. 付艳斌，王福道，陈湘生，陆岸典，沈翔，李旭辉，王贝凌，洪成雨. 破碎带地层盾构隧道建造关键问题. 铁道标准设计. 2023(01): 25-33 .
    8. 章玉伟，徐泽鑫，谢远，邱军领，杨桃，谢永利. 断层破碎带隧道围岩敏感性及沉降控制分析. 科学技术与工程. 2023(08): 3493-3501 .
    9. 张玉芳，袁坤，周文皎，范家玮. 门源地震对跨冷龙岭断层的大梁隧道结构变形特征和地表裂缝分布规律研究. 岩石力学与工程学报. 2023(05): 1055-1069 .
    10. 陈斌辉. 跨活断层公路隧道损伤规律研究. 河南科技. 2023(10): 59-62 .
    11. 肖文斌，谢印标，郑扬，武科，陈榕，李秋雷，程睿哲. 活动断层下城市地铁隧道变形破坏与损伤. 山东大学学报(工学版). 2023(03): 1-13 .
    12. 王志岗，陶连金，石城，安韶. 逆断层错动作用下考虑柔性接头的综合管廊结构力学行为研究. 铁道科学与工程学报. 2023(06): 2256-2267 .
    13. 刘汉东，赵亚文，杨长林，徐红超，李冬冬. 穿越活断层倒虹吸结构变形影响敏感性研究. 华北水利水电大学学报(自然科学版). 2023(03): 81-88 .
    14. 张卜，姬若愚，钟紫蓝，许成顺，杜修力. 穿越岩土交界面竖井结构水平地震损伤破坏模式. 隧道与地下工程灾害防治. 2023(03): 27-40 .
    15. 史新伟，冯新，范哲. 逆断层作用下复合衬砌输水隧洞损伤演化分析. 防灾减灾工程学报. 2023(05): 1132-1140 .
    16. 周光新，盛谦，崔臻，王天强，马亚丽娜，付兴伟. 走滑断层错动影响下跨活断层铰接隧洞破坏机制模型试验. 岩土力学. 2022(01): 37-50 .
    17. 董航凯. 断裂作用对输水管道的影响效应研究. 水利与建筑工程学报. 2022(02): 66-71 .
    18. 崔臻，盛谦，李建贺，付兴伟. 蠕滑错断-强震时序作用下跨活断裂隧道变形破坏机制初步研究. 岩土力学. 2022(05): 1364-1373 .
    19. 王杰，盛俭，赵梦丹，王欣宇. 康西瓦断裂错动对近断层隧道影响的数值模拟分析. 地震工程与工程振动. 2022(03): 235-242 .
    20. 李翔，孙文昊，孙州，陈立保. 盾构法隧道穿越活动断裂带方案探讨. 隧道建设(中英文). 2022(S1): 369-375 .
    21. 姜久纯. 黏滑错动下地铁隧道结构破坏特征及设防措施. 西安科技大学学报. 2021(03): 474-480 .
    22. 王鸿儒，钟紫蓝，赵密，汪振，赵旭，杜修力. 走滑断层黏滑错动下隧道破坏的模型试验研究. 北京工业大学学报. 2021(07): 691-701 .
    23. 陈立保，孙文昊，孙州，武哲书. 胶州湾第二海底隧道跨断裂带抗错方案研究. 铁道标准设计. 2021(10): 116-122+166 .
    24. 王杰，盛俭，赵梦丹，王欣宇. 断层错动对隧道工程影响研究的若干进展. 防灾科技学院学报. 2021(04): 34-42 .

    Other cited types(26)

Catalog

    Get Citation
    PDF
    XML
    Article views PDF downloads Cited by(50)
    Related
    Copyright © 2010 Editorial By Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering 苏ICP备05007122号-11公安联网备案号：32010602011255
    Editorial Office address：34 Hujuguan,Nanjing 210024,ChinaPostal Code：210024Tel：025-85829534，85829556E-mail: ge@nhri.cn

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return